LEWISTON — Two police officers who stood in front of a pickup truck fired their handguns at it when the truck suddenly lurched forward, a detective wrote in a sworn statement.
A surgeon who later removed a bullet from the driver's neck said the woman was "very lucky." The bullet apparently mushroomed when it passed through a window before it lodged in her neck muscle in front of her vertebrae and behind her esophagus.
The woman, Kristy Lee Cookson, 28, of Manchester appeared in 8th District Court dressed in a jail suit, a bandage wrapped around her chin. A judge reduced her bail from $25,000 cash to $15,000 cash. He also allowed $30,000 surety.
After chasing Cookson through town Tuesday evening, reaching speeds of 80 mph, officer Raymond Vega told Detective James Theiss that the stolen truck she was driving crashed into a parked car, then came to a stop, according to an affidavit filed Thursday in Androscoggin County Superior Court.
Vega got out of his cruiser and drew his service handgun.
Standing at the driver's side of the truck, Vega pointed his gun at Cookson and ordered her to stop and get out. He recognized her as the woman he had pulled over and arrested on Nov. 24 and charged with operating under the influence. She was released on bail.
Cookson looked at Vega and ignored his orders, he told Theiss. Vega saw another officer, Keith Caouette, run toward the back of the truck. Vega said he was afraid the truck might hit Caouette, so Vega shot at the driver's side tire.
The truck became stuck on a bank. Both officers moved to the front of the truck as it spun its wheels, the driver shifting from reverse to forward in an effort to free the vehicle. Then the truck lurched forward, they told Theiss.
"With the apartment building behind Officer Caouette and a retaining wall to his right, (he) had no place to retreat," Theiss wrote Wednesday in his sworn affidavit in support of a warrantless arrest. "Officer Caouette told me it was his belief that, based on Cookson's previous attempt to strike him and showing no desire to stop her vehicle at any time, it was her intention to strike one or both of the officers with the truck. Knowing how large the truck was, Officer Caouette feared that he would be run over or pinned up against the apartment building. Officer Caouette felt that this would either cause serious or fatal injury to himself or Officer Vega."
Vega was near the center of the front bumper; Caouette next to Vega toward the driver's side. Each officer fired two or three times. The truck backed up again, Theiss wrote.
Caouette told Vega to step to the side of the truck's path. Caouette fired his stun gun at Cookson, hitting her on her left shoulder. She eventually got out of the truck and was handcuffed, then taken to Central Maine Medical Center for treatment.
Cookson was charged with eluding an officer and reckless conduct with a dangerous weapon. Each of the felonies is punishable by up to five years in prison. She also was charged with violation of condition of release, a misdemeanor.
Assistant District Attorney Andrew Matulis argued for high bail, claiming Cookson had ties to Florida where she once lived and might try to return. He said she has a lengthy criminal history and poses a safety threat to the community.
Attorney Allan Lobozzo, who represented Cookson during her court appearance, said her family lives in Maine and she planned to stay with her mother in New Gloucester. He was seeking minimal cash bail and supervision by Maine Pretrial Services.
Judge Rick Lawrence set bail and conditions, including no operating a motor vehicle and counseling for anger issues, substance abuse and psychological issues.
Cookson has been charged 16 times in Broward County, Florida, according to court records there. Charges include child abuse, drug possession, eluding a police officer, resisting arrest and operating after suspension.
In Maine, Cookson was convicted last year on one count of domestic
violence assault and sentenced to 120 days in jail, with all time
suspended. She violated her probation on that charge earlier this year
and served eight days in jail.
Since Cookson's Maine license was issued, she has been involved in
one previous accident and, since 2008, has been convicted of one count
of operating under the influence, operating without a license,
operating an unregistered vehicle, failure to pay a fine, failure to
display inspection sticker, failure to produce evidence of insurance
and three convictions for failing to appear in court on separate
charges of failing to report an accident, driving without a license and
operating under the influence of liquor. In 2008, Cookson's license was
suspended for seven months for failure to take a Breathalyzer test.



There would have been no
There would have been no reason to shoot this criminal if they had really stopped her truck to begin with. By stop her truck, I mean block her into the car she hit, or ram her into something else that won't move.
Why did they get out of their cars to chase her on foot while her truck was still underway? This article reads like a retrospect excuse, it is verbosely lame.
I have never read so many mindless blips in support of an action which was so obviously wrong, like this one. I hope none of you own one of those 3 million Toyotas, whose accelerator pedals suddenly stick; you risk being shot in Lewiston with that recall issue. Maybe Toyota would pay your med bills after the shooting. Or maybe the Lewiston PD wouldn't miss the head-shot and kill you. Not a very comforting thought.
When you support the police in what ever they do, by default you will be correct in your support at times and dead wrong at other times - and this incident is one of those other times.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I think I now hate
I think I now hate Candiceanne more then Tron. You can tell in the tone of her posts that she's not sharing a bed with anyone which is probably why she is so negative all the time. Take a Trim Spa baby and maybe someone will like you some day. Until the day comes when you finally get to clean out the rats nest I suggest you comment about matters you actually may have a clue about.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Your personal attacks are
Your personal attacks are not wanted here. If you disagree with someone, then just state your case.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Richy, you are indeed one of
Richy, you are indeed one of the dregs of society. Your comment illustrates how debase a humanoid you are. Return to your genus and leave us true humans alone.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.CANDICEANNE From someone who
CANDICEANNE
From someone who really was involved in law enforcement… and I don’t mean some elitist who thinks just because they have a college degree (which I do and so do many of the police working for that department btw) that they know more than the cops who are actually working the streets. You sound more like an elitist who has a bone to pick with cops. Like one of those people that want cops to shoot the gun out of some bad guys hand or something. I have to ask, were you ever a uniformed officer working the streets?
*The last I checked in the state of Maine they have not changed when Police can give chase. Not to mention that none of us really knows what happened that night. Not every state or municipality want to give criminals the idea that they can just run from the police.
*You have no way if knowing what transpired to question the officer’s decision that placed him in front of the vehicle.. is it possible that the officer had to cross in front of the vehicle for only a split second?? Who knows…YOU DON’T!
*Anyone with common sense or at least any REAL law enforcement officer knows that a flat tire does not disable a vehicle?? I mean really…college didn’t teach you that.
There is always something to be learned from every situation. But that does not mean the officers acted inappropriately. I too was involved in Law Enforcement both out of state and here in Maine and I know better then to judge someone or some incident before having ALL of the facts. I am not Obama.
I really don’t detect any law enforcement background in your posts; maybe you realized you couldn’t cut it, or maybe it’s been so long you forgot what it’s like to be on the street and having to make these decisions.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Erin--just so you
Erin--just so you know--candiceanne is a proffesional trainer in Law Enforcement and I am the Pope!! LOL LOL LOL
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Nice how Candiceanne can
Nice how Candiceanne can give us a full synopsis of what the Officers should have done in this incident. All traffic stops are text book perfect aren't they Candicanne. Amazing how you already have drawn diagrams of where all vehicles were located and positioned, where all officers were positioned while the vehicle was still moving. You must either have a crystal ball or was onscene during the incident (both of which I highly doubt). I'll give you credit, you've done some research online. Yes an officer during routine traffic stops never approaches a vehicle from the front or back but up along the side with hand on holster ready to draw...but wait this wasn't a routine traffic stop was it? She was fleeing from the get go. Can I also ask Candicanne whats LPD pursuit policy? Your research, as you claim, to only follow in a pursuit if its a violent offender is wrong. Majority of departments have a pursuit policy for speeds, types of offenses committed for a pursuit, weather conditions, road conditions and amount of traffic on a roadway. Most of the time officers have no way to identify who is behind the wheel until they actually stop the vehicle, unless they have your magic crystal ball. Its kind of hard to know if the driver is a violent offender in every stop. Its also funny how you give the offender due process and time to gather facts about the incident but have already passed verdict on the officers involved, who possibly were following training and standard operating procedures put in place by their department. Heres a clue next time you want to claim to be some kind of professional...know your facts.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I love you Erin! :D
I love you Erin! :D
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Even with the reduced bail,
Even with the reduced bail, I really doubt she is going anywhere. Who, even if family, is going to be willing to risk their own $15,000 cash or $30,000 worth of property, that this person actually decides to appear at the date set for her hearing, especially given her past criminal history, the severity of the pending charges, and her out-of state ties?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond..40 caliber holes let the
.40 caliber holes let the stupid out.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.To those of you saying the
To those of you saying the woman in the vehicle could have been a teen who was scared....This officer saw and recognized who she was before he shot her. I have no opinion on this matter...hard to tell what happened..we weren't there.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Thank you lex3379!!!
Thank you lex3379!!! Finally, a voice of reason!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.candiceanne, you sound like
candiceanne, you sound like a whinig little girl who was picked last in dodge ball. The cops should only be reprmanded for being a bad shot, other than that Great Job PD. If the courts wont put these looser away, you take care of it on the streets. Do we need to have our officers shot like the ones in Washington state, before we wake up and realize we are enabling this type of criminal activity.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.It is so unfortunate that
It is so unfortunate that you miss the point that it was lucky that none of the officers or innocents were hurt or killed. This is an event that a lot of lessons can be learned from and fortunately as an instructor I could use this as a case srudy of what not to do and still say no one died and no one was hurt. Sad in Maine we can not honestly look at what is happening around us and say, we did not handle this well, we could do this better, we should have done this and next time we will...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.candiceanne...there is a
candiceanne...there is a lesson to be learned...don't try to run from the police and don't try to run over an armed policeman. ANYTHING else is pure speculation from your part. By the way what with this "we" stuff? You were not there so please do not interject yourself into this scenario. I hope you,as an instructor,do so in an unbiased and impartial manner, but I have a feeling that may not be the case. Teach children or adults THE FACTS not opinion, something the mainstream media has forgotten or refuses to do.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Yea, Robert. If your kid or
Yea, Robert. If your kid or grandkid was playing in that yard on central ave, I'm sure your first reaction would be, "Thank God the police gave chase" rather than running the plate and determining who the driver is." But who cares about innocent bystanders when you can get a testosterone rush?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Yes Sandra2 because everyone
Yes Sandra2 because everyone drives the vehicle that is registered to them and never drives someone elses vehicle. Knowing who the driver was, in this instance, would help in a decision to pursue how? Please don't tell me you'd suggest letting them drive home and contacting them later, especially when the driver war reported to be driving irratically or in a dangerous way before hand. I'm sure an instant bystander wouldn't have mind the officers allowing her to run over one of them. Damned if you do, Damned if you don't. Stop with the sterotypes all ready and realize CSI is not real life.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Lets get back to the
Lets get back to the article. A judge what judge? Whats his/her name? Why not drop the bail to ten bucks then she could be out on the street faster. Officer Vega arrested this person on Nov 24 for OUI. Less than two weeks later she is back in custody for the same and numerous other charges. In stead of lowering her bail it should have been raised to a million. She obviously has no regard for the law. It's time to show her that we mean business.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Earnest writes: "In stead
Earnest writes: "In stead of lowering her bail it should have been raised to a million"
Just what is it that you have against the Constitution of the United States, Earnest??
Bill of Rights, 8th Amendment to the Constitution: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
------------------------------------------
When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.candiceanne illustrates why
candiceanne illustrates why we have so much crime now. Not enough fear of punishment. Let's see....if I swipe a $100 pair of sneakers and speed off then the cops should not chase me because they are putting inoocent lives at stake. So now I can take anything I like and not have to worry about the cops unlsee I slip up and get busted somewhere down the road. So now Mom & Pop store owner arm themselves to protect their investment because the cops can't do anything about it. Joe Criminal now arms himself to commit the crimes. Mom & Pop fight back and end up getting shot. NOW the cops can chase them. Great plan.
I think I would rather have the cops chase the $100 sneaker thief and risk an innocent. If something happens you add the charge to Joe Criminal so that $100 sneaker theft could cost him his neck. And yes I realize that the innocent could be my family member. When the Lord calls your number, that's it.
That scenario just happened in Charlotte, NC. The suspect fled and police pursed, but not at a high rate of speed. The suspect crossed the center line and killed a person. The cops came upon the scene after the crash. The sneaker thief now faces vehicular homicide charges among a host of other traffic violations. It doesn't matter if the cops pursue at 30 MPH the criminal will speed. So don't blame the cops for anything a criminal does while fleeing. It is 100% the criminals fault and should be treated as such. Stop hand cuffing the cops and let them do their jobs.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Recalling my training some
Recalling my training some 35 years ago at the Police Training Institute at the University of Illinois, it was hammered home to we rookies that our bodies were not an appropriate object to place in front of a fleeing motorist - (cruisers, perhaps) - but never one's body - even if armed. It mostly dealt with physics; mass, momentum, the impossibility of two objects occupying the same space, etc - and really didn't have a whole heck of a lot to do with any legal variables. One simply doesn't place themselves in an untenable position.
But once they have - it all goes downhill from there......
------------------------------------------
When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I LOVE how Tron trolls the
I LOVE how Tron trolls the S-J comments looking for ANY reason to attack the LPD, even though he WASN'T EVEN THERE.
Tron is an effing Troll.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.send her back to Fla and let
send her back to Fla and let them deal with her save us some $$$$$ here we go again paying and paying wish someone would wake up and smell the coffee.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.In a story below this one in
In a story below this one in today's SJ is an article on First Selectmen Ivey entitled "Ivey Charged With Driving With Suspended License." In that article every one of Ivey's past motoer vehicle violation convictions is listed as convictions. There is not one previously charged with. Makes you wonder if this woman wasn't cleared of all previous charges and the police who made a tremendous amount of mistakes are grasping at anything to divert attention. and I am a former law enforcement professional.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Most states require a
Most states require a college education to be a police officer and for very good reason. I have that education and spent the 80's attempting to train law enforcement officers in Maine. Nothing has changed, apparently, from befoe I started. Firat off, these officers had no business chasing a vehichile not involved in a violent vrime through town at speeds in excess of 80 miles an hour. Research has show, an professional law enforcement all over the country are teained that unless they are in pursuit of a violent offender who posess an imminent threat to the public they them selves by continuing the high speed pursuit are creating the iminent threat. The offender can be arrested at a later time without further risk. Often times these are kids joy riding etc and the likely hood of a fatal crah as the result of the pursuit out ways the need for immediat apprehension.
A professional officer never approaches a suspect vehicle from behind or front but along the side, rare to front stopping at the door post. This is the safest position foe the officer safe from vehicle movement and gunfire from the vehicle (It is hard to aim out a side window twisted in a seat. and the officer can see what is going on in the vehicle). A professional officer never puts themselves between the proverbial rock and a hard place, theis only endangers himself and the public further. This vehicle had been disabled be the officer shooting out the tire and the officers had identified the nonviolent offender and could wait her out. The officer, of course never should have discharged his firearm in the first plae. He mDe the bad situation worse in several ways. First the driver probably could not see the officer behind the vehivle who should not have been there and was not aiming for him. Second, he risked injuring officers and innocents with stray bullets (an apt building was close by) and he caused the vehicle to become uncontrolable if it did move further endangering everyone for a nonviolent offender..
I lived in Florid for 11 years, I can assure you it is common practice to file charges in the hopes the charged will offer cash to settle and be done with it. Check out BikeWeek and BiketoberFest warnings on the internet. The woman was charged in Broward which is the county south of Volusia which includes Daytona. Also child abuse cases are a mess in Florida. It would be mor important to see if she were convicted. Also the Maine case list aeems to include some duplication, it says she was charged with OUI once since 2008 but it listed twice and the refusal to take a breatholizer is probably the same case the officer plans to make his case on the refusal and observation. The operatinng under suspension is also under that same stop and all of this is probably from the stop last week. How many of us have in advertantly let our registrations lapsed or borrowed a car from someone who for got? Being without insurance is a no no but may have been on a borrowed car and the card may not have been in it or may have been her's either way it could have been produced later and thAt happens all the time. There are charges but nothing on convictions, innocent until proven guilty means until we have all the facts. In this case we have three officers who do not know how to handle an evader in a non-violent and a stop and old charges that may all be not guilty and no convictions.
Time to go back to school before those sworn to protect and serve kill the innocent.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.N/A
N/A
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Spell check - why don't you
Spell check - why don't you give it a try?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Unfortunately spell check is
Unfortunately spell check is not available on the mobile device I use to read 7 newspapers and recive bulletins between meetings all day beginning around 4:30 AM. I wish it were or I had the ability to add a larger device with greater capabilities to my arsenal but it is not feasable. My apologies for the device limitations.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Please don't blame your poor
Please don't blame your poor spelling and syntax on device limitations.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This woman has absolutely no
This woman has absolutely no respect for the law. She has a record that should have had her in jail, not driving the streets of Lewiston. It is only a matter of time before one of us becomes her victim. The officers recognized the threat and took action. Good job LPD. The biggest problem here is with our juducial system who should have had her behind bars and a threat to no one but the jail guards. It is amazing how a person can continually show she that laws do not apply to her and keeps getting away with it. She will probably get out of this with a hand slap. If so, hopefully she will take her show to another state.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This women is really a fine
This women is really a fine young lady who is being persecuted by the LPD. We should just let her go.
WTF is the matter with you people? How can this be a police problem. This women is a problem, now she will be costing taxpayers money to jail her and treat her so she can do it all again when she gets out.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I guess it's pretty easy to
I guess it's pretty easy to pass judgment on a situation that none of us were there at. Fact is Lewiston Police are very well trained and extremely professional. The Police department was the first department in Maine to be nationally accredited, is highly regarded and serves as a leader in the law enforcement community. Officers not only have to meet strict entry requirements to be hired and accepted into the academy but also undergo extensive and continuous in-service training throughout their career. Nobody is perfect 100% of the time but when it comes to situations like these my benefit usually sides with the young men and women in uniform who are working on the front lines and are forced to put themselves in these precarious situations making split second decisions only to be Monday morning quarter backed by, I’ll just say “less then credible” citizens who have no idea what occurred.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I'd say the police were very
I'd say the police were very lucky, this out of control woman could have killed them. She still should have been in jail on domestic violence charges, if she were a man would she be let loose with no time served? These crazy substance abusers need to be helped somehow, they are a drain on society.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Can someone please explain
Can someone please explain to me what good SPIKE MATS would be, please? Spike mats stop/slow down a car in a chase situation. Officers still may have to shoot to keep the vehicle from running them or someone else over.
She got what she asked for. We need to get more of these psychotic people off the streets.
As far as the officers standing behind and in front of the truck--lets commend them for putting their lives at risk, so she wouldnt drive off and kill your child!!!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Lewiston police are as
Lewiston police are as untrained as many of you posters are ignorant of police procedure. They should never have put themselves in front of her car. Period. It's like running out in front of someone with a gun - while they're fleeing a crime! There are training methods that deal with this specific type of situation.
Her car should have been contained back and front with cruisers or pushed off the road or constrained up against another vehicle if she refused to stop in a timely manner. Then - guess what morons - she couldn't use her car as a weapon. No. Let's just try to shoot her in the head. That's a lot more fun.
This could easily have been a scared teenager and it could have resulted in death to the teen.
These must be home grown cops. It's easy to see why they aren't professionals. They don't have much to draw from.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The voice of reason, I'd
The voice of reason, I'd almost given up hope.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Where are u from T
Where are u from T wonderland?Could be ur an idiot north woods.How do u know that State Worker?Were u there?Last time i checked accused are innocent til proven guilty.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Her previous record is
Her previous record is enough for me!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Where are u from T
Where are u from T wonderland?Could be ur an idiot north woods.How do u know that State Worker?Were u there?Last time i checked accused are innocent til proven guilty.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I think the cars and the
I think the cars and the people that was in her path was lucky that she didnt kill someone GREAT JOB lewiston Police
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.the right amount of force
the right amount of force appears to have been used. When they feared for their lives they used deadly force but once they were no longer in harms way they used less lethal force. Good jobs guys.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.hey arthur last time I
hey arthur last time I checked the spike mats were in the trunk of the cruiser not in the Officers back pocket. I dont think they had time to run to their cars when they're standing in front of a crazy womans front bumper.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The weren't, they were on
The weren't, they were on the sides, except for the idiot who stepped BEHIND the truck. Seems stupidity gives cops a right to shot?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.No, her trying to run down a
No, her trying to run down a police officer gave them the RESPONSIBILITY to use deadly force. At this time this woman presented a threat to their fellow officers. She created the situation. Whatever other tactics the officers may have been able to use (the spike mat argument is completely specious, where the officers placed themselves is difficult for me to judge) this woman chose to refuse to obey lawful orders and presented a clear threat to life.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.what happened to spike
what happened to spike mates? Does this give police a right to shot to kill then get time off with pay must be nice
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What an idiotic and/or
What an idiotic and/or moronic statement, but entertaining!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.and true!
and true!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.She was trying to run the
She was trying to run the police officers over!!! Well call me stupid, but I think that gives them the right to shoot to kill. Boy, some people always just seem to focus on the negatives and stir up a bunch of controversy! Drama, Drama, Drama!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I'd be willing to bet that
I'd be willing to bet that "arthur" has been arrested before. Most people who are blindly critical of law enforcement are law breakers or have a family member or close friend who is a law breaker.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.T or they could just be an
T or they could just be an idiot
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.