Two important initiatives

I write to urge Maine voters to join me in support of two important initiatives on the ballot this November. Question 2 reduces Maine's auto excise tax by half, while Question 4, TABOR, places responsible limits on the growth in government spending of taxpayer dollars.

Question 2 is a fair and common-sense solution to reduce Maine's excise tax (seventh-highest in the nation). By passing that initiative, real money comes back to Mainers' pockets (about $800 for the average Maine family), and makes it much less costly to purchase a newer, cleaner, safer vehicle.

Question 4 would finally bring excessive government spending under control. By limiting government spending to the rate of inflation plus population growth, TABOR guarantees government won't spend more than taxpayers' ability, or desire, to pay. It also strengthens Mainers' voices in the debate about taxing and spending by requiring voter approval to exceed spending limits, and requires voter approval to pass a new tax or excessive property tax increase.

According to information provided by the Maine Heritage Policy Center,Colorado passed its own version of TABOR in 1992 and has seen tremendous economic growth because of it. With TABOR, Colorado spending actually tripled, without increasing taxes, borrowing or increasing debt. In fact, nearly $7 billion in tax rebates were returned to Colorado taxpayers because of TABOR's reasonable, effective provisions.

Questions 2 and 4 give taxpayers a chance to experience the tax and spending relief that could improve family budgets and grow the state's economy.

Lois Snowe-Mello, Poland

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

citrus's picture

Baldacci bragged about not

Baldacci bragged about not raising taxes. He says nothing about all the new fees thats been added since he first got elected as Governor. Fees & taxes are all taxes.

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

mad dad, Politicians are

mad dad,
Politicians are also taxpayers. The problem with Maine taxes is the property tax on poor people. We are property rich and income poor. Federal income taxes have fallen from 90% to 35%. The last two tax changes to federal income taxes were reductions. The state income tax was just reduced from 8.5% to 6.5%. The state sales tax was reduced last time from 6% to 5%. The rate of property taxes has dropped greatly with the homestead exemption, increase school subsidies, and increased revenue sharing. Taxes are going down everywhere. But that said, increased assessments and at best stagnant and at worst falling wages have increased the property tax burden on the poor and middle class.
Because TABOR mis-calculates spending needs it will burden the poor with increasingly worse public services. With TABOR we will get the worst of all world, poor public services, high property taxes, low income. TABOR solves nothing.
Jon Albrecht Dixfield

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

The letter perpetuates the

The letter perpetuates the Heritage Centers misinformation. Colorado grew because businesses moved out of California because of overcrowding, crime, water restrictions and dought, and budgetary chaos brought about by California's version of TABOR Prop 13. California went from first to worst in education in the Nation before the people began to move to Colorado with their children. So the Heritage Center moved to Colorado and passed TABOR with the help of their Billionaire donors. Colorado has suspended TABOR for the last 5 years because it was doing to Colorado what it has already done to California - wrecked public services.
Jon Albrecht Dixfield

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

Both these measures make no

Both these measures make no sense and neither is necessary.
Since TABOR I defeat, state budgets including prior to the recession have conformed to TABOR I requirements. So TABOR II is unnecessary.
We also need to know that Maine is being used by the Hertiage Center in Washington as national guinea pig. They have already stated that if TABOR II passes in Maine they will start campaigns in other states.
The excise tax changes if passed will have 3 effects. 1. The guy who bought the Mercedes will pay a lot less in excise taxes. 2. A lot of police and fireman will be fired across Maine or 3. Your property taxes will shoot up or a combination of the two.
Makes so sense to give the rich a huge tax break at the risk of losing a poor retired couple's home to fires we can no longer contain or contain quickly enough.
Jon Albrecht Dixfield

tron's picture

This lady has the state buy

This lady has the state buy new cars for her and SHE wants to pass these referendi? Let's get common sense back into the mix and leave right wing wackos like snowemello out of it.

Robert61's picture

Kind of stretching the truth

Kind of stretching the truth aren't you tron....the state did not buy a new car for her, however her actions about wanting some supplemental pay for extra time worked were for the purposes of buying a car...and given she had to drive to Augusta to conduct business it seems reasonable she might just need a car for that purpose...or would you rather she drove an old cluker, bad on gas, bad for the environment, expensive to maintain?

mad dad's picture

I disagree on #2 and agree

I disagree on #2 and agree on #4. Yes on #2 only helps on new vehicles and cuts funds needed for road and bridge repair. Yes on #4 MIGHT give the taxpayers a chance to hold down politicians spending.

Rinoblast's picture

Question #2 might make sense

Question #2 might make sense if it wasn't a tax-cut for the rich. For all the Mainers who own cars in models older than 2004, enjoy paying the same-old amount. I'd like to see the data on number of cars owned before and after 2004 and the income levels of the owners.

Robert61's picture

Um Rino, do you realize who

Um Rino, do you realize who you just included in that statement?

Rinoblast's picture

Haha, it's all relative. A

Haha, it's all relative. A better initiative would have been to reduce everyone's excise tax, but perhaps by a smaller amount.

Advertisement