Report: Lingerie, jewelry, leather jacket paid for with Washington County inmates’ benefit fund

MACHIAS — A “Santa Baby” novelty plunge bra, four sateen push-up bras, a velour bustier top and a ruffle-trim leather motorcycle jacket were apparently purchased in 2012 with funds from an inmates’ benefit account at the Washington County Jail.

An attorney hired to investigate potential irregularities in the disbursement of funds from the account says, in his report, he found “unpersuasive” the explanation by the woman who made those purchases that “it was necessary to be dressed properly at work and that her work directly benefitted inmates.”

The Washington County Commissioners will meet Thursday at 1 p.m. to review and discuss a 24-page report on his investigation by Waterville attorney Peter Marchesi. He was hired by Washington County Sheriff Donnie Smith to look into what Smith perceived as irregularities in disbursement of funds earmarked to benefit inmates of the county’s 48-bed jail.

Marchesi said in his report, which was released this week by Washington County Manager Betsy Fitzgerald, that his investigation could not justify the purchase of dresses, jewelry and lingerie among other things.

Last month, Smith suspended with pay the jail’s two top administrators — Capt. Robert Gross, the jail’s longtime supervisor, and Sgt. Karina Richardson, the jail’s clerk — while the matter is being investigated.

The inmates’ benefit account collects and disburses funds deposited by jail inmates or by others on their behalf to purchase telephone time, cable TV services, snacks, stationery, stamps and other approved commissary items.

Marchesi’s investigation focused on benefit account disbursements in 2012, but he said in his analysis, in which names were redacted, that alleged misuse of the fund appears to have occurred over many years. Checks drawn on the account required the approval of Gross, Smith or County Treasurer Jill Holmes.

“There is extensive and incontrovertible documentation of widespread use of funds from the inmate fund that do not conform [with standards],” he said in his report. “I believe it is most likely that similar, nonconforming uses of the funds from the inmate account have taken place over the course of many years.”

Chris Gardner, the chairman of the three-member board of commissioners, said Wednesday he could not comment on Marchesi’s report prior to Thursday’s special meeting.

“I have seen it and reviewed it, as have the other commissioners,” he said. “It will be the center of discussion at the meeting tomorrow.”

Marchesi declined to discuss his investigation prior to Thursday’s hearing. He states in the report that his review of the records for the fund show that, between Nov. 1, 2011, and Nov. 19, 2012, the total amount of expenditures that he feels did not benefit inmates amounted to $7,272.

Expenditures other than the lingerie, he said, included books, half of which are not in the jail’s current library inventory, such as cookbooks, books about crafts and books about holiday decorating, none of which he said would be of interest to jail inmates. He also questioned the purchase of eight DVDs, as inmates don’t regularly view DVDs while incarcerated. Marchesi also questions use of inmate benefit funds to purchase high-end cellphones and to pay for cellphone monthly charges.

Five county employees, whose names were blacked out in the report released to the public, were interviewed by Marchesi during his investigation. Two of the four, he concluded, were not involved in “improper use” of the inmates’ fund. Two others, he said in his report, appear to have made use of the fund “for personal gain.” The status of the fifth person interviewed is unclear in his report.

It remains unclear whether the special meeting of the county commissioners at 1 p.m. Thursday will be an open meeting or conducted behind closed doors. That decision will apparently hinge on the wishes of those under investigation.

Attorney Jeff Davidson, who represents Richardson, and attorney Jeffrey Toothaker, who represents Gross, have both previously said their clients want the hearings to be held in open session. Richardson and Davidson could not be reached for comment Wednesday morning.

“My client has nothing to hide, and he did not do anything wrong,” Toothaker said Wednesday morning. “When you hear the whole story you will see that he did nothing wrong. My client is not intimidated by the facts. Let the facts fall where they may.”

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

Inmates.

Good Lord. What is this world coming to. This is an outrage. Who ok'd the money for these purchases? I am a firm believer that if you are put in jail for a crime you committed you should have in your cell 1. A cot to sleep on, 2. A toilet, 3. A washbowl, and 4. A book to read that is a Bible. Meybey was by the time they was released they would no longer be a menace to sociaty.

Jeff Kelley's picture

stolen inmate funds

What is a suprize to me is a statment made that they are not sure if the meeting to discuss this will be open to the plubic,and it depends on what the persons want who supplosed took these funds, well gess what they work for the plubic and if they truly think this was ok then let the plubic hear their side of this matter,but iam sure this will not happen because it will make other people that are in charge look like the incompantent morns that they are and at taxpayers expence these people who stole this money do not have a leg to stand on they took money that didn,t belong to them and used it for themselves plain and simple not too hard to figure out, they should be fired on the spot and their supervisors be sepended without pay for a period of time,we need to send a clear message this will not happen again

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...