LePage vetoes energy bill, but House quickly overrides veto

AUGUSTA — Gov. Paul LePage late Wednesday night vetoed a comprehensive energy bill, but the House a few minutes later overrode the veto by a vote of 121-11 after only short discussion.

The Senate is expected to take up its override vote June 26.

Among other things, the bill expands New England’s natural gas infrastructure, boosts funding for energy efficiency, directly lowers businesses' electricity costs and makes it more affordable for residents to abandon oil heat.

The bill passed the Senate 28-7 and the House 131-7 earlier this month. Both tallies would meet the threshold to override a LePage veto if all lawmakers stick to their original votes.

Lawmakers on the Legislature’s Energy Committee over the past few months assembled elements from more than 12 pieces of legislation into a comprehensive energy bill that contained elements favored by Republicans and Democrats. Some of the elements originated in legislation proposed by LePage.

Sen. John Cleveland, D-Auburn, the Senate chairman of the Energy Committee and one of the bill's chief sponsors, called the veto "catastrophic," coming in the final minutes before the measure would have become law without LePage's signature.

The veto also came as lawmakers were barrelling toward adjournment for the current legislative session. They will return next week to finish their work, including veto override votes.

House and Senate lawmakers who had worked on the energy measure began an impromptu and near-immediate meeting on the Senate floor just after the veto message was received in the Legislature.

"It's never over until it's over," said Rep. Barry Hobbins, D- Scarborough, the House chairman of the Energy Committee and another sponsor of the bill. "We will just keep working it and trying to get it through."

Lobbyists who had been working on the bill for clients, including Maine's paper industry, offered their thanks to the lawmakers involved in the process.

Rep. Ken Fredette, R-Newport, the chief GOP sponsor of the bill and the House minority leader, called the legislation "the most significant energy bill in a half-century to be passed by the Maine Legislature."

LePage objected throughout the process to parts of the legislation, including a provision that would allow the Maine Public Utilities Commission, rather than the Legislature, to set the systems benefit charge that’s added to nearly all electric bills to fund conservation and efficiency programs.

He pushed lawmakers to add provisions, including a slate of changes to Maine’s Wind Energy Act that would erase the state’s wind energy generation goals from state law.

In the end, LePage said he wouldn’t support the measure unless lawmakers passed legislation that would have required the PUC to reopen its review process for offshore wind energy projects and to consider an offshore wind energy pilot project developed at the University of Maine for support from electric ratepayers.

LePage has strongly opposed a PUC decision made earlier this year that awards ratepayer support to Statoil North America, a Norwegian company, for a pilot offshore wind energy project in which the company would moor four floating turbines in federal waters off the Maine coast.

Lawmakers who were instrumental in assembling the bill worked into the night Wednesday trying to develop language the governor found acceptable. Evidently, LePage wasn’t satisfied.

“I gave my word that if that one additional provision was included, I would let this bill go into law without my signature,” LePage wrote in his veto message. “There are many things we can disagree on, but we should all agree that our flagship university deserves the opportunity to compete on a level playing field.”

As the energy bill is currently written, it allows the PUC to consider the University of Maine for ratepayer support if the Statoil project doesn’t secure necessary federal financing, if the company opts out of its Maine project or if the company doesn’t meet construction deadlines. The bill language specifically allows the University of Maine project to be considered for ratepayer support.

If the Senate also votes to override LePage’s veto, it would be the first time this legislative session that a LePage veto was overridden.

Although the governor vetoed the legislation, he is still keenly interested in parts of it, including a section that aims to spur pipeline construction in New England by allowing the state to buy up to $75 million in new pipeline capacity.

LePage recently met with representatives from Kinder Morgan, a major pipeline developer planning a pipeline expansion in northern Massachusetts, to discuss a potential investment by Maine ratepayers in the new pipeline.

Cleveland said early Thursday there was some question of whether the Senate could produce the votes to override the veto.

Cleveland said that while the measure was being held up by issues regarding the University of Maine and offshore wind development, the natural gas components of the bill were important to more than 10,000 Maine workers in the paper industry who would benefit from less costly electricity from the expanded use of natural gas in Maine.

sthistle@sunjournal.com

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

Kelsie Chamberlain's picture

Really

Why can we not just do what is right for Mainers, instead of special interest and political gain! Why do we always try to bundle instead of single legislation? Can we simply not agree on whats best for Maine, or are all politicians just to darn stubborn! As a reminder, it takes all up in Augusta to do whats right, not just one.

JERRY ARIPEZ's picture

Veto master; simple minded fools way out

It is simple to veto all the bills, since he cannot govern. He doesn't want to take responsibility of Maine's business, since the majority of the people are there to make laws that he has sworn to object to any Democratic ideas and he runs away from doing the peoples business.

Time for this hack wantabe to be put back on the streets so Maine can grow....

ANTHONY NAZAR's picture

Perhaps

it's time for Maine voters to remember how LePage got where he is.

While no great fan of the Democratic Party's alternative, Mitchell would have governed the state, not vetoed everything in sight just because she didn't agree with it.

Eliott Cutler is to Maine as Ralph Nader was to the United States in the 2000 election.

LePage may not be the worst governor in the country, but he's a contender for that dubious honor. Let's return him to Marden's as defective merchandise.

AL PELLETIER's picture

Tony, speaking of Marden's

When Lepage was the general manager his chief responsibility was dealing with the employees. Although Marden's offers it's full time employees health insurance many simply can't afford it, even though Marden's plan is as good as other large retail stores.
You would think that with his background he would have the compassion to see that these employees, who can't afford the Marden plan, would have an alternative for health insurance they could afford.
For this guy a VETO is far easier then compassion.

Claudette Therriault's picture

Al, compassion??

Lepage does not know the meaning of the word. He is heartless.

ANTHONY NAZAR's picture

left out

insert "100%" between agree and with in the second sentence.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...