Maine pays lawyers $300 to $333 per hour to defend CDC officials in whistle-blower case

AUGUSTA — The private attorneys hired by the state to defend the Maine Center for Disease Control & Prevention from a federal whistleblower lawsuit filed by a former employee are being paid $300 per hour.

Sun Journal illustration

According to a Complaint of Discrimination filed by Sharon Leahy-Lind, director of the Maine Center for Disease Control & Prevention's Division of Local Public Health, she was told to shred documents supporting funding decisions.

Maine Attorney General Janet Mills has authorized the state's Department of Health and Human Services to spend up to $50,000 on private lawyers — after a pair of attorneys in her office asked to be recused from defending the state and CDC Director, Sheila Pinette, in January.

Pinette has retained Portland-based attorney Gaydon Stevens in the firm of Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman to represent her. Stevens will be paid $333 per hour by the state, according a letter from Mills authorizing the expense. That representation is also capped at $50,000.  

In an email Wednesday, Timothy Feeley, a spokesman for Mills, wrote that the state has sought outside attorneys 72 times during 2012 and 2013. 

The Maine CDC is an agency within the Maine DHHS.

The lawsuit, filed by former CDC official Sharon Leahy-Lind last October, alleges that Pinette and others in DHHS and the CDC violated the Whistleblower Protection Act by retaliating against her when she refused to destroy documents connected to the funding of the Healthy Maine Partnerships program.

Leahy-Lind's suit also alleges defamation and violations of state and federal medical leave acts, the Maine Human Rights Acts, the federal Civil Rights Act, the Freedom of Access Act and the First Amendment.

Leahy-Lind said she was ordered to destroy documents used to rank Healthy Maine Partnerships participating agencies after the Sun Journal requested copies of the records in June 2012.

The agency eventually produced records for the newspaper. But Leahy-Lind said they were not the original documents, bringing into question the authenticity of the records and the entire process that was used to distribute $4.7 million in tobacco settlement funds.

Leahy-Lind recently said she was also interviewed by the FBI about issues at the CDC and, in late January, technicians from the state's Office of Information Technology took computer hard drives from several employees, including Pinette, CDC Deputy Director Christine Zukas and Office of Health Equity Director Lisa Sockabasin in an effort to secure potential evidence for the lawsuit. 

According to a letter from Mills to Kevin Wells, the state attorney who serves as the general counsel at the CDC, the state will pay attorneys Eric Uhl and Jonathan Shapiro of the firm Fisher & Phillips — a nationwide firm with a Portland office — $300 per hour for their work on the case.

Fisher & Phillips specializes in employment and labor relations law, according to the firm's website.

The state will also pay associate attorneys working on the case $240 per hour and paralegals on the case $125 per hour. In her letter to Wells, Mills notes, "this authorization also extends to other attorneys in the firm who may be called upon from time to time to assist in the case ."

The authorization from Mills caps the total expense at $50,000 without prior approval from her office.  

Mills also notes the authorization to pay the outside firm does not extend to work on an appeal and that an additional authorization, in writing, would be needed, "if the scope of the engagement, term of the agreement or the hourly rate need amendment."

The letter also authorizes "reasonable mileage" for those working on the case to be paid at the state's current rate of 44 cents per mile.

In a joint motion filed Jan. 17, Maine Assistant Attorneys General Susan Herman and Ronald Lupton asked the U.S. District Court if they could each withdraw as counsel, “due to a recent and unexpected development.”

No details of that development were provided and so far, neither Mills nor the judge presiding over the case has disclosed what the unexpected development was.

One of the duties of the state AG’s office is to represent the state of Maine, including defending the state and its agencies in court.

But, according to the federal motion, “the Office of the Attorney General is unable to continue to represent either the CDC or Pinette in this litigation.”

The Legislature's Government Oversight Committee has also been investigating the issues surrounding the Healthy Maine Partnership and the improper destruction of public records.  

Last week, Uhl and Shapiro wrote GOC members, asking them to postpone their work until the federal lawsuit was disposed of. The committee has been reviewing the findings in a report issued by its investigatory arm, the Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability.

OPEGA's report issued in December confirmed CDC officials ordered the destruction of documents. The GOC is expected to take up the case again when it meets at 9 a.m. Friday in room 220 of the Cross Building, next to the State House in Augusta.

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



FRANK EARLEY's picture

This whole thing looks bad for the CDC's head honcho's.

I have a feeling that once all the investigations are complete, we will see some familiar faces looking for legal help.
You have to ask yourself, what possible reason would Ms. Leahy-Lind have to make these claims? I just can't get past that question. I don't think the sick leave thing would prompt someone to make such extraordinary accusations. I knew nothing of the Healthy Maine program and even I knew something was definitely wrong with the numbers. It wasn't until the first accusations arose that the amounts started to make more sense. I'm just hoping that when those that are found guilty, as part of their sentence, be ordered to repay legal fees.
Now you'll have to excuse me, I've got to go check out some of them Law Schools. Hell, I've been in the wrong line of work.....................


So! Let me get this straight.

So! Let me get this straight. We are not only footing the bill for the 2 "letter-to-the-editor" lawyers in "suits", but also "associate" lawyers and "paralegals?????? What a surprise. I smell a rat or perhaps several.

JERRY ARIPEZ's picture

Further interest as to WHY?

after a pair of attorneys in her office asked to be recused from defending the state and CDC Director, Sheila Pinette, in January
_____________-Conflicts of interest on the States side?

What was on the printers and PC's hard drives?

JERRY ARIPEZ's picture

My gut tells me

from my past experience and skill set of being an IT Admin...there is evidence on the server and the tape backups....the paper trail maybe shredded and gone, but the tell tale heart lies within those devices and possibly on private email accounts.

The state doesn't recuse itself, especially both attorneys because of a possible conflict of interest or lack of impartiality....
There is more there than meets the eye or has been disclosed from discovery.

This going into nearly a year for a real reason of malfeasance and illegal manipulation....if it was all that clean, this would of been cleaned up way back.


Eau d' rat

Well, I guess we can imagine the motivation of these two "$300"-an-hour lawyers in their letter to the editor, "In rebuttal, J. Shapiro and E. Uhl: Two sides to every story" of February 18, 2014.

AL PELLETIER's picture

Got that right Carolyn

I shoot my mouth off every two months in letters to the editor and I do it for FREE!
I'll repeat myself, If orders to shred came from Lepage or any person in the DHHS they should be held legally accountable for these outrageous legal fees. Commit the crime---do the time!
You, I, plus all Maine taxpayers did nothing to deserve this bill.

JERRY ARIPEZ's picture

Double dipping, for both being they

were paid by taxpayers money to write that editorial together...


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...