Among nations, Americans are not very healthy

The news last week for Americans under 50 was not good.

On average, they are in poorer health and more likely to die before 50 than young people in other developed Western European countries, Canada, Japan and Australia.

That's the bleak assessment of the Institute of Medicine, the health arm of the National Academy of Sciences, and the National Research Council.

A panel of experts formed to analyze the results called our higher rates of disease and shorter lives "the U.S. health disadvantage."

The 378-page report is the first comparison of health and death data for people of all ages and examines a wide range of maladies. When compared to the "peer" group of 17 nations, the U.S. fared poorly in nine areas:

Infant mortality, accidents and homicides, sexually transmitted diseases, HIV and AIDS, drug deaths, obesity and diabetes, heart disease, chronic lung disease and disability.

The researchers found that American men ranked last in life expectancy and American women ranked second to last.

"Something fundamental is going wrong," Dr. Steven Woolf told the New York Times. "Something at the core is causing the U.S. to slip behind these other high-income countries. And it's getting worse."

And that's very bad news for a nation that already spends considerably more money than all others on health care.

While the report may not have been front-page news last week, another related story was: our national debt.

If you are worried about our ballooning federal debt, federal health care spending is the most frightening component going forward. If current trends continue, Medicare and Medicaid will eventually crowd out other government spending on infrastructure, defense, education and research.

It is also easy to see how higher rates of death and injury translate into a major disadvantage for the U.S. economy as employers suffer lost productivity and higher health insurance rates.

The researchers started out expecting to find a mixed bag of good and bad news for the U.S. "But the U.S. ranked near or at the bottom in almost every health indicator," Woolf told the Times. "That stunned us."

The only bright spots: we detect cancers earlier, control high blood pressure and cholesterol better and the very oldest Americans, those over 75, tend to live longer than their "peers" in other countries.

The authors could not put a finger on one specific reason for our poor health results.

Instead, they pointed to four likely explanations:

First, the relatively large number of people without health care insurance in the U.S. who, as a result, lack access to regular primary care services.

Second, our unhealthy behaviors. While we may smoke and drink less than people in some cultures, young people in the U.S. are more likely to consume more calories, abuse drugs, fail to wear seat belts, have accidents involving alcohol and use firearms in violent ways.

Third, while Americans generally have high incomes, the poor in the U.S. are poorer and have less social mobility than low-income people in many of the 17 nations.

Interestingly, they said the U.S. has fewer "safety net programs that can buffer the negative effects of poverty."

Finally, the authors said, we have structured our communities around automobiles, discouraging physical activity and encouraging obesity.

Having this data in hand should be a wake-up call for U.S. policy makers. As Dr. Woolf said, there is something wrong "at the core" of how we live.

Is it our habits? Our attitudes? Our approach to life? Our health care system?

For years, our nation has overcome one threat after another. The challenge now before us is to figure out what's happening and fix it. 

It is often said that our health is our greatest source of wealth. If so, our wealth seems to be slipping through our fingers.

rrhoades@sunjournal.com

The opinions expressed in this column reflect the views of the ownership and the editorial board.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

Betty Davies's picture

Statistics--Medicare & Medicaid vs. the cost of war

Is the cost of Medicare and Medicaid at risk of becoming larger than "defense" spending? Check out this website (or google "cost of war dot com): http://costofwar.com/

The cost of US wars since 2001 = the number one with TWELVE digits after it.

The cost of war in Iraq = 8 followed by 11 digits. Cost of war in Afghanistan = 6 followed by 11 digits.

Withdraw from those countries and free up enough money to fund universal single-payer health insurance.

(FYI, the cost of war to Maine is found here, or google costofwar dot com & state & ME) --http://costofwar.com/state/ME/)

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

"Withdraw from those

"Withdraw from those countries and free up enough money to fund universal single-payer health insurance."
I know no one who would not support such a plan if it were funded without ANY increase in current spending. Another funding mechanism would be to cut off most foreign aid to countries whom we know do not like us, and all foreign aid to countries whom we know hate us should be eliminated entirely.
Unfortunately, none of the above will ever take place, at least, not in our lifetimes.

Steve  Dosh's picture

Among nations, Americans are not very healthy

ed., 13.01.13 21:00
Ain't it the truth ? Among nations , North Americans are not very healthy . We are the hardest workng of any industrialized nation but ( get this ) it only leads to stress and heart disease . 60 hour work weeks , workaholics ? Have you ever seen a headstone that read , ' I wish i had spent more time at the office? " A: No . Mind you , some do say , " i told you so ." l o l @ terminal hypochodriacs
Cancers are caused by stress . What is cancer ? Cells gone wild . So , what have we got to to look forward to ? Death by heart disese , cancer and ' old timers .' HAhah !
http://www.bloomberg.com/slideshow/2012-08-13/world-s-healthiest-countri...
Knowing all this we can change our unhealthy habits
a ) Get that flu shot . A dozen have died in New Hamshire already , this year , 2 0 1 3 , b ) Stop smoking . It sets a bad example and second hand smoke is gross . It kills asthmatics and people with emphasima , c ) Drink less alcohol . Although you may have two kidneys you have only one liver and brain ( strokes ) , d ) Eat fewer sweets , diabetics , e ) Drive more carefully . What's the big rush ? You only save like a minute or two max , f ) Conversly , if you are > 75 years old , take the local AARP driving course and have your vision re checked periodically , g ) Laugh a little . It's like jogging ( on the inside ) , h ) Hug a child . You both are rewarded for that action ? , i ) get a pedomter from your local health plan and use it . Excercise . h t h ? /s, Steve http://www.letsmove.gov/

Steve  Dosh's picture

. . .. forgot to mention

. . .. forgot to mention guns , the major form of suicide for selfish guys in the these U S of A . Women do pills & alcohol or slit their wrists . Either way , it's against the law . . ..a felony , in fact . Murder ?

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

Who get to go to jail for the

Who get to go to jail for the crimes?

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...