Criminals sell guns, too

This is in response to Karen D'Andrea's letter, printed March 22.

I like the sound of her organization, and that's all.

First of all, she really can't be that blind to think for one minute that curtailing sales out of Uncle Henry's or at gun shows is going to stop handgun violence. Is she that naive?

There are so many avenues to purchase guns outside of the arena that it would be all but impossible to stop gun sales to criminals. Effectively, it would stop buying and selling between law-abiding citizens.

I know many people who sell through Uncle Henry's or gun shows, etc., that require a Maine license to purchase guns. Does that stop gun violence? No, but neither would any half-baked legislation put forth by people such as D'Andrea who can't stand the fact that people own guns.

The gun sales issue has been beaten to death. Let gun owners police themselves.

If you are from any other state besides Maine, you go home empty-handed, but is that going to stop that person from buying a gun elsewhere?

It's never going to happen because, guess what — criminals sell guns, too.

George Gowell, Sabattus

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Bravosixalpha's picture
verified

Gun Control (Simple Solution for simple mind)

If you can take ALL the guns in the world and ban their sale, you MIGHT  get most of them.  The criminal will then find an alternative weapon to use.  Remember sling shots?  Cross Bows??  How about rocks? 

BenHarrison's picture

Law-abiding citizens do not

Law-abiding citizens do not need anymore restrictions regulations or any such nonsense, Why because the are law-abiding citizens. Criminals are criminals you can pass all the laws you want guess what they don't care why because they are criminals!! Do you really think any law that are Civilised Society can come up with stop criminals from getting their criminal hands on guns!

thinkingman's picture

typical knee jerk reaction by

typical knee jerk reaction by liberals..wonder if they'd feel the same after staring down the barrel of a fully loaded gun in the hands of a criminal...yeah I have! 

robert's picture

SSDD...how did gun bans work

SSDD...how did gun bans work in the UK and Australia?  Why don't you take a few minutes and research that one and get back to us...

SSDD's picture

Easy question easy answer

Both the UK and Australia have a fraction of the handgun homicides we do.

Thanks for playing Robert - you lose.......again.

jchick's picture
verified

Tell the whole story (cont)

Britain, Australia top US rates in violent crime

http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/guncontrol_20010302.html

More about violent crime in Britain

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1256474/Violent-crime-risen-44-13-years-Labour.html

Still more...

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/violent-crime-underestimated-for-10-years-971489.html

Australia...

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/30/2641300.htm

Australia more violent despite gun ban

http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=17847

To make a long story short... taking firearms away from the general public does not do a thing to diminish violent crime. Allowing law-abiding citizens to defend themselves is a good thing.

John Chick
Monmouth, ME

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." --Thomas Jefferson to Charles Yancey, 1816. ME 14:384

jchick's picture
verified

Tell the whole story.

The key words in your statement being "handgun homicides." Both Australia and the UK have seen an increase in violent crime since they took firearms away from the general public. But don't take my word for it. In an article published 2 Jul 2009, Telegraph.co.uk:

"The United Kingdom is the violent crime capital of Europe and has one of the highest rates of violence in the world, worse even than America, according to new research.

Analysis of figures from the European Commission showed a 77 per cent increase in murders, robberies, assaults and sexual offences in the UK since Labour came to power."

You can read the whole article here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5712573/UK-is-violent-crime-capital-of-Europe.html

Guess what one of the things the "labor party" did? (hint: banned all guns, including shotguns and rifles.) British Citizens are not even allowed to defend themselves. If you are attacked, and you fight back injuring or (God forbid) killing your attacker, YOU will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Now perhaps you feel there is justice in that, but I don't.

At least in the United States of America, the citizen still has a fighting chance and the right to defend themselves. Which is a good thing. When every second counts, the police are just minutes away.

John Chick
Monmouth, ME

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." --Thomas Jefferson to Charles Yancey, 1816. ME 14:384

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

Voluntary policing?

"Let gun owners police themselves." Let Wall Street police itself. Left Enron police itself. Let business voluntarily regulate themselves. Has voluntary policing ever worked anywhere at anytime. No. If its a big enough problem to be discussed it needs independent regulation.

But that doesn't make SSDD right in this case. "handguns which serve no purpose but to kill people.." only means "which serve no purpose I recognize, but to kill people". 

275,000,000 guns in private hands can not be regulated without such burdensome measures that they would be politically impossible to attain. Banning the sale and possession of handguns is a fantasy that prevents real solutions from being discussed or implemented. Let's get real.

SSDD's picture

Simple solution

Ban the sale and possession of all handguns which serve no purpose but to kill people.

Advertisement