Bills seek to reduce or remove ethanol from Maine gas

AUGUSTA — A pair of bills introduced Thursday by state Rep. Jeff Timberlake, R-Turner, could have a significant impact on what goes into the gas tank of your car, lawnmower or snowblower.

One of Timberlake's bills would cut the percentage of corn-derived ethanol in Maine gasoline from 10 percent to 5 percent. The other measure would allow the state to form a coalition with other New England states to create an ethanol-free gasoline market for Canadian petroleum-vendor Irving.

Timberlake said Irving has offered to deliver ethanol-free gasoline to customers in New England if it has a minimum of three states willing to eliminate ethanol from the gas supply. New Hampshire has passed similar legislation, Timberlake said.

He said he suspects that bill would be amended so gas stations would have the choice of offering either product, with or without ethanol.

A farmer and the owner of a hardware store, Timberlake called ethanol one of the worst "government boondoggles" of his lifetime.

He said the additive wreaks havoc with fuel lines in small engines, especially those that sit unused for any period of time.

"It's really hard on engines and really affects our fuel mileage," Timberlake said. "Ethanol doesn't like small engines; it doesn't like fuel lines, chain saws, weed whackers, anything with fuel lines."

He noted that federal farm subsidies paid to those growing corn for ethanol have contributed to a sharp increase in the price of corn and subsequently, in all products made with corn. Everything from feed grain for cattle and dairy cows to most of the food products consumed by humans have corn-based ingredients in them, Timberlake said.

He said getting New England to move away from ethanol could be the first step in a national movement to remove the additive from American gasoline and cut the subsidies to Midwestern farmers growing corn for biofuel.

The next stop for Timberlake's bills will be the Legislature's Committee on Labor, Commerce and Economic Development.

sthistle@sunjournal.com

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

Noel Foss's picture

Hopefully they put it up for a vote

Ethanol is energy negative. It takes more energy to create a gallon of ethanol than you'll get out of it. It depletes the soil, and drives up the cost of grain. Which drives up the cost of meat, dairy and eggs. I'd rather see the government subsidize solar or windpower if they're going to throw money at energy alternatives. At least solar and wind can pay for themselves (as long as they don't pull a Solyndra and go under)

DANNY FITZSIMMONS's picture

this stuff kills small engines

I brought a mower 30 yrs ago and though it was a good machine it was time to buy a new one after 15-16 yrs since then I have had 7 mowers with lifespans getting worse the last one was 4yrs about 45 uses the amount of corrosion is unbelivable although it may be cheaper parts also to blame, I think in a few years it will be proven that this corn additive has proven destructive to our engines. At which point our great goverment will hold off the lawsuits (so long as our legislators get their cut) and will instead file thier own lawsuit that will of course be much smaller than those of a record class action then will attempt to bar us from filing such lawsuits in the future. And what will we get for the hundreds of millions maybe billions in damages will be a goverment whitewash where they claim to have punished the ethenol manufactuers while they get the money and we get the shaft.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...