Before you vote, give 'The Lie Factory' a read

If you have time for just one political article before the election, make it “The Lie Factory,” by historian Jill Lepore in the Sept. 24 New Yorker.

It concerns a California firm called Campaigns Inc., which Lepore identifies as the very first political consulting firm, founded in 1933 by Leone Baxter and Clem Whitaker, two people whom I, and probably most readers, had never heard of.

But Lepore tells an amazing story. Campaigns Inc. got its start running a progressive campaign against a referendum proposed by Pacific Gas and Electric. The utility was so impressed it hired Campaigns Inc. for its later referendums.

But the real significance of Baxter and Whitaker is that they coined the slogan that has prevented Americans from enjoying the benefits of the universal health insurance system enjoyed by everyone else in the world.

They started in 1945 when Earl Warren – later U.S. chief justice but then California’s Republican governor — proposed a public health insurance system. Warren, a wealthy man, had suffered from kidney disease and wondered how other people could afford the hospital bills.

Let’s pause right there. Had Warren been successful, at least one state would have had universal health care before anyone else — before the European pioneer, Britain (1948), and long before Canada’s national system (1984).

But, of course, he wasn’t. Campaigns Inc. coined the term “socialized medicine” to describe Warren’s bill, even though there was nothing remotely socialistic about it. It merely used public dollars to purchase insurance — exactly the same approach used by Medicare and Medicaid (1965), although those landmark programs fall far short of covering everyone.

Worse, the “socialism” described had nothing to do with European progressives. It referred to the National Socialism of Adolf Hitler. In one vile passage, here’s how Campaigns Inc., in 1945, described the dangers of public insurance: “Certainly we don’t want to be forced to go to a ‘state doctor’ or pay for such a doctor whether we use him or not. That system was born in Germany — and is part and parcel of what our boys are fighting overseas.”

Warren’s bill proposed no “state doctors.” It would merely have permitted everyone to see one. What Campaigns Inc. did was to take an actual Hitler technique, the Big Lie, to defeat a measure that could have produced a better future for all Americans.

Had Warren prevailed, we would not now be paying 50 percent more than any other country for health care, while still leaving out 50 million Americans. And we wouldn’t still be struggling over the Affordable Care Act, which will cover most of the uninsured but only at the cost of huge payoffs to for-profit insurers and drug companies.

Campaigns Inc. reprised its act when President Harry Truman proposed national health insurance in 1949. Congressional mail went from 4-1 in favor of the plan to 4-1 against. The American Medical Association, allegedly representing physicians, spent $5 million to amplify the false “socialized medicine” claim.

Read the article and see if it doesn’t change your view of the last 75 years.

Campaigns Inc. lives on. Mitt Romney used the last “foreign policy” debate to renew his pledge to repeal Obamacare. Considering that his major achievement in his only elective post, governor of Massachusetts, was a remarkably similar plan, the Republican presidential nominee’s hypocrisy is staggering.

His answer for the 50 million uninsured is the same as George W. Bush’s eight years earlier — visit the emergency room; they’ll do something. To suggest that Americans with heart disease and colon cancer should wait until they can’t function, when these preventable conditions could have been easily treated years earlier, is insulting.

In New Hampshire, the Democratic candidate for governor, Maggie Hassan, wants to accept the federal offer to expand Medicaid to thousands of uninsured residents, 100 percent paid for. Her Republican opponent, Ovide Lamontagne, wants to skip the expansion and have the federal government hand over the cash so New Hampshire can somehow design its own health-care system. Seriously, folks, that’s his plan.

Everyone says this election is about the economy, but four years after the biggest financial crisis since the Great Depression, things are improving slowly and neither Romney nor Obama will have a huge impact. The bigger factors are how Congress crafts the budget and how the Federal Reserve handles the money supply.

The big issue is health care: continue Barack Obama’s great experiment or do nothing with Mitt Romney. Before you vote, consider whether we should still be going down the long, dismal path that Campaigns Inc. helped set us on all those years ago.

Douglas Rooks is a former daily and weekly newspaper editor who has covered the State House for 25 years. He may be reached at drooks@tds.net.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

Betty Davies's picture

Canada's Medicare covers everyone, yet is far less expensive

http://www.pnhp.org/news/2012/october/canada%E2%80%99s-health-costs-for-...

"Including the elderly in a universal, nonprofit, publicly administered single-payer system has been the key to Canada’s cost control... [Because the US version of Medicare] is only one of many health care payers in the United States... doctors’ and hospitals’ administrative costs are inflated by having to deal with a multitude of payers and by having to track eligibility, attribute costs and bill for individual services. This extra paperwork and bureaucracy is a major contributor to rising costs in the U.S., and these costs spill over into the relatively efficient Medicare program. In contrast, Canada’s single-payer system is much more streamlined and lean throughout, with big dividends for clinical care.”

RONALD RIML's picture

The Insurance Industry Lies and People Die.......

We're the Greatest Country in the World - for the Insurance Company Robber Barons.

For efficiency of health care delivery? Try about #37.

The 'Free Market System' is shutting down St. Andrews' Hospital where I live on the Boothbay peninsula.

But never mind. I much rather prefer my socialized health care at Togus V.A. All Americans should deserve such benefits of citizenship and/or residency.

Steve  Dosh's picture

Before you vote, give 'The Lie Factory' a read

Doug 12.11.28 10:00 am ? hst •
. . Then watch n e thing by Mike Moore :)
Suggestion : Sicko
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sicko
h t h , /s Steve
\/ote ! ( or they win )

RONALD RIML's picture

What 'Fox News' said about Michael Moore's 'Sicko'

'Sicko' Shows Michael Moore's Maturity as a Filmmaker


"Filmmaker Michael Moore's brilliant and uplifting new documentary, "Sicko," deals with the failings of the U.S. healthcare system, both real and perceived. But this time around, the controversial documentarian seems to be letting the subject matter do the talking, and in the process shows a new maturity.

Unlike many of his previous films ("Roger and Me," "Bowling for Columbine," "Fahrenheit 9-11"), "Sicko" works because in this one there are no confrontations. Moore smartly lets very articulate average Americans tell their personal horror stories at the hands of insurance companies. The film never talks down or baits the audience.

"This film is a call to action," Moore said at a press conference on Saturday. "It's also not a partisan film."

Indeed, in "Sicko," Moore criticizes both Democrats and Republicans for their inaction and in some cases their willingness to be bribed by pharmaceutical companies and insurance carriers.

(Read the entire article at link provided)

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...