Lawyer says he'll consider dropping appeals if labor mural displayed elsewhere

PORTLAND (AP) — A lawyer for five people who sued over Gov. Paul LePage's decision to remove a large mural depicting scenes from Maine's labor history from a state office building that housed the Labor Department is challenging the governor to stand by his administration's pledge to display it elsewhere.

Jeff Young said Thursday he'd consider dropping appeals if the state displays the mural at the Maine State Museum or other suitable location, but there was no immediate response from the governor.

"We are calling upon the governor to keep his word and get this thing displayed in a venue that he considers to be appropriate. Our suggestion is that it be displayed at the Maine State Museum, which is a repository for paintings and objects that are related to the state of Maine," he said.

The Republican governor created an uproar last year when he ordered the removal of the 11-panel, 7-foot-tall mural because he believed it presented a one-sided view of history that bowed to organized labor and overlooked the contributions of entrepreneurs responsible for creating jobs.

The mural's scenes included World War II's "Rosie the Riveter," a 1937 shoe strike in Maine and New Deal-era U.S. Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, among others.

Three artists, a union member and a former Occupational Safety and Health Administration official who were plaintiffs in the lawsuit contended the removal of the artwork from display in the Labor Department's reception area violated the mural artist's First Amendment rights.

But the lawsuit was dismissed by a federal judge and the decision was upheld Wednesday by an appeals court in Boston. Young could appeal the decision to the full 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals or U.S. Supreme Court, or could file new legal action in state court on other grounds. He had made no decision as of Thursday.

The appeals court on Wednesday agreed with the LePage administration that the governor's actions amounted to political speech and Chief Judge Sandra Lynch wrote that "governors and administrations are ultimately accountable to the electorate through the political process."

Young took exception with the suggestion that it's up to voters to settle the matter.

"We shouldn't put First Amendment rights up to a vote. The First Amendment is designed to protect not just the majority view but the minority views as well," he said.

The mural was commissioned by then-Democratic Gov. John Baldacci and created by artist Judy Taylor after a competition by the Maine Arts Commission. Taylor chose not to participate in the lawsuit.

A full-sized replica has been displayed in Maine, but the original artwork's location has been a mystery ever since its removal. The LePage administration has declined to say where it is.

LePage previously suggested placing the mural in Portland City Hall. During oral arguments in Boston, the state's counsel committed to the showing of the mural elsewhere and noted that the publicity has made the mural the "most famous piece of art in the state of Maine," Lynch wrote.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

Mural

I believe it is a waste of money and time to keep this going in the court system. Mural lovers have been ruled against, why keep it up. This mural did not belong where it was, so it should be put in a library where more people will see it in a day than saw it the years it was in the labor office. This was not a labor mural it was a union mural.

 's picture

Mural

Unions were good for what they did years ago. Now all they are doing are getting our shops and mills closed because they want to much. Companys will leave this country to make more money. My point was that mural did not belong in a Labor office, if it needed to be somewhere it should have been in a union office if what the painter wanted to show was unionization of the nation.
I belong to a union and I am paid well but the union President and cronies are payed more for doing little else. But as I said my only complaint was location of the mural.

JOANNE MOORE's picture

"not a labor mural....

...it was a union mural."

Where do you think people who labor would be today if it wasn't for unions, people banding together, to get workplace safety, the 40 hour workweek, better wages, etc.? These things didn't just happen you know. People, men and women have been harrased, beaten and even murdered just because they wanted workplace fairness.
Have you ever heard about the Triangle Shirtwaist factory fire? Is that how you want workers to be treated?

 's picture

Remember the...

..."Open for Business" sign the governor had installed at the beginning of the Maine Turnpike that was later "stolen." I believe it's in a room, next to the mural.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...