Jeff Young: IP strike failure points out need for labor reform

Twenty-five years ago, on June 15, 1987, 1,250 men and women took a stand at International Paper’s Androscoggin Mill in Jay that proved to be a turning point in labor relations in Maine and a sign that our country needs real labor reform.

Despite a year of record profits, IP proposed a new union contract that demanded substantial wage givebacks, reduced benefits and hundreds of job cuts.

After a lifetime (and in some families, multiple lifetimes) of dedication to and hard work for the company, the workforce felt betrayed. IP was no longer interested in maintaining the longstanding relationship built out of mutual respect between employees and management. Instead, the company decided to make every effort to cut costs in order to increase profit for shareholders.

The workers had no choice but to strike, and demonstrated remarkable solidarity.

When IP hired permanent strike replacements, few of the strikers flinched, despite the loss of their jobs and paychecks. During the lengthy 15-month strike, only 78 of the 1,250 strikers crossed the picket line and returned to work. They remained steadfast under the able leadership of Local 14 President Bill Meserve. Hundreds attended weekly meetings, joined by union brothers and sisters from Maine and all over the country. They all chanted together, “Scabs out, union in.”

The community also stood up for their neighbors. Food and clothing were distributed to union members. Job banks were created. Local financial institutions even relaxed loan terms to ease the pressure on striking workers. Imagine that happening today.

Unfortunately, the strike ultimately failed.

In October 2009, the unions called an end to the strike and unconditionally offered to return to work. Under the National Labor Relations Act, workers were recalled as vacancies arose. The last worker was recalled to work just a few years ago, almost 20 years after the strike ended.

The seeds of the strike’s failure lay in a Supreme Court decision some 50 years earlier, which was little noticed at the time. In 1938, in NLRB v. McKay Radio, the high court held that it was not an unfair labor practice to hire permanent replacements. The significance of the case lay largely dormant until 1981, when President Ronald Reagan hired strikebreakers to replace the air traffic controllers. Until then, few employers dared to hire permanent replacements. After the strike, it was open season on unions. Indeed, as a precursor to the Jay strike, two years earlier, Boise Cascade in Rumford also had hired a number of strike replacements.

On a local level, the strike affected more than the 1,250 who were on the picket lines. It affected their families, their neighbors and the entire community. To this day, some family members still don’t talk to each other. Even when they do, there is still anger, hurt and mistrust.

IP’s victory showed that even where you have a community as strong and close as Jay was, when an international company determines to defeat a union, a community can break and the effect can last generations.

On a larger scale, the Jay strike marked the beginning of the end of the use of the strike as an economic weapon and underscored that our nation’s labor laws are ineffective. If 1,250 workers can strike for 15 months, maintain virtual 100 percent solidarity and still be defeated, then the labor laws don’t prevent a company from crushing its union.

On this day, the anniversary of the beginning of the Jay strike, let us honor the heroic men and women of Jay by demanding real labor reform.

Real labor law reform would mean banning the hiring of permanent strike replacements, assuring employees who strike of the right to immediate reinstatement upon the end of a strike.

If we can’t do that, let’s at least pass a limited version of the Employee Free Choice Act, which would require mediation and then binding arbitration if parties are unable to agree upon contract terms after 90 days. Right now, there is no incentive for an employer to agree.

If we are to learn anything from the Jay strike, it is that the imbalance of power between companies and workers affects not only our workers, but our communities. We need to end that imbalance through labor reform.

Jeffrey Young is an attorney and partner at McTeague Higbee. He represented the union and workers during the International Paper strike in Jay.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



FRANK EARLEY's picture

My one and only union job...

When I turned twenty-one, I was finally able to drive trucks outside state lines. My first job was with a fairly large company based out of Boston. I didn't really care that it was a union company. I had to pay union dues, but other than that I really didn't care.
I was however in a unique position to observe something happen a few years after I started that cemented my view of big business, and how far they would go to screw the average workers.
It all started when someone realized that they could make more money in Haiti, than the U.S. They could pay workers there, two dollars to three dollars a day compared to seven to eight dollars per hour here. It was like watching a slow motion accident unfold in front of you. They actually used the union against the very same people who supported it.
This company had one central hub in Boston, and five plants spread out in Mass. and Maine.
First they opened the first plant in Haiti. No one knew that their jobs had already been taken by off shore interests. What they did was when union contracts were up for renewal, they offered nothing. They wanted the unions to strike.
I had become friends with many people at the various plants. No one would listen to me, a lot of these people had worked for this company for many years. They couldn't believe the company would screw them. I saw it happen five times. The plant would go out on strike, the next day, uniformed security guards would show up and chain the doors, and I would have to help clean out the machinery.
Shortly after the first Maine plant was closed down I quit. Thats when I moved to Maine. I refused to be part of that kind of under handed corporate greed. Although I have worked for large corporations since that time. I never stopped looking over my shoulder. Sadly it takes away your ability to trust anyone.

 's picture

in the cases of air traffic

in the cases of air traffic controllers and nurses, where patients and customer's lives are at stake, striking without allowing for replacements is dangerous, counterproductive, and in line with terrorism. "give me what i want or people are going to die". if the replacement workers are more skilled then the strikers, then they should have the job. as for the paper mill workers in jay, they should have been grateful to have even had jobs to begin with and with such highly prized paychecks. sorry, but the unionized unskilled mill worker force has seen their jobs disappear only to be replaced with low wage service industry jobs and welfare. the unions were unsuccessful with competing with the world market and preventing companies from relocating to poorer countries (mexico, then china). this is the legacy that those unionized mill workers tell their children. and yes, my great grandparents on down to my parents and older siblings worked at mills, as did some of my current older coworkers, and they will all tell you the same thing: the union was nice when it worked, got you good pay and benefits and you didn't have to work too hard, but the company doesn't have to stay open and will leave you high and dry in the end and the union will do nothing about it but get you a limited severance package, then hand you over to the state to sort out.

Betty Davies's picture

Republicans believe corporations should have ALL Power

They keep claiming that destroying unions and slashing wages and benefits for all workers is the only way America can become prosperous once again.

Plenty of workers believe them (they assume that only OTHER people's wages and benefits will be slashed).

Trickle-down from corporate bosses and millionaires to the rest of us hasn't worked for generations. But Republican leaders keep pushing the notion--it helps them set workers against each other.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...