Casino backers collect 99,000 signatures in 20 days

It looks like Maine voters will again be asked to voice their opinion on a resort and casino in western Maine, after the group proposing the project announced Monday that it collected 99,000 signatures to get the proposal on the November 2010 statewide ballot.

If more than 55,000 of the nearly 100,000 signatures are certified, then Mainers could vote on the matter as early as next fall.

"We figured we'd go after 80,000 signatures and expected it to take about 10 weeks," said Peter Martin, spokesman for Black Bear Entertainment LLC, the group proposing the casino. "We collected 99,000 signatures in 20 days from 500 communities." 

Martin said he believed the number of signatures and the time in which they were collected to be a record. He said one of the biggest changes between the previous signature drive and today was an increase in support from affluent coastal communities such Falmouth, Freeport, York and Kennebunk. The communities, which were very vocal in their opposition last time around, were much more supportive now, according to Martin.

Martin credited the change of heart as stemming from the downturn in the economy over the last two years.

"People realize that it's time for Maine to start creating jobs," Martin said. He said residents expressed support for a casino and four-season resort in Oxford County because it would create jobs and boost state revenues.

The anti-gambling group Casinos NO!, on the other hand, criticized organizers for paying a California firm $170,000 to collect signatures.

Martin served as an adviser for the original proposal to build a resort casino in Oxford. The initiative failed at a statewide referendum last year but gained strong support in the town and county. Originally run by a group called Evergreen Mountain Enterprises, the effort was later purchased by Las Vegas-based Olympia Gaming.

Opponents charged that the casino would reduce the state's gambling age from 21 to 19, allow credit to be extended to gamblers, lead to more infrastructure costs and crime, and not draw in significant numbers of tourists.

But under the new proposal amended by Maine legislators, no changes would be made to the gambling age, the president of the casino would not be seated on various boards and oversight committees, credit would not be extended to gamblers, a 10-year moratorium on casino construction would be replaced by a current law separating facilities by at least 100 miles, and the number of slot machines at the casino would be limited to 1,500.

Rupert Grover, an owner of Grover Gundrilling in Norway and member Oxford Economic Development Advisory Committee, said he was pleased with Monday's announcement. Like other backers of the casino effort, Grover believes the project would help to make Western Maine more of a tourist destination.

"I'm very interested in it and I feel that it will give Oxford County a great opportunity for jobs, and that's one thing we need here," Grover said. "And the money generated will go mainly to education."

The latest proposal calls for the casino to be taxed at a rate of 46 percent, of which 25 percent would go toward the state's K-12 Essential Programs and Services; 4 percent each toward the University of Maine Scholarship Fund and the Passamaquoddy and Penobscot tribes; 3 percent each to the Maine Community College System Scholarship Programs and Maine Gambling Control Board; 2 percent to the town of Oxford; 1 percent to Oxford County; and 1 percent  each to the state's dairy stabilization, agricultural fair support, sire stakes, and harness racing purse funds.

Martin said that could mean about $32 million annually for the state.

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

K0NPHL1C7's picture

You are foolish of you think

You are foolish of you think for one second that the folks hired to work at the casino would be local. If you build it, they will come. Cheap workers from out of state will FLOOD the nearest "metro" areas, BLEEDING our system dry.

Rinoblast's picture

Couldn't you make that

Couldn't you make that argument for any industry bringing in a large amount of jobs at once? If this were a new paper mill, call center, or boat yard, would you be voicing the same complaints?

jaygirl1980's picture

Personally, I don't really

Personally, I don't really like casino's, gambeling, and some of the 'acts' but it is something. It is bring something into this state when all we seem to do is lose good high paying jobs and careers for nothing. It could create at least a couple hundred jobs, increase sales at businesses on the drive there, etc. The governor, et al. does want this state to be more dependent on tourism.. might as well have something in western maine! I only hope that if it passes that the police are vigilant.

Ron's picture

It's ridiculous that some

It's ridiculous that some Mainers will vote against casinos, but they have no problem with Megabucks, Powerball, and the plethora of lottery tickets that are available...and the cash that the State gets from them. And the Governor/Legislature are hypocrites for allowing these tickets, and Hollywood Slots (which just happens to be in Baldacci's home town...hmmm....), to exist but whine about society being devastated if Maine had a few more casinos like Hollywood Slots. I've been to HS a few times and have found it very friendly, clean, safe, and fun. I did not become addicted to gambling, nor did I lose my life savings. I was not mugged, and saw no hint of prostitution or any other crime while I was in Bangor. I will say one thing: if the Gov/Legislature/some voters try to limit my entertainment choices again by not allowing more casinos, that will not cause me to spend my entertainment dollars on skiing, camping, or buying Maine trinkets in shops along the coast. I'll go shopping in New Hampshire, go to HS, or save for my out-of-state vacations instead!

All that said, if Oxford is going to get 2% of the taxes from this casino, the town should use that for local services for the casino...the State should not be picking up any of that tab.

T's picture

Do you have documented

Do you have documented evidence that the people who are against a casino in Maine "have no problem with Megabucks, Powerball, and the plethora of lottery tickets that are available" ?

I thought not.

SteveH's picture

Casinos bring business

Casinos bring business people and retired folks. The ONLY reason you should vote against this is if you are currently on welfare and dont WANT a job. Sit on your welfare butts and collect free money. Dont base your vote on what you see on CSI Las Vegas either. Think of all the business meeting and banquets that can be held there.

verified

Hope fully Maine voters

Hope fully Maine voters won't again be sold on Casino No's B.S scare tactics!Our State could use some job's and tax revenue!

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...