Trading our environment for wind power

In 2008, the Kibby project, 44 turbines, miles of roads and hundreds of acres of cleared forest was approved. The Expedited Rule did its job for the developer, streamlining the necessary review since the location is part of over 14 million acres of land opened to wind development.

Now in 2010, TransCanada wants to expand the Kibby project and is proposing 15 turbines on Sisk Mountain, which overlooks the Chain of Ponds.

To do this TransCanada wants to expand the already expedited area of Maine to include the portion of Sisk Mountain not yet within this "umbrella." TransCanada is petitioning to add another 630 acres to the expedited area, all of it overlooking Chain of Ponds, Big Island, and Massachusetts Bog.

Mountain tops and ridges above 2,700 feet will host all 15 turbines, 3.6 miles of crane road (34 feet wide), 3.6 miles of collector lines, (60 feet wide), 0.6 miles of access road to ridge and miles of “temporary” skidder trails. That does not include upgrades to a number of existing tracks.

A total of 90 wetland areas were identified with 11 Palustrine scrub — shrubs in the path of the collector line corridor. TC surveyed the area for vernal pools and listed 14 significant pools, meaning it has a high habitat value and is home to or has an abundance of threatened or endangered species. All will be impacted to some degree.

Clearing and grubbing will remove 140 acres of forest. Of that, 42 acres is described as fir-heartleaved birch sub-alpine community. Having a statewide S3 ranking means it’s a rare community type of forest and the clearing will isolate and alter the habitat adjacent to the community, allowing sunlight and wind, which removes moisture, deeper into the forest and impacting the rest of the community and altering it forever. The Bicknell Thrush, a threatened song bird, will lose 12.4 acres of critical habitat.

Blasting and excavating estimates are 750,000 cubic yards, with 650,000 cubic yards of fill. This is very significant, given that the soils, hydrology and the steep slopes above 2300 feet are very fragile. It is very difficult to build roads in this zone without significant blasting and its effects to the surrounding environment.

Underlying hydrology needs to be identified and protected. This includes water from seeps, springs and streams disrupted by blasting of ledge and rock for roads and turbine placement.

The results from diverting will change the temperature and volume of streams, thus impact salmon in North Branch Dead River, Horseshoe stream and wild brook trout in Clear Brook.

Roads and collector lines will cross 57 perennial and intermittent streams.

Gold Brook is a tributary of the north branch of the Dead River and provides temperature refuge for landlocked salmon and supports wild brook trout. Kibby Stream, a tributary of Spencer Stream, supports wild brook trout. When existing hydrology is disturbed and large amounts of sedimentation is deposited into these streams, significant impacts to our native fish population will occur.

In 2008 Roaring Brook Mayflies were discovered in Gold Brook, whose headwaters are on the southern slope of Sisk. This insect is listed under the Maine Department of Inland Fish and Wildlife as Endangered. First discovered at the base of Mt. Katahdin in the Roaring Brook, it is protected for its entire length in Baxter State Park. It is a significant source of food for the brook trout, bats, dragonflies and other wildlife.

The bog lemming, golden eagle historic nesting area, and Canadian lynx tracks were discovered in the Kibby and Sisk area.

Boreal straw and snowline wintergreen were found, both listed as a S2, imperiled in Maine due to rarity of species. Both grow along the margins of perennial streams.

All these and more species fall under some regulations for protection!

Where is their protection in all this fury to make money? This is an oxymoron if there ever was one — killing endangered species, some due to global warming species, in order to curtail global warming?

The Benedict Arnold Trail is listed in the National Register of Historic Places and 18.7 miles of the trail lies within the projected area of visual effect.

The state scenic byway, Route 27, Chain of Ponds, will have scenic impacts due to the visibility of turbines along the ridge of Sisk Mountain.

I encourage the public to come to the hearing and let their voices be heard.  More information can be found on the LURC Web site.

Nancy O’Toole is a member of the Friends of the Boundary Mountains, a nonprofit that intervened in the Kibby Mountain project as well as the Sisk Mountain project before LURC now. She has a bachelor of science degree in environmental engineering and 10 years of experience with high mountain road construction and hazardous waste cleanup in towns in Utah. She lives in Phillips.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

xhming's picture

ed classic handbags sale

glenncz's picture

What a Shame

We are a very foolish "people" to allow this to happen to our environment.  I live in Pennsylvania, but it could just as well happen on the ridges surrounding the area where I live.  For years our environmental groups fought tooth and nail to keep developement from ruining our natural areas, now they are the forefront, demanding that we install this very foolish way to create electrical power. 

44 turbines will directly destroy hundreds of acres of prime natural habitat, and destroy the scenery for literaly hundreds of surrounding square miles.  Also, likely there will be homeowners whose lives will be severely intruded upon and their health affected by the noise that these ghastly beasts create. 

Yes, you Mainers are a foolish people for allowing this to happen.  I get my electrical power from a two tower nuclear plant 60 miles away from me.  It puts out 2400 MW of power 24/7.  You would need 3,000 3MW turbines with an average output of 25% to equal the power of that nuclear facility which is on about 60 acres of secluded, scrubby land, bothering no one! 

These turbines will have an average output of about 25%, and create an average of only  44 x 3MW x .25% = 32MW of output per year.  Or less than 1.5% of the energy of the nuclear facility down the road from me.  Or about 3% of the average coal/gas power plant.  What  a Shame.  And sadly, because about 1/3rd of the time they will have ZERO ZERO ZERO output, no coal/gas or nuclear facility will be decommissioned because of this farce, they will replace absolutely nothing, but just add an extra burden to the taxpagers and utiliy buyers.  What a Shame.  Our grandchildren will be paying for the electricity they make, literally Forever.  What a Shame...

Nancy, beautifully written article.

use less's picture
verified

In a VT Public Radio news

In a VT Public Radio news story on Friday regarding the reappraisal of the hydro damns on the Connecticut River, owned by Trans Canada, Cleve Kapala, of TransCanada said, "I mean the plants are obviously worth less today than they were pre recession and pre-oversupply of electricity."  ( http://vpr.net/news_detail/87443/ )

Because of lower demand for electricity, there is a glut of power in the NE market, The price of natural gas and wholesale electricity prices are lower than they've been in years and are predicted to remain low for the forseeable future. So the question must be asked,  why do we need industrial scale wind turbines?

If TransCanada is asking for lower appraisals on their damns because of an "oversupply of electricity" why would they or anyone want to build more inefficient unreliable wind plants?

The obvious answer is, to collect subsidies and tax credits which is what the industrial wind scam is really all about.

Blueyes1119's picture
verified

Sisk Mountain

Thank you, Nancy, for the well written, informative guest column.  The LURC should be ashamed for allowing the destruction of Kibby and must not sacrifice Sisk Mt. for the folly of industrial wind sites.  The political climate in Augusta with Baldacci and an unknowing legislature pushing wind development throughout rural Maine is the greatest environmental travesty of our generation.  We in Maine once revered the natural treasure that is our state.  The Dickey Dam was stopped because of the rare Furbish's Lousewart; citizens' referendum preserved the Bigelow Range from development; over the years we have bonded hundreds of millions of dollars (including the interest) to protect Maine's "special places", including the Chain of Ponds Public Reserved Land. 

Now along comes wind development.  We have LURC and DEP blithely ignoring all we have worked to protect, including all you have listed, for an industry that wouldn't (and shouldn't) exist without deep subsidies and preferential treatment.  An industry that provides no benefit to Maine.  The heinous statute that expedites wind permitting is undemocratic, severely restricts citizens' input into public decisions, and will lead to ruination of rare, priceless ecosystems.  Please write or email LURC and your legislators and tell them to stop Trans Canada's ruination of Sisk Mt. and to repeal the expedited wind permitting statute!

Blockhead's picture

Any One Of These

Thank you Nancy for a terrific, informative, article. Any one of the species mentioned should be a deal breaker. LURC has already shown their capacity to double cross the natural world and I am afraid that they are very capable of doing it again and more than likely will. There must be a way to stop them and I can't imagine a lawsuit, though costly, could be a losing cause in this situation. Just who and what is LURC there for? Enough is enough!

Queenie's picture
verified

Wind power is a scam

It is destroying the environment in order to save the environment. And it kills. All the herbicides dumped onto our mountaintops to retard growth will kill off rare alpine plants that have been there for centuries.

All the fluid leaks (these turbines leak like a seive) will find their way down the mountainside to poison fish, fowl, and animal life.

Thousands of migrating birds and bats will be chopped up by the rotor blades and raptors like the bald eagle, falcon, osprey will be eliminated, no longer soaring majestically over the ridgetops.

Fragmenting the forest with blasting and access roads causes mass migration away from these areas by deer and other larger animals of our forests and the infrasound emitted by the turbines makes that migration permanent. No animal can withstand the constant drumming and low vibrating hum the turbines make.

Wind power is a scam. A few will be enriched by the destruction. You know who they are. Challenge them to be honest about what they are doing to our state. With millions of dollars set to line their pockets, they will lie. They care about money above all else.

thinkingman's picture

Because some of you refuse to

Because some of you refuse to beleive and will demand proof...you can easily check as I did - 2007 financial disclosure form which lists "Assets and 'Unearned Income'" of between $100,001-$250,000 from Clean Energy Fuels Corp. -- Public Common Stock. Clean Energy Fuels Corp. (CLNE) is a natural gas provider founded by T. Boone Pickens. And we wonder why she pushes wind power and rails against big oil?

thinkingman's picture

Wind power...the great

Wind power...the great farce...if not for incredibly large govt subsidies would never even be close to a money maker...costs are huge and never recovered without federal subsidies....did I mention the dems love wind power..doesn't Nancy pelosi's husband have significant investments in wind power with T Boone Pickens?

Advertisement