Casino in Mill 5 raises questions

The idea of using Lewiston's Mill 5 for gambling isn't new. Ten years ago, when an Indian tribe wanted to locate a high-stakes bingo parlor in the remote mountains of western Maine, Mill 5 was floated as an alternative site.

Since then, a host of creative ideas have surfaced for the massive building, from storage shed to convention center. None has come to pass.

While we'd love to embrace a single, sweeping solution for the most prominent piece of property in Lewiston, the casino idea faces long odds.

First, there's the significant obstacle of changing state law to allow what would be the first full-scale casino in Maine.

The backers of Hollywood Slots in Bangor narrowly received an exemption, and only after holding a figurative gun to a horse's head.  A lucrative "racino" was sold as a way to rescue the hobbling horse-racing industry, backers said. Some gambling revenue from Hollywood Slots now goes to bigger horse-racing purses, a sort of endless equine subsidy program.

But it was the save-a-horse angle that passed the Bangor plan.

Since then, Maine voters have turned down at least three casinos in various parts of the state. What would make a Lewiston casino any more compelling to voters from Fort Kent or Kittery? The jobs/economic development argument hasn't worked anywhere else, and there's no reason to think it would work here.

Another obstacle: The state's voters are likely to see a competing casino proposal before Lewiston's can hit the ballot.

A fairly deep-pocketed group of investors hopes to have an Oxford County casino proposal before voters in November 2010. Lewiston clearly can't complete the signature-gathering process before January, the deadline for 2010. So, voters couldn't see it before 2011.

By then, voters may have said OK to a casino in Oxford County, in which case locating another casino 15 miles away would be impractical. Plus, there's a clause in their proposal that bars another casino within 100 miles.

Or, more likely, voters will again have said "no" to another casino. If so, offering another plan so soon after a rejection would be foolish.

Anonymous sources say the Lewiston City Council is considering giving a two-year option to the local investors to get their casino effort under way. Meanwhile, the city will pay about $800,000 to tear down the current structure.

It would be unfortunate if this deal were signed, sealed and delivered behind closed doors (which seems likely) and on the eve of another group of councilors taking office next month.

That's a big commitment for the city, and it should be considered openly. It  is a big commitment made largely by a group of people who won't be around city hall to deal with its implications. It's also a big commitment made on the eve of hiring a new city administrator who will start work next month. Ed Barrett could bring his Bangor/Hollywood Slots' experience to the table.

By acting now, the council would tie up that property for the next two years. That commitment should not be made so quickly, so secretively or by so many people who will soon be out of office.

The idea of a casino in Bates Mill No. 5 is clearly a long shot with a long timeline. There is no reason to act precipitously.

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

A casino anywhere is a bad

A casino anywhere is a bad idea.

jim m, What sort of

jim m,
What sort of background do you have that allows you to knowledgeably respond to the casaino proposal other thanlistening to the Baileys fear mongering?

 's picture

Word around City Hall is

Word around City Hall is Stavros Mendros lost the bid to get signatures for Oxford and this is sour grapes. Paper says Oxford got 100000 in a month so it looks like they made the right choice. Too bad Chicoine is being used like a puppet in a cat fight

 's picture

The location proposed in

The location proposed in Lewiston is quite small. The Oxford proposal covers 40 acres. I don't see 40 acres at that location, unless they tear down everything from Bates #5 to the water. Even then, this is a bad idea.

Everyone keeps thinking that we need a "big" buildling where #5 now sits. Why not think smaller, split it up into many parcels and create a village type of atmosphere? A blend of shops, housing, and green spaces.

 's picture

Hollywood slots is on a

Hollywood slots is on a smaller lot than Mill #5.

 's picture

I guess Lewiston will just

I guess Lewiston will just need to repeal Oxford in its Language.

 's picture

This council doesn't care.

This council doesn't care. They've thrown money around to get legal opinions to their liking, and thumbed their nose at state laws on open versus closed meetings. This is their opportunity to go out in a blaze. I just hope we (the taxpayers) are not in the path of this meteor streaking towards impact.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

Does Tron consider Ed

Does Tron consider Ed Barrett a suitable replacement for Jim Bennett, and, would Phil Nadeau have been a better replacement? The parrot needs this info for an essay he has to submit for obedience class tomorrow.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

The parrot sez he'd sure

The parrot sez he'd sure like to have some of those sunflower seeds, T.

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

Great idea. I have just the

Great idea. I have just the place for them at dockside. Thanks.

 's picture

The Lewiston Casino bill can

The Lewiston Casino bill can rewrite everything and anything in the Oxford bill up to and including complete repeal of Oxford. They can easily change the 100 mile monopoly law Oxford has.

Why tear up green space when we can rebuild a downtown?

 's picture

People like you make me

People like you make me laugh. Every city no matter what state is going to have bad areas. I have lived in Lewiston, Auburn, and currently So. Portland/Portland. Everyone of the cities everything was the same except the buildings. Just saying though.

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...