Sensible clean energy future

In my contact with J. Dwight at a debate in Dixfield Feb. 4, he seemed a reasonable man, so I was quite surprised at his Perspective column in the Sun Journal Feb. 17.

Offering a series of false assertions about wind power, he neglects mentioning its indisputable benefits, nor the overwhelming threat of climate change.

Every kilowatt hour of wind power replaces one from fossil fuels, making our air cleaner. Wind doesn't produce smog, acid rain, mercury or climate-changing carbon dioxide.

Saying “no” to wind, as Dwight seems to suggest, leads to increased pollution and health problems.

I agree with the Natural Resources Council of Maine that it is in Maine’s best interest to develop wind as one approach to climate change, while recognizing there are tradeoffs with every energy resource.

Maine’s chief health official, Dora Anne Mills, M.D., M.P.H., notes there is no evidence in peer-reviewed journals of adverse health effects from wind turbines. On the contrary, Dr. Mills said, “There are tremendous potential health benefits to wind turbines, including reductions in deaths, disability and disease due to asthma, other lung diseases, heart disease and cancer. Maine has among the highest rates in the country of asthma and cancer. Wind turbines mean less dependency on foreign oil and coal … which ... contribute to the diseases above.”

Continuing dependency on fossil fuel will not create a healthy planet for our children. Wind power must be part of a sensible clean energy future for our state.

Richard K. Jennings M.D., Fayette

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Blueyes1119's picture
verified

PS, The Natural Resources

PS, The Natural Resources Council of Maine, who Dr. Jennings says he agrees with, is wrong on this issue as well.  They sully their reputation for advocating for protection of Maine's natural resources with their stance on encouraging industrial wind sprawl.  NRCM, since when is blasting away 350 miles of Maine ridgelines, permanently clearcutting more than 50,000 acreas, and creating a spiderweb of hundreds of miles of new powerlines protecting Maine's natural resources?  Ditto for DEP and LURC.  Shame on you all!

Blueyes1119's picture
verified

First of all, xyz, this is

First of all, xyz, this is not NIMBY, it is about issues that impact all of the state, all taxpayers, and all ratepayers.   The beauty and natural resources being destroyed by the development of wind turbines is everybody's yard and it is everybody's wallet.  This is an extremely important public policy issue and I have to strongly disagree with Dr. Jennings.

It is unfortunate that Dr. Jennings, in his well intentioned concern for public health  related to air pollution, embraces sprawling industrial wind turbine sites across the rural landscape of Maine.  That wind turbines are seen as the be-all panacea to air pollution, climate change, and energy issues is a result of the masterful propaganda of Big Wind/Big Lie.  I would like to believe that people like Dr. Jennings and Dr. Dora Mills, intelligent enough to earn the MD degree, would also be intelligent enough to fully research this scam.  They would realize that massive wind turbine proliferation ends up creating so many other negative impacts that their development does virtually nothing that their idealism envisions and extracts a huge, untenable, and unwarrented price.

 

Lisa Linowes's picture

Dr. Jennings, Please step

Dr. Jennings, Please step down from your lofty perch and try to understand how electricity generation and dispatch works. The simplistic concept of 1kwh wind displaces 1kwh fossil is simply not accurate. In fact, it is quite likely that wind in Maine is displacing other renewables. And in the case of Stetson Wind, it competes directly with renewables. Regarding health effects, until Dr. Mills has taken it upon herself -- as the State's medical officer -- to speak with the residents of Mars Hill and Vinalhaven and evaluate the veracity of their situation, her opinion (and for that matter, yours) adds nothing to the public debate other than to selectively recite the comments of others. 

--Lisa Linowes

PenobScot's picture

Watch THE JACKSON VIDEO about

Watch THE JACKSON VIDEO about wind in Maine --If you want to get a quick education - from first hand experience - about the debacle that ensues when big wind comes to a town in Maine, watch "The Jackson Video". It's two parts, each about nine minutes. Send it to all whom you know.

See: http://www.windtaskforce.org/video

rstonge's picture
verified

There is a lot of good info

There is a lot of good info in there, but you have to remember the author is opposed to wind development. There was also a newsletter distributed through town that on occasions distorted or exaggerated the facts.

use less's picture
verified

There are many reasons to

There are many reasons to oppose industrial wind turbines: noise, habitat fragmentation, erosion and sedimentation of streams and wetlands, aesthetics, property devaluation, loss of quality of life, killing birds and bats, impacts to wildlife, flora and fauna, etc., but mainly that they are a highly subsidized scam that will produce only an intermittent, unreliable, insignificant source of power that will do nothing to solve our energy needs no matter where they are sited.
This project is more about playing on peoples fear and greed in order for wind developers like First Wind/UPC and their hedge fund and Wall St. investors to collect subsidies, grants, tax credits, double accelerated depreciation, etc than about producing "clean & green" electricity. The promises of "green" jobs and the linkage to energy independence, global warming, clean air, and imported oil by proponents and pandering corrupt politicians are vague, doubtful, unverifiable, and untrue.
The social injustice of politically connected corporations like First Wind/UPC and other big wind developers hiding behind the "green" mantel and destroying rural communties for the sake of greed is immoral. Unfortunately, today corporations seem to have more rights than citizens.
Currently there is a glut of generation in New England and wholesale prices for electricity are lower than they've been in years. We don't need environmentally destructive industrial scale wind turbines in the mountains or offshore. Industrial wind turbines are nothing more than a symbolic cure for non existant global warming.


 

PenobScot's picture

Lil says sarcastically we

Lil says sarcastically we should wait for our kids.

Lil, as we keep throwing money into so called sustainable energy that is in fact only sustainable by unsustainable subsidies, we mortgage our kids' future. The wind turbines offset virtually no CO2. But they do raise the price of electricity, create massive transmission infrastructure which costs the ratepayer a seprate fortune, they increase our nation al debt at a time we are going broke and they cost us jobs. Just look to the Europena experience and you will see we lose jobs for every "green job" created.

I can also tell you that if you knew even the first thing about the tourism industry in Maine, you would know that the 350 miles of ridgelines marked for turbines and their requisite mammoth transmission structure from Bangor to Kittery will hurt the tourism industry. Have you ever heard of something called "Quality of Place"?

Lil, maybe get a little background on this stuff before you spew.

Queenie's picture
verified

  Destroying our forests here

 

Destroying our forests here in Maine causes great amounts of CO2 to be released

into the atmosphere. If the con artists have their way, 50 thousand acres will need

to be clearcut to support the turbines, access roads, substations, and high voltage transmission lines.

Tourism is Maine's bigest industry. Kiss that goodby if we "destroy the village in order to save the village."

Maybe those for Industrial wind can afford to see their light bills triple but most small businesses can't and most householders can't.

Also, remember this: Those promoting Industrial wind power are blocking cheap, renewable hydro power from Canada. Why? It will compete with their expensive, feckless, environmentally damaging plans to erect turbines on every rdigeline, hilltop and mountain top as far as the eye can see.

Follow the money.

snuffy's picture

you might be a NIMBY, if you

you might be a NIMBY, if you love the silence bestowed you from living in Maine.

you might be a NIMBY, if you don't like higher electric costs.

you might be a NIMBY, if you are skeptical of men offering piles of cash.

Lil's picture
verified

Some people just can't

Some people just can't understand this: "Every kilowatt hour of wind power replaces one from fossil fuels, making our air cleaner." So, let's wait and let our kids do it?

PenobScot's picture

Yes, you can't understand

Yes, you can't understand this. The wind complexes' intermittency requires backup generation run all the time in a hot standby mode where no electricity is produced, but plenty of fossil fuel is combusted - inefficiently I might add. So what you accuse other people of not understanding, you are in fact ignorant about.

macmac's picture
verified

Unlike the doctor who seems

Unlike the doctor who seems to think we must plunge rapidly into placing wind turbines all over our mountains and thus saving the planent for our children, my belief is in our youth, who will realize there are better ideas to energy management through advanced technology while saving our precious areas of Maine. And if you think capturing wind is an advanced idea, perhaps think of Christopher Columbus and the days he spent cursing the wind when he didn't sail for lack of and watched the wind ravage his ships when there was too much.

Doctor, wind turbines are not going to save this earth for your children. As they rot away from the landscape, our children will ponder upon what a silly notion it was.

xyz's picture

Here they come I can hear

Here they come I can hear them now........ yep I knew they were close by I could hear their whinning from a mile away. It is worse than any noise a wind turbine could ever generate. Listen to it, NIMBY NIMBY NIMBY.

Advertisement