Heroin busts, overdoses on the rise

One man was found in bed, dead at 39, in the early hours of the morning. Three sleeping children didn't know about daddy's drug habit.

Another was 32 and found dead, at home, in the bathroom last month.

A third was 62, also found dead in bed by family.

Lewiston and Auburn police are investigating the three possible fatal heroin overdoses between March and May, waiting for toxicology results and possible charges. Police say the deaths are too spread out to have been one bad batch.

But then, it's heroin. It's all bad.

And it's on the rise in Maine, again.

Heroin killed three times as many people in 2012 than it did in 2011 in Maine, according to numbers from the Office of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services.

Maine Drug Enforcement agents around the state made 99 heroin busts in the first five months of 2013 after counting 127 for all of last year.

Numbers also show more heroin addicts checking into treatment here. One-quarter report they've shared needles. The state epidemiologist worries about users spreading hepatitis and HIV and catching infections that can go straight for the heart. Law enforcement officers worry about patting down suspects and getting pricked.

"We're seeing a lot of heroin," said Dr. Michael E. Kelley, chief of psychiatry at St. Mary's Regional Medical Center in Lewiston, which has inpatients and outpatients in its chemical dependency detox program.

At the root is economics, with deadly implications.

About 15 years ago, Kelley said, doctors received a subtle message regarding pain meds: Start prescribing.

"The federal government put a mandate of 'adequate pain management' onto every doctor and would actually start citing doctors during their surveys if their patients said they weren't getting enough pain control," Kelley said. "It turned a lot of doctors' management of pain around, from, 'I don't want to give narcotics to patients' to, 'Oh, my god, I better give them narcotics, otherwise I'm going to get in trouble with the federal government.'"

He added, "(It) sort of changed a lot of the way we prescribe, unfortunately. Now we're swinging in the other direction."

With safeguards like the Maine Prescription Monitoring Program, doctors are tightening up potential drug abuse and diversion (patients taking pills and selling them on the street).

The number of prescriptions for oxycodone and other synthetic opiates in Maine dropped from 391,972 in 2011 to 379,659 in 2012 and illegal oxy has become more expensive.

Heroin has stepped in as a cheaper alternative. Cheaper but inconsistent.

"There's no such thing as 'good' heroin," said Matt Cashman, MDEA supervisor for Androscoggin, Oxford and Franklin counties. "You may be using three bags of heroin at 25 percent purity levels and you're normally getting your supply from a specific individual, but that individual may be out and you've got to go to alternative B and you buy the same three bags of heroin and the purity levels are now 50 percent, so realistically you're doing twice the dosage.

"That's where you're getting your overdoses," he said.

Breaking point

In Maine, heroin was blamed for the deaths of roughly six people in 2010 and 2011, according to an April report for the Maine Office of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services.

In 2012, that jumped more than threefold to 21 deaths. (The figure is based on heroin being the primary drug or one of the primary drugs.)

Methadone, oxycodone and benzodiazepines killed more people, but those numbers have declined or held fairly steady the past three years.

The death toll for the current year isn't clear yet.

So far in 2013, more than 1,100 people have sought treatment for heroin addiction, compared to 2,241 for all of last year.

Guy Cousins, director of the Office of Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services, said people arrive at heroin through different avenues. Some start with alcohol, then use marijuana and cocaine, ultimately trying cocaine or heroin intravenously. Others start with a prescription opiate, get hooked and when that source dries up, they turn to the street.

Black-market oxy pills are selling for $30 to $45 each, heroin for $25 to $30 for a 0.1-gram bag, Cashman said.

Addicts can hold down jobs and raise families, Cousins said, but often not for long.

"At some point, there's typically a break point where the amount of money one needs to be able to maintain staving off withdrawal symptoms requires a tremendous amount of assets and juggling," he said. "It's an eventuality that at some point, that's not going to be working anymore."

People enter heroin treatment both voluntarily and not, at an average age of 31.6 for women and 33.2 for men. This year, more are reporting that they have dependents (845 year-to-date compared to 636 last year) and more are reporting that they're pregnant (12 percent year-to-date compared to 9 percent last year).

"Every time I admit somebody I'll say, 'What do you use?' and they start listing the Percocets, the Vicodins, the oxycodones and the OxyContins, and heroin has joined the list on a significant portion of my patients now," Kelley said.

Five years ago, there weren't nearly as many.

It's not just a matter of using, it's also how.

According to intake numbers, 83 percent of people admitted for heroin treatment say they only use the drugs by needle. One-third of them have shared needles.

"The hepatitis rates in Maine for IV drug users was up way beyond 30 percent of all IV drug abusers last survey I saw," Kelley said. "Somebody who ends up dying from these illnesses ends up costing the system tremendously. Liver failure is a horrible way to die, and unfortunately a tremendously expensive way to die because it's not a quick death."

Risks extend beyond users: Hepatitis B and C and HIV can be caught by needle and spread by sex. "There's a significant societal issue with that," he said.

State epidemiologist Stephen Sears said there's also the heroin itself to worry about.

"Heroin is not sterile," Sears said. "(Dealers) are often mixing it with something that is not sterile. The people who do it don't really know about sterile techniques. You can see infections of the skin and then you can see bacterial infections; they're potentially injecting bacteria."

'Maybe we'll get lucky'

Roy McKinney, state director of the Maine Drug Enforcement Agency, said heroin gets to Maine along the same smuggling lines as cocaine and marijuana, up from South America. It's diluted several times along the way by traffickers looking to increase profits.

Dealers frequently drive from big New England cities, selling along the I-95 corridor.

"They'll come up, sell the drugs, then go back with the money to their source of supplies and then they turn right back around," McKinney said. "A single bag in southern New England may sell for as low as $5; they may get $25 to $30 up here for that one bag. It has to do with supply. They'll charge whatever they feel they can get away with. Of course, the more you purchase at any one time, the better the price is going to be, just like in any business."

To afford it, Cashman said, users are known to resort to prostitution, theft and burglary. 

"There's always a direct correlation with the number of our property crimes in relation to our drug problem," Auburn police Deputy Chief Jason Moen said. "A lot of the burglaries that we experience and a lot of the motor vehicle burglaries we experience, it's all driven by drug addiction for the most part. They're stealing stuff to sell or pawn to get the money for their dope."

The 32-year-old who died in Auburn of a suspected heroin overdose on May 4 had few contacts with police. That wasn't the case in Lewiston.

The 39-year-old man who died March 19 and the 62-year-old who died March 28 "both had several involvements with the police, including past drug violations," Lewiston Lt. Michael McGonagle said.

The state's record with the drug makes the future difficult to predict. According to admissions, 2,040 people sought heroin treatment in 2003 before that number dipped. It rose to 2,247 in 2009, dipped, then rose again last year.

"I think we've done a much better job at controlling the narcotics coming out of the doctor's offices," Kelley said. "Right now, there's a bump in heroin. It could go one of two ways: Theoretically, it's easier to start with a pill when you're young. If you're 19 and for the first time somebody offers you a pill, 'Oh, yeah, I'll take a pill, it's a medicine.'

"That same 19-year-old might not grab a needle and shove it in his arm," he said. "So maybe we'll get lucky, who knows. Maybe the next five or seven years pass and maybe less people will get addicted. That would be a blessing, as the pills become harder and harder to come by."


What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



Thomas Jenkins's picture

I guess I am not as

I guess I am not as articulate as some of the other folks who respond to these articles.

As far as I am concerned one more overdose that results in a death is just one less person on the welfare rolls.

I have worked one full-time job and two part-time jobs, all at the same time for the past 31 years. I have no interest in paying any more taxes than I do, especially tax money that goes towards welfare in any form.

Richard Lumb's picture

Starting at the Finish Line

And so it goes. When government, primarily enforcement, is the single most prominent reaction to the substance abuse problem, it will fail to reduce consumption, as nearly 50 years of experience shows. This country has spent multiple billions on enforcement, prosecution and incarceration, and while it does what it does, we have not experienced reduction or change of attitude since the 1960's kick off of the “War on Drugs”.

And importantly, we have dumped this gigantic social problem on our law enforcement folks, walked away, and complain things are not working. We have not given them parallel systems and help needed, and given that fact, shame on us! We are not true partners with law enforcement and standing in the shadows pointing fingers is a useless gesture.

Want to fix this social problem; it will take a massive effort from all quarters of society. We seem to like the pain, ruined lives, and deaths, at a cost we do not fathom. Truth is, as a family among many in Maine that has experienced what improper use of drugs can do, we are saddened and angry at what happens to people (loved ones), who cannot resist the pull of substances that take control of life.

If we add the cost of services, crime, criminal justice, medical, lost wages, damage to families, deaths, harm of substance abuse, social services, wasted lives, lost income, etc.; we would gasp at the total dollars. As we do not track costs in their totality, so we remain ignorant of the depth of harm, thus dampening the true problem.

If money is to be made on dependence, the flow of illegal or prescription drugs to those addicted will never diminish. Actually, it appears to be a more serious social problem today and escalating. Until we change focus from arresting away the problem to include, in a substantial way, an applied education, prevention and treatment balance, we are continuously starting at the finish line.

No one wins that race!!

Ed McCaffrey's picture

If we just stop treating drug abusers

Eventually they will all kill themselves off and the problem will have solved itself. if they're all dead, there is no market for the dealers and therefore no need to spend billions fight a stupid drug war.
I know it seems terribly callous, but the cost of treatment programs, most of which have miserable success rates, far outweigh the the returns. http://www.soberforever.net/currenttreatdoesnt.cfm
The paper in the link, a well researched paper, suggests that addicts fare better without treatment when they try to deal with their addictions on their own terms, and that they are more likely to be successful in staying sober or drug free. What it all comes down to is that usually, only the people who actively seek help with their addictions generally succeed in winning the battle, while people who are mandatory placed in programs have a very high probability of failure because they didn't want to quit to begin with. The money spent on treatment is , more often than not, wasted.
Logic would suggest that if you allow a defective set of genes (in this case those prone to addiction) to die off through time and attrition, eventually there will be no more addicts. In attempting to "cure" a genetic abnormality, we are, in fact poking evolution in the eye. Survival of the fittest, as it was meant to be, has given way to a society that is killing itself with its need to protect genetic lines that in nature, would have died out long ago.

Richard Greene's picture

Our society seems to be less caring than I have ever imagined

I can't believe people have become so callous to their fellow human beings. If people are really that uncaring, just know that it's the damage drugs do to our society and to peoples lives that are the real problem. Child abuse and neglect, crime, medical costs, loss of productivity rob us all. That is the alternative to treatment.

Treatment is expensive but addiction is far more costly. I know a number of people who have received treatment and go on to live productive lives.

Prevention is the most effective thing we can do. Keep kids engaged, give them things to do, support their goals and aspirations, fund education, provide recreation, the arts and sports programs. Teach them how to handle their feelings and deal with uncomfortable one.

I shudder to think that the media is creating such callousness for our fellow human beings. It's clear that programs like FOX news have studied the science of hate to anger people into political action. Right now, this hatred is as big of a threat to society as the drug problem in my opinion.


It's not a war on drugs, it's

It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on druggies. An easy target and completely ineffective. It makes the Fox viewers happy though.

I disagree that the Federal Government should never be in our lives. That's a knee-jerk reaction and too simplistic. The populist view.

Jeff Kelley's picture


By far Lewiston has the worst drug problem because the feds forced doctors to prescribe drugs that people abused, now these people are sent to methadone clinics which we as taxpayers have to foot the bill. the fed should leave medicine to the doctors and let the professional's
to handle our health care

Jeff Kelley's picture


Anytime the federal government is involved in our lives you can be sure it is not for our own good leave the doctors alone they know what is best for their patient's


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...