Shouldn't be recognized

It is a crushing blow to the homosexual community to not be able to get married. But though gay marriage was vetoed, it might encourage people to try harder for what they believe.

It is also disappointing that Maine would be one of the states that oppresses a group of people. But then, why would homosexuals want to enter, through a ceremony, the same status as a group that denies them and shows hatred toward them?

I firmly believe that marriage shouldn't even be recognized by the state. How can something that the state recognizes be denied to people who live in that state?

I believe everyone should have civil unions, and that marriage shouldn't be recognized by the state because of its religious properties. If marriage is to be a religious ceremony, the state should not recognize it.

So don't deny homosexuals, but deny the selective religious ceremony that targets people of this great nation. We the people are not the people if we don't all have the same rights.

Brent Couture, Lewiston

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

jchick's picture
verified

Marrige = one man + one

Marrige = one man + one woman. It is the foundation of the family, which is the building block of society.

For this reason, governments protect the institution of marriage and offer incentives in the form of bennefits and privileges. (There is also the ulterior motive... it encourages couples to have more children, which increases the population, which increases the tax base.)

BUT THE GOVERNMNET DID NOT INVENT OR CREATE MARRIAGE, CIVIL, RELIGIOUS OR OTHERWISE. And the government certainly has no authority to redifine it.

This is NOT about equal rights. We are ALL born with equal rights. If gay couples want the same bennefits and privileges afforded to them that are currently afforded to married couples, then get the legislature to do so without changing the definition of marriage.

John A. Chick

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." -- Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Colonel Charles Yancey (January 6, 1816)

Pirate's picture
verified

"It is disappointing that

"It is disappointing that Maine should be one of the states that oppresses a group of people." Thirty-one states, including Maine, have voted against allowing same sex marriage. That's 62% of the country. Doesn't that tell you something? 62% of us refuse to have 2% of the population telling us what the definition of marriage is going to be. Marriage is a union, civil or religious, between one man and one woman. Gays are free to call their unions anything they decide to call them. But it ain't gonna be marriage. Remember, 62% of the entire country have voted against it. Think about that instead of spending your time thinking up new names to call us.

Fear not the enemy at the gate, for it is the enemy within that will devour you.

tron's picture

We don't need to think up of

We don't need to think up of new names, bigots and homophobes are extremely accurate and descriptive.

Pirate's picture
verified

Whine, whine, whine. You

Whine, whine, whine. You might wish to consider visiting the cheese tray in the back of the room.

tron's picture

No thanks, cheese doesn't go

No thanks, cheese doesn't go with whiskey.

Pirate's picture
verified

Good point.

Good point.

queenhoneeybee's picture
verified

blah, blah, blah...

blah, blah, blah...

Pirate's picture
verified

Nice to see honeybee's been

Nice to see honeybee's been working on her articulation.

queenhoneeybee's picture
verified

Its a waste of time to read

Its a waste of time to read what ignorance writes... a waste of time to even respond... more like-it's boring.

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

Civil Unions are a dead

Civil Unions are a dead issue.
I agree that the state should not recognize matrimony (the church rite), but the state must recognize marriage (the secular contract between two people that defines the civil rights and privileges tht the state provides to committed couples.) Jon Albrecht Dixfield

lead dog's picture

After last Tuesday's vote I

After last Tuesday's vote I don't think civil unions are a dead issue. I expect to see the next legislature write new civil union rules that give them the same rights and responsibilities as a traditional marriage. They will try to please the gay marriage agenda without offending the rest of us by not calling it marriage. Unfortunately I don't think this will be enough for the pro gay marriage crowd.

lead dog's picture

The state doesn't recognize

The state doesn't recognize any babtism, communion or other sacraments. Why should it recognize matrimony? I am not agreeing or disagreeing with state recognized marriage, only pointing out a fact and asking a question.

jojolou's picture

You don't like this state,

You don't like this state, then move.

queenhoneeybee's picture
verified

Its because they don't have

Its because they don't have anything else better to say. I was born and raised in Maine, and honestly I couldn't imagine living any other place. I am just getting use to the weather! HAHA! In time we will have EQUALITY for all Maine residents... I am hopeful for that.

Pirate's picture
verified

What's the next demand after

What's the next demand after same sex marriage?

tron's picture

Never said there was one,

Never said there was one, that's your side's arguement. You're the type that is never satisfied.

Pirate's picture
verified

We were also told that civil

We were also told that civil unions were not going to lead to demands of same sex marriage. Was that a smoke screen or a flat out lie? And now, you want our trust and tolerance?

Pirate's picture
verified

"You're the type that's

"You're the type that's never satisfied." You've just described the entire homosexual movement.

Joseph's picture
verified

Why should we? We love this

Why should we? We love this state as much as you do. And . . . we want to live here with the same rights and responsibilities as you do. So if you don't like "married homosexuals" living in this state why don't YOU move instead?

98civb18c's picture

Brent although I disagree

Brent although I disagree with your views I respect them. You have writing a well thought out letter that warrents respect.

jchick's picture
verified

Well thought out

Well thought out letter?!?

You must be joking. Brent's letter reminds me of a child who can't have his own way, so he throws a temper tantrum. Kinda like "If you don't let me pitch I'm going to take my ball and bat and go home so no one can play ball."

John A. Chick

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." -- Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Colonel Charles Yancey (January 6, 1816)

Gil's picture

He said ball "Reasoning with

He said ball
"Reasoning with a liberal is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end. " Pirate

Pirate's picture
verified

The parrot says he likes

The parrot says he likes your posts, Mr. Chick.

98civb18c's picture

jchick Brents letter is a

jchick
Brents letter is a good letter because he is stating his views in a respectful way. He did not use the words bigot, uneducated, sinner, or pervert. The only part that was even close to childish was when he was saying about marriage not being recognized at all by the state. A year ago it would might have been childish but since this debate has started that letter was the most adult thing I have read(on both sides). I once again say I disagree with Brent but respect his views.

Advertisement