New Legislature facing plenty of red ink

AUGUSTA — The 126th Legislature, which takes office this week, faces serious financial problems, including addressing funding needs that could reach $200 million in the current budget year that ends June 30.

“I think that the new Legislature could see a $150 to $200 million supplemental budget," said Rep. Patrick Flood, R-Winthrop, the outgoing co-chairman of the Legislature’s Appropriations Committee.

That budget would make up a revenue shortfall and spending in excess of projections, mostly in the Department of Health and Human Services.

“We have had similar shortfalls in the past and solved them, I think we can solve this problem,” said Rep. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston, the lead Democrat on the Appropriations Committee for the last two years. “It’s not going to be easy, but we can get it done if everybody works together.”

After the first four months of the budget year, state revenues were $26 million below estimates, and the Revenue Forecasting Committee has decided that red ink will grow to at least $35 million.

Those lower estimates will continue into the new two-year budget that starts next July 1 and means about $128 million fewer tax dollars to fund government programs and services. All of those revenue changes were triggered by the report of the Consensus Economic Forecasting Commission.

Jim Clair, chairman of the commission, said that the economy is growing slightly better in the current budget year than projected, but the panel does not see any major increase in growth over the next few years.

“We either kept our estimates as they were from last February or reduced them slightly,” Clair said. "We don’t see the economy really moving until after all of this uncertainty in Washington is resolved.”

The panel made the assumption that Congress will avoid the “fiscal cliff” by continuing at least some of the current tax rates and making “selective” cuts in federal spending.

Complicating the situation is that the solution to the federal budget issues could affect the states in different ways. Mike Allen, Tax Policy associate commissioner, chairs the Revenue Forecasting Committee and said the variations on what Congress will do make it very difficult to estimate state revenues.

"Your head can explode if you try to take into account all this stuff," he said.

The single biggest funding need is in the Department of Health and Human Services. Commissioner Mary Mayhew told lawmakers her agency is facing a need of at least $100 million to pay the bills in the current budget year.

“At this point, our expenditures are exceeding our budget," she said. “That is mostly in three areas.”

The first is cuts made in MaineCare, the state’s name for Medicaid made in a budget passed earlier this year. Mayhew said the Legislature approved a package of changes that would affect coverage for about 36,000 low-income Mainers.

“We have not heard from the federal government whether they will allow those changes, so we are not saving the money that had been booked in the budget,” she said.

Medicaid is a joint federal-state program, and Mayhew said the state’s share of the cost of the program has increased significantly even though the overall costs of the program have had a very small increase.

“The state’s share from fiscal year 2011 to fiscal year 2012 is up by 47 percent,” she said, “even though our overall spending has increased by just six-tenths of a percent.”

All states got an enhanced match rate under the Recovery Act. That was phased out this year, and at the same time the state was expected to increase its share of the costs because the state’s average per capita income was doing better relative to the national average.

“We are also seeing greater utilization of MaineCare services,” she said, “while we are not seeing an increase in the numbers on MaineCare.”

Mayhew said 20 percent of those Mainers covered by MaineCare account for 87 percent of the cost of the program. She said part of the budget shortfall is greater utilization of services by that group.

“We are analyzing the data to see why this is happening,” she said.

While revenues and Medicaid are driving most of the state’s budget shortfall for this budget year, other programs are also experiencing budget problems, as they do every year. For example, the General Assistance program administered by local municipalities will need additional funds.

Last year the state cost for the program was $11.8 million, over its budgeted amount of $7.4 million.

There are also other budget needs every year. Last year those additional budget items totaled $37 million, but Finance Commissioner Sawin Millett said the non-Medicaid needs are still being reviewed as the supplemental budget is drafted.

For example, energy costs have fluctuated this year, and some state agencies may need additional funds for gasoline or for heating buildings.

“And yes, we may have to change that later as we find out what Congress does and how that impacts the state,” he said.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



FRANK EARLEY's picture

While we're all being held hostage....

While we're all being held hostage on the Federal level, I don't see how any real headway can be accomplished on the State level. Its just the same old arguments from the Right, they don't seem to realize that the people have spoken on Nov. 6th. The Republicans are still pushing the same lame budget issues they used in the election, the issues that the people rejected. One point of contention which is bothering me, was a statement made by John Boehner, R-Ohio. This statement probably went unnoticed by many, but hit me particularly hard. It was not what he said, It was the callous way he said it. His explanation for the items the Republicans want to reduce spending on the federal level must contain cuts to Medicare, not for the providers, but the receivers of care, he wants Medicare recipients to feel as much pain from the cuts as the so called higher income wage earners, will feel from having to pay higher taxes.
Lets put that in layman's terms. If Mr smith needs a wheel chair to get from his bed to the bathroom, Mr. Boehner, feels that by denying Mr. Smith the wheel chair. That would satisfy the Republicans obscene requirement that if the rich are going to pay higher taxes, then we're going to cut needed medical help and treatment to the less fortunate. If your a republican, that's considered fair, if your a human being, I would call that insulting. I can only imagine what boneheaded ideas they will come up with next......


Gee, sounds like the Governor

Gee, sounds like the Governor and Mary Mayhew put the chicken before the egg and compiled a budget for DHHS that was unrealistic without having the federal waiver which they were told they would likely not get. Sounds like the bullying backfired and now they are going to find a way to screw more people


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...