Dejection fills ballroom after gay marriage vote

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) - Cecelia Burnett and Ann Swanson had already set their wedding date. When they joined about 1,000 other gay marriage supporters for an election night party in a Holiday Inn ballroom, they hoped to celebrate the vote that would make it possible.

  Gay Marriage Referendum
Pat Wellenbach

Friends console one another after learning about the unofficial defeat on Question 1 at election night headquarters in Portland, Maine, early Wednesday morning, Nov. 4, 2009. Maine voters decided decide to rescind the Legislature's approval of same-sex marriage.(AP Photo/Pat Wellenbach)

  Gay Marriage Referendum
Pat Wellenbach

Friends console one another after learning about the unofficial defeat on Question 1 at an empty election night headquarters in Portland, Maine, early Wednesday morning, Nov. 4, 2009. Maine voters decided to rescind the Legislature's approval of same-sex marriage. (AP Photo/Pat Wellenbach)

Instead, they went home at midnight, dejected and near tears after a failed bid to make Maine the first state to approve same-sex marriage at the ballot box.

"I'm ready to start crying," said Burnett, a 58-year-old massage therapist, walking out of the ballroom early Wednesday with Swanson at her side. "I don't understand what the fear is, why people are so afraid of this change.

"It hurts. It hurts personally," she said. "It's a personal rejection of us and our relationship, and I don't understand what the fear is."

With 98 percent of precincts reporting, gay-marriage foes had 53 percent of the vote in a referendum that asked Maine voters whether they wanted to repeal a law allowing same-sex marriage that had passed the Legislature and was signed by Democratic Gov. John Baldacci.

"The institution of marriage has been preserved in Maine and across the nation," said Frank Schubert, the chief organizer for Stand for Marriage Maine, which lobbied for the repeal.

For the gay rights movement, which has gained a foothold in New England, it was a stinging defeat. Gay marriage has now lost in every state - 31 in all - in which it has been put to a popular vote. Gay-rights activists had hoped to buck that trend in Maine, framing same-sex marriage as a matter of equality for all families in a campaign that used 8,000 volunteers to get out the message.

Five states have legalized gay marriage - Iowa, Massachusetts, Vermont, New Hampshire and Connecticut - but all did so through legislation or court rulings, not by popular vote.

Portland resident Sarah Holman said she was torn, but decided - despite her conservative upbringing - to vote in favor of letting gays marry.

"They love and they have the right to love. And we can't tell somebody how to love," said Holman, 26.

While the gay marriage opponents claimed victory, Jesse Connolly, campaign manager for No on 1/Protect Maine Equality, held off conceding until early Wednesday, when he issued a statement vowing to continue to press the issue.

The fight for marriage equality will continue, he told supporters at the Holiday Inn ballroom, where a buffet table included a three-tiered wedding cake - with two grooms standing side by side, two brides standing side by side and the inscription: "We all do!"

"We're not short-timers. We're here for the long haul and whether it's just all night and into the morning, or it's next week or next month or next year. We will be here. We'll be here fighting. We'll be working. We will regroup."

That's not what gay marriage opponent Chuck Schott wanted to hear. At age 71, and after other gay rights efforts in 1998, 2000 and 2005, Schott said he's getting tired of taking his fight to the polls.

"Before the final tally last night was even in, the No on 1 warned us that we'll have to fight the battle all over again - soon. I wish they'd take their battle to some other state, and give us a rest," he said Wednesday.

Roman Catholic Bishop Richard Malone, who urged his followers to reject same-sex marriage, said he was grateful to people, like Schott, who voted to define marriage as between a man and a woman "as it has been understood for millennia by civilizations and religions around the world."

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

FarmAlumn's picture

. .. .Equal rights ,

. .. .Equal rights , opportunities , responsibilities , and protections will , in fact , win out in the long run because it is our shared American heritage and simply makes common sense . This was the classic old fogies against the new & young ( and more understanding and accepting ) struggle . In a strange way , it's also why no one will ever get married again in those two Catholic churches in Loystone that just closed up . What a proud and shining moment this must be for the victors , both married and single religious types . Wanna' get married ? Come to Hawai'i or go to Mass or VeRrRRmont . Even Louisiana kicked out that truly bigoted Justice of Peace who wouldn't marry the interracial couple down they'ya the other day . It's funny thinking of N'orleans ahead of Maine on the lifestyle acceptance curve . Love rules and always has ( not hatred :)

STEVE215D's picture

Love and forgiveness? I

Love and forgiveness? I always thought that was the message of the new testament. Ironically, it is also what seems to be missing from the church in this debate.

Gil's picture

K0NPHL1C7, you won't see an

K0NPHL1C7, you won't see an article praising the 53% for voting their conscience. Any deviation from the lib ideal is labeled as hate and bigotry. Reporting on that hate and bigotry would garner a negative response, and the SJ can't have that, let alone none of their writers agree with you. You can tell by the slants on all of the articles - dejection for gay couples, a civil rights struggle, blah, blah, blah... Over half of those voting dared to go against the gay agenda of pushing their lifestyle into the norm. Over half of the voters declared that the legislature should not be able to determine the definition of marriage. Over half of the voters stood up for their ideals, their beliefs, and their religious convictions. 605 of the state turned out to vote, an the left will have you believe that over half of those are bigoted, hate filled, religious wackos who are gong after blacks and the disabled next. The losers pretend that gay marriage is akin to the civil rights movement of the 60's, that not being granted special rights because of sexual preference is an affront to humanity. And the SJ backs them up using editorial bias on their articles reporting on the defeat of their use of the courts and the legislature to pass their agenda. The people have spoken and those who think they are above that are now besides themselves trying to figure out how they could have been so wrong.
"Reasoning with a liberal is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end. " Pirate

K0NPHL1C7's picture

How about a couple articles

How about a couple articles about the PROUD 52% of the state who stood for what they believe, EVEN under the constant ATTACKS by the liberal media?

exoggensani's picture

ya I wonder why..

ya I wonder why..

Scotty_O's picture

Give it time, you'll get

Give it time, you'll get your way. After all the greatest generation and their kin are dying off. Oh, why are they called the greatest generation? Well lets put it this way, they fought true battles and endured tough times beyond your wildest imagination. The pu$$y's that are growing up now, you can have em', that is, if you can pry them from their Nintendo's long enough to do something.

K0NPHL1C7's picture

I'm 28 and secular. I voted

I'm 28 and secular. I voted "Yes". Morality is NOT a lost cause.

STEVE215D's picture

"Secular" yet you want to

"Secular" yet you want to deprive people of equal access to the institution of marriage? How is this "moral" for you if you are not homophobic or a devout Christian?

queenhoneeybee's picture
verified

It is a sad moment, I

It is a sad moment, I agree-however No on 1 supporters have to prevail! Keep your heads up! This is a fight worth fighting for! xo

EQUALITY FOR EVERYONE! =]

Taxpoor's picture

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU

WHAT IS WRONG WITH YOU PEOPLE homosexual is not normal You are the ones with this problem not us. If you are homosexual thats ok with me but please stop trying to convince us you should have any more rights then folks that dont agree with it. That dont mean we hate anyone But I dont want young children or my self seeing you acting like a man and woman might do. If I see a man give his wife a big kiss before parting I think its nice but I sure dont want to see two men or two women do the same thing. I guess most of us dont or the law would have stood. Why cant you except that it is wrong because you know it is. Most of us dont need religion to know being homosexual is not normal. Stop crying and get on with life and stop calling people that dont agree BIGOTS,
ignorant , haters on & on

STEVE215D's picture

You know what's wrong? Your

You know what's wrong? Your spelling and grammar. Obviously, you barely graduated from high school (though I think middle school is probably pushing it).

You know what's wrong? That your homophobia and "discomfort" around others means that other people are unable to be themselves and live their own lives.

You know what's wrong? Your inability to see the inconsistency in your own logic. You say: "If you are homosexual thats ok with me but please stop trying to convince us you should have any more rights then folks that dont agree with it." Asking for the right to get married to somebody you love isn't having "more rights" than the common people. It's equal rights.

You know what's wrong? You probably would have made the same arguments about black people and desegregation in the 1960s.

You know what's wrong? You obviously don't know what "bigot" or "ignorant" means. You know why? You just proved it in this post.

Taxpoor's picture

Well Michael I guess enought

Well Michael I guess enought people think like I do. FYI the yes vote won so your opion is like A**holes EVERYBODY HAS ONE but Big deal if calling names make you feel better about losing go for it. As I said before it dont take much schooling to know same sex marriage is wrong Even a stupid person like me knows better. Gee maybe you could exsplain it to me cause im trailer trash with very little learning but your better then me. Tell us how everyones EQUAL unless they go to collage and become an eaducated fool. Have a nice day :-)

news4u's picture

"You are so young, my son,

"You are so young, my son, and, as the years go by, time will change and even reverse many of your present opinions. Refrain therefore awhile from setting yourself up as judge of the highest matters."
--Plato

Ever heard of Plato? No, not play dough.

STEVE215D's picture

Umm...I would really like to

Umm...I would really like to debate with you, sir, but the written medium of language requires you to string letters and words together to make a coherent sentence.

concerned111's picture

why are so many of you

why are so many of you saying Maine has spoken. I understand No on 1 was the winning group, but seriousley is 53% to 47% really that large of a victory. I think we all need to realize the outcome could have been different. You may say I am ignorant or some kind of moral sinner, but today is the first day i have ever been ashamed to be a Mainer.

Taxpoor's picture

What are you smoking? "why

What are you smoking? "why are so many of you saying Maine has spoken. I understand No on 1 was the winning group". What did they win? It sure was not the vote on 1. You could always move out of MAINE if your so ashamed to be a mainer

STEVE215D's picture

Again, Taxpoor: If you are

Again, Taxpoor: If you are going to attack people on this site please do so in a way that makes some sense.

Somebody's lucky that passing a literacy test isn't required anymore in order to vote...

Then again, according to your logic, if the majority passes a law that says "people who don't know how to spell shouldn't vote" then we must accept it as true and right.

Taxpoor's picture

Cry cry cry maybe you could

Cry cry cry maybe you could write a song your the one attacking and it makes cents to me but dollars would be better

STEVE215D's picture

Do us all a favor, Taxpoor:

Do us all a favor, Taxpoor: Don't project onto groups of innocent loving people just because your own life sucks. They are not the reason that you likely failed out of high school and are stuck in a dead end job.

exoggensani's picture

Question 1 Same Sex

Question 1 Same Sex Marriage
99% OF PRECINCTS REPORTING
> Yes 299,483 53%
No 267,574 47%

Umm ya that IS a large victory.. 31909 to be exact....

Foamfollower's picture

a large victory?not really.

a large victory?not really. This was much closer than I expected. My money is that we will be voting again. Every single time this is put to a vote more and more people vote for it. Its only a matter of time before it passes

exoggensani's picture

close would of been 2000 or

close would of been 2000 or under........ next time it will be more for traditional marriage :) meaning... 350,000 or more for traditional marriage

jayla's picture

You're an idiot! Take a

You're an idiot! Take a freakin Stats class before you start running your mouth.

exoggensani's picture

I guess you don't know how

I guess you don't know how to add or subtract correctly?

And thank you for the nice compliment, I love you too

STEVE215D's picture

Statistics don't justify

Statistics don't justify hatred of other people perceived as being different from the norm. If you learned anything from the 1930s and 1940s you wouldn't be making such a short-sighted comment like that.

abcpammy's picture

We need to remove the

We need to remove the church's tax exemption status. Maybe then they couldn't afford such a massive smear campaign!

Big Love's picture

Great idea, "RB". While

Great idea, "RB". While you're at it, let's do this same thing to private schools, chambers of commerce any non-profit or charitable/benevolent organization that decides to open their mouth about some political issue......ACORN outta love that.
____________
"A liberal is a person with two perfectly good legs who develops bed sores while waiting for a conservative to carry her around."
Big Love

lebearun's picture
verified

Check out this video for

Check out this video for "traditional" marriage: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntC0PNHFRgU

Quicknote's picture
verified

How many more articles is

How many more articles is the S-J going to print with the tears, grief and bitterness of those in the No group? Seems the Yes group is not getting the same coverage.

Speak as rationally as possible, recognizing human beings are not always rational.

STEVE215D's picture

It's because people in

It's because people in journalism tend to hear both sides when they cover a story. It's only sensible that they don't want to air out homophobia. Call this election what you want. Sure, the people have spoken. But "the people" should not be able to trump the court when legal experts deem the refusal to allow people to marry unconstitutional.

Should the newspapers of the 1960's have celebrated personal victories of George Wallace? I think we have a pretty huge consensus on that issue now...

Gil's picture

Once again the people have

Once again the people have spoken. Twice the gay special rights bill was defeated by the citizenry and the gay agenda had to be passed through the legislature above the reach of the people. Again we were bypassed by the legislature in order to pas a gay marriage bill that they knew would never have been passed in a referendum, because the libs know that given the choice, most people will not vote to give gays special rights, or allow them to redefine marriage. This time it didn't work. As has been the case in over 30 states now, when put to a vote, the people will overwhelmingly deny special rights to homosexuals. It is not a civil rights issue, and the comparison just draws more rancor from the citizenry, especially blacks. It is not a hate issue, nor a bigot issue. It is a populace proclaiming that given it's failures, the institution of marriage still means something. It is a vote to bring the legislature's overbearing, pretentious, better than thou attitude to a screeching halt.
"Reasoning with a liberal is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end. " Pirate

STEVE215D's picture

Wow. You call allowing same

Wow. You call allowing same sex couples to get married "gay special rights" but claim this isn't hate or bigotry? You know, if you've taken a logic class you'd know that something can be BOTH democratic AND hateful/bigoted - they are not mutually exclusive at all. That's why our forefathers wrote about something called "tyranny of the majority."

verified

Read this then tell me this

Read this then tell me this isn't about second class citizens and hate mongering! This has been approved for circulation: Citizen Initiative Petitions Currently Approved for Circulation for the 2010 Ballot

TITLE: An Act to Remove Protections Based on Sexual Orientation from the Maine Human Rights Act, Eliminate Funding of Civil Rights Teams in Public Schools, Prohibit Adoptions by Unmarried Couples, Add a Definition of Marriage, and Declare Civil Unions Unlawful
Issued: May 21, 2008; 18-month deadline: November 21, 2009

If this was circulated about you how would you feel? If I got a petition approved to prohibit you from anything at all, how exactly would you feel? Prop 1 was just a stepping stone to further strip people of any right to dignity or respect and everyone that fell for it were sheeple being led by evil disguised as your clergy. My husband, children and I will continue to add our votes to the side that views Jesus' love as all encompassing. I believe when the bible says judge not lest you be judged God meant it.

TREEHUGGARRR's picture

If civil unions are good

If civil unions are good enough for hetros they should be good enough for homosexuals.
The line needs to be drawn somewhere. What's next, NAMBLA members marring their child paramours with the permission of the parent or guardian?

Lil's picture
verified

You first in

You first in line?
______________________

"A conservative is a man with two perfectly good legs who, however, has never learned to walk forward."
Franklin D. Roosevelt

RuffRyderGirl's picture

Well I for one think they

Well I for one think they should of passed the law. Who cares if they are the same sex or not. They are human just like the rest of us and they should be happy too.

Taxpoor's picture

WHO CARES? Just a guess but

WHO CARES? Just a guess but I would say the majority of us care

FarmAlumn's picture

2009 Marriage is a social

2009 Marriage is a social union or legal contract between individuals that creates kinship. It is an institution in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are acknowledged by a variety of ways, depending on the culture or demographic. Such a union may also be called matrimony, while the ceremony that marks its beginning is usually called a wedding and the marital structure created is known as wedlock.
People marry for many reasons, most often including one or more of the following: legal, social, emotional, economical, spiritual, and religious. These might include arranged marriages, family obligations, the legal establishment of a nuclear family unit, the legal protection of children and public declaration of love. etc :) Love, Us http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marriage

RpsNoMore's picture

"They will continue pushing

"They will continue pushing their agenda until they get what they want, regardless of what the rest of us feel."

And the "right" will continue to peddle hate and intentional division for political gain by appealing to people like you.

Ron's picture

RpsNoMore, I'm not

RpsNoMore, I'm not interested in getting into a political argument but I do want to make one comment to your post: in order for this referendum to have passed, it needed some from the "left" (Dems) to vote for it. This isn't a simple partisan issue.

RpsNoMore's picture

"This is not a Civil Rights

"This is not a Civil Rights issue it is a COMMON SENSE issue!"

Until you can demonstrate how the Constitution and Bill of Rights should not be extended to some people based on the personal ignorance of others, then your version of "common sense" is equivalent to approving discrimination.

Let's not forget that we had a Civil War become a segment of America said that slavery was "traditional." It would seem that America is still much plagued by ignorant people.

Foamfollower's picture

Sorry case not closed and it

Sorry case not closed and it will be revisted....47% voted for no every time this vote occurs it gets closer to passing....its only a matter of time

Joseph's picture
verified

Gays and Lesbians who wish

Gays and Lesbians who wish to marry are not freaks. So grouping this issue into some ridiculous association with farm animals is callous and uncalled for. And same-sex marriage IS a civil rights issue regardless of whatever histrionic comparisons you try to make.

skippy's picture
verified

The people of Maine have

The people of Maine have spoken, and we must all accept their vote. If the people want this to be the final time they have to vote on this, they had best research who voted for it in the Legislature and vote them out of office. This is not the first time the question has been put to a vote, and until the gay community gets what it wants it will not be the last unless the people act and vote the supporters of this legislation out of office. Those people that worked so hard to defeat this legislation should get a list of who voted for this in the Legislature and publicise it next year at voting time. It is high time that the citizens of Maine hold their elected officials accountable for their voting record. Mainers as a whole are a conservative thinking group, and their elected representatives must be made to realize this.

FarmAlumn's picture

. ...No big deal . Come to

. ...No big deal . Come to Hawai'i and get married :) ( or VeRrRMont. .or MA or la Canada . .heh

exoggensani's picture

Same-sex marriage prohibited

Same-sex marriage prohibited by statute:
Delaware - Hawaii - Illinois - Indiana - Maryland - Minnesota - North Carolina - Pennsylvania - Puerto Rico - U.S. (Federal Level) - Washington - West Virginia - Wyoming

Hawaii has legalized neither same-sex marriages nor civil unions. Two unmarried people can register for a reciprocal beneficiary relationship, which provides some of the rights and benefits that come with marriage.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recognition_of_same-sex_unions_in_Hawaii

Ron's picture

So, now that the election is

So, now that the election is over with, why can't both sides now work toward getting a law passed that ensures that gay couples who are registered as domestic partners have exactly the same legal rights and protections as married heterosexual couples? Heteros can be called "married", and gay couples can be called "unioned", "paired", "partnered", "parried (partner + married)", or something similar. I heard throughout the campaign from the Yes On 1 side that they would be supportive of that, as long as the term "marriage" was kept to the traditional man plus woman. I also heard from the No On 1 side that all they wanted was the same legal rights as married couples enjoy. Seems like they could work together to accomplish this.

Old Bill's picture

Ron, I share your

Ron, I share your sentiments. Unfortunately, the Gay - Lesbian Alliance does not. They will continue pushing their agenda until they get what they want, regardless of what the rest of us feel.
"The democracy will cease to exist when the government takes from those who would work and gives to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson.

jkl's picture

What a cruel thing to say!!!

What a cruel thing to say!!! These are human beings who have feelings just like you!! You seem to be saying this with utter contempt and glee.

exoggensani's picture

Why are you saying that what

Why are you saying that what Sammie said is a cruel thing to say? The same thing has happened in CA too. This is not a matter of being cruel to people as we know that ALL people have feelings. This fight will go on and on and on is all he was saying and I agree, it will.

The people of Maine voted YES on 1 for a reason. People that voted NO on 1 need to accept what the people of Maine have to say.

FeloPrergoHok's picture

Yes, accept this loss and

Yes, accept this loss and move on please. You will not endear yourself to Mainers and will become like the TABOR group!
1998 - 2000 - 2005 - 2009!

If it continues I predict a larger margin of victory next time.

exoggensani's picture

Sammie, I agree with you. I

Sammie, I agree with you. I do feel that next time the margin will be much larger. The people of Maine have spoken and the do not want homosexual marriage. I'm sorry to say but the people HAVE SPOKEN....

Taxpoor's picture

Yes we have spoken and I am

Yes we have spoken and I am not sorry one bit. Fact is it made my day. All they did was make people that seldom gave gays a thought reason to not like their ways even more and now they call names and tell us how dumb we are and how much we hate them. They spent almost twice as much and still didn't convince the majority of the people to agree with them.

Advertisement