Three scenarios presented for Outlet Beach

AUBURN — An engineering company Tuesday presented three possible courses of action for the city to take at Outlet Beach.

They included aerating the pond and dredging it, turning it into a park for fishing and birdwatching and closing it and naturalizing the land.

Eileen Pannetier, president of Comprehensive Environmental of New Hampshire presented the company's findings to a group of mostly Lake Auburn Watershed Neighborhood Association members.

Pannetier said the three-acre site next to Route 4 has limited beach space in comparison to parking. Although there's room for as many as 60 vehicles, only about 35 swimmers at a time can use the beach, she said.

Her report noted the primary source of fresh water for Outlet Beach is stormwater, mostly from Route 4. That means it's susceptible to pollution.

With minimal outflow from the small pond into Bobbin Mill Brook, Pannetier said there is inadequate circulation of water, making the pond susceptible to algae blooms from Lake Auburn. She also pointed out the levels of enteroccus and E. coli bacteria that exceed Environmental Protection Agency standards, waterfowl excrement, beach erosion and adjacent impervious surfaces.

Pannetier presented a three proposals to the city.

One would cost between $400,000 and $600,000 to:

* Aerate the 6½-acre pond.

* Treat stormwater.

* Spend an additional $500,000 to $1.5 million for dredging.

The plan did not include renovations to the park, maintenance, monitoring or lifeguards needed.

Another plan would cost $65,000 to:

* Turn the site into a park for fishing and birdwatching.

* Regrade and revegetate the land.

* Reduce the size of the parking lot.

* Control erosion.

* Provide handicap access.

The third plan would cost $30,000 to:

* Decommission the park.

* Erect signs prohibiting swimming.

* Remove existing structures.

* Reduce parking.

* Regrade and naturalize the land.

* Block public access.

Pannetier emphasized any plan should focus on long-term water quality and the city, before enacting drastic measures to save the beach, should consider the thousands of dollars of investment per swimmer for a relatively small public beach.

Given the recent history of fecal matter in the water, Pannetier highly recommended daily testing if swimming continues.

Director of the Auburn Water and Sewer District, John Storer, said the department is testing Lake Auburn three days a week and is prepared to test more if the city supports such a move.

Tizz Crowley, speaking as part of the Lake Auburn Watershed Neighborhood Association, asked whether there had been any illnesses specifically related to the water quality.

Deschene pointed out that there is no way of knowing how many potential illnesses there have been over the years and cautioned against asking people to report possible beach related illness.

"We may have over-reporting if we ask for reports," he said.

City Councilor Leroy Walker expressed concerns that water flow to the beach is not adequate for clearing out pollutants and fecal contamination. As for limiting the number of swimmers to 30, Walker called the idea, "ridiculous."

He said he has seen up to 75 children at the beach without any problems, and said people have been swimming there for years without issues.

He said he believes Route 4 to be the culprit of recent woes at the beach. When Route 4 was expanded, he said, the ditches that now drain into the pond were expanded. "I didn't see anybody worried about water quality at the time," he said.

While Walker said he would like to see emphasis put on swimming at the beach, he would at least like to see the land used as a park until swimming can resume. He recommended installing wash stations to stave off duck itch, also called swimmer's itch. The rash is caused by parasites from fowl living in fresh water.

Councilor Belinda Gerry said she is concerned with chemicals getting into the water from Route 4 and believes the state is partly responsible for the potential cleanup cost. She proposed diverting stormwater where it can be treated and returned to the pond, as well as multiple outlets from Lake Auburn to increase flow through the beach.

City Manager Clinton Dedchene, who moderated the meeting, said he hopes to present concerns from Tuesday's meeting to the City Council, with a decision on the course of action within the month.

dmcintire@sunjournal.com

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

Tizz Crowley's picture

speaking as a resident and supporting Water District Trustees

Just would like to correct a notation. I was not at the Beach Study meeting as a member of LAWNA. I stated I was speaking as an Auburn resident and in strong support for the Auburn Water District, where I serve as the Mayor's Representative, and the Lake Auburn Watershed Protection Commission. The AWD has offered to assist the City to keep the beach and PARK open. AWD has agreed to provide daily water testing, to assist with removal of the birds and to provide any technical support/ advice needed relating to water and the the park lands owned by LAWPC. Additionally, the AWD and LAWPC strongly support getting the State to take responsibility for the Route 4 issues the State created... it is the primary reason for water problems and citizen safety this specific location.

One option would be to increase monitoring of the water and see if testing indicates a need to close the water to swimming.... last year that was 4 days, partly due to delays in the retesting of the water. Do we really need to close swimming and the PARK because 4 days were eliminated?

I support the City's position of ensuring safe swimming. I just ask the same concern be applied to all swimming in the city. The Comprehensive Plan mentions swimming, but we have not heard the City commit to ensure other facilities are also safe. Yes, I know they are privately owned locations, but the City has to license the facilities. I agree public safety is a responsibility of the City, but it applies equally.

The consultant admitted she had limited data and did not have access to all water testing results. She mentioned state park standards but did not indicate how our water quality compared. She did not seem to know about Swan Lake State Park which has had significant duck issues- "and how has that been handled"... I asked.

The consultant also did not address any Park issues or concerns. Even without the swimming option, this is a lovely park and picnic opportunity... one of the few in all of Auburn. The city is holding up monies designated for park improvements. There should already be a plan in place to implement this spring for the park with or without swimming.

The city keeps talking about a recreation master plan... great idea, especially based on the amount of monies, over $8.6M, we've voted for recreation projects in the last 6 months. But if the City is holding up actions for one park until the recreation master plan is completed, than all parks should be treated equally. We should not be buying land and spending money on a park that is not in the comprehensive plan or the CIP document in previous years if we cannot take care of what we already have in Auburn. A recreation master plan will identify where we need our parks and what we can afford to maintain. The two parks in the Lake Auburn Watershed have not been maintained adequately for years... very sad since they are great community assets and enjoyed by all ages and abilities. The City's response has been to close one and sell off the other... really!?

So, as an Auburn resident, I urge the community to take action and get this PARK opened for Father's Day weekend.

Thank you very much to the Auburn Water District and the Lake Auburn Watershed Commission for their efforts and financial commitment to recreation in the watershed.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...