Retain the existing cap on charter schools

As a realist, Gov. Paul LePage probably knows legislation to eliminate the cap on creating new charter schools is likely doomed in a Democratic Legislature.

But we would hope many Republican legislators also agree that lifting the cap after a single year, and before the cap has even been reached, is totally premature.

Department of Education spokesman David Connerty-Marin confirmed Sunday that the governor is determined to abolish the 10-school limit set by the state's new charter-school law.

Opponents of charter schools argue that the schools pull money away from traditional public schools. 

That's a concern, but if we saw stronger evidence that charter schools produce better-educated students, then that would be a sacrifice worth making.

But two decades after the charter-school movement began in Minnesota, the evidence of their effectiveness is muddled at best.

Some charter schools do seem to produce better results, some have worse results and most have about the same results as public schools.

Some research shows that charter schools do the best in large, urban school systems. They have been less successful in small, rural school districts of the type found in Maine.

The most successful charter schools have longer school years and rigid discipline. Which raises the question of why more than a handful of public schools in Maine aren't taking the obvious steps of adding instruction days if they truly want to improve education.

While many critics like to blame teachers and administrators for the lackluster performance of U.S. public schools, we have always felt that weak student and parental motivation is the bigger culprit.

We can all think of families that have three or four children, all of whom become top students. Then, of course, there are families that have trouble even getting their children to school on a regular basis.

Most advanced countries have educational systems that resemble our own with traditional style teachers and classrooms full of students.

Many of those foreign schools have larger classes and less comfortable schools, yet their top students regularly outperform U.S. students in international testing.

It's not charter schools that set them apart, nor technology or even more highly trained teachers.

Nearly all of them have longer school years plus, we suspect, more highly motivated parents and students.

In Japan, parents sometimes attend school with their student, help with homework and even hire tutors to help their child keep up.

Parents set high expectations for their children and there is often relentless pressure to meet those expectations. Sports and other activities take a back seat to a successful education, and hours of homework are par for the course.

Students fully appreciate that their key to success in life depends upon getting as much education as possible.

In November, U.S. students were ranked 17th in the developed world based upon a series of measures including test scores and graduation rates.

Finland and South Korea topped the list of 40 nations with the best education systems, followed by Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore.

Researchers explained that the nations with the best educational systems offer teachers higher status and have a culture that emphasizes education.

Does that sound like our culture?

Charter schools may be a solution for some students and some families in Maine.

But before we lift the current cap, let's see if the first ten prove their worth.

rrhoades@sunjournal.com

The opinions expressed in this column reflect the views of the ownership and the editorial board.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

Steve  Dosh's picture

Retain the existing cap on charter schools

all, 13.01.09 09:20
. .We are not reallyfans of charter schools either . Som eof ours' here reallu suck . Yet , we used Calvert home schooling in Africa . Parochial schools ? Religious ¿ Even my alma mater Bates was Baptist ? 1 5 0 years ago . Public schools in ME wil always be with you . Always . By increasing variety and choice the public schools and techers will get better yet posibly fewer given the madate of N C L B . Our public schools in Hawai'i require a college teaching degree ( or equivalent ) . Charter , religious , parochial , and home schooling schools and tutorigng do not . Deciding where to send ones' kids' is a choice not matter - w h e r e - one lives inthe known univers . We support choice . Eliminate the existing cap on charter schools n ME . /s Dr Dosh , Hawai'i

Robert McQueeney's picture

Let's keep it in context

"That's a concern, but if we saw stronger evidence that charter schools produce better-educated students, then that would be a sacrifice worth making."

I always look on with interest at such statements. I seldom see any one quantify such statements.

For example, if charter schools cast, say 80% more per student, but only turn out 10% better students, that is a poor return on the investment, and I'd not be in favor of it. But if it cost 10% more to run a charter school, and produced 20% better students, that is an investment in education I'd be solidly behind.

Are there any statistics for the cost verses improvement in America? In other countries, it seems to work well. Have there been any studies to see what is different there from here, and have the positives put in place here?

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...