Time for paid sick leave

Researchers predict that between 30 and 50 percent of the population may get the H1N1 flu this season. That's an amazing statistic, and it means that everyone has a role to play in stopping the spread of the disease.

Government officials are urging people to stay home from work if they have symptoms, and to keep sick children home from school. But this isn't an option for millions of workers. Of course, they want to do the right thing, but without job-protected paid sick days, these workers will risk their paychecks and even their jobs if they stay home when they or their children contract the flu.

It's time to create a basic protection of paid sick days. Maine Senate President Libby Mitchell has introduced a bill that would require a modest protection of paid sick days for all workers.

Certainly most employers will follow the president's advice and create flexible sick leave policies to deal with this flu and other workplace contagion. I hope they will. But for those who haven't yet stepped up to protect their employees — and their customers — a paid sick day law will create an important new standard for everyone to follow.

Kate Brennan, Lewiston

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

"Obama is not offering Joe

"Obama is not offering Joe the Plumber, Shaws, Victoria's Secret or Ruby Tuesday's any stimulus or bailout money." The Obama administration has any number of programs to help small business. This is just flat out wrong. Ever hear of the Family Leave Act.
This is a great idea. Better one is to require documentation and a reason when firing someone. Better still is passage of the Employee Free Choice Act. Best is requiring all employees to join/create a bargaining unit in every business and organization including non-profits. Jon Albrecht Dixfield

queenhoneeybee's picture
verified

It would be a great idea for

It would be a great idea for residents of Maine to have extra protection in the work place when it comes to diseases and illness that affects the overall population and puts them at risk health-wise and employment. I think as a society we need to be prepared and H1n1 just may be a wake up call to get our butts in gear. It may just have to get 'that' bad before people do something about it. I mean look at Katrina! And that was a flood! I guess many do not see the fact of exactly how many people have been affected by H1N1 since it has first reported. We are in a economic crisis (that everyone seems to be complaining about and probably the ONLY thing that EVERYONE agrees on) and employers are itching to 'get rid' of anyone all for the sake of being able to 'cash out' at the end of the day to maintain. "If anyone is living so tight that they cannot afford to put aside a few dollars from each and every paycheck for emergencies, they are living beyond their means"-does this apply to employers too in the mist of this economic crisis? They are looking for any reason to drop someone like a bad habit no matter how qualified and dedicated an employee may be (to hire someone at minimum wage or not hire another person to fill the position at all). In the State of Maine it may say "Employee Rights"-but in fact there are not many rights for the hard workers of Maine at all... they rules benefit the Employers.

I don't know about anyone else, but I do NOT want to get the flu period-let alone H1N1. I think we could have done a better job at trying to contain this if we just 'stayed home'.

candiceanne's picture

Clearly you are very

Clearly you are very uninformed on what is involved in hiring and firing and in areas of operatinng a viable business in any economy. Employees who are released from employmen[ receive unemployment benefits (currently for a record 99 weeks which will probably be 255 weeks by the end of 2012. Each year every company is rated based on that company's previous year's unemployment claims. From that rating a rate is set and the employer pays unemployment compensation tax on the new year's payroll every pay period. The more people released times and the greater the number of weeks claimed, the bigger the bill. It is not in an employer's best interest to run up claims by letting people go when it comes to long-term unemployment costs.
Hiring and taining is not easy or cheap. Employers hold on to their people who know the business, no the product or process and if there is customer interaction, they most definitely hang on to the people that keep the customers coming back. These factors are even more critical during economic downturn when goodwill, customer satisfaction, low loss, high quality control and the ability to be flexible can make you or break you. Good employees are not let go because they are out legitimately ill.
The businesses you see still in business, excluding those who got bailout money and are feeding of we taxpayers of course, have, do and will continue to live within their means. If they did not, they would be gone, Obama is not offering Joe the Plumber, Shaws, Victoria's Secret or Ruby Tuesday's any stimulus or bailout money. These and millions of other smaller and larger businesses are running on very small margins by watching every penny and making sure it is spent wisely if it has to be spent. They are doing the equivelent of those of us living within our means at home are doing to set a little aside for a rainy day such as doing away with cable TV completely or at the very least no extras. They have done away with "training" programs that include meals or travel and I expect there will be very few holliday parties or bonus (outside wallstree and banking of course) this year or next. It is not up to your employer to do anything for you beyond a paycheck that does not bounce and a safe work environment. You owe your employer your undevided attention during the time they are buying from you and to maintain that safe work environment which means do not bring communicable disease i.e. H1N1 knowingly to the workplace.

queenhoneeybee's picture
verified

shall i saw rather...

shall i saw rather... personal experience.

queenhoneeybee's picture
verified

I am very well informed...

I am very well informed... the fact of the matter is Employers in the State of Maine can fire any employee without giving a reason and when it comes down to it with that phone call between the State, Employer, and Employee for benefits-the Employer can say anything about the Employee so they don't have to pay out for Unemployment. Being 'released' and being 'fired' are very different meanings/definitions under the Unemployment Law. There needs to be protection AND standard procedure for an employee who is legitimately ill so they do not bring a communicable disease to work. Employees are getting 'threatened' IF they call out of work sick, they are treated as though they are liars even when they have a doctors note, and they are giving attitudes from the time an employees calls into work and when they return. It was a snow-storming night when I got a call from my aunt-that my grandmother was admitted into the hospital and the doctors thought that it was CHF (for those who do not know what that is-it is Congestive Heart Failure). I spoke with my boss and told her I HAD to leave to go to the hospital to be with her and my family. My boss gave me such an attitude knowing what I had just been told. It definitely heightened my stress and worries. I was threatened if I left... I did just that. My Grandmother passed away two days later. At another place of employment-I injured my back twice within 4mths at work. I had missed time from work for appts and not being able to physically work some days or my full shift some days... they fired me because I missed time. In the eyes of Unemployment/Worker's Comp (which I never collected BTW cuz I knew I could do this on my own)-that wasn't suppose to happen.

candiceanne's picture

You are the perfect example

You are the perfect example of abuse of the system by your own words. First you talk about taking several days off from work not because you are sick but because your grandmother is in the hospital. You can not even justify this by saying you were needed to care for a child or elderly relative as she was 1) in the hospital under professional care and 2) there were other family members at the hospital in addition to the hospital staff providing care. Given the description of your grandmothers condition she was probably in intensive care with extremely limited visiting so your being out of work served no purpose beyond freeing you to do whatever and inconvenience your employer and co-workers.

Next you confess to repeatedly taking time off over a period of a few months for appointments in addition to but unrelated to two workers comp cases involving your back from a single employer. Why in the world would you expect your employer to give you time off for appointments? Appointments are to be scheduled to occur on your own time not your employers. You would not work for me because clearly you are not interested in working but a paycheck for nothing. You are the reason employers do not/can not offer sick or personal days, you would so abuse the privilege. LEGISLATURE, HERE IS YOUR POSTER CHILD AGAINST THIS IDEA.

queenhoneeybee's picture
verified

ok thats just really psycho

ok thats just really psycho or never had to experience of loss of someone. i never even said anything about taking several days off work. it was one night to see her because i was told that she wasn't going to make it. as a hard-working, dedicated employee (70-80 hrs a week) i think that i was entitled to take the few hours off. i guess i didn't make my comment clear that employers shouldn't dump or threaten their employees when someone in the family is in the hospital and it is an emergency or could be the last time you could see them. and sorry-may want to read AGAIN... my injuries were related to that single employer. under workers compensation i was protected but the employer disputed and argued and ultimately i got the rotten end of the deal-Unemployment and Comp weren't there to help me out as far as 'protecting' me and as far as money goes-i didn't want it. my statement was geared more towards in the LAWS of Unemployment AND Comp they could not fire me based on me having to have RESTRICTIONS (authorized by doctors), however my employer did. its funny how people are quick to judge when they never walked a foot in someone else's shoes.

Brian_L's picture

You don't want people to

You don't want people to have paid sick leave....Well don't complain when you get swine flu from them when they cough all over your food at the restaurant.

candiceanne's picture

What a way to be out of a

What a way to be out of a job, chase the customers out the door by going to work sick and exposing your employers most valuable asset, the customer to a communicable disease. When your employer is forced to close his/her doors because you have turned goodwill to ill will with your rude, inconsiderate and dangerous behavior, I am sure it will be too much to hope you accept responsibility and not blame the employer, the economy or someone else for your unemployment.

Mac antSaior's picture
verified

Great Brian, you can cut me

Great Brian, you can cut me a check for my next call out. Besides, it's the job of management to send home infected food handlers.

It is the undauntable thought, my friend. The one that says, "I'm right!" ~Bobby Sands

Robert F.'s picture

How about this novel

How about this novel idea.
People, on their own and because of being responsible adults, save (ouch) a few dollars from each and every paycheck and provide for themselves and by themselves on their own(another ouch) their own rainy day fund. That is the way I was taught and I can tell you honestly, IT WORKS! If anyone is living so tight that they cannot afford to put aside a few dollars from each and every paycheck for emergencies, they are living beyond their means.

Brian_L's picture

Guess you never worked for

Guess you never worked for minimum wage.

Mac antSaior's picture
verified

There are things that sound

There are things that sound good and then there are things that make sense. Making employers foot the bill for your time off sounds good, but makes no sense. When will people stop trying to make other people pay their way in life?

It is the undauntable thought, my friend. The one that says, "I'm right!" ~Bobby Sands

Gil's picture

Well said "Reasoning with a

Well said
"Reasoning with a liberal is like trying to pick up a turd by the clean end. " Pirate

Centarie2000's picture
verified

How will it be funded? The

How will it be funded? The assumption is that employers can afford it yet choose not to. The reality is the ones who don't really can't. The Maine workforce is already paying for an array of services.

Who will replace workers while they are home? Not every company can hire an endless supply of short term replacements (who need to be paid, trained, covered, scheduled, and terminated), and some jobs are not be cross-trainable.

BTW: We had 12 call outs over 3 consecutive days last week. Many had to stay late in order to continue services uninterupted. Overtime pay is not always approved, even in such times.

dandee84's picture
verified

On Thursday, an individual I

On Thursday, an individual I know personally, was diagnosed with H1N1, put on Tamiflu and told to stay home from work. She stayed home from work Thursday and Friday. Friday coughing and with a 102 degree fever, she and three friends went to the movies. I would expect in the next 10-14 days a good many of the people at that theater during and after her visit who touch anything she left virus on will be getting sick, some may even become disabled or die. To have the day off to spread this at a theater she should be paid by an employer who must pay another to do her job? Many employers simply are not in a position to provide sick days and with employees like this it is little wonder. I doubt she is any more responsible on her job than she was in putting all those people at risk. What a wonderful world we live in. No respect, consideration and most of all NO COMMON SENSE.
If we could only return to common sense...

Centarie2000's picture
verified

Common sense is no longer so

Common sense is no longer so common, is it?

tron's picture

Gotta agree with the right

Gotta agree with the right wing wackos this time. Forcing an employer to pay people for time off isn't right. I think allowing people to take time off without fear of getting fired would be acceptable, within limits, and I think an employer would be prudent to have paid sick leave, but to mandate paid sick leave isn't right.

veritas's picture
verified

And Kate Brennan's going to

And Kate Brennan's going to fund it! Hoo-ray!!!

------------------------------------------
When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.

mad dad's picture

Could be another way for

Could be another way for someone to get paid for doing nothing sick or not !!!!!!!

Advertisement