Maine official says she was told to destroy documents

Also on this page: Complaint of discrimination | Background documents and stories

A Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention director has sent a complaint of discrimination to the Maine Human Rights Commission alleging, among other things, that her bosses ordered her to shred public records to prevent the Sun Journal and the public from seeing them — and assaulted and harassed her when she refused.

The documents, she said, showed the scoring results for the 27 Healthy Maine Partnerships at the center of last summer's controversy over state funding.

"What was described as an 'objective' test was in fact manipulated so certain (Healthy Maine Partnerships) were favored over others," Sharon Leahy-Lind, director of the CDC's Division of Local Public Health, said in her complaint.

Leahy-Lind said Tuesday through her lawyer that the scoring results posted on the CDC's website differ from the scoring results she was told to destroy.

"One of the documents that my client was ordered to shred was different than the final, 'clean' so-called version that was posted to the website," said Leahy-Lind's lawyer, Cynthia Dill. "Some of the scores were different."

Those scores determined which organization got hundreds of thousands of dollars in state funding. Healthy Androscoggin in Lewiston, for example, scored surprisingly low last summer and lost $163,000, more than half of its state funding. River Valley Healthy Communities Coalition in Rumford scored surprisingly high. It was designated a lead agency based on that score and was expected to get about $129,000 more in state money, an 84 percent increase in annual state funding.

Leahy-Lind has worked for the CDC since 2002 and has served as director of the Division of Local Public Health since January 2012. In her complaint to the Maine Human Rights Commission, she said the CDC's deputy director told her to shred documents connected to funding for the Healthy Maine Partnerships program before the Sun Journal made a Freedom of Access Act request for the records. Leahy-Lind said she didn't destroy the documents because that would have been illegal.

When the Sun Journal made the Freedom of Access Act request, Leahy-Lind said the deputy director learned that she hadn't destroyed the documents and "physically assaulted me and ordered me to take the documents to my home and destroy and dispose of them there." She said she again refused and instead stored the records in files at her office.

After that, Leahy-Lind said, the deputy director and the director of the Office of Minority Health/Office of Health Equity retaliated and discriminated against her, creating a work environment so hostile that she had trouble breathing and took a medical leave.

Leahy-Lind said she was told at one point "to 'shut my f'ing mouth' by the (director of the Office of Minority Health) and not to mention the favorable treatment given to the Tribal Healthy Maine Partnerships, or face adverse employment consequences."

At another point, she said, the same director called her "a stupid-ass goody-two-shoes."

Leahy-Lind said she was repeatedly physically and verbally assaulted.

"The (deputy director) often raised her voice and screamed, while grabbing my arm or kicking me under the table. Her behavior was extremely aggressive and hostile," Leahy-Lind said in her complaint.

The CDC's deputy director is Christine Zukas and the director of the Office of Minority Health is Lisa Sockabasin. Although Leahy-Lind did not give their names in her complaint, both women have held those positions since 2006 and were there during the time outlined in the complaint.

CDC spokesman John Martins said the department does not comment on impending legal action and he could not comment on Leahy-Lind's complaint of discrimination. However, in regard to her assertion Tuesday that scoring results on the CDC's website differed from those she saw and was told to destroy, he said different working documents were circulated during the scoring process and scores may have differed from one draft to the next. But, he said, scores never changed so significantly that an organization jumped to the head of the line for greater funding and lead-agency status.

Leahy-Lind said she did not take the documents with her when she went on medical leave. In February, she said, she requested copies of specific public documents and files. She received some paperwork, but said the documents she was told to shred were missing. 

Dill said she has asked for those documents again.

Healthy Maine Partnerships organizations receive state funding to provide community-based health programs, including smoking cessation, fitness and nutrition education programs. The CDC changed funding for those organizations last summer, saying it had to streamline administration and save money.

But the change came with little notice, public input or explanation. And there seemed to be oddities. Rumford's little River Valley Healthy Communities Coalition was named to lead the entire tri-county western region, while funding for the more robust and active Healthy Androscoggin was cut in half.

The Sun Journal asked the CDC to show how it had scored each organization. State Sen. Margaret Craven, D-Lewiston, and State Rep. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston, made similar requests.

"I felt it was very important for the state of Maine to be able to demonstrate to the public that the assessments they were using were, in fact, valid, so people could have confidence that the government was evaluating programs in a fair way," Rotundo said. "It was also about wanting to make sure the public could have confidence in the work (the Department of Health and Human Services) was doing."  

The CDC initially said it could fulfill the requests, but it charged $500 to pull the data. It later agreed to waive that fee.

But while the CDC provided some information, both Craven and Rotundo said they weren't happy with the documents or the explanations given about funding. Craven said she never got the information she requested.

The pair met with CDC and DHHS officials to talk about the issue about a month ago.

"A lot of the concern had to do with the subjectivity of it," Rotundo said. "After a fair amount of conversation, there was an acknowledgement on their part that there were areas where it could have been strengthened. At the very end, however, the commissioner did say we were just going to have to agree to disagree, that she stood by the work that they had done. And stood by the assessment tool they had used."

Craven, who is a member of Healthy Androscoggin's board, said she was concerned last summer that funding was redesigned to be politically manipulative. Lewiston-Auburn's delegation is largely Democratic and members can be outspoken about Republican Gov. Paul LePage.

"I just thought the governor had a vendetta against Lewiston and against representatives from Lewiston and they knew that's what's near and dear to my heart, that Healthy Androscoggin is near and dear to my heart," Craven said.

Leahy-Lind's allegations brought up that concern again.

"This administration promised the most transparent administration ever, and in my opinion it is the least transparent that I've ever experienced in the 11 years that I've been up here," Craven said. "This is public money and the public should know how it's spent and they expect fairness."

Craven is chairwoman of the Health and Human Services Committee, which deals with the CDC and the Department of Health and Human Services. She also is a member of the Government Oversight Committee. Rotundo is a member of the Appropriations Committee.

Before sending a complaint to the Maine Human Rights Commission, Leahy-Lind said she filed a complaint within the department for investigation by a state Equal Employment Opportunity officer. She said she had also filed a workers' compensation claim because the medical condition that forced her to leave work was caused by harassment, hostility and retaliation on the job.

Leahy-Lind said she was set to return to her job when she was placed on administrative leave last week. In her complaint to the Maine Human Rights Commission, she said she was told the department placed her on leave while it investigates allegations that she shared inappropriate and/or untruthful information, including confidential information from senior management discussions.

The Maine Human Rights Commission will now review Leahy-Lind's complaint and decide whether to investigate. 

ltice@sunjournal.com

Redacted MHRC Complaint

Complaint of Discrimination

Read the complaint filed by Sharon Leahy-Lind against the Center for Disease Control.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

MARK GRAVEL's picture

People can stop this alleged

People can stop this alleged government corruption at all levels – better living through SMALLER government.

Diminish all opportunity for corruption by shrinking government all levels.

Steve  Dosh's picture

Maine official says she was told to destroy documents

Lindsay, et. al., Weds. 18:30 ? hst
Good work . Be careful . Tread lightly , Ms. Leahy-Lind . We suggest http://www.kcnlaw.com if things get real hairy . They are pros ?
Something's ƒishy in Denmark , Paris , Norway , Disgusta [ sic ] and Sweden , too . " Bearers of bad tidings often fare badly . " W. Edwards Deming , 1 9 6 2 ref: http://deming.org/
/s, Steve ., former Ombudsman for the US Federal Govt.

Mike Lachance's picture

Tying this to LePage is a

Tying this to LePage is a bit... overreaching. The accused strong-arm corrupt Administrators were from the Baldacci Administration era; therefore by logical extension (used in the article to tie it all to LePage) the evil-doers are all a part of Baldacci's evil empire, not LePage's. The bottom line is this is a Maine CDC corruption case. Blaming Baldacci or LePage is a stretch either way.

We all agree that there is corruption in Maine Govt, surely it existed in full bloom during Baldacci's 8-years as it likely continues today.

Steve  Dosh's picture

Mike ? This. .uh . .stuƒƒ .

Mike ? This. .uh . .stuƒƒ . .usually starts at the top and slides slowly down hill
" I am not a crook . " " i did not have sex with that woman ." Absolute power corrupts , absolutely & every time
Just ask former US A. G. John ' Waterboarding ' Ashcroft , " Dead Eye Dick " Halliburton® Cheney or former felon Ollie North
The buck hardly ever seems to stop there w/ your Hon Gov. , now does it ? We believe he has alienated everyone in your state government , including his own A G . Stating he will not respect their collective bargainig unit ( the union ) was dumb . Please correct us if we are wrong
hth ? /s, Steve

Tony Capola's picture

You are spot-on Frank

The problem is that many of us are NOT fooled by the antics of these so-called officials. They believe we are too stupid to see what's going on. It is obvious that LePage has no interest in doing the right and proper thing by holding his administrators feet to the fire. Apparently he has no interest in being returned to office after his first term expires; which can’t happen soon enough. When you think you're God you believe that you're not accountable to anyone.

FRANK EARLEY's picture

Oh give me a break.......................

First of all, cut back on the overly polite forms of conversation used by politicians, it's only purpose is to make just about everything sound oh, so innocent. I would like to know just who they think their trying to fool. When requesting certain documents to explain a very drastic, unexplained change in funding assessments, is pretty strait forward. John Martins explanation is nothing short of artistic. Lets break this down. (1) Different working documents being circulated. Definition: We created a bunch of possible drafts to see which one would suit our needs the most, in the final printing. In other words, the truth just didn't cut it.
(2) Score may have differed, from one draft to the next. Definition: Someone screwed up and let the cat out of the bag.
The bottom line is simple, If I had done, on a term paper in College, what they are doing with legal documents, I would have been expelled. Evidently, being elected to an office, or appointed to an important cabinet position, allows you to be pretty fancy free with the truth, After all, what the tax payer can't see, won't upset the status quo, unless of course someone with a shred of backbone decides to do the right thing.....

Tony Capola's picture

Here we go again

The alleged misdoings of Maine CDC officials read like a mystery novel.

It has become painfully apparent that the LePage administration is willing to go to great lengths to ensure that their perceived intention to do whatever they want takes priority; the public be damned...

The alleged actions by Maine CDC officials are grievous and criminal. Everything must be done to investigate the charges and, if supported, punish the officials involved.

Telling a member of Maine’s Legislature that they must “...agree to disagree” and accept the actions of appointed officials only serves to support Ms. Leahy-Lind's allegations.

If there was nothing to hide then where are the documents in question?

Jonathan Albrecht's picture

Strange

Republican administrations have never destroyed documents, doctored results, falsified scientific studies, mislead the public or hyped false conclusions for political gain. Why would they do it now? Why? oh! why?

Steve  Dosh's picture

Jon , Hump Day . .. as the

Jon , Hump Day . .. as the sarcasm drips from his lips . . ..
Q: Does the ME State Govt. perform any - any - TS work ? TS = Top Secret . A: No
There are several levels including ' Eyes Only , ' ' NIACT ,' Secret ', ' HUMINT ' [ Human Intelligence ] , Classified , L O U ( Limited Official Use ) and others . This is not secret information
Republicans use classifications to routinely obfuscate and hide information on the Federal level
Have you ever seen a ' burn bag ' n e one ? The FOIA applies here already
Shredding documents = C Y A ( Cover Yer Ass ) and everyone knows it
The likely perps in these cases aren't fooling n e one except themselves
The wheels of Justice grind slowly but ever so finely
Sarchasm -- the gulf between someone expressing it and those who do not understand it
hth ? Steve ;)

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...