Rich Lowry: Obama looking to humiliate Republicans

Back during the 2008 Democratic primaries, Rush Limbaugh launched Operation Chaos. Four years later, President Barack Obama has embarked on Operation Humiliation.

It is coming off without a hitch.

Stage One was to dispatch his treasury secretary to Capitol Hill to make a laughable offer to Republicans on the fiscal cliff -- literally. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell reported that he burst out laughing upon hearing Tim Geithner spell out the White House's terms.

Stage Two is watching Republicans squirm and panic. Less than a week after the hilarity courtesy of Geithner, The New York Times headlined a front-page piece, "GOP Looks for Fallback to Avoid a Fiscal Standoff."

The grand budget deal that all the talking heads say we need to prove that Washington is still functional, to vindicate the memory of Ronald Reagan and Tip O'Neill, etc., etc., is almost certainly not going to come off.

For a deal to happen, one of two things must be true: The White House must either want a deal, or feel that it needs a deal. You don't have to be a hostage negotiator or a game theorist to understand that neither is the case.

Does the White House need a deal? It considers its position so strong that it probably thinks it did McConnell and House Speaker John Boehner a favor by having Geithner show up to insult them in person. He could have done it by text message.

Obama just won an election in which pretty much his only concrete agenda item was a tax increase on the rich, although the casual listener might have thought he was only talking about taxing millionaires and billionaires. Tax increases on the rich poll well, while the Republican counterdemands — entitlement cuts — don't.

If nothing happens, tax increases go up for everyone, and all the polls show that the public is primed to blame the Republicans. That means that the president and the media will be plowing fertile ground when they paint Boehner and company as hideous extremists who hate the middle class if all rates go up at the end of the year.

So if the White House doesn't need a deal, why would it want one? Because it is secretly spoiling to cut entitlement spending? Because Obama wakes up every morning wondering how he can cut the deficit today? Because weeks after sweeping to re-election, he is brimming over with modesty?

Obama loves to praise himself in public for his alleged courage in private discussing possible entitlement changes with Boehner during the fight over the debt ceiling. But he never says specifically what these changes were, let alone makes the case for them. He is always in favor of tough choices — in theory.

It has been rich to hear Democrats say that Republicans have to go first on entitlements, when House Republicans have passed the Paul Ryan budget twice. The president has the unique power to support any serious entitlement reform and instantly make it a matter of bipartisan consensus, because Republicans will endorse it and Democrats will grumble and go along. All the evidence is that he simply has no interest.

The Republican budget wonk and blogger Keith Hennessey carefully analyzed the numbers in the Geithner offer and figured, between the phantom savings and the new spending, it is a net spending increase. The new "balanced approach" is more taxes coupled with more spending.

The president is in a particular fever to raise tax rates, so that the Republican counteroffer of $800 billion in revenue through tightening up the tax code is dismissed out of hand. Why would the president want to increase any tax rates when the economy is still weak, and when he is said to be interested in pursuing tax reform next year that will presumably cut them right back down again?

It doesn't make sense as economics or policy. It does as the triumphant finale of Operation Humiliation.

Rich Lowry is a syndicated columnist. He can be reached via e-mail at:

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



David Lingard Jr's picture


All i have to say is REPUBLICANS get over yourself......the President is only doing what is best for the country not making you all of parties to look bad......and further more not everything is about you all either......get over it and try something else to make yourselves look like victims.......and victims you are not!!!!!!

Steve  Dosh's picture

Rich Lowry: Obama looking to humiliate Republicans

Rich ? 12.10.12 5 pm hst ?
. .umm . .President Obama is not looking to humiliate Republicans . They do it well all by themselves /s Steve Dosh , Hawai'i •

David  Cote's picture

From an unbiased standpoint...

Both parties have tried to embarrass each other for some time now. Bush and company tried to turn that trick against the dems soon after he was re-elected as well. That is the nature of the beast, and the reason why things are so screwed up present day.Anyone who disagrees is probably enjoying a nice, frosty mug of either red, or blue kool-aid.

RONALD RIML's picture

From a biased 'unbiased' opinion

"If you disagree with me you're nuts"

Sure, David - of course you're right.......

David  Cote's picture

Drinking kool-aid doesn't mean you're nuts

It merely points out one who chooses to drink it has a narrow mind, a person who has no inclination to listen to an alternate thought. Ron, I'll give you 8 out of 10 for effort to confuse the issue, 2 out of 10 for effect.


Embarrasing Republicans?

Good Lord! Last week alone their leader in the Senate fillibustered his own bill and they voted down a bill to support the disabled that is already the law in the US and was proposed for the UN by George W and lobbied for by Bob Dole ! I don't think things can get much more ridiculous.

FRANK EARLEY's picture

The president needs to do nothing.......

The Republicans are doing just fine on their own. At the rate their going, it won't be long at all before the Republican Party is completely alienated. As far as I'm concerned, it can't happen fast enough......


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...