Lewiston school board rejects redistricting

Daryn Slover/Sun Journal

Jodi Wolverton, left, tugs on Sarah Morin's jacket as the Lewiston School Committee rejects the recommendation to redistrict 223 elementary students during the school committee meeting at Lewiston High School on Monday. Wolverton and Morin have children that go to McMahon Elementary School and are happy that the redistrict plan did not pass. 

LEWISTON — After months of hearings and one hour of debate Monday night, the Lewiston School Committee rejected a controversial recommendation to redistrict 223 elementary students this fall.

The vote was 5-3.

Several committee members speaking for redistricting said it was their duty to make sure all of the city's children had access to the best educational opportunities. Those opposed said there were too many problems with the plan, that it left out several schools and didn't go far enough. Others said new classroom space at McMahon Elementary School could be filled without disrupting so many families.

The redistricting committee had recommended moving 131 downtown students from poorer neighborhoods to Geiger Elementary and and McMahon, and 92 Geiger students from middle-class neighborhoods to Montello.

Supporters said the reasons were to better balance the city's poorer students and those learning to speak English, and fill new classroom space opening up at McMahon.

For the full details from this story, read more here.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



 's picture

LSJ a little help here...

Who voted for/against?

GARY SAVARD's picture

Nathan, the print edition has

Nathan, the print edition has the for/against breakdown.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...