Party-line vote recommends rejection of capital gains tax cut

AUGUSTA, Maine — A bill that would ease the tax rate on capital gains elicited a party-line recommendation against passage Friday in the Legislature’s Taxation Committee amid debate over what effect the measure would have on state revenues and a fragile economy.

LD 65, “An Act to Reduce the Income Tax on Capital Gains,” will go to the Legislature with an 8-5 “ought not to pass” recommendation, with majority Democrats voting as a bloc to oppose the measure. It sought to separate capital gains derived from the sale of assets held for more than a year from a person’s regular income and tax that amount at 3 percent. That would represent a tax cut for most Maine state taxpayers, who currently pay between 2 percent and 8.5 percent in personal income taxes on capital gains.

Michael Allen, an analyst with Maine Revenue Services, estimated that the bill would ease taxes statewide by up to $40 million, though he told the committee Friday that he couldn’t calculate the effect on state coffers exactly because cutting the capital gains tax could change the amount of capital gains realized in Maine.

“The question is how much of that $40 million would be offset by additional capital gains realization,” said Allen. “It is probably one of the most complicated areas to try to forecast.”

Allen said the capital gains tax realizations would have to double in Maine in order to make up for $40 million impact of the bill, which was sponsored by Rep. Richard Malaby, R-Hancock.

Sen. Doug Thomas, R-Ripley, the ranking Republican on the Taxation Committee, said he saw the bill as an opportunity to spur economic development.

“I see a capital gains tax cut as a way to reward people for providing jobs and making our economy grow,” said Thomas. “We could possibly end up making money on this bill.”

Sen. Anne Haskell, D-Portland, said she saw merit in Thomas’ point but said there were too many unknowns in Malaby’s bill for her to support it. She said she favors a “claw-back provision” that would allow the Legislature to walk back the tax cut if it didn’t produce the expected results in terms of jobs and private investment.

“We want to know how many jobs are going to be created. We want to know what that number is and the timeline for doing it,” said Haskell. “I couldn’t go to my taxpayers and say I can adequately model that if we provide this $40 million cut.”

In other bills dealt with by the Taxation Committee, lawmakers voted unanimously against a provision that would have exempted low-income people age 65 and older from paying property taxes and tabled a bill that would create a one-year window for landowners to withdraw from the state’s Tree Growth Tax Law without penalty. Members of the committee suggested they deal with the issue later in the legislative session when they consider several other bills related to the tree growth program.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.




One more reason for investors

One more reason for investors to not reside in Maine

 's picture

Republicans, the tax-cut party,

simply wants to re-distribute wealth upward as this capital gains tax cut would while worsening the state budget gap which they would eventually solve by cutting benefits for the poor or increasing borrowing. No jobs would be created; no increased economic activity. All hollow promises which will not come true; just as the Bush tax cuts did not "pay for themselves" rather they increased national debt by more than $2 trillion.

Steve  Dosh's picture

Party-line vote recommends rejection of capital gains tax cut

B D N readers 13.02.15 20:00
b t w - We're not all " Capitalist Tools , " Mr. Steven Forbes . In fact a lot of us are part of the Occupy movement and the 99% and we just won an election for the C E O of the whole U S of A
Are you going to run again ? ref : " When Forbes ran for president in 1996 and 2000, he sold some of his Forbes, Inc., voting shares to other family members to help finance his run. He did not come close to securing the Republican nomination . "
Good luck if you do , loser
Fail ?  /s , Steve and friends :)


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...