Resolve on hunting and fishing amendment falls short in state Senate

AUGUSTA — A state legislative resolve that would lead to a statewide ballot question asking voters to amend the Maine Constitution to prohibit citizen initiatives on hunting and fishing regulation fell short of the two-thirds vote it needed for passage.

The measure, which would ask voters to approve a constitutional change that would leave fish and game regulation to the Legislature, gained majority support in the state Senate. But the 20-15 vote was four votes short of the two-thirds margin it needed to be sent to voters as required by the state constitution.

Lawmakers supporting the measure said special-interest groups from outside Maine were working to limit hunting rights and were willing to pour millions of dollars into citizen-backed referendums.

"I can't imagine somebody trying to come here in the state of Maine and take that heritage away from me or my grandchildren or your grandchildren, even if they don't choose to hunt or fish," said Sen. David Burns, R-Whiting. "If we don't take the appropriate precautions, we are in danger of losing that heritage."

But lawmakers opposed to the resolve said they did not support picking and choosing which laws citizens could affect with ballot initiatives.

Sen. Anne Haskell, D-Portland, said while those in favor of the measure intended it to protect bear hunting in Maine, which has been targeted before by animal rights groups, that wasn't the aim of the measure.

"It limits the citizen initiative here in the state of Maine and we have allowed the citizen initiative process and it is my opinion that that should not be restricted for any one group, whether I agree with group or don't agree with that group," Haskell said.

The fear that well-funded outside groups would advocate for change in Maine and succeed was a fair issue to raise, Haskell said.

"And if you want to look at multimillion-dollar lobbying groups in this chamber, you don't have to go very far around the room to see more than one," Haskell said.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.




yes let our little maroons

yes let our little maroons rip more of our constitution, why not after all it is not like the times of yore when they actually feared the reprisal of the publics wraith, now the public is so fractured and subdued by our own government they know they have free rein to rip more and more of our rights.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...