The giant dragging feet of mankind

Space, the great purposeless frontier.

Now, before you start throwing Tang at us, hear us out. It is not space's fault that it has no prescribed purpose. Rather, it is ours. In 40 years, since we, mankind, put life where life is forbidden, the moon — our thirst for manned exploration and achievement has been slaked.

We beat the Russians, then retired from the celestial ring. Retirement hasn't been pretty. It's seen American efforts fall from the heavens in both disgrace and tragedy. We've lost advanced technology because scientists failed to convert to metric measurements. We've talked about going to Mars, but it never garnered any realistic traction or funding.

In short, it feels like we've given up, and left the space exploration to the minds and budgets of Hollywood, so they can dream about the possibilities of the final frontier. We have achieved re-entry into an atmosphere of science fiction, when we seemed so close to making manned space travel scientific fact.

As a measurement of American accomplishment, however, the moon landing ranks equal to splitting the atom. When politicians talk about conquering the pressing problems of our age, they often demand a campaign like that of the Manhattan Project, or the space program.

Those endeavors, however, had something that our current space aspirations didn't: a purpose. In those cases, it was defeating an enemy that fueled our thrusters. When our dominance was demonstrated, it was replaced by complacency. Yawn, we conquered space. So, what's next?

What's next should be finding a new purpose to travel through space. The American ability to travel beyond our planet remains, as evidenced by our unmanned flights. But the purpose for it is now unclear. We are gathering information, but for what end? Instead of sending astronauts into space because we can point and say we did, the American people are saying what's the point?

That's the conclusion of public-interest polls, anyway. More and more, the will to spend vast sums for space loses against the critical issues on Earth: health care, taxes, defense, etc. In this era of a trillion-dollar deficit — a figure which seems to be ripped straight from science fiction — where does space exploration now fit?

It fits with a renewed purpose. The early, heady days of NASA laid the groundwork for an entire generation of technological breakthroughs. The computing culture we have developed today is an ancestor of the space program, and its emphasis is on pushing the boundaries of the possible.

This is still possible, while curtailing — or even outright ending — a space program would be the essential admission that the United States is too weighted by its earthly problems to still shoot for the stars.

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Big Love's picture

"We've lost advanced

"We've lost advanced technology because scientists failed to convert to metric measurements." ????What!? I'd say the shuttle program is pretty advanced technology, and that are scientists are pretty familiar with the metric system, and every other measurement system or unit from Pascal to Parsecs. Start looking at your value system and educational system. And go back to the days when men and women who conquer the new frontiers are admired and respected as much as the juiced-up, drunk driving, wife-beating, illiterates who can throw 100 mph(161 km/h) fastballs or hit 400 ft(122,000mm) homeruns. ok...I feel better now
Big Love

tron's picture

I believe the "lost advanced

I believe the "lost advanced technology because scientists failed to convert to metric measurements" refers to the Mars explorer that crashed into Mars because part of the project was built in Europe and part in the US and no one notice that different measuring systems where being used.

Big Love's picture

Yes, I remember that one.

Yes, I remember that one. But I understood that one was not so much metric/imperial harware screw-up as a software re-programming screw-up. And the polar lander crashed as a result of the software design error too. Anyway, I am still amazed at the things out people in the space program can pull-off.
Big Love

JohnBerry's picture

We can spend a ton of money,

We can spend a ton of money, like we have with the International Space Station, and get nothing much, like we have with the International Space Station, or we can do science that will answer questions and in the process develop technologies that we can use on a daily basis. We need to take a realistic look at our plans and ask if we are doing things for the "wow factor" or are we trying to accomplish something that will be useful.

One counter to my frugal approach is that our space program didn't directly accomplish much beyond getting humans to the moon. But indirectly it encouraged and funded the science that has touches our lives daily. I love science and the idea of space travel. But I cannot see wasting trillions to ultimately accomplish what can be done with mere billions. We do have a lot of things that need funding here on earth: aging infrastructure, healthcare, defense, etc.

___________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."
- Gerald R. Ford, 38th President of the United States

Jay Bee's picture

John, The question is, WHY

John,

The question is, WHY do we go into space? I'm not sure small unmanned one-offs capture public imagination and spirit like actual humans in space do. Passing the torch to India and China is something I often hear, and it speaks volumes about the current state of the American spirit. Don't get me wrong - maybe we can't afford it, but if so, that is a sad commentary on current events.

As an aside, I have a suspicion that a space elevator is more about money and politics (if you think NIMBYs are bad for a Walgreens, try a corridor running dozens of miles into the sky) than it is tech.

JohnBerry's picture

Space can best be explored

Space can best be explored by using small, limited-purpose, economical, robotic spacecraft. We can send these craft to anyplace that interests us. This is science. Sending humans is expensive and dangerous and is "Adventure". Our approach to space needs to be all about science and not about adventure. Let Russia and China or India waste money to get a human to mars. They will be bringing back martian tchotchkes and for far less money we will be doing real science.

Our initial space-based missions should be to help energy studies. Later we can get humans into space by developing a "space elevator" which would take people far higher in space than the current space station which is a failure by any measure.

___________________
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have."
- Gerald R. Ford, 38th President of the United States

Advertisement