Finance Committee member clashes with Rumford police over alcohol charge

RUMFORD — A Finance Committee member charged with providing a place for a minor to drink alcohol on Sunday night has since accused police of specifically targeting her when she sought help resolving a domestic altercation.

Police say otherwise.

Early Sunday evening, Sgt. David Bean summoned Jennifer Norris, 37, of 393 South Rumford Road, on a charge of furnishing a place for a minor to consume alcohol. She will be arraigned on April 6 in Rumford District Court.

“I reached out for help and I got slammed,” Norris said Tuesday.

According to three police reports generated by Bean and Sgt. Tracey Higley about the 7:42 p.m. call, Norris complained that she had been assaulted by her husband, Lee Norris, and wanted him out of their house.

“Of course, he wasn't there at the time,” Cpl. Doug Maifeld said on Tuesday, reading from the reports. “We don't have the right to eject a spouse unless he or she is arrested for (something illegal).”

Lee Norris is awaiting jury trial next month in Oxford County Superior Court in Paris stemming from his arrest on Nov. 29 on charges of domestic violence assault against Jennifer Norris, and for preventing her from reporting the incident to police.

When Higley and Bean arrived outside the Norris home, they were met by Lee Norris' young son, who told them that Jennifer had been yelling and screaming at the father, Lee, but that he hadn't assaulted her, Maifeld said.

Higley then spoke with Chelsea Santos, 20, of Bourne, Mass., described by Maifeld as a friend of Jennifer's.

Chelsea “admitted she had been drinking alcohol, and Jennifer claimed she didn't know she was drinking, but (Chelsea) said she was drinking while sitting right next to Jennifer on the couch,” Maifeld said.

Based on that admission, Jennifer Norris was summoned, Maifeld said.

Lee Norris, who left beer in the residence, told police he wasn't aware that Santos was drinking it.

“Lee admitted he was outside and that's why he wasn't charged with furnishing,” Maifeld said.

Higley summoned Santos on a charge of possession of drug paraphernalia, but not on possession of alcohol by a minor. She will be arraigned on April 6 in Rumford.

Maifeld and police Chief Stacy Carter said they didn't know why Higley didn't also charge Santos with alcohol possession. Higley was unavailable for comment on Tuesday.

Carter said his department isn't out to get Jennifer Norris.

“We are not targeting her or any other member of the community,” he said. “She called us and we responded to a complaint. During the investigation, probable cause was determined that she furnished a place for a minor to consume, and I am expecting the district attorney to charge her.”

“She hasn't done anything on the (Finance Committee) to bring attention to herself," Carter said. "We just responded to a complaint we received."

Contacted Tuesday, Jennifer Norris said she called Rumford police for help with her husband, a 17-year Air Force veteran who served in Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder.

“They got here and Officer Higley turned everything around on me and, like, made me out to be the one that was the criminal as soon as he came through the door,” Jennifer Norris said.

She acknowledged that she and her husband got into an argument that became tense and that Santos got into her husband's beer.

“I had nothing to do with any of it," Norris said. "I don't even drink.”

tkarkos@sunjournal.com

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Comments

Timeout's picture
verified

Ms. Santos, I appreciate your

Ms. Santos, I appreciate your defending Jen but I must ask if you care about her so much, why would you put her in this situation with such thoughtless behavior?  Look in the mirror girl and start there.  This began with your own actions.  To make it worse for Jen, and it sounds like she has enough on her hands with her spouse, you are spouting all about it in the paper...how does that help her? Just sayin'...

fairyandliar's picture

BTW, heard you benefited from

BTW, heard you benefited from tim galant's proceeds! have a great one and i mean it this time! GIGGLES

fairyandliar's picture

thanks a lot, have a great

thanks a lot, have a great one! and i mean that with pure sarcasm.

Erin's picture
verified

Before everyone gets their

Before everyone gets their panties in a bunch over this issue let looks at some realistic out comes.  One she was wrong for looking the other way when the 20 year old was drinking in her home.  She deserved the summons no doubt about that.  One thing people need to realize just because you are a potential victim of a crime does not mean the police will look the other way for your transgressions.  With that said, any liberal Maine judge will throw this summons out.  Lee should have also been charged not only for providing the alcohol but for violating conditions of release stemming from the previous domestic violence case.  I believe there was a no contact order in place, meaning he can't have contact with the victim.  In the laws eyes it doesn't matter if Jen let him back in, he was still violating that condition and they are in place and inforced to protect victims, even if those victims fail to protect themselves.  Second the RPD went for a more serious charge with the minor then comsuming alcohol.  With the pot at the residence they would have had proable cause to search the house or at least secure it and apply for a search warrant.  With Jens history and posts on her many blogs and social media pages I would not be surprised if they found more in the house.  They also could have taken her to jail for the night instead of doing whats called a paper arrest.  So yes Jen they were cutting you some breaks, ligthen up a little.  Bottom line is this charge will be thrown out and Jen will feel vindicated, brag about it for weeks, and used it every time she feels she was treated unfairly by any police department.  So does it really seem plausable to either side to argue this much about it?

Whateva's picture

Ok, I am confused.  She was

Ok, I am confused.  She was charged with "providing a place for minors to drink", is this correct?  Is she the renter or owner of the home?  If so, that sure sounds like a valid charge to me if the minor was inside the house.  Sounds like Higley gave her a break by not citing her with an additional charge of providing alcohol to a minor.  Two different charges, and I'm thinking these two (Jennifer & Chelsea) are not quite intelligent enough to realize the difference.

Also, everything I've read indicates that Officer Bean cited the adult (Jennifer), and Officer Higley cited the minor (Chelsea).  So why is theJennifer spreading so much hate and discontent about the officer that didn't even cite her, but praising the other?  I bet there's a lot more to this story that hasn't come out.

I think Jennifer needs to formally apologize, and perhaps buy a gift for Officer Higley to thank him for responding to her call for help and for not charging her with more infractions than he could have.  :)

fairyandliar's picture

like your name says, WHATEVA

like your name says, WHATEVA

lynric's picture

just moving to this state

just moving to this state trying to get my life together, trying to do g o o d but i get screwed too

 

so you snuck and "stole" beer from your friend and carry your drug equip...your 20 find someone who can help you change your life not destroy it.

fairyandliar's picture

drug equip? hahahah what was

drug equip? hahahah what was i charged for crack or meth? its pot, comes from the earth! they are called pipes, such as people smoke tabacco out of too! funny. fyi, shes not destroying my life, where did you get that idea from? i brought what is against me upon myself, at least i'm mature enough to know where to place the a c t u a l blame :]

T's picture

So, you're blaming yourself

So, you're blaming yourself and not the RPD?  That's a good sign Chelsea.

fairyandliar's picture

yes, because i was caught for

yes, because i was caught for something that is illegal, whoever you are [id say your name otherwise] but you see as the above article states, that jennifers husband bought the alcohol, although they also stated he was outside, he was the one who brought it into the house [which is also his] so really, who is to blame? you merely further my point that all these petty comments are based upon how people feel about her politically, not how they feel just based upon this above article, and although the two tie together, yes, they are still very far apart in reality. but what the hell do i know? i carry drug equip like a dumbass :D

fairyandliar's picture

also if the admin reads that,

also if the admin reads that, i was calling myself a dumbass, keeping civil convo towards others. no worries please and thank you much. have a beautiful night.

Alexander Nevsky's picture

She's a freak, let's just sit

She's a freak, let's just sit back and watch her throw the match on her own stake. Burn baby burn. This is too much fun. I would like thank Lee Norris for his service to our Country and i don't blame you at all. Leave the bitch!!

fairyandliar's picture

what did she ever do to you?

what did she ever do to you?

fairyandliar's picture

everytime i look at this page

everytime i look at this page i am just even more disgusted that i want to puke. yeah i know i shouldnt look blahblahblah but why would someone want to write such a story to completely further ruin someone's reputation? i dont pay attention to politics, or any of this nonesense waste of time stuff, but now i obviously am. the funniest thing is that you all are human just like jennifer. you all have commited crimes, whether being falsely blamed, or never caught. how dare anyone judge her just because she finally decided to call out for help and this is what she gets? none of you would understand or even care but it should be heard. your futile lives are probably filled with misery but jennifer's isn't, even despite this, so as much as you dump of her she will rise. and so will i for that matter, just moving to this state trying to get my life together, trying to do g o o d but i get screwed too. life is funny and im only 20, naive and a lotta years ahead of me. i hope i never end up as brainwashed as any of you.

Read it right's picture

"just moving to this state

"just moving to this state trying to get my life together, trying to do g o o d but i get screwed too."

 

You sound like somone who moved to this state because it is easy to abuse welfare here.

fairyandliar's picture

didn't know that one but

didn't know that one but thanks for update!

T's picture

"how dare anyone judge

"how dare anyone judge her"?....You see Chelsea, that's just it.  Jennifer Stowell Norris judges everyone, unfairly.  There are many tired, worn clichés I could use describe her situation (You reap what you sow; What goes around comes around), but I'd be wasting my time with you.

fairyandliar's picture

why would you be wasting your

why would you be wasting your time with me? thats not very nice :[ now im oh so sad. i understand you have your own views, points whatever. thanks for sharing them

lynric's picture

No one has been convicted of

No one has been convicted of domestic violence....just accused and by someone who wouldn't know the truth if it fell on her.

fairyandliar's picture

are you positive about this?

are you positive about this? i think its silly silly silly!

T's picture

FYI..."fairyandliar" is

FYI..."fairyandliar" is Chelsea Santos, the minor who allegedly consumed the alcohol at the Norris residence, and was summoned for possession of drug paraphernalia.

Chelsea Santos, 20, of Bourne, Mass., was issued a summons by Sgt. Tracey Higley on a charge of possession of drug paraphernalia on South Rumford Road. Santos is scheduled to appear in Rumford District Court on April 6.

fairyandliar's picture

wow you are smart!

wow you are smart!

T's picture

Why, thank you.

Why, thank you.

fairyandliar's picture

no problem, buddy ;]

no problem, buddy ;]

Tree Hugger U's picture

Well there you go Jennifer

Well there you go Jennifer Norris!  It's about time you get what you deserve!  Whah whah whah booo hooo hooo, i'm the victim again...  whah whah whah...  I'm NEVER wrong and everybody in public safety are crooks.  Well it appears that RPD has done a wonderful job, once again, at getting criminals off the streets.  You violated the law, you got caught, and now you're going to pay!  What lies are you going to come up with now to bash public safety?  I have dealt with Officer Higly many times and he has been wonderful to me and my family, even when I have been in the wrong.  I'm sure you started running your mouth as soon as he got there and when he told you to calm down you just kept running it like you usually do.  You, and your alter ego "fairyandliar", are not innocent in any way!  You do nothing but cause hate and discontent in the River Valley and you need to go.  And what "job" should the cops have done?  There was no evidence you were abused, by your own admission, and they noticed illegal activity, which you were cited for.  Sounds to me like they did EXACTLY what they were supposed to do.  So now what???  You're gonna slam them up and down, and threaten them on your blog that nobody, accept those who agree with you, can post their opinion?  Now that's wrong!  Oh, I don't agree with this person't point of view, even though this is what I claim my site is all about, so I'll just hit DELETE!  You can't get THIS one removed Jenny Jenny!  Haaaahahahah, Haaaaahahahah!!!!

fairyandliar's picture

oh yeah this isnt her "alter

oh yeah this isnt her "alter ego", you twit. read the name and thats who i really am, unlike you without the ballz lolzzzzzzzzzzzz

preaves's picture
staff

Admin warning Please keep the

Admin warning

Please keep the conversation civil. Thanks.

Pattie Reaves, Web editor

fairyandliar's picture

OMG YOU CLEVER PERSON YOU!!!

OMG YOU CLEVER PERSON YOU!!! how stupid you really must be, and tree hugger? wheres the real name? grow balls hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahah

fairyandliar's picture

ok i swore my bad but

ok i swore my bad but jennifer is not the guilty one here. like i said in my before comment. this is all the rumford police, ONE POLICE ACTUALLY higley or whatever turning a domestic abuse call alllllllllllll the way around. i believe she shouldnt have gotten this charge because she didnt buy the booze, she didnt give me the booze, she didnt know i was drinking it either!!! FUNNY HUH i took it all on my own yet i didnt get a ticket cause i was polite to sir highness higley. this is honestly just turning into stupid politics just because she is a good person who gets THE TRUTH out there unlike this newspaper writing a bull article after merely five minutes of conversation with her. if anyone would like to know the truth perhaps read a BETTER newspaper, a more truthful view, like many others who HAVE BRAINS think. in ending, jennifer did not furnish a home to a minor. a minor has high anxiety, OBVIOUSLY A DRUG PROBLE HAHAHAHAHHA and chose to take it herself, put it in a cup and would you have know BEING ACROSS THE ROOM? silly hicks, politics are really for the smart people, MOVE TO MASSACHUSETTS BEST STATE EVER YA HURRR

PB4UGO's picture

Kudos for charging Mrs.

Kudos for charging Mrs. Norris with furnishing a place for minors to consume alcohol, but can the charges actually stick when the minor that was drinking was not charged with posession of alcohol, but rather with drug paraphernalia?

That's like putting bullets in the gun, but letting someone else pull the trigger!

fairyandliar's picture

this paper is retarded why

this paper is retarded why does anyone bother to read it anymore

news4u's picture

No one is forcing you to read

No one is forcing you to read it. You chose to do so. Blame the paper. Blame the police. Blame everyone but yourself. Grow up and take responsibility for your actions.  

George73's picture
verified

“I had nothing to do with any

“I had nothing to do with any of it," Norris said. "I don't even drink.”

Yet on her facebook she said,wow i an getting drunk!!and a few other things !

fairyandliar's picture

you, sir, hah. people really

you, sir, hah. people really amaze me these days but you, sir,  in a horrible way.

mainexile's picture

Ms. Norris operates a blog in

Ms. Norris operates a blog in which she has been openly critical of the Rumford Police Department's operations, tactics, spending, etc.  She has consistently questioned the RPD budget submissions and the staffing levels for a town that is seeing its population shrinking.  I wouldn't be a bit surprised that RPD saw this as an opportunity for "payback".  Oh wait, law enforcement officers would NEVER do anything like that, right?

T's picture

Jennifer Stowell Norris'

Jennifer Stowell Norris' criticism of the RPD has included blatant accusations of corruption and illegal activities based, not on fact, but her political ideaology.  It goes well beyond consistently questioning.  She is already suggesting that she was summoned because she's a conservative Republican.

fairyandliar's picture

i believe it is upon fact

i believe it is upon fact seeing as she was issued a summons on false pretenses, i do believe. i do believe, i being the minor in question stated to said officer that her husband bought the beer, and i took it m y s e l f without her knowlege. further, i do admit i put it into a cup so she wouldn't get upset that i chose to drink, for reasons of her not drinking and obviously why would she want me to be when i am underage? but despite that she was still issued a summons, when she stated she truthfully had no idea i was drinking. i believe i was there, and i do believe the cops turned it around. but cops do what they want, don't they?

Erin's picture
verified

fairandliar you should know

fairandliar you should know cops are required to carry voice recorders on their person during contacts.  I would consider what statements you are making now, as most likely then can be proven right or wrong.

fairyandliar's picture

oh they would though!!! thats

oh they would though!!! thats why they are doing this!! keep up with the rumford reporter and maybe you'll hear the TRUTH!! have a great one!!!

Ginger1's picture

Wierd. Don't complain about

Wierd. Don't complain about the cops doing their job; especially since you called them lady.

fairyandliar's picture

the cops did not do their

the cops did not do their "job". were you there? no. thanks for the opinion!

marooned's picture

You don't have to drink to

You don't have to drink to provide alcohol to a minor dummy!  I used to get people to buy it for me when I was still a minor in the military.  It sounds like she "shot herself in the foot" like others cases of "domestic violence"!  Jail her!

fairyandliar's picture

dont you mean jail the

dont you mean jail the domestic abuser which was not her? read the story again but oh wait they slammed her with bullshit.... again!

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...