Chapter 22: Health, Plumbing and Sanitation
Article 1: General
Section 3.9 Interference with collection
No unauthorized person shall remove any garbage or waste or any portion of same that has been placed for collection by the department of the city.
* * *
Violate this long-standing ordinance in Auburn, and expect to receive a summons and pay a fine to be determined by a court.
Oh come on, Auburn. Picking through the curbside trash is a tradition. It’s recycling at its very best. It’s the very definition of “reduce, reuse, recycle.”
Street scavenging is, according to author Pramod Nayar, about change. People abandon items they no longer need, and others pick up needed items. It’s what he terms “aesthetic salvage.”
It also just makes sense to lessen the amount of material we put in the trash stream, putting material goods to good use and saving a buck or two along the way.
“Use it up, wear it out. Make it do, or do without.”
Right?
That’s been a way of New England life well before the World War II poster made this a catch phrase for all things frugal.
Auburn’s rarely-enforced ordinance making it illegal to pick through any waste left curbside has been on the books for decades, but will now be enforced by the Auburn Police Department. Patrol officers, according to City Manager Glenn Aho, will be looking for pickup trucks full of junk. If you’re seen with junk, “you can count on getting stopped and questioned.”
That’s quite an ambiguous charge for police, since one man’s junk is — as we all know — another man’s treasure.
Are police really being asked to stop any truck filled with junk, when that junk may very well be someone moving their personal raggedy furniture to a new apartment?
They are. And that’s wasteful.
And what about the trash pickers who stow their take in a panel van? They get a pass?
Auburn has decided to enforce the city ordinance for a couple of very understandable reasons.
Curbside trash pickers can be sloppy when sorting through a neatly-arranged pile set out by homeowners, leaving behind a far-flung array of trash that city workers have to take time to gather up. The city also wants to sell marketable items, such as copper pipes, power cords and metal, instead of seeing Joe Citizen of Auburn or Elsewhere pocket that profit.
Good reasons, but the all-encompassing approach to summons anyone picking and hauling junk will also mean someone can’t claim a used Big Wheel to give to a youngster who would otherwise never know the raucous joy of pedaling plastic at street level.
Instead, Auburn city crews will pick up that toy, and haul it to MMWAC where tax dollars will pay for its destruction because there’s no market for the city to sell that particular item.
Is the city going to collect and sort through every trash pile to find markets for dinged bookshelves? Lightly used overstuffed chairs? Mattresses and clothes?
Not likely.
The City says it is watching taxpayer dollars by collecting and selling curbside trash, but it will also be spending taxpayer dollars by collecting and disposing of tonnage that enterprising people over the years have proven recyclable.
If this ordinance is to be enforced, perhaps it should be enforced curbside only and only when observed by police.
A summons for disrupting a neatly-stacked pile of waste. A summons for lifting copper or wire.
No summons for the discrete lift of a Big Wheel, or the recovery of a could-be-painted bookshelf.
Recycling must be encouraged. Not criminalized.

Twenty odd years ago we had a
Twenty odd years ago we had a scatalogical city counsil who passed a law declaring it illegal for a dog to defecate anywhere within the city of Auburn that was not the property of the dog's owner. I believe no summons has ever been written regarding the ordinance. Mr Ah so's proposal will no doubt end up in the no summons issued catagory.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Just a thought
"The U.S. Supreme Court decided in the 1988 case California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 that anyone, including law enforcement agents and journalists, can access garbage that has been put out to be collected because it is considered public property."
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.thinkingman well said
Have a garage sale and sell cheap Police have way more inportant things to do than spending time tracking down pickers has society gone that bad as to have police guarding trash while crime is at a all time high IS THAT THE BEST WAY TO SPEND TAX DOLLARS thinkingman right place a free sign the next day
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.time
Well if the cops have nothing better to do then stop people and give them a ticket for trash picking then they have way to much time on there hands. We can save money if we just get rid of the cops and that would save on the property taxes. So lets see give a ticket with a fine of $100.00 or layoff a cop for $40.000, well thats easy thunk about it.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond."Costellos were big law and
"Costellos were big law and order people?" lol Call out the posse, scavenger on Fern Street.
I agree reducing the amount of trash that needs to be processed is more beneficial to the city than the value of the trash. If they need another truck with men to collect metal just processing it isn't worth what the can get. It's going to be mixed metals which is sold as iron, or whatever the least valuable metal is in the mix.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Some folks actually do need
Some folks actually do need the items placed out, either old furniture or items they can sell for a dollar. Why should the city care if they collect it, less for them to clean up. Here's a thought - if I am a homeowner and simply place my junk out for spring clean up but place a sign on it that says "free for the taking" have I now indicated the material is not presently out for spring cleanup? Remove the sign the day they collect in my neighborhood and voila, no violation of law and I help someone else.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.way to go
in the spirit of your fellow republican teabaggers you've demonstrated how to circumvent the law. However spitting on, throwing bricks and sending death threats are still illegal.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I am not cimcumventing any
I am not cimcumventing any law, I am simply pointing out a loophole big enough to drive a truck through...the assumption of the law is that you put things curb side for the city, and by simply putting a sign on it indicating free to anyone, you are not out of compliance with any law. And this editorial has nothing to do with spitting or sending death threats so I have no clue why you use them here other than to bolster a very weak argument and make yourself look more like the haters you profess are on the right wing. Still a one trick pony i see.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.because
while you refrain from advocating so, you endorse it.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Once again, Its put up or
Once again, Its put up or shut up time...please cite anywhere that i endorsed it...just because you say it doesn't make it true, another lie by dan breton!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Great idea.
Great idea.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I agree that these junk
I agree that these junk pickers should be fined only if they are collecting metal in large amounts however picking up furniture and repairing it as well as other discarded items people see should be allowed to be taken and please dont fill the land fill with stuff that need not be there in the first place that is BEAUCRATIC STUPIDITY AT ITS FINEST But hey what di you expect its LA!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Load of crap
Junk haulers leave messes on peoples lawns and cost the city money and ans as such should be arrested and/or fined. I thought the Costellos were big law and order people?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.