Bill pushes funding for L-A passenger rail study

AUGUSTA — Advocates for a passenger rail connecting Lewiston-Auburn to Portland and possibly to points north and west asked the Legislature's Transportation Committee to get on board Tuesday.

State Sen. Margaret Craven, D-Lewiston.

A bill, LD 999, authored by Sen. Margaret Craven, D-Lewiston, directs the Maine Department of Transportation to fund or to seek funding to complete a design and engineering assessment for extending passenger service along the state-owned St. Lawrence and Atlantic rail corridor from Portland to Auburn.

Craven said she has long been "baffled" by the notion that passenger rail to Brunswick, the latest connection for the Amtrak Downeaster, was more feasible than passenger rail to Lewiston-Auburn — the state's second-largest population center.

The hope is for a station in Lewiston-Auburn to be a stop en route to Montreal. "It is not a dead end," Craven said.

Tony Donovan, president of the Maine Rail Transit Coalition, said the time was ripe and various sources of federal money could be tapped into by the Maine DOT.

"There is money out there," Donovan said. "The idea is to ask MDOT to seek these funds." 

Donovan and MDOT's Nina Fisher each detailed previous passenger rail studies but pointed to different results.

Fisher, who testified against the bill, said previous studies did not reflect enough demand for passenger service to Lewiston-Auburn.

She said a previous feasibility study of the rail upgrade needed to bring passenger rail to Auburn showed a cost of between $138 million and $158 million.

Estimated daily ridership on the line, based on recent studies, showed as few as 432 people riding the train in 2035. Daily ridership between Portland and Brunswick was estimated at more than 1,600 people, Fisher said.

She said the engineering and design work alone could cost the state between $13.2 million and $15.5 million. 

But Donovan said he believed the demand for rail was higher than MDOT's estimate. He said local meetings on the topic from Auburn to Bethel to Berlin, N.H., often had a singular theme.

"Every meeting in Lewiston-Auburn, the word is, 'We want rail,'" Donovan said. "But that cry goes all the way up that corridor."

Donovan said government has been promising passenger rail for this part of New England for decades and Craven's bill was the first step in making good on that promise.

Others testifying for the bill included Gary Higginbottom, a South Portland resident and consultant who previously worked in Auburn. He said the passenger rail between L-A and Portland would be more than just a gimmick or a tourist attraction.

"I have a very strong feeling that the two major population centers in the state of Maine need to be much more tightly integrated to move the state forward to the degree that we would like to see the economy of Maine move forward," Higginbottom said. "The two cities have been relatively isolated from one another — I say relatively isolated — in many cultural respects, in many economic respects and in many transportation respects."

He said the state-owned rail corridor linking the two cities is a "tremendous, tremendous resource." Higginbottom said the demand for mass transportation was increasing among younger Americans, especially as the cost of owning an automobile continues to climb.

The costs of maintaining and improving highway infrastructure was also growing beyond the state's ability to pay for it, and rail offered a solution, Higginbottom said.

"I would suggest one way to deal with it is to look at more efficient means of enabling people to travel, especially between the major economic centers," Higginbottom said.

Craven said her bill isn't a do-over of previous studies but a fresh look based on new information and new economic circumstances and the availability of new federal funds.

"This bill is for a different time and a different project, and as I understand it, a different model altogether," Craven said.

The committee will take up the legislation again during a work session in the weeks ahead before sending it to the full Legislature with a recommendation.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



 's picture

Not Much

The bill is for the southern part of the state to recieve something that the whole state has to pay for.

 's picture

You do realize that

You do realize that Cumberland, Androscoggin, York and Sagadahoc have,more then half of the population in the state residing in them right? I didn't even include Oxford county where the train eventually is going to pass through which would have stops (biggest one is Bethal) in it as well. Not to mention that between Cumberland, York and Androscoggin they have a large chunk of the states economy, which would be why people live there. I am sure that these areas have paid for quite a bit of things that didn't effect them.

 's picture

You must realize

You must realize that these counties should pay for what they want. If they have paid for road maintenance it hasn't hit above Bangor yet. Also just because there are more people there why should the Northern population have to pay for something they will never use.

 's picture

The fact of the matter this

The fact of the matter this is good for not only the counties in which it is directly impacting, but it is good for the State. Once you get off your high horse you will realize this. Guess where all the young Northern people move to? Either to Southern Maine where there are not only jobs, but entertainment as well or out of state. Would you rather help the State retain our greatest export/assets or further harm it because you are riding the mighty high horse?

Not to mention if you have paid attention to the developments and studies of this commuter rail, you'll realize that this is a profitable endeavor which would need little to no help from the State government.

If you feel so strong against it, do a petition and put it on the ballot. Problem with that is again the population is in the South which just means it will pass one way or another.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...