Lewiston woman, sickened by ground beef, testifies on Capitol Hill

Danielle Wadsworth vividly recalls the night in late 2011 when she awoke with agonizing stomach pain. Lying on the couch in her Lewiston home, Wadsworth was violently ill for several days with what she assumed was the flu.

2013 Supermoms Against SuperBugs
The Pew Charitable Trusts

Supermoms Against Superbugs Advocacy Day 2013 on Capitol Hill in Washington DC. Danielle Wadsworth (right) visits Capitol for Pew's Supermoms Against Superbugs event to lobby members of Congress Tuesday, April 16th, 2013.

She’d been discharged from the emergency room at a local hospital earlier that day after undergoing some tests. She decided to sleep downstairs during what she now calls “the most horrible night of my life” to avoid waking her boyfriend.

“I kept going back and forth to the bathroom every 15 minutes and finally, I said, ‘This isn’t normal. I’m not OK,’” Wadsworth said. “So I crawled upstairs, literally on my hands and knees.”

Her boyfriend brought her back to the hospital. Three days later — hooked up to intravenous drips in both arms and losing so much blood through diarrhea that doctors considered giving her a transfusion — Wadsworth received a diagnosis: salmonella.

“I was really scared … it was excruciating,” she said.

She would later learn that she was one of 16 people in seven states known to have been sickened by an antibiotic-resistant strain of the bacteria, which was linked to ground beef sold in Hannaford supermarkets in late 2011. Wadsworth, 32, suspects that tacos she ate the night before Halloween led to her illness. She’d pinched an undercooked piece of meat from the pan as she was preparing the meal, she said.

Wadsworth is now pursuing a legal claim against Hannaford.

The experience led Wadsworth to travel to Washington, D.C. this week to argue for stronger regulations to curtail the use of antibiotics in livestock farming. She took part Wednesday in “Supermoms Against Superbugs,” an initiative of the Pew Campaign on Human Health and Industrial Farming.

“I just think it’s very unnecessary, I think it should be regulated and I’m here to help with that,” Wadsworth said. “Hopefully my experience can open some eyes here in Congress.”

More than 50 mothers, fathers, physicians, farmers and others participated in the event.

The antibiotics that Wadsworth was prescribed at the hospital kicked her salmonella infection, she said. But the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warned after the 2011 salmonella outbreak that the strain’s resistance to antibiotics “may be associated with an increase in the risk of hospitalization or possible treatment failure in infected individuals.”

The startling rise of antibiotic-resistant bacteria has been called one of the world’s most pressing public health threats.

Supporters of greater regulation cite long-simmering worries that the overuse of antibiotics in livestock contributes to the rising prevalence of antibiotic-resistant “superbugs” that can infect humans. Many drugs used to treat illnesses in people, such as penicillin, are administered to livestock to keep them healthy.

More than 70 percent of all antibiotics sold in the United States are intended for livestock. In 2011, nearly 30 million pounds of antibiotics were sold in the U.S. for meat and poultry production, four times the amount sold for sick people, according to the Pew Campaign on Human Health and Industrial Farming.

While most of the country’s antibiotics are destined for animals, the role that meat consumption plays in the rise of superbugs remains fiercely debated. Discerning a connection between eating meat from animals treated with antibiotics and resistance to those drugs in humans is a complicated challenge, said Dr. Stephen Sears, Maine state epidemiologist.

Pew highlighted the spread of a deadly strain of bacteria called carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, or CRE, which has grown resistant to even the strongest antibiotics, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. That bacteria, however, is primarily associated with hospitals, not food production, Sears said.

Overall, reducing overuse of antibiotics in people, agriculture and fish farming would benefit public health, he said. Mounting evidence indicates that exposure to antibiotics through food is contributing to the increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, Sears said.

“Anytime antibiotics are used injudiciously, the potential for resistance occurs,” he said.

Overprescribing of the drugs by doctors has also been implicated. Researchers estimate that about half of all prescriptions for antibiotics may be unnecessary.

The issue has sparked legislation in Congress to beef up monitoring of antibiotic use in animals.

U.S. Rep. Louise Slaughter, D-New York, a microbiologist, has reintroduced the Preservation of Antibiotics for Medical Treatment Act, a bill that would ban nontherapeutic uses of antibiotics in food animal production.

The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, an industry trade group, has argued that the legislation would hamper veterinarians’ and livestock producers’ efforts to prevent disease in animals raised for food production.

Slaughter also has sponsored another bill, along with U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman, D-California, that would provide federal regulators with more information about the amount and type of antibiotics given to animals raised for food.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



Steve  Dosh's picture

Lewiston woman, sickened by ground beef, testifies on Capitol Hi

Ms. Wadsworth Thursday 16:40 hst
. . Sorry to hear of your discomfort and near death experience . We used to call it " Montezuma's revenge , " when we lived and worked in Guatemala
They call it ' steak tar-tare , ' in Europe ( raw meat w/ egg in Paris ) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steak_tartare
Personally, ( and only speaking for my own family) , we'll eat anything that is either very fresh or very cooked and have done so on many occasions . We have sampled dog and sea turtle , sashimi , sushi , and other such island - style delicacies
Hannaford ® should not be held liable for anything much as DeCoster would not be for salmonella - on - eggs ( chicken poo ) if they were left out too long , not washed or not prepared properly before consumption . As for your local hospital ? MRSA is avoidable w/ good hygene
Just one man's opinion
/s , the Steve Dosh ohana , Hawai'i us of a

Noel Foss's picture


"She’d pinched an undercooked piece of meat from the pan as she was preparing the meal, she said."
Case dismissed, if there's any sense left in the legal system.

Every piece of meat I've ever bought from Hannaford includes cooking and handling instructions, as well as a warning on the dangers of consuming undercooked meat.
While it is certainly problematic that the meat may have contained salmonella, it's a non-issue if you cook your food correctly. Any blame lies with her own poor judgement, not with Hannaford.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

[This comment was removed at

[This comment was removed at the request of the poster]

Martha Burnell's picture

personal responsibility

I'm sure this meat, like any other product included instructions for proper handling. These instructions invariably contain the warning not to eat it without cooking it. Since Ms. Wadsworth states that she "pinched an undercooked piece of meat," why is it Hannaford's fault that she got sick.


She cannot blame Hannaford for her shortcomings, when the blame actually belongs on the distributor that supplies Hannaford, and the FDA for letting this go through standards. Generally Hannaford lets consumers know if a product is tainted through recalls on tv or in the papers.

Steve  Dosh's picture

Bruce , Paul , Martha & Noel

Bruce , Paul , Martha & Noel , Thursday afternoon in Hawai'i
Doesn't this remind you somewhat of people who sue McDonalds ® , Wendys ® , or Burger King ® because their coffee is too hot when they drop or - p o u r - it in their laps ?
Numnuts • 
hth ? /s, Steve

Joe Gray's picture

Stop watching the mass media and learn some facts for yourself

Every time anyone compares anything to the McDonald's situation I have to say you don't know what you are talking about. Watch the documentary "Hot Coffee" and learn the truth about McDonald's and the situation with that woman. She won the court case for a reason.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

Yes, but one must not turn a

Yes, but one must not turn a blind eye to her pain and suffering.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...