Some of the windows are boarded up. The red concrete steps are broken and chipped. Even the “Fallout shelter” sign in the basement looks a little rough.
No matter. When Rick Whiting sees Auburn’s former Webster School, he sees potential.
Webster closed down four years ago. A water leak and time have taken some toll on the nearly 100-year-old, three-story brick building in a tight, busy neighborhood. On the inside, carpet is bumpy from warped wood floors underneath and green lockers hang open, at attention.
Whiting, executive director of the Auburn Housing Authority, hopes to buy Webster from the city at the end of summer for $350,000 and start work this fall creating 28 apartments for low-income residents. Families will live in classrooms and in a gym.
Webster is one of five subsidized housing projects in various stages around the Twin Cities, which finds itself in the midst of a subsidized housing bubble. Two others opened earlier this year.
Officials say it’s part coincidence — at least two projects were conceived five years ago. Part of the renovation push is due to the Legislature — a historic tax credit passed into law has heated up interest in turning old properties into housing. Part is demand — some 8,000 families here can’t comfortably afford the average two-bedroom rent, according to the state.
And part is the area’s potential. Developers want in.
“The same sort of concentration that’s happening in Lewiston now happened in Portland maybe 10 years ago,” said Dale McCormick, director of the Maine State Housing Authority.
Already in the pipeline:
• Blake Street Apartments in Lewiston, 10 units for the former homeless, families living in shelters or in cars, breaks ground next month on a vacant lot;
• Franklin School apartments in Auburn, six units for the former homeless and disabled, starts renovation this fall;
• Webster, with a mix of one, two and three-bedrooms, starts renovation this fall;
• Intown Manor in Lewiston, 32 units of senior housing in the former assisted living facility and former orphanage, could start renovation in 2011;
• The Lofts at Bates Mill, at 52 units, the only project mixing market rate and low-income housing, could also start renovation in 2011.
Opened earlier this year:
• Vincent Square in Auburn, 17 senior housing units, in January; and
• Birch Hill Elderly Housing in Lewiston, 20 units, in April.
Saving the old, making new
Combined, the projects would add 147 subsidized housing units to L-A, on top of roughly 2,900 already here. Most of the new development counts as below-market affordable housing, available at a flat, low rate to those who earn under a certain amount. (The alternative, Section 8 housing projects or vouchers, charge 30 percent of a renter’s income.)
“We think we’ll easily fill them,” said Don Kniseley, executive director at Tedford Housing in Brunswick, behind the two former homeless projects.
The Lewiston effort is five years old, the Auburn one three-and-a-half. He’d hoped to have both open by now, but various delays slowed the works.
Kniseley said someone at the city encouraged him to consider the old Franklin School, which closed in November 2005.
“It’s pretty run down and sad looking,” he said. “It’s a little expensive because we have to do asbestos and lead paint abatement and those kind of things, but we think it’s going to be a beautiful, beautiful project and a real compliment to that neighborhood.”
At Webster, Whiting said he’ll do as much as possible to keep the character and original appearance, leaving some lockers and blackboards. It needs new windows, sound-proofing, insulation, an elevator. A Headstart program will use one of the two gyms and the restored auditorium.
“This was a state-of-the-art building in 1916,” he said.
Right now, Whiting’s trying to get Webster on the National Register of Historic Places, a step toward state and federal tax credits that could cover almost half the project.
Mike D. Johnson at the Maine Historic Preservation Commission said that since January 2008, when the state expanded its historic tax credits, more than $100 million worth of projects have applied.
“We’ve seen a lot of activity, particularly with mill buildings and schools,” said Johnson, a historic preservationist.
When it’s used to create affordable housing, the state credit is 30 percent, paired with a federal credit of 20 percent — but the building has to be on the historic register, he said.
“That’s definitely an important piece of our project; our project wouldn’t be feasible without it,” said Nathan Szanton of Maine Workforce Housing, the developer behind the Bates Mill proposal.
He’s looking to get the mill on the historic register.
Also influencing his timing, Szanton said: the four-year-old Brookings Institution report that drew attention to preserving historic structures.
“In order for Maine to do well economically, we need to invest in and bring out places that make us special, unique,” he said. “Turning them from a liability into an asset.”
The whys, why now
Dan Brennan, MSHA director of development, said the pace of new subsidized housing statewide has held steady. The federal government gives Maine between $2.5 million and $3 million each year in low-income housing tax credits, making way for 150 to 200 units.
Areas are studied for need and saturation before new projects get a green light.
"Developers come to us with their projects and compete,” Brennan said, getting points for projects in downtown spaces, something that’s helped Lewiston.
In the past, developers promised to keep new units affordable for so many decades, scoring more points the longer they pledged, according to Peter Merrill, MSHA’s communications and planning director. Six years ago, the requirement became a flat 90 years.
Twin Cities project costs range from $166,000 to $243,000 per unit, including costs like escrow for maintenance.
“When I first got here, the debate we used to have, for instance, (was) you could build one apartment unit in Portland or two houses in Cornish, so what is the best public policy?” Merrill said.
Subsidized housing can have the side effect of keeping local private rents down, Merrill said, but that’s not the goal.
With roughly half of the people living in subsidized housing being elderly or disabled, “society has to have just a modicum of compassion for people who are unable to take care of themselves,” Merrill said.
It’s housing for those who need help, McCormick said, along with making good economic development sense.
“Lack of housing where jobs are stresses the roads, stresses the family, stresses the budget, stresses the city services,” she said.
There's also the issue of eyesore.
“Having a big empty building in the middle of a neighborhood, it’s a real negative impact on people,” said Whiting. It attracts vandals, graffiti.
In the late 1960s, Whiting attended the seventh, eighth and ninth grades in the old Webster School, the school he's looking to revitalize now.
“My sister was my teacher (one year), which was horrifying,” he said, walking its old halls in early June. “She couldn’t give me an A.”
He remembers passing instead with a B-plus.
kskelton@sunjournal.com
















joeziehmer
I don't have a clue how you got your racist rant out of what I said. And personally, I don't give a damn.
No, we don't need more shelters. Don't like the facts? Too freakin' bad for you. Keep drinkin' the kool-aid joe; the bleeding hearts depend on folks like you to believe their BS while taxpayers line their pockets. Poverty, mental health, children sevices and minorities are big business in this day and age.
Somali's? Why'd you bring them up, joe? You a racist, joe? Russian, too? Oh my...
Have another swig of that kool-aid...suuuuckah.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Glad to see
Mac you have a narrow minded apathetic strain for htiumanity glad to see that you use the justification to put it to use. Glad to see Jo put it to use that we do not need another shelter, guess that means goodbye to homeless shelters, abused women shelters, and every other shelter simply because it is a welfare excuse. Pardon me Mac but most of the violence comes from white class kids trying to make it more and more a ghetto. There are Somalis who work harder then anyone else here but it is the common strain of racism which gets in the way. Also, Jo we vote businesses out and use the Somali's as an example when we have the Russians moving into Portland heading up little Mafioso business here and there. Of, course since they are white and Russian it does not matter, then we have the Jamaicans, and the Latin Kings slowly moving in. Which passes by unmentioned because they are not Muslim nor are they Somali. Not to mention the other gangs and outfit influences moving in slowly. Was not that long ago that I walked by a club packed with Neo-Nazi skinheads who were all W-H-I-T-E!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Why are they making such a
Why are they making such a success story of furthering the Ghettofication of L/A? As for the money at stake for slum lords, the government pays even bigger money to those who offer housing to Somalis. Can't we put a stop to this before the few legitimate property owners see further market devaluation?!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.To jpat
Absolutely not. I met all regulations by LHS and MeSHA. Had regular inspections by both parties and still they would not send section 8 parties my way. I was always told "there wasn't any more money" to send people my way. I also suspect that you have NOT actually viewed all available vacancies. I took great pride in my two apartment buildings while I had them and resent anyone that implies otherwise. I think you will find that all LALA apartments have met LHA, Fire, Code enforcement, etc, inspections on an annual inspection and are either in compliance or have been shut down. So LHA and MeSHA doesn't have money but we the people will subsidize non-profits so that they have the money. Remember that when your taxes go up again.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.LSJ should check
The LSJ should check with the Lewiston Auburn Landlord Association as to how much available housing they have. I think you all might be surprised. Not only is there a large amount of housing in the area but LALA landlords are open to section 8 housing. Why should the general public be footing the bill for subsidized housing when there is already available housing not being taken advantage of? As a former Landlord, I found that Lewiston Housing Authority was not helpful in filling my vacancies no matter how many hoops I jumped through. Subsidized Housing such as talked about in this article does NOT generate taxes. Private Landlords DO.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Also wondering aloud
Could it be because so many of the current vacancies are in terribly run down buildings? And many of the apartments provide sub-standard housing?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Fat Cats
Aggravating as hell folks are getting rich providing government subsidized housing. Of course these developers/landlords will tell you sob stories and tug on your heartstrings why more is needed, but don't fall for it. They're out to make $$...big $$.
L/A haven't you learned yet? If you build it, they will come. Just like Tedford being granted taxpayers $$ for a shelter in Auburn. Why didn't the City of Auburn look to see just how many times Hope Haven and St Martins are over capacity? Cuz they aren't. We don't need another shelter. Nor do we need more subsidized housing. We need to attract business and taxpayers. You think anyone with $$ wants to move to this area when it's a social service mecca? Hell no...
I have to laugh when the Growth Council, the Chamber, both city councils, mayors and managers (along with a plethora of other committees) scratch their heads why business is leaving this area and we can't hold onto our educated youth.
Stop the madness...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.You are spot on....
L/A (Lewiston-Auburn) is world famous for subsidized housing, welfare, mill fires, dodgy politicians, and parking garages. These two cities also have an abundance of halal money laundering outlets.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.?
Do we really need this much subsidized housing in Lewiston-Auburn? It seems to be on every corner.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Are any of these projects
Are any of these projects contemplated to be built with private financing, or are they only to be built with taxpayers picking up the tab via subsidies? In an area with an overabundance of VACANT apartments surely these developers cannot seriously expect to get government assistance of any type, or do they? A quick look at the classifieds in today's or any edition of the Sun Journal should convince anyone that there is no need for additional housing in the twin cities. Maybe tenants do need help in paying their rent, but that is not a reason to create more housing. The local governments should be looking at ways to help these tenants find ways to afford their housing either by getting more rental assistance for them or by making the twin cities more attractive to prospective employers bringing in well paying employment. To create new subsidised apartments that the owners of the current housing stock cannot possibly compete with is a waste of taxpayer monies and creates a future problem for the cities. When owners cannot rent their units they cannot generate enough funds to maintain them and eventually walk away from them. We are all then left holding the proverbial bag as these deserted buildings become eyesores, magnets for derelicts, and fire hazards. No one can afford to build or convert these units without subsidies and reent them in the $500 TO $900 per month range; it is physically impossible to do. The Sun Journal should send out a reporter to City Hall in both Lewisotn and Auburn and ask them how these projects are to be funded, what impact these projects will have on existing housing and on the tax base of the Cities.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.even with abatement-i would
even with abatement-i would think that there still would be traces there no?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.