AUBURN — Parents who complained that not enough
was done to protect their two first-graders from sexual assault by another
student met with the Auburn School Committee on Wednesday night.
The closed-door meeting was called to
look into parents' concerns about steps the school took, or didn't take,
to keep students safe.
Meanwhile, educators from Advocates for Children, a nonprofit organization dedicated to preventing child abuse,
are teaching sexual abuse prevention to first- and second-graders at
Sherwood Heights. Advocates for Children provides the service every
year, but the agency is acting "in part in response to this
incident," Executive Director Betsy Norcross Plourde said Wednesday.
The
issue came to light on Oct. 7 when a mother
spoke to the Auburn School Committee about the safety of her son and
others at Sherwood Heights.
"On Sept. 17 my 6-year-old son, who
is in first grade, was sexually assaulted by a fellow classmate in the
boys' bathroom," the woman said through tears.
Three weeks later she said, "I don't believe that the representatives of the
Auburn School Department and Sherwood Heights have sufficiently
provided a safe environment for the community's children."
After
talking to numerous officials and not getting the attention she said
the issue deserved, the woman told School Committee members that she had to
resort to a public forum "hopefully to prevent another family from
experiencing our nightmare."
The alleged perpetrator, also a
first-grader, has been moved to a different classroom, she said. "As
far as I know, none of the parents in the new classroom are aware of the
change or risk to the children."
The mother said she feels for
the first-grader who allegedly assaulted her son. "Something obviously
was done wrong to this poor child. Unfortunately, he can't be my
concern."
She said her son was one of two victims.
School
officials "apparently did nothing to warn the police or address the
behavior," she said. "The other victimized family was only made aware
of the issues after my son's assault."
On Oct. 7 she asked for the executive session to look at how the school and the school department handled the incident.
The
other parent also said on Oct.
7 that the issue was poorly handled. Since his son was assaulted, "you have
done nothing but try to hide this thing," he said. "This school has
violated my son's civil rights and the other little boy's. They've done
nothing but sweep this under the table and bully us. I
am not a man that's going to be bullied by anyone. I am going to
protect my son and the other children involved."
Auburn
Superintendent Tom Morrill responded by saying any allegation is
"thoroughly investigated" by many, including the school resource
officer, who works for the Auburn Police Department.
"We contact
various agencies," Morrill said. "In this case, we continue to contact Advocates for
Children to make sure their personal safety program is delivered to our
students."
Advocates for Children will speak about
sexual abuse prevention at Sherwood Heights' upcoming PTO meeting, the
superintendent said. That meeting is scheduled for Nov. 10.
Morrill
said he was not at liberty to talk about specifics in the case, "but it
has been taken seriously." The school has responded with the
appropriate actions and involved the appropriate parties. "Also, we can
never forget it's also our responsibility to educate all children,"
Morrill said.
The father of one of the alleged victims disagreed, calling Morrill's response "a
bunch of crap. ... You have not taken the appropriate actions. You can
talk about plans and placement and programs and all this nice,
touchy-feely stuff and hide behind all these laws, but your school
failed to protect my kid, bottom line."




Tron Oh boy there you are,
Tron Oh boy there you are, just doing what you do best. Anyway I'm a parent of a 5 year old at Sherwood Heights and I for one, NEVER got the Letter! Nor did my daughters mother. So no, we ALL were not contacted on the current events going on in S.H. As a matter of fact I have to hear about this in the NEWSPAPER!?!?!?!?! Pretty unbelievable and totally, TOTALLY takes all TRUST I may of had for the Principal of said school. And from what I have read from some pretty angry parents this is not the first time this principal has hidden/ covered up things that might look negative on ones resume. Well with any luck we can all raise some good questions at that PTC in November and believe me I'll be there. Hey maybe we'll get lucky enough and that principal who is obviously not well at facing her problems head can do just what she didn't want to do in the first place. Add this latest episode to her Resume she will hopefully be filling out in the after math of loosing her job. UNREAL to say the least! I'm gonna feel real safe dropping her off Monday morning. Oh and to the parents one more little tidbit of the shananegins going on there at Sherwood Heights. last week my daughter came home and reported that a couple young kids were seen by her at recess kicking each other in the private's. And not a teacher knew about it.......
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.momof2 My child is a first
momof2
My child is a first grader at Sherwood Heights and this is the first I have heard of this and it's really disturbing. I did NOT get a letter, phone call or any other mean of communication from the school re: this incident. HIPAA laws would NOT apply to this. That's a MEDICAL law. This is the first year my son is in this school and already I'm wanting to take him out and go to a different school just to protect my child. Just a few days ago a jacket of my childs was stolen from the school and I did notify the school about that. If the school isn't willing to talk to parents about what's going on in a school that we taxpayers and parents fund then how am I going to feel safe that my child is safe and his well being as well as the well being of others are being taken care of. Kudos to the parents for coming forward and speaking out about this. Without YOUR information then the rest of us parents whose child goes to this school would of been in the dark. For the boy in question, I would suggest DHHS go in to find out what kind of home life he's having and get him counseling because this child has been victimized in someway too. He's still a small child and whatever trauma he has endured needs to be dealt with now before it may get worse as he gets older.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.HIPPA laws do not apply, but
HIPPA laws do not apply, but FERPA laws do... Student Confidentiality Under the Family Education Rights Privacy Act (FERPA)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Some of us that have been
Some of us that have been sexually abused as children are no longer interested in sex. It is only a lifetime of pain and dysfunctional relationships. There's no excuse for any type of abuse because a parent or relative forced their animalistic ways upon you. Fire the superintendent and demolish the school. Or vise versa.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This is yellow journalism at
This is yellow journalism at its finest hour. Sun Journal, you should be ashamed of yourself for such misleading reporting. A first grader is not a sexual predator but rather a poor victim of some horrible event. You can sell papers without lying.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This is yellow journalism at
This is yellow journalism at its finest hour. Sun Journal, you should be ashamed of yourself for such misleading reporting. A first grader is not a sexual predator but rather a poor victim of some horrible event. You can sell papers without lying.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.so i have read down thru all
so i have read down thru all these postings. some i agree with some i dont. what gives any person here or anywhere to make comment that a child could be lieing about this? talk about making a child feel as if its not safe to tell a grown up if something like this happens to them. geesh how many of us as parents tell our children that no matter what its not ok for anyone to touch you in anyway that makes you feel uncomfortable?! weither it be a friend or family or teacher or dr. we all tell them that! im most certain that these children were questioned very heavily before their parents went out and pointed fingers. coming from experience of being molested when i was 4yrs old. if someone told me are you sure your not lieing cause it sounds like something off a tv show i would have been so afraid to tell anyone anything ever again. do i think that the news could have done this article differently? Yes. but i also think the school should have sent home something descrete that said there has been an incodent and if u feel that your child may have been involved to please contact the school. There is absolutely no reason why parents should have found out in the paper. all in all there was so many things that could have been done differently but fact is that its done and now its up to auburn school and apd to make sure that all the children of that school and all schools are safe from here on out!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I think you misunderstood
I think you misunderstood what I said and how I said it. I simply said that a child of this age could lie about things because all children do. So basically you are saying that one child is lying (the one that said nothing happened) and the other is not. How do you come to that conclusion? This was exactly the point I was making; people make decisions on their beliefs and not actual facts. Secondly I never said this sounded like a tv show, but this is EXACTLY like what happened on this cartoon. Maybe the boy is not lying but with all of these things on tv especially as of late it would be simple to take these things and make up stories. Again I am not saying that this is the case but be open minded. I am sorry about what happened to you when you were a child but seriously apples and oranges. They are not the same.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Well first off I must say
Well first off I must say that I understand why the parents of the child feel the way they do; but the fact remains that at this point it is a he said she said deal. One child says it didnt happen and the other says it did, and no one outside of that room knows the actual truth. Unfortunitly children at that age do lie and that is a fact. The parent that decided it did happen can not be 100% positive that it happened they were not there, just as the parents of the other child may think it didnt as they were also not there. The fact that the parent whom are interviewed and not identified in the publication continues to slander the school officials NEVER gave these officials enough time to do their jobs before going to the media. As a parent I too am not pleased with the way the school has been run for the last two years; but I do know they are doing the best they can with people they have on staff. My point is I dont run to the media unless I am 100% certain that all of the facts are there which this parent has not done. Now you have one child who has been moved and even though it has been kept quiet who the child is kids ask questions and will when a new child enters the classroom this far in the year. Parents will ask their children if any new person has come in the class and the ones that say yes will be told why. Now the child that was moved will always be associated with this for their entire educational career even if he was innocent. Honestly the whole story sounds like a South Park episode where this happened. Let me ask you sir, has your child ever watched South Park?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I am proud of the parents
I am proud of the parents for going to the media. Are you kidding?? I have dealt with the school committee as well as the school and I will be the first to say they really are good at avoiding issues with parents. When matters are brought to their attention they are not very good with getting back to you and informing you of any new commings or talk about issues!!! So I can completely relate to these parents. As a parent when you feel you aren't being heard and it involves your children you as a parent will do anything to get that addressed. If that means going to the media to make the Auburn School Committee realize they don't really have the childrens best interest at hand then so be it. If I were in those parents shoe's I would not only go to the paper, but I would go to the channel 6,8,13. I would go to State Legistration. I would email as many Big time news media to inform them! Our children are precious and we need to go through mountains to keep them safe. And I am not just talking about the 2 children who were victim to this, I am also talking about the child who is accused. He is just as much a victim as the other 2 boys!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.There is not enough
There is not enough information for everyone to be making judgements here. Parents are up in arms because they weren't told about the situation, which is still unclear. Education about sexual abuse, molestation, assault and any other part of sexuality needs to begin at home and continue to be an open topic at home. Of course the parents weren't named to protect the children. A 17 year old's name is not listed when he/she has committed a real obvious crime to protect them since they are minors. Come on, people....don't jump to conclusions that are so high you'll never get back down. Don't terrify the kids who were or were not involved in this. No matter what the school officials had done, it would have been wrong to someone. I have no clue how homosexuality fell into this pot of confusion, but step back and use some common sense. I would bet that nearly 100% of adults had some curiousity about sex issues in the minds of children and acted upon those questions years ago. Did that make you a pervert or homosexual? No---you would have been perverts or homosexuals whether or not that had happened and there is no connection between perverts and homosexuals. In the animal kingdom there are homosexuals and do you you think it was because some little bear came along and touched another little bear? Nope, it is biological. Stay involved with your kids and teach them what they need to know about good touch and bad touch, curiousity and answer their questions honestly. Allow them that dignity.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I have been attempting to be
I have been attempting to be extemely sensitive to the sensibilities and potential age of the readers, however some of our participants do not seem to get it so I must go a bit further with my explaination and hope they do. "Touch" here would be skin to skin contact or contact of one body part of one person to the body part of the other. From my past professional experience, I do not believe that either of these are what we are talking about in this case. I will only add to help those still in the dark a reminder of a comment made by a much earlier writer to the effect that 6 year olds do not have the physical development to perform. I hope this will suffice.
If we could only return to common sense...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.iangol.....this was not
iangol.....this was not saying it was acceptable...if so it MIGHT be homosexual....possibly the child is ...a homosexual....( I personally think it was not.. it could have been curiosity or he had been assaulted etc) homosexuals don't just turn into being "that" way after being taught...so he might have a desire to interact with another of the same sex..however first grade is pretty young for acting on sexual desire. I don't believe it is a choice..why would anyone want to be ridiculed about their sexuality every day of their life? BTW I am not homosexual..but I do know several people that are. I know some who hate that they are...and who wish they were not.
I also agree the child needs help that did the assault as well as the one assaulted. I think open communication with parents is wonderful as well. If some people had open communication with their children they might learn that their child is homosexual if it happens in your backyard you might see homosexuality in a different light.
Just my opinion....
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.If the child did indeed
If the child did indeed sexually assault the other one, all possible steps should be taken to see that the assaulted child doesn't suffer lasting affects, to protect others from the perpertrator and to get the perpertrator the help he needs. Parents should be warned of any danger.
If this was just a case of natural curiousity, the parents should each have a little informative talk with their child, and other parents with an interest should be told that it was just an innocent event so that their minds will be relieved.
That's my opinion.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I am the mother of a 1st
I am the mother of a 1st grader at Sherwood Heights and it really bothered me that I had to hear about this incident in the newspaper and not from the school officals. What is the school department and the school doing to protect my child and the well being of the other students at Sherwood? This type of incident needs to be addressed when it happens not a month later, why did the school not inform parents about this? Things need to change, our children need to feel safe and protected.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I am sorry but Sherwood
I am sorry but Sherwood Heights DID inform parents about the situation to the best of their ability without breaking HIPPA LAWS. They sent out letters in the mail to everyone in the school and I know this because I am a parent and I received one.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.HIPAA laws? How do HIPAA
HIPAA laws? How do HIPAA laws come into play in this situation? HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) protects people from having their health information released without their knowledge or consent. This is just basic Rights of Minors to not have the students or their parents names released.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Students are protected under
Students are protected under FERPA laws. Student Confidentiality Under the Family Education Rights Privacy Act (FERPA)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sorry to inform you but I
Sorry to inform you but I DID NOT receive that letter, so I did not know about this until yesterday.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.My children go to Sherwood
My children go to Sherwood Heights as well. I did not recieve such a letter. I have 2 children that attend the school. Hmm, maybe some of the parents names were picked out of a hat and those parents were lucky enough to recieve the letter. My children have many friends and none of the parents I have spoken with recieved such a letter. Maybe what they should have done is eat up the cost and mail letters to ALL parents within the entire Auburn School Department!!!! I think this would have been more effective rather than leave all of us parents in the dark!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Thank you so much for
Thank you so much for backing me up on this :)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This has nothing to do with
This has nothing to do with homosexuality....it has to do with unwanted sexual advances from one person to another - SEXUAL ASSAULT!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I totally agree with you
I totally agree with you 100%!! All I have to say is thank god the boy had good communication with his parents to tell them! It is obvious his parents kept the lines of communication open with their child!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Thank god someone on here
Thank god someone on here has some common sense, it isn't about politics, homosexuality or getting votes during election time, it is about keeping our kids safe while they learn. It is about the adults doing their jobs while educating our children. It is about keeping the lines of communication open with children, parents and teachers.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I could not agree with you
I could not agree with you more noseynellie, thank you for saying what I was thinking :)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.well the article clearly
well the article clearly says...... a boy touched a boy, that is not heterosexual behavior
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.It does not say touched, it
It does not say touched, it says two boys were sexually assaulted and all readers for the sake of every child in their lives needs to be perfectly clear on that. The touch issue was raised in discussing the child advocacy group that is teaching the students good touch and bad touch. I do not have first hand knowledge of this particular case but unfortunately I do have knowledge as an investigator of other cases involving child offenders and "touch" as most of you are thinking of it was not the issue in the sexual assault and I will leave it at that.
If we could only return to common sense...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.umm I guess what your saying
umm I guess what your saying the little boy just looked? How do you sexually assault some one with out touching them?
The article says: sexually assaulted by a fellow classmate in the boys' bathroom," which means TOUCHED
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.It is a learned behavior by
It is a learned behavior by a child who has been abused in the past - obviously! He needs help and he needs counseling, he needs to be removed from the school before he does this to someone else!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I can not believe what I am
I can not believe what I am reading. First off, I would completely understand the parents not having their names put in the paper. This causes parents of other children to know exactly who they are and what child or children this is being referred to. If I were in these parents shoe's I would go public with my name left out of it. I would never want to see a child being singled out because of what has happened to them. Children can be mean to other children. We are not all stupid to this fact. Children are not perfect especially our own.
Second, my children attend Sherwood Heights and I am deeply upset this matter has been so hush hush. How is it fair for us parents to educate our children more on what is and isn't appropriate touching if we are not made aware that something has happened in the school. Our schools are supposed to be safe for our children. We as parents talk and should talk to our children about matters like this but If we are not made aware of incidents or even allegations we are not giving the right to address things to our children in another talk. Most of us do educate our children on this matter but when something like this comes up shouldn't we be aware of it so we can have another talk with our children.
My children are older and do know what is appropriate and whats not, but having this information would have been nice so I could readdress this with my children.
Tron, Honestly I can not believe you would insinuate this is a political thing. Shame on you for not taking the parents and the childrens upset into consideration. There are more important things that NEED to be addressed on this matter then worrying about stupid politics. We as parents educate our children and give them the tools they need to succeed in life. Safety of our children should come first! Politics need to take a back seat sometimes!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.And another thing while I'm
And another thing while I'm so aggitated by this subject. The Auburn School Committee never looks at what is in the childrens best interest. There should never be any cuts financially with the schools. Our teachers teach our children and they deserve to have good insurance and pay salaries. They deserve to have a committee who has their backs and their interest! The auburn school committee seem to be more interested in the political view rather than what is truly important. Our Children and Our Teachers and staff!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Strange. Nobody here has
Strange.
Nobody here has referred to experiences or knowledge of children exhibiting natural curiosity and do what was once called 'Playing Doctor.
Is it that most readers/posters here are just a bunch of Pervs???
------------------------------------------
When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond."On Sept. 17 my 6-year-old
"On Sept. 17 my 6-year-old son, who is in first grade, was sexually assaulted by a fellow classmate in the boys' bathroom," the woman said through tears.
Well this is an indication to me that this first grader that is the offender is being taught homosexuality from some where.
I feel so bad for the parents of the child that had this happen to him. Unwarranted sexual advances should be punished harshly.
It's a shame that such behavior some people think is acceptable but to me it's not. Voting yes on 1 is the way to go and this article is a prime example of why.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What is taught in
What is taught in Homosexuality 101? I can't believe you seriously believe this.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Are you serious? Since when
Are you serious? Since when did this become a story about politics, it is about a child who sexually assaulted another child. Homosexuality has nothing to do with this incident and I can't believe that some people can be so close minded as think that it does. Wake up, this is not about politics it is about a child that has had some bad things happen to him in his life. Leave homosexuality out of this. Let's focus on helping these children heal. By the way I am voting NO on 1; because I support the equal rights of all human beings and all Mainers.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.WAKE UP HER SON WAS SEXUALLY
WAKE UP HER SON WAS SEXUALLY ASSAULTED NOT INVOLVED IN CONSENTUAL SEX. Homosexuality is consentual not forcible. I left out very regretably in my prior comments that the two known victims, this young mans classmates, are likely not the only two and the others are probably younger than he is. In all likelihood he is or has violated younger siblings, cousins, neighbors, children he is at daycare with, younger children and schooland church any child he has access to is a potential victim and at risk. It is hard to use the terms and to wrap the mind around them when talking about a 6 or 7 year old but this is a sex offender and very likely a pediphile. Keep in mind this was not consentual but assault.
If we could only return to common sense...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.yes he was and it was a MALE
yes he was and it was a MALE touching a MALE.. use your common sense
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The child who is the accused
The child who is the accused molester isn't being "taught homosexuality" he has more than likely, been molested or at least been witness to sex acts in some form. Homosexuals do not go around "teaching homosexuality". Pedophiles are sick minded people and aren't "teaching" anything, they just find what innocent/helpless victims that they can and then...
When helpless kids are bullied and/or molested, sometimes they deal with it by finding people who they can bully or molest to show that they are not as helpless as they feel.
This has nothing at all to do with question # 1. It, more than likely, has to do with pedophilia molestation.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.To Tron, obviously something
To Tron, obviously something did happen or the school committee would not have even listened. What happened and to whom should ABSOLUTELY remain anonymous. How dare you think they should name the parents who spoke out; so everyone can figure out who the children are? Shame on you. At the age of 12 my daughter and a friend were sexually harassed by a boy in their class at an Auburn elementary school. I started with the principal and got no where. I called the school resource officer myself and he had not even been aware. From there I went to the Superintendent before something was done. Parents need to advocate for their children because if they don't, who will?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sadly as a former member of
Sadly as a former member of law enforcement who delt withdomestic and sexual assault cases, I can very well imagine how one first grader can sexually assault another first grader of either sex. And do not go putting any of this on the homosexual community who have the utmost regard for and respect of children. In all likelihood the offender here is the victim of a pediphile and already practicing what he learned and extreme measures must be taken now or this young man will grow up to be an adult sex offender. The names of the parties were rightly not given. It would be wrong to identify the parents of the victims as this would through infrence identify the victims who have enough to deal with. The perpetrator should not be in the school any longer but receiving treatment and an education away from others he may potentially victimize. So long as that student is within that facility, evey student is a likely victim. Clearly proper reporting has not been by the school as required by law or those receiving the reports and subsequent parties have not done their jobs. Teaching people of any age how to keep them self safe is to a large degree dependent on authorities to keep known offenders in check. Here we have a fox welcome in the hen house then expected not to feast.
If we could only return to common sense...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.If a child has been abused
If a child has been abused sexually in the past this behavior is learned, if a child is bullied or physically abused at home this behavior is also learned and will be repeated because little Johnny thinks it is normal. Going to church or the park isn't the answer to the school not doing their jobs, home schooling for tax paying hard working middle class parents who pay the salaries of the teachers and principals isn't the answer either. Dr. Dosh - you need to get a clue, or maybe a job...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This reminds me of an
This reminds me of an incident that occurred between my two of my tenant families about 14 years ago. One couple complained that their 4-year-old daughter had been sexually abused by the other couple's 5-year-old daughter. Within a few days a doctor, the police, the DHS, and a network of gossipy neighbors had all somehow become involved, the father of the 5-year-old had threatened to kill the father of the 4-year-old, and the latter was making plans to move. But I doubted that either of the little children at the heart of the storm knew what it was all about. They only knew they weren't allowed to play with each other any more. I see this kind of thing as an example of societal hysteria about sexual child abuse. Real child abuse is a serious matter--but what two little children do to each other is not sexual abuse.
I notice that in none of the other comments on this article is the writer's real full name given. Someone who posts as "tron" complains that the two 6-year-olds and their parents are anonymous. Really, tron, why not set an example by identifying yourself when you post? And I am voting Yes on 1 (though not a member of any "crowd") but this incident has absolutely nothing to do with that issue. I also agree that this incident wasn't worth putting in the newspaper.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.A sexual assault on a first
A sexual assault on a first grader by another first grander could be touching the "private area" ....it wouldn't HAVE to be any more, but it might have been.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I'm not sure I understand
I'm not sure I understand the whole story....I'm not sure why they are teaching about child abuse..(I reread the story and it says sexual abuse as well) but it seems to me the parents might be looking for someone to monitor the bathroom. They also want other parents to be aware.. If you are suggesting tron that this has something to do with homosexuality I am afraid you missed the mark..there is a difference between being a homosexual person and a child molester. I do think the child may have been sexually abused (who did the assaulting) and I hope if this is true the person responsible is found and appropriate action taken.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Anonymous people making
Anonymous people making anonymous allegation about an anonymous child. Something is fishy here. Either name the parents making the accusation or cut this out. The timing of the allegation is strange, just a couple of weeks before the election. The Yes on 1 crowd will pull out all the stops to win. IF this is true, then it appears the necessary steps are being taken, to bring this into a public forum smacks of another agenda.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.