LePage's refusal to issue bonds leaves conservation program short of cash to fund commitments

Paul LePage
Pat Wellenbach

In this Friday, April 27, 2012 photo, Gov. Paul LePage takes a sip out of a coffee mug where a "no new taxes" message is proudly displayed on the bottom of the cup at his office at the State House during an interview with the Associated Press. With control of the Legislature at stake, LePage is making selective appearances on behalf of Republican candidates, turning down more invitations for appearances than he's accepting. (AP Photo/Pat Wellenbach)

AUGUSTA — The state’s primary land conservation program is facing a $2.3 million funding gap that could endanger its ability to make good on commitments it’s made to 19 projects in the state.

Land for Maine’s Future, which has conserved more than 445,000 acres statewide since its start in 1987, has pledged about $6.95 million to help land trusts and other partners close deals on 18 parcels that will be set aside for conservation, recreation and sustainable forestry, and another parcel to be set aside for farming. The program, however, only has $4.66 million on hand.

Program officials thought they would have access by now to about $7 million in bond funding voters approved for the program in November 2010. Gov. Paul LePage, however, said in June that he doesn’t plan to sell the bonds until 2014.

Voters authorized another $5 million in bonds for the Land for Maine’s Future program earlier this month.

The governor and state treasurer have five years from the time voters authorize a bond package to sell the bonds on the market. LePage has said he doesn’t intend to let bonds lapse, but he doesn’t plan to issue more until he’s able to rein in state spending.

“The governor’s position on bonds is not about the individual merits of one program or another,” said LePage spokeswoman Adrienne Bennett. “It’s more about Maine’s current fiscal state.”

But LePage’s refusal to sell bonds supported by voters two years ago has land trust officials whose organizations have qualified for Land for Maine’s Future grants wondering if they can make their deals work if they don’t receive their promised funding on time.

The Androscoggin Land Trust is working with Verso Paper in Jay and surrounding communities to buy about 1,300 acres from the paper company and set it aside as a community forest available for hunting, snowmobiling and other outdoor recreation.

The land trust last year qualified for a $240,000 Land for Maine’s Future grant, said Jonathan LaBonte, the land trust’s executive director. As a condition of receiving the grant, the land trust has to raise the same amount in matching funds from other sources.

“Some of those funders were told specific timelines of when we would close,” LaBonte said. “The landowner is sitting there with a set of assumptions that we shared with them on when we thought this would come together.”

It’s possible the purchase could wait until bond funding is released in 2014, LaBonte said. By then, however, the $30,000 appraisal the land trust paid for would no longer be valid.

“By the time the governor would allow the bonds to be issued, I’m going to have to spend money on a brand new appraisal,” LaBonte said. “If there was an intent not to allow bonds to be issued, the state should never have initiated the grant process or gone through the allocation in 2011.”

On advice from the LePage administration, the Land for Maine’s Future board issued a request for land conservation proposals in early 2011 — following voters’ approval of the $7 million bond package in 2010 — and approved funding for qualified projects. That was before LePage announced he didn’t plan to sell more bonds until 2014.

In Washington County, the Downeast Lakes Land Trust is preparing to close in the coming months on a conservation easement that will allow the state Department of Agriculture, Conservation and Forestry to conserve nearly 22,000 acres of forest in and around Grand Lake Stream.

The parcel includes wetlands, 17 miles of lakeshore, three lakes and 42 miles of streams, said Mark Berry, Downeast Lakes Land Trust’s executive director.

“It’s a really important property for the community of Grand Lake Stream, where the economy is largely dependent on outdoor recreation and tourism,” he said.

The project depends on a $1.25 million Land for Maine’s Future grant and matching funds from the U.S. Forest Service’s Forest Legacy Program and private sources.

“Anytime that you’re trying to line up other sources of funding and now have a delay of more than a year, that certainly puts the federal funding in jeopardy,” said Tom Abello, senior policy adviser for the Nature Conservancy in Maine.

Berry said he’s hoping Downeast Lakes Land Trust can secure its Land for Maine’s Future funding in the next few months since its project is nearing completion.

“We’re in a little bit better situation than some other projects because we potentially can close in time before they run out of money,” he said.

At a meeting Monday, Land for Maine’s Future board members agreed to set up a meeting with LePage staffers in an attempt to persuade LePage to release some land conservation bonds. With the funds it has on hand, the board decided to issue grants to those projects that need funds most urgently.

“I am not critical of the governor. He thinks this is the best way for us to go, but it puts the Land for Maine’s Future Board in a difficult position,” said Donald Marean, who was chairman of the Land for Maine’s Future board until earlier this week when he resigned following his election to the Maine House of Representatives.

Bennett, LePage’s spokeswoman, said the governor doesn’t intend to jeopardize Land for Maine’s Future projects and encourages the program to find alternate means to keep its commitments.

“There have been other state agencies that have helped town officials work on other gap-financing options,” Bennett said, referring to towns that qualified for bonds under the Communities for Maine’s Future program, which LePage also doesn’t plan to release until 2014.

“The governor certainly does encourage that out-of-the-box-type thinking,” Bennett said.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

Reply to Frank

So tell me; what does all of this have to do with a woman's drawstring handbag?

ret·i·cule noun \?re-ti-?kyül\

Definition of RETICULE

1: a woman's drawstring bag used especially as a carryall

2. A drawstring handbag or purse.

Origin of RETICULE

French réticule, from Latin reticulum small net, mesh bag, from diminutive of rete net
First Known Use: circa 1738

FRANK EARLEY's picture

I think it was sub conscious........

You see, by adding remarks about a " Woman's handbag", I must have been hoping it would push LePage to loosen up his purse strings. Hell, nothing else seems to be working......

FRANK EARLEY's picture

LePage needs to put up, or shut up.......

This is starting to get a little reticules. We keep hearing how the State is at a stand still economically. Jobs are getting harder and harder to find. The people of Maine have decided that bonds need to be used to fund projects that are needed to maybe jump start the economy, and hopefully provide jobs. What ever, the people have spoken again, and the governor has refused to listen. He seems to feel he's the only one who knows whats going on. His "No new taxes" stance is fine, but at what expense? What good is it to reduce spending now, when it will cost much more to get caught up with a new Governor with half a brain.
It's time the administration listen to the people. They vote for a reason. LePage has no right to override the voice of the people.....

Peter Denby's picture

No New Taxes

No New Taxes got Bush in trouble. Will it strike twice?

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...