LaBonte: Sharing would save Lewiston, Auburn millions

Amber Waterman/Sun Journal

Auburn Mayor Jonathan LaBonte is urging Lewiston and Auburn to take another look at a 2008 study recommending consolidation of services to save money as budget cuts loom. A reduction in state revenue-sharing could mean $4 million to $6 million less next year for the Twin Cities.

Looking out at New Auburn from the window of his living room on a recent Saturday morning, Mayor Jonathan LaBonte said he had the perfect example for why joint services matter.

"I only have to look out and see the 4-foot snow pile that's been built up by my local plow truck," LaBonte told listeners by telephone on WGAN's "Inside Maine" radio show as Winter Storm Nemo piled up drifts across New England.

"If I'm a resident of the Lewiston-Auburn area, I'm really not concerned in this storm if the plow trucks going by have an Auburn decal, a Lewiston decal or a decal of some other entity. I just want to make sure my road gets plowed," LaBonte said.

He was on the radio that morning with former state Treasurer Bruce Poliquin to explain how Lewiston and Auburn could do better and trim their municipal expenses by sharing costs for core services such as police, fire and public works.

The cities had the chance to do just that five years ago, when a Citizens Commission on Lewiston-Auburn Cooperation issued its final report. The report calculated that each city could save about $1.2 million per year by combining police and public works departments and by sharing administrators in several other departments.

"We spent all that money on studies, but there was no need to implement," LaBonte said. "Politics got in the way. There was no fiscal cliff facing us, making us do it."

Some say that cliff is here now, in the shape of a potential $93 million cut in state revenue sharing to Maine cities and towns. In Lewiston-Auburn, those proposed cuts could mean between $4 million and $6 million less for the 2013-14 municipal budget, forcing massive service reductions and drastically higher property taxes, according to municipal officials.

With such fiscal challenges looming, LaBonte says it's time for Lewiston-Auburn to seriously reconsider the proposals in the controversial 2008 cooperation report, which included sharing one city administrator. And, he says, it's time for other Maine towns and cities to do the same.

"Why do we think we need 493 towns and cities to provide services for people?" LaBonte said. "Why can't Mainers simply agree to work together and do something different and actually trust each other?"

L-A: Consolidation leaders

LaBonte says the model for L-A — as well as other municipalities — is the 2008 report. He says the Twin Cities could lead the way, each city combining virtually every municipal department with its counterpart across the river.

The $2 million in annual savings are still there, he says, if the cities have the political will to make it happen. "If there are savings out there, we have no reason not to take them. It's a matter of leadership."

The 2008 report sketched out organization charts for combining just about every department in the two cities: Public Works, Recreation, Police, Fire, Finance, Assessing, City Clerks and Planning. A single director would guide each department in both cities. In some instances, they'd have deputies and staff working under them and dealing with one city. That was the plan for the combined fire departments.

In others — police and assessing, for example — the staff would be broken up into multiple districts across the two cities. They'd be responsible for their district but would be able to work across the entire community, treating the entire community as one.

"It's not so much having fewer people delivering the service, but having fewer people in an office somewhere telling them how to do it," LaBonte said, adding that five years after the study, those savings are still available.

For example, he said the study recommended a combined Lewiston-Auburn police force of 144 employees, down eight positions from the 2007 staffing level of 152.

Staffing levels remain roughly the same. Auburn added two sworn officer positions and one civilian since 2007, while Lewiston lost one sworn officer. Today, the two cities' police forces have 154 total employees.

And if it works in L-A, it can work everywhere in Maine, he said.

"That's what happens south of the Mason-Dixon line and out West," LaBonte said. "There are cities, but you find the rural towns partnering together through a regional government."

But not everyone agrees that municipal cooperation is the best way to deal with the looming revenue cuts.

'Myth' of consolidation

While the Twin Cities gained attention for their consolidation efforts, other Maine municipalities were exploring the idea as well.

In 2006, the state's Fund for the Efficient Delivery of Local and Regional Services awarded $500,000 to 14 municipal, county and regional governmental organizations for that purpose. Another 26 received grants in 2007.

According to a Maine Development Foundation report in 2007, 11 of those programs showed dollar-for-dollar savings: They were able to leverage state grants into actual savings on several projects — many of them storm-water consolidation projects. For others, savings were expected years in the future.

Maine's cities and town are still trying to make themselves more efficient, said Eric Conrad, spokesman for the Maine Municipal Association, which advises Maine towns on personnel and legal issues. "We continue to receive examples from our members of how they are cooperating."

The MMA issued a report in 2011 that showed 550 examples of Maine communities working together to provide services. Most were sharing public safety services — ambulance and emergency response costs — and establishing mutual aid agreements for fires and other emergencies, according to the MMA report.

But often the towns were sharing to expand services, not to save money, the report indicated, Conrad said.

"It may save money, but it may also let a government add expertise," Conrad said. "It may give a smaller government access to skilled or trained employees they normally would not be able to attract."

In fact, Conrad said, simply sharing services does not save money. For that reason, he said, sharing and consolidation among towns is a bad way to replace revenue-sharing cuts.

"Here's the myth: Every time you consolidate towns and cities, money is saved," Conrad said. "We don't believe that's true."

For example, he said, a smaller fire department may pay individual firefighters less. Combining with a larger, better-paid department forces up the average payroll costs.

"The highest-paid department is never going to come down and take the contract from the lowest-paid department," Conrad said. "The cost comes in higher, across the board. And when your up-front costs come in so much higher, good luck getting paid back."

LaBonte counters that the savings to towns would come from eliminating duplicate services.

"Mutual aid is not the same as having a regional fire department," LaBonte said. "Residents don't care what firetruck shows up if their house is on fire, so what's the best way to make sure the firetruck shows up as quickly as possible? It's probably not to have every town deciding on their own where to put their fire stations. It's deciding where in a region the stations work best for everyone."

The question: 'Political will'

LaBonte admits his strong push for consolidation has critics at home. It has since the 2008 draft of the plan suggested the cities take advantage of the then-vacant Auburn city manager's position and appoint one person to manage both cities. It would have saved $90,000 a year. But city councilors in both cities were skeptical of that idea, and it was one reason the plan ended up on the shelf.

Similar discussions among LaBonte, Lewiston Mayor Robert Macdonald and Gov. Paul LePage last month led to more tension, with Macdonald telling LaBonte to focus on Auburn and leave Lewiston alone.

But the plan hasn't been ignored by Twin Cities' staffs, according to Lewiston City Administrator Ed Barrett. Over the past few years, the cities have found efficiencies by coordinating, matching software services, going in together on large capital expenses and sharing services for such positions as animal control officer, arborist and code enforcement.

"Clearly, we do a lot together, and things we have done together have contributed to holding down the costs of government," Barrett said. "We have the lowest operating budget per capita in comparison with the other 10 largest cities in the state. One of the reasons is that we do things cooperatively with Auburn."

He added, "There have been a lot of changes since that study came out — just staffing reductions alone. We are looking at the study again to see if what was recommended still makes sense."

Right now, LaBonte said, it's most important for city staff to identify potential savings that can be brought about quickly, within the next 10 to 12 months.

It's just as important for Twin Cities political leaders — himself, Auburn councilors and their Lewiston counterparts — to decide if greater consolidation is possible, he said.

"If there's political will, and that's a big if, what can be saved?" LaBonte said. "That's what we need to answer, for the short term and for the longer term, through 2015."

LaBonte said he's optimistic when it comes to elected officials.

"I think the public may be hesitant," he said. "There is a commitment that Lewiston-Auburn, we are in this together. So I don't think there will be any challenge with the elected officials and political turf. The question is, is the community at large ready for us to work together at a higher level?"

His other big concern is making sure the cities have an incentive to cooperate.

"If we're going to see cuts at the state level, there needs to be a carrot for those willing to do things that are bold," LaBonte said.

The governor could help, LaBonte said, by creating incentives for governments to work more efficiently. For example, the amount of revenue-sharing funds a city or town gets could be tied to its per-capita municipal costs.

"One thing I've made clear all along is we won't be able to make up for the entire loss of revenue-sharing just by becoming more efficient," LaBonte said. "But the revenue-sharing formula has nothing to do with how efficient you are now. If it did, there might be an incentive to become efficient — or stay efficient."

It's something Maine's cities and towns must deal with, he said.

"You can't change the fact that Maine is competing with other places on the map, and at some point people have to realize the status quo is not going to make us competitive," LaBonte said. "I'm the lone wolf on this issue right now, but I'm eager to fight for it."

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



 's picture

Jason Theriault, on paper it

Jason Theriault, on paper it looks great, but in reality, the savings are minimal once you divide the saved salaries amoung the remaining top echelon to take on the supposed extra work. Then there is the strenghtened heirarchy that is more prone to corruption and secrecy that has little to no use for public input. Look at how LaBonte has shut down the people of Auburn. LaBonte has great aspirations. Don't be fooled by his words, but rather look at his actions. Also, Bob Stone made some great points!

Jason Theriault's picture

Without studying the proposal...

Ok, I'm not going to study the proposal, but if you can cite where it has inflated claims or where the Mayor is lying, I will listen.

Also - what actions has he taken that would be, as you put it, shut down the people of Auburn?

Bob's points I don't think are applicable. Auburn wont be taking on Lewiston's debt, and vica versa. How does the debt load of either city play in a services sharing agreement?

JERRY ARIPEZ's picture

Consolidation has consequences

LA----It has always been referred to Lewiston- Auburn ;
In 1795, Lewiston was officially incorporated as a town.
Auburn would itself be set off and incorporated on February 24, 1842.

So LaBonte and others need to ask themselves but more importantly the citizens of these two cities. Are they ready to eliminate Auburn as a city for the merger since the incorporation of Lewiston the older and second largest city in the state of Maine and first settled should be the beholder of the corporation of the city council.

I would have to say good luck to LaBonte holding office ever again if that would be the case. I will give Johnathan credit for looking at a resolution to a large issue, but I think his carrot dangling is going to dry up from no takers.

Although in today's economic dire straits, consolidation of services or departments can reduce huge expenses but at a cost of peoples jobs on administrative levels and operations. Raises property taxes and putting them on the hook for mismanagement and borrowing is irresponsible. If the problems are not corrected and continue, everyone suffers.

Jason Theriault's picture


Why would the cities have to merge? This is about sharing services to eliminate overhead.

What we are talking about is that public works will still need the same amount of plows and drivers, but less HR and administrative overhead.

 's picture

Lewiston's Debt

When I was on the Lewiston Finance Committee, we warned the City Council repeatedly about the rapidly increasing debt load the city was incurring. The Council ignored our warnings, and continued to borrow. The debt exploded during the Jim Bennett years.

Auburn has less debt but is now looking, potentially, to add significant amounts of debt for the new Edward Little High School.

What most citizens, and probably most councilors in both cities, might not know is that the collateral that the councilors pledge when they borrow money includes the assets owned by the citizens of the community. That's right, your homes, among other items that you own. Lewiston and Auburn taxpayers are on the hook for hundreds of millions of city borrowing.

As an Auburn resident and taxpayer, I have a problem taking on Lewiston's huge outstanding debt load. I wish that debt inequality would have been discussed in the Sun-Journal story, because it is a huge line item on Lewiston, and Auburn's, annual budget. I don't see how consolidation of services can ever work well without combining the governance to one council for both cities. Yes, I mean one city.

Gail Labelle's picture

Saving Money for the cities of Lewiston and Auburn Maine

Mayor LaBonte give Mayor Michael J. Heitzler, Ed,D. and read the article below by ABC Channel 4 News Charleston SC...maybe he can give you some hints about saving money .....

GOOSE CREEK, S.C. (WCIV) – For the 36,000 people who live in the city, Goose Creek is the best of both worlds.

"It pretty much got everything up here," Lloyd Gabriel said.

At the community center Tuesday, residents came to take advantage the amenities the six year center offers.

"The services that the city offers are outstanding. The gym we are standing in right now, $50 a year for a resident," Gabriel said.

The city was established in 1961 and has not raised property taxes in 33 years.

The median home value in Goose Creek is $160,500. In 2012, a house valued at $160,500 would pay $98.23 for their property tax bill.

Mayor Michael Heitzler says the city has been debt free since November.

"We have sufficient money in the bank to build two additional fire departments, one being a command center," he said.

According to Charleston Trident Agency of Realtors, the city's real estate market has been consistent and has made positive progress in the last 13 months.

"At the end of 2012, the area's sales increased a healthy and sustainable 4 percent throughout the year and median price followed suit, edging up 3.2 percent to $160,000. In comparison, that's where median prices stood at the end of 2008, before reaching a low of $153,000 in 2010," communications director Meghan Weinreich said.

The area also has some of the fastest-selling property in the region, at an average of 81 days on the market.

"Inventory has declined as well, with nearly 22 percent fewer homes for sale, which can make for a more competitive market environment," she said.

Rodney and Linda Wilson have been living in Goose Creek for two years and say it is one of the most charming places they have lived.

"If you are stopped on the road someone will come out and help you. If you ride by folks they stop and wave at you. It's just a great place to live," she said.


 's picture

Let me guess, Labonte will be

Let me guess, Labonte will be King of the two cities. I sure hope he doesn't run unopposed this year.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

Labonte can't disagree with

Labonte can't disagree with Mayor Macdonald without going to the media with it, and these two guys are supposed to have the ability to sit down and agree on whose roads will be plowed first during a major snowstorm without having it turn into a food fight?


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...