Directors removed from NPSW board

PARIS — By the unanimous votes of two Boards of Selectmen, all seven members of the Norway-Paris Solid Waste Board of Directors were removed Thursday.

Norway and Paris selectmen held a joint meeting to discuss a series of resolutions to remove the directors. The first resolution passed by the boards allowed the towns to execute the restated articles of incorporation between the towns and the board. Another resolution removed all of the appointed directors from the board “with immediate effect.”

They are: Al Atkinson, Joe Bracy, Bruce Hanson and Janet Jamison of Paris; and Norway residents Eric Grondahl, Bruce Cook and Dundee Pratte.

The votes on each resolution were unanimous, as was a vote on a third resolution establishing a temporary method of running the NPSW board until replacement appointments are made. Town Managers David Holt of Norway and Philip Tarr of Paris were appointed interim board members to oversee the operations of waste corporation. If there is a tie vote on an issue, either the chairman of the Board of Selectmen from Paris or Norway will act as a director to break the tie.

“The essential complaint that we have and the Norway board also has is one, that the board of Norway-Paris Solid Waste adopted bylaws which are inconsistent with the interlocal agreement previously adopted by both town meetings of Norway and Paris,” Paris Selectman Raymond Glover said.

Glover said the board also acted inconsistently with the agreement when they ignored Tarr's advice to not remove director Janet Jamison from the board and appointed  Bracy to fill the remainder of her term.

Norway-Paris Solid Waste serves as a quasi-municipal organization to dispose of solid waste generated in the two towns. An interlocal agreements passed at the annual town meetings of both communities last year established a number of changes in the operation of the board of directors, such as the creation of a more regular meeting schedule and an increase in the number of directors from five to seven.

In December, the NPSW board voted 5-1, with one member absent, to amend the bylaws. Among the amendments is a section requiring the board to approve appointments made by the two towns and the ability to remove a director by a two-thirds vote of the board. The board may also nominate their own directors if the town fails to appoint a replacement for a vacancy within a certain time frame. NPSW board President Al Atkinson of Paris said the bylaws were consistent with state laws.

However, Jamison, the dissenting director in the December decision, has accused the board of seeking to undermine the interlocal agreement.

Jamison was removed by a 4-1 vote in January, with Atkinson and other directors accusing her of unprofessional behavior. He said she exceeded her authority by discussing changes to the board's bylaws with Norway selectmen after he had motioned to have a joint meeting between the boards of selectmen and NPSW directors.

The vote followed a move by the NPSW board to not recognize Jamison's appointment in August and a request by Atkinson that the Paris selectmen rescind Jamison's appointment. The Paris selectmen upheld the appointment on both occasions.

At a meeting last week, attorney Rob Crawford agreed that the bylaws were inconsistent with the interlocal agreement and said removing the directors and appointing new ones was one option selectmen had. Crawford said Monday that official letters would also be sent to the directors, consisting of four Paris and three Norway appointees, advising them that they would no longer have control over the funds and duties of Norway-Paris Solid Waste.

Atkinson said Thursday that he did not believe the vote was valid, since only two Paris selectmen were present.

“Two selectmen can't make the decision,” he said.

The Paris selectmen were scheduled to meet Thursday, as opposed to their usual date on Monday, to allow Selectman Glen Young to attend. Glover said Young was unable to go to the meeting because of delays in returning from his vacation. Glover said he was advised that under recent legislative revisions, he and Selectman Lloyd “Skip” Herrick would be able to take action on an issue if they were in agreement.

Holt thanked the departing directors for their service on the board.

mlangeveld@sunjournal.com

NORnpsw022610
M. Dirk Langeveld

The Norway Board of Selectmen voted Thursday night to remove its members from the Norway-Paris Solid Waste Board of Directors. From left are Paris interim Town Clerk Elizabeth Knox, Paris Town Manager Philip Tarr, and Paris Selectmen Lloyd "Skip" Herrick and Raymond Glover, Norway Town Manager David Holt and Norway Selectmen Bill Damon, Bruce Cook, Warren Sessions Jr., Irene Millett and Russell Newcomb.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Tricked Pony's picture

What a smokescreen.  TWO

What a smokescreen.  TWO SELECTMEN from Paris voted to dismantle this board.  ONLY TWO, yet the board is made up of FIVE!

 

It is very sad to read that a few with a hidden agenda interpret the law to make us believe that this decision could not be put off for a few more days to have a full board to act.  It is phoney. 

 

Simply stated, Ray Glover and Skip Herrick have once again shown ZERO integrity and no ethics in regards to the 5,000 people of this town.   The lawlessness continues.  The lack of ethics continue and the integrity in our local government has once again suffered because of their self serving agenda.

Paris Patriot's picture

THERE WERE FIVE BUT 2 WERE

THERE WERE FIVE BUT 2 WERE VOTED OUT....LEAVING THREE. THE THREE AGREED TO HAVE THEIR 2ND FEBRUARY MEETING ON THE 25TH, the one, GLENN YOUNG DIDN'T SHOW UP TO. Even if Glenn had been there to vote, the outcome would have been the same! THE TWO NEW SELECTMEN'S SLOTS WILL BE FILLED IN A WEEK AND A HALF! Nothing illegal happened except for the in the minds of the dumb dumbs!

Gees.

Idiots.

You'll never understand what I'm saying, tricked pony, so why am I bothering to explain it once again?

It's like talking to a rock!

 

 

Paris Patriot's picture

A REMINDER TO PARIS

A REMINDER TO PARIS CITIZENS:

On March 9, 2010, Paris citizens will again be heading to the polls at the Paris firebarn from 8am to 8pm to cast their votes to fill the 2 remaining seats on the Paris Board of Selectmen.

You can vote ABSENTEE BALLOT before March 9th at the Paris town office if you desire.

Jean Smart and Ken West are running to fill Troy Ripley's seat and Ted Kurtz is running to fill Dave Ivey's seat with that term ending this June 2010.

http://www.sunjournal.com/node/803789

We have to keep the momentum going because there is a lot of unfinished business in Paris and we must remind the new Board after the March 2010 election to tie up those loose ends so Paris can move forward. We are all looking forward to this fresh start and we thank all of the citizens of Paris who have taken time out of their schedules to be the great PATRIOTS they are! You've all been wonderful!  :)

 

 

 

 

Tricked Pony's picture

Neither Skip nor Ray had the

Neither Skip nor Ray had the integrity to put a halt until the Paris board had a full compliment of members in a mere 14 days?  Why the hurry gentlemen?  What hidden agenda has come to light?  

Paris has five positions for selectmen.  Only two now make a decision like this?  I'd call this very unethical.  

 

A minority is literally running the town of Paris.  How sad.  Two people with no ethics and zero integrity.  I hope Marge sues.

 

Paris Patriot's picture

I see tricked pony hasn't

I see tricked pony hasn't been paying attention because this whole thing didn't happen as fast as it did because of a "non-emergency". We had a NPSW Board that decided on their own (and by reading the laws wrong!) that they had the power to change the interlocal agreement between the towns of Paris and Norway so they could fire Janet. If you're a lawful American, that move right there should have made you angry! Anyway, the two towns met and decided that the best way to handle this Board WAS TO DO IT QUICKLY TO PROTECT THE BEST INTERESTS OF BOTH TOWNS (something you obviously don't agree with!). Paris happened to have February 25th scheduled as the day of their next Selectboard meeting (Glenn Young picked the date and then didn't show up!) and the two towns agreed that that was the appropriate time to vote on the dissolution of the NPSW Board.

 

http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/30-A/title30-Asec2521.html

§2521. Call of town meeting

Each town meeting shall be called by a warrant. The warrant must be signed by a majority of the selectmen, except as follows. [1987, c. 737, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); 1987, c. 737, Pt. C, §106 (NEW); 1989, c. 6, (AMD); 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD); 1989, c. 104, Pt. C, §§8, 10 (AMD).]

1. First town meeting.  The first town meeting shall be called in the manner provided in the act of incorporation.
[ 1987, c. 737, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); 1987, c. 737, Pt. C, §106 (NEW); 1989, c. 6, (AMD); 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD); 1989, c. 104, Pt. C, §§8, 10 (AMD) .]
2. Majority of selectmen.  If, for any reason, a majority of the selectmen do not remain in office, a majority of those remaining may call a town meeting.
[ 1987, c. 737, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); 1987, c. 737, Pt. C, §106 (NEW); 1989, c. 6, (AMD); 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD); 1989, c. 104, Pt. C, §§8, 10 (AMD) .]
3. Petition of 3 voters, if no selectmen.  When a town, once organized, is without selectmen, a notary public may call a meeting on the written petition of any 3 voters.
[ 1987, c. 737, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); 1987, c. 737, Pt. C, §106 (NEW); 1989, c. 6, (AMD); 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD); 1989, c. 104, Pt. C, §§8, 10 (AMD) .]
4. Petition by voters, if selectmen refuse.  If the selectmen unreasonably refuse to call a town meeting, a notary public may call the meeting on the written petition of a number of voters equal to at least 10% of the number of votes cast in the town at the last gubernatorial election, but in no case less than 10.
Those remaining on the Paris Selectboard: Ray Glover, Skip Herrick, and Glenn Young. The majority (Ray & Skip) of the remaining board called a meeting. Get it now or are you spinning it in your head to mean something else?
A minority is not running this town. A majority is considered two or more. One is a minority.
Whose Marge? Does she live in Cumberland County but says she resides in Paris (Oxford County) by using a P.O. Box, her cell phone number, and lists her law office as her actual residence all so she can keep her powerful job?

 

 

 

 

Paris Patriot's picture

Here's another interesting

Here's another interesting section of the law:

http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/30-A/title30-Asec2526.html

§2526. Choice and qualifications of town officials

[...]

4. Selectmen and overseers.  The following provisions apply to selectmen and overseers.

A. A town may determine at a meeting held at least 90 days before the annual meeting whether 3, 5 or 7 will be elected to each board and their terms of office.
(1) Once the determination has been made, it stands until revoked at a meeting held at least 90 days before the annual meeting.
(2) If a town fails to fix the number, 3 shall be elected. If a town fails to fix the term, it is for one year. [1987, c. 737, Pt. A, §2 (NEW); 1987, c. 737, Pt. C, §106 (NEW); 1989, c. 6, (AMD); 1989, c. 9, §2 (AMD); 1989, c. 104, Pt. C, §§8, 10 (AMD).]

 

 

Three (3), 5, or 7 members of a Selectboard constituties A MAJORITY BOARD. So that means...

Of the 3 man Selectboard that exists in Paris right now, the majority (2 of the 3) of that board called a meeting (and the 3rd was notified of it! He's the one who picked the date of the meeting!) to do the town's business and to have the Norway Selectboard present to conduct the two town's business in connection with the NPSW Board. 

Where are your facts, tricked pony, that a minority is running the town and the vote that was taken on February 25th was not a legal one?

 

 

Tim S's picture

boy, you are diluted. you are

boy, you are diluted.

you are totally misinterpreting the law.

paris last decided that they would have five selectboard members, a quorum is 3 out of 5.

just because the voters removed two members does not change how that board is made up and the rules under which they function

the law you reference clearly states that two selectmen cannot do anything other than authorize payroll and call a town meeting or set an election.  nothing ini there indicates that they can dissolve a quasi-municipal corporation on behalf of the town at the whim of a troublemaker like janet jamerson

Paris Patriot's picture

You're not reading the WHOLE

You're not reading the WHOLE LAW which says if Selectmen are removed from the Board (or step down...whatever the reason may be for a Board to go from 5 Selectmen to 3 Selectmen) then the remaining MAJORITY of the Board can still call a meeting and can act as a majority board.

Do you read with your hands over your eyes and listen with your fingers in your ears, tricked pony? Something tells me you do.

GLENN YOUNG ASKED FOR FEBRUARY 25TH TO BE THE 2ND MEETING IN FEBRUARY. He, Ray, and Skip all agreed on the date. Young didn't show up but he was well aware a meeting was scheduled. Ray & Skip representing the Paris Board met with the Norway Board to discuss the NPSW Board. The two town's agreed that February 25th would be the quickest and best night to hold a join meeting to dissolve the board. Even if Young had been at any of these meetings he would have voted against all of it AND HIS VOTE WOULDN'T HAVE MATTERED BECAUSE THE MAJORITY WAS IN EFFECT.

Understand now or do you need me to draw it out with crayons?

 

 

 

Tim S's picture

you left out an inportant

you left out an inportant word.  the word is town.  the remaining selectmen can call a town meeting where the citizens make the decisions, that is different than conducting a selectmans meeting and alone making decisions on behalf of the town.

you stated in another post that glen young was unable to make it to that meeting as his flight home was delayed.   is that so unreasonable whereas most of the eastern seacoast, especially throughout new england, had shut down airports due to storms for most of the week?  you are something else.  your hatred has consumed your ability to be reasonable.

news4u's picture

I can recall a

I can recall a special Selectman's meeting that was held when Skip Herrick was out of state. The board was well aware that Skip would be unable to attend that meeting, yet they opted to hold the meeting. How is this different? Did Glen call the Town Manager of Paris and ask that the meeting be rescheduled? Or, to save face (or avoid showing his) was it easier to use the "my flight was delayed" as an excuse? Do you honestly think he would have attended the meeting? After all, he doesn't have Mr. Ripley to stare him down anymore and to spoon feed him the answers. He might have to make a decision on his own-something he hasn't done in the last 8 months.

The boards met with the town attorney last week. The joint public meeting that was held with the Norway & Paris Selectboards was a legal meeting. It was publicized in the newspapers. Much the opposite of how the NPSW board meetings have operated over the last several months.

"Those who complain about the way the ball bounces are often the ones who dropped it." ( Anonymous)  You seem to be having great difficulty playing by the legal rules, Tim. Time to take your ball and go play elsewhere! 

Tim S's picture

the special selectmans

the special selectmans meeting was with 4 out of 5 selectmen, not 2 out of five.  even if two seats are vacant, they are still active seats of the board.  your ignorance has already been proven in your words, the later actions of the boad will also.  flights get delayed when major storms disrupt traffic at several major airports, make it into whatever you want but the truth is the truth.

 

Paris Patriot's picture

According to the wingnuts,

According to the wingnuts, only 5 make a majority! Dimwits.

Paris Patriot's picture

tricked, pony, Paris

tricked, pony, Paris currently has a majority board because it consists of 3 INDIVIDUALS. Three consititutes a majority as does 5 and 7. Odd numbers! Isn't that neat? A Board consisting of 2 individuals would still be able to function, however. A Board of one would not, because if you remember correctly in your homeschooled lessons (hopefully it was touched upon!), we here in America don't like the King running the show! Again, isn't that neat?

Tim S's picture

you are wrong again.  reread

you are wrong again.  reread the law with your public school education.  read it slowly and maybe it will sink in

Paris Patriot's picture

No, you read it dimwit. It

No, you read it dimwit. It states that if there are missing Selectmen (no matter the reason) the majority of who is left (even if they decided on 5 to be a Board!) can still call a meeting. Another section of the law talks about how 3, 5, and 7 are considered majority boards!

 

You show me the part of the law that proves me wrong.

 

 

Tim S's picture

no wonder you dont use your

no wonder you dont use your real name, you discredit yourself and your position more and more with every post

Paris Patriot's picture

Provide a link to the law

Provide a link to the law that supports your position please!

news4u's picture

Where did you obtain your law

Where did you obtain your law degree? The same school as Dana Hanley?!? LOL!

Paris Patriot's picture

Some days I can't tell if

Some days I can't tell if Orly Taitz is running the show or that guy is!!!! It's very confusing. LOL

Tim S's picture

but anywho  

but anywho

 

Tim S's picture

weren't ray and skip and

weren't ray and skip and their supporters screaming something about unlawful beahvior over the last year or so?

wow this is a new low for those scumbags in paris

Jolly Roger's picture

I only hope that in the

I only hope that in the wisdom of the selectmen from both towns that Jamison is  NOT allowed back on this board.

IMHO she is/was/has been the root cause of this entire mess.  The Paris board should have seen this coming (but of course we all know they have had their own problems over the last year).  Jamison operates in a counter productive and disruptive manner in conducting the publics business. 

Paris Patriot's picture

Janet acts on behalf of the

Janet acts on behalf of the WHOLE TOWN(S).

You don't and you support the idea of having individuals in place who support the tiny little grumpy minority of the whole town!

Tim S's picture

grumpy minority? are you

grumpy minority?

are you talking about the 10 or so "concerned citizens" in your gang of mischief

or 

do you mean the 400 from paris hill out of the 5000 citizens of Paris

Paris Patriot's picture

I'm talking about you. Funny

I'm talking about you. Funny how again you're not seeing it or understanding a thing.

Tim S's picture

talk is cheap.  do something

talk is cheap.  do something about it.  this just shows that bully tactics are how to get things done.  act like janet and you will get what you want.

Paris Patriot's picture

Al Atkinson believes the vote

Al Atkinson believes the vote last night wasn't legal? Where the hell was Glenn Young, you know, the Paris Selectboard member WHO CHOSE FEBRUARY 25TH AS THE DAY HE COULD ATTEND? Not sure I believe his plane was delayed or that he was 'stuck in Florida', because one can make a cell phone from anywhere in the country and one could say they were in Florida, when really, they're standing in their kitchen in Paris! Anyway...

The vote last night even with Glenn there would have been the same result. Glenn most likely would have voted against the dissolution with Glover & Herrick voting for it.

But hey! Facts don't matter to the feeble minded who don't understand their butt from their elbow.

 

Paris Patriot's picture

How do we know if the NPSW

How do we know if the NPSW Board saved the towns money WHEN AN AUDIT HASN'T BEEN DONE? The best part of last night's meeting was hearing Phil Tarr saying they (he and Dave Holt) will expose how the money has been spent.  If money has been saved, then great....but that doesn't negate the fact there was abuse of power going on! Paris & Norway residents deserve to know how the money has been spent and having a Board believing it was all-powerful who could add their own by-laws to the two town's 'Constitution' to use against one of their directors to remove her for using her First Amendment right of free speech AFTER AL ATKINSON CREATED A FACEBOOK PAGE TO ALLOW PUBLIC COMMENTS, well, I say GOOD RIDDANCE! Hey, you create it and they will come....

Al Atkinson's letter to the Advertiser Democrat this week was laughable. Does Al always refer to himself in the 3rd person? Apparently!

 

 

Micky Finn's picture

  Its done and over with.....

  Its done and over with..... for now........just hope the "winners" can control their new powers and not become what they defeated...

zeke's picture

Let me be the first too say

Let me be the first too say what a day in the history of Norway-Paris.
Jamieson said she would clean this Board out by Gawd.Now who wants to
serve under these conditions?Ray Glover has out done himself here
with his loyal side kick Skippy.Bruce Cook voted to remove himself,
how poetic.Warren had a huge ax to grind with the NPSW board too.
Plus the lease is us with Oxford County who Warren serves with to
the tune of about 47,ooo a year plus benifits.Take a Board that has saved
both towns over 100,000 k in 6 years and do away with it.All because Janet-
Ray and others cant control it.Make sure boys when you redo it you put
all Yes people on that will do what Key club bosses Philly Tarr-Davey Holt say.
You dont want to do anything but hide behind your postions.Dave has got
more white out and rubber stamps coming you will all have an unlimited supply.
Yes siree Great job-- you all should be soooo Proud.Lets put Janet-Warren-
Cook,Paine-- and few more like that on.That will Learn them real Good
Zeke

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paris Patriot's picture

Why don't you run for a

Why don't you run for a position on the NPSW Board? If you think you would be an asset to it, then by all means please run! No one is stopping you. If Janet does decide to run again for this Board, so what? At least she cares! You don't seem to. In fact, I sense a little jealousy coming from you as I read your words.

The condition of the new NPSW Board will be better now. We all appreciate the hard work of those who work at the transfer station etc. They do a fabulous job (we also have to thank the people of Paris & Norway who are recycling!). The last Board, however, was a train wreck.

Advertisement