Rumford Finance Committee chooses same budget amounts as selectmen

Terry Karkos/Sun Journal

Rumford Finance Committee members Ted Hotham, left, and Jeremy Vashaw listen Wednesday night as Public Works Superintendent Andy Russell answers Vashaw's question about possible split shifts.

RUMFORD —  Six Finance Committee members mirrored on Wednesday night what selectmen did Monday night in approving amounts for eight municipal budgets.

Terry Karkos/Sun Journal

Rumford Public Works Superintendent Andy Russell answers a question Wednesday night from the Finance Committee during a budget meeting.

All but one article was approved unanimously.

By 6-0 votes, the committee OK'd raising and appropriating:

* $655,000 for the Fire Department budget.

* $738,774 for the Police Department.

* $922,030 for Public Works.

* $652,683 for Public Safety.

* $78,000 for General Assistance.

* $799,080 for General Government.

* $423,000 for Capital Accounts.

By a 5-1 vote, the committee approved $1,390,700 for Unclassified Accounts. Member Richard Greene dissented.

The proposed municipal budget was initially rejected by voters June 11. Then, eight of 12 budget articles were rejected July 23, forcing this week's meetings by selectmen and the Finance Committee.

At Wednesday night's Finance Committee meeting, fire Chief Bob Chase briefed the board on Monday night's selectmen meeting, then suggested they approve the same number as selectmen approved. The committee did without discussion.

Police Chief Stacy Carter did the same for his budget, saying that it would allow him to keep his second detective, who is paid hourly instead of salaried.

"It's important to get one number on the ballot to get a budget passed," he said.

In the past two elections on the budget, voters have a choice between the selectmen's recommendation and the Finance Committee's recommendation when they differ, and a third choice of neither of the above. More people have been voting for neither than voting for one of the two recommendations, defeating the article.

After voting, the committee moved on to Public Works. Committee member Jeremy Vashaw asked Public Works Superintendent Andy Russell how his department would work with the selectmen's new recommendation.

"We'll work with it as best we can," Russell said. "The hard part of this past winter is we had a lot of storms on weekends."

He said the $922,030 budget recommendation will mean reducing the amount of sand and salt that he buys. He is also contemplating taking a mechanic out of the shop and putting him to work driving a truck.

When asked if he would consider splitting his staff, Russell said that would only mean he'd either have five men plowing snow for four hours or 10 men plowing for two hours to cover the whole town.

He also said that his hands are tied by the union contract, which allows workers to take weekends off if they choose.

Russell said he doesn't favor splitting shifts.

Committee member Ted Hotham asked Russell if he is confident that his crews can keep the roads safe with the reduced budget.

"We should be, but it's going to be difficult, especially if we have a lot of freezing rain storms," Russell said.

Town Manager Carlo Puiia spoke for the rest of the budgets, briefing the committee on what led selectmen to recommend their numbers, and fielded questions.

When the committee reached the Unclassified Accounts budget, Puiia was asked if selectmen added money to help the Greater Rumford Community Center as the committee did previously for the July 23 vote.

Puiia said no.

Gary Dolloff, chairman of the community center's board of directors, then briefed the committee on current fundraisers, saying that since voters rejected funding the center, they have raised around $6,000. However, layoffs begin in two weeks. Then the center will reorganize and run on a volunteer basis.

He said they've got grant applications out and are trying to raise money. Dolloff then told the committee to go with the selectmen's amount, but add $124,300 into the contingency fund.

Hotham then asked Puiia to look into making the community center a part of the town and not fund it through the initiated articles process.

"Too many people have told me they didn't recognize the 'No' vote was a death knell for the community center," Hotham said.

He said the center is a valuable asset to the town and needs to be saved. He then motioned to go with the selectmen's amount without adding money into the contingency account and that was approved.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.




what a surprise! so now the people have a 6.9 million dollar budget to vote on. It was 6.5 by the selectboard for the 2nd vote and the people said no. Now it's 6.9. SURPRISE!SURPRISE. ! Let's hope that the polls are open 9 to 8 this time. I urge people to see that your vote NO means nothing. Why would anyone want to open a business and move here with such high taxes. Look at the vacant businesses on Congress street. Four directly across from the town hall. The Selectboard want you to give up your vote of NO . Thinking that we want it done and over with. Stay strong. VOTE NO when the time comes. Don't give up and give in like the RSU10 vote went.

 's picture

are you freakin kidding

come on frank, please dont tell me that all this bull crap you keep whining about is all over $75.00 a year in taxes per household
either you really dont have a life or you just really enjoy whining. Im sure that most of the working families in rumford can afford the extra money I might be wrong , but I for one like the fact that for a small fee we have the grcc and black mountain that our children can use. you on the other hand would like the people to stop paying their share so there is absolutely nothing for our kids to have in this town , all this is going to do is force the WORKING people to move , so all that is left are the whine bags and all the welfare who pay no taxes anyway , so by save rumford you mean drive all the tax payers out you are doing a good job keep it up

Brad Gallant's picture


It seems, Frank, we could be operating on a 6.5 million dollar budget should the "Save Rumford" group had chose to compromise AT ALL. Mark Belanger came out and supported the selectmen's budget after the finance committee set their number after the first vote failed. If the weight of the group would have been thrown behind that number It would have been a good step to your goal, but instead you all chose to shoot yourselves in the foot by insisting on sticking with your immovable number. You went even further at the selectmen's meeting.You stuck to you guns, I will give you that. Mr. Adley proposed a number near the selectmen's number so this time the vote would only have one, smaller number...but you insisted on trying to cut further. The people voted to pass a budget Frank...I know you don't want to see that but that is what happened. I think you and the "Save Rumford" group have shown you do not want what the majority of people want what you want...period.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...