Maine pipeline company gives up tar sands permit

New England Pipeline
Toby Talbot

FILE-In this March 20, 2013 file photo, a sign marks the location of an oil pipeline in Irasburg, Vt. The company that owns an oil pipeline that runs from Portland, Maine, to Montreal says it's considering its options after a Vermont ruling that it would need a state permit to reverse the flow of that pipeline.(AP Photo/Toby Talbot, File)

SOUTH PORTLAND (AP) — A company that operates a pipeline in Maine announced Thursday that it surrendered a permit that has raised concerns about its plans to transport tar sands oil to South Portland.

The Portland Pipe Line Corp. said it's giving up the 2009 permit it has with the state's environmental department, which would allow for the construction of two vapor control units in the city in order to prove that it has no present or future plans to move tar sands.

Tar sands opponents worry that the 236-mile underground pipeline that transports crude oil from South Portland to Montreal could be used in reverse to send tar sands oil from Canada, a move that would require the construction of the vapor control units.

A citizen group called Protect South Portland gathered 3,000 signatures to put a proposed ordinance on the city's November ballot designed to prevent that from occurring.

Portland Pipe Line Corp. says that proposal, which would prevent further expansion of any petroleum facilities, will hamper existing facilities along the city's waterfront.

The company has maintained that despite its proposal to reverse the flow of the pipeline several years ago, no such project is in the works now. But Protect South Portland has said that the outstanding permit proves that the company has its eye on transporting the oil.

Larry Wilson, the company's CEO, said in a statement that the negative impact of the ordinance "is too significant for citizens to vote based on the erroneous assumption that the PPLC has an imminent project."

But Cathy Chapman, spokeswoman for Protect South Portland, said in a statement that the announcement does not change the group's view on the need for the ordinance, pointing to the fact that the company could reapply.

"We are not protected from tar sands until the Waterfront Protection Ordinance passes," she said.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



Michael Schaedler's picture

When it comes to income,

When it comes to income, Maine residents are more reliant on government payments and derive a smaller percentage from earnings than the rest of the country.

That is out of another article in todays paper.
Just wondering when the anti anything that creates jobs people are going to get a clue.

David Rossi's picture

They won't until they are the

They won't until they are the ones in need of a job.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...