Paper: Bush considered sending troops into Buffalo

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Bush administration in 2002 considered sending U.S. troops into a Buffalo, N.Y., suburb to arrest a group of terror suspects in what would have been a nearly unprecedented use of military power, The New York Times reported.

Vice President Dick Cheney and several other Bush advisers at the time strongly urged that the military be used to apprehend men who were suspected of plotting with al Qaida, who later became known as the Lackawanna Six, the Times reported on its Web site Friday night. It cited former administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The proposal advanced to at least one-high level administration meeting, before President George W. Bush decided against it.

Dispatching troops into the streets is virtually unheard of. The Constitution and various laws restrict the military from being used to conduct domestic raids and seize property.

According to the Times, Cheney and other Bush aides said an Oct. 23, 2001, Justice Department memo gave broad presidential authority that allowed Bush to use the domestic use of the military against al-Qaida if it was justified on the grounds of national security, rather than law enforcement.

Among those arguing for the military use besides Cheney were his legal adviser David S. Addington and some senior Defense Department officials, the Times reported.

Opposing the idea were Condoleezza Rice, then the national security adviser; John B. Bellinger III, the top lawyer at the National Security Council; FBI Director Robert Mueller; and Michael Chertoff, then the head of the Justice Department's criminal division.

Bush ultimately nixed the proposal and ordered the FBI to make the arrests in Lackawanna. The men were subsequently arrested and pleaded guilty to terrorism-related charges.

Scott L. Silliman, a Duke University law professor specializing in national security law, told the Times that a U.S. president had not deployed the active-duty military on domestic soil in a law enforcement capacity, without specific statutory authority, since the Civil War.


What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



 's picture

this story is rediculously

this story is rediculously slanted. Now president Bush is being chastized for not sending in the miltary to a Buffalo suburb. This reminds me of how idiot members of congress were upset at Dick C for not keeping them informed of a program thatwas never implimented.

How about Obama and his idea of his own national police force? If he is considering it isn't that enough to go after him like the people wan to with Cheney n Bush?

RONALD RIML's picture

You should brush up on your

You should brush up on your basic reading comprehension their, Skippy. Bush merely 'considered' the option - it was "Darth Vadar' Cheney who was pushing that additional violation of law.

Thank God cooler heads prevailed.

And our military hasn't been knocking off a number of unarmed women and children since 2003? Or is 'collateral damage' a figment of our imagination?

You can go back to Mama's basement, Troll........

When I was a young Sailor - I drank like a Sailor, fought like a Sailor, and screwed like a Sailor. Now that I am old and wise - I have a few scars, but many fond memories.

 's picture

David A. "It cited former

David A.
"It cited former administration officials who spoke on condition of anonymity". That tells me everything I need to know. NY Times needs to drop its vendetta on the former administration before its completely in the crapper and has to close its doors.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...