The text message can wait

"It's convenient," said Robert Smith, 22, a recent college graduate in Windham, Me. He says he regularly texts and drives even though he recognizes that it is a serious risk. He would rather text, he said, than take time on a phone call.

"I put the phone on top of the steering wheel and text with both thumbs," he said, adding that he often has exchanges of 10 messages or more. Sometimes, "I'll look up and realize there's a car sitting there and swerve around it."

- New York Times, July 27

Get him off the road. Now.

Ever since the Maine Turnpike crash in 2005 that killed Tina Turcotte, a new found emphasis has been placed on the bad habits of drivers. What's been discovered is that bad driving habits can become ingrained. Bad drivers will stay bad drivers.

Remember Walter Noble, of the multiple drunken driving incidents and revoked license fame in Franklin County? He compiled a driving record so swollen with infractions and arrests it became apparent that nothing short of spike strips would stop him.

There have been investigations of the dangers of the suspended drivers still cruising Maine roads. A series in the Portland Press Herald in 2008 found, for example, crashes involving these drivers were six times more likely to cause a death.

The evidence supports two conclusions: that drivers who display regular disregard for rules of the road, or just smart driving practices, are more dangerous to themselves and others. Plus, this behavior is hard to change, as evidenced by myriad examples of repeat offenders.

Maine has cracked down on the worst, with policies like Tina's Law — named for Turcotte — which stiffened punishments for repeat, suspended drivers. Yet this is a reactive policy; what's also necessary are proactive policies to ensure drivers never see Tina's Law.

Texting is a prime arena for this. We hope Mr. Smith is an exception, not the rule, but if his cavalier approach to typing while driving becomes widespread, the roads of Maine have just become more perilous.

The article in which Smith was quoted talked about a study of long-haul truckers who texted while driving. Researchers found texting, as compared to other habits that distract drivers, is exponentially more dangerous than once thought.

Each text message can sway a driver's attention for five full seconds, which means Mr. Smith, during an average commute, may stop watching the road ahead for almost a minute. Then, by dumb luck it seems, he'll look up and realize he's barreling toward a stopped vehicle.

Texting is unsafe. Lawmakers in Maine should ban it specifically (not just distracted driving). Drivers should be told of its dangers and punished if caught doing it. It is a safety issue. It's common sense. As Smith told the Times, "I'm pretty sure that someday [my behavior is] going to come back to bite me."

So true. Or even worse, Mr. Smith, you could end up killing somebody else.

editorialboard@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

Tony602's picture

Now...some of you might

Now...some of you might remember me from the old site as Anthony...those of you that do might also remember that I'm not exactly conservative.......however (isn't there always one of those howevers)......nor am I libertarian...but I just have to say...where does it stop? Now, before I begin, I am not professing that Mr. Smith is a rocket scientist nor do I think he'll ever become leader of the free world...but is his behavior as idiotic as some of ours? I'm sure all of you have been guilty of eating some kind of fast food favorite while bombing down the road, a foot long sub in one hand, maybe both, trying to find your favorite radio station or popping in a CD while taking a sip of that soda in your cup holder...I know I have. Or what about the infamous, "oops, I dropped the (insert object here)," and now I have to bend over to pick it up before I get to the (insert place here). Come on!! Then there's the personal favorite...reaching in the backseat to grab my thingamabobber, because I need it for my thingamajammy. Where is all the scientific research on this idiotic behavior...thankfully someone else mentioned makeup before I did. The point is...once again...where does it stop? Where do we allow common sense to take over before shouting from our soap box..."there ought to be a law?" What if a "whopper" or a "blizzard" was proven to cause some horrific accident, and how many have "snuck through the cracks?" Would you all then scream in such a united voice to ban all drive-in service? Something deep down inside is telling me...probably not. In a state where we clamor for smaller government...less involvement...less taxes...where do you all think these laws are created? Lobbyists...special interest groups...lawmakers...and finally...tax dollars...that's where and how. It's having your cake and eating it too folks...and it's also the stripping away of Americana...who's free in a country where the constituents want to legislate every little piece of every little action of your day? Will I think it's unfortunate that "Sally Smith Jones" was killed on her way to work because Mr. Smith from the above is a dufus....absolutely....but I'll probably be doing so, ripping down the highway, with my large dunkin original in one hand, and a smoke in the other.

Old Bill's picture

B, to answer your question:

B, to answer your question: Title 29A section 1921 covers TVs in cars: "A person may not operatore a motor vehicle equiped with a television viewer, screen or other means of visually receiving a television broadcast that is visible to the operator."
Title 29A Section 1923 reads; "An operator may not read printed material, including but not limited to, a newspaper, book, brochure or pamphlet, while operating a motor vehicle. Printed material does not include maps or printed directions to a specific location." BTW, cops are exempted from the tv law - I guess so they can watch their dashcams when documenting something like an OUI or something.
"The democracy will cease to exist when the government takes from those who would work and gives to those who would not." - Thomas Jefferson.

B's picture

Old Bill: Thank you very

Old Bill: Thank you very much. Now if only the state could make drivers aware of the law (I've never heard of it), and I wonder how often people have been arrested/ticketed or fined for breaking that law....

B's picture

What is that law? I do not

What is that law? I do not find it listed on Maine's website : http://www.mainelegislature.org/legis/statutes/29-A/title29-Ach19sec0.html

B's picture

Any law should be against

Any law should be against gross driver distractions when in motion, not just texting. The worst offenses need to be decided upon and clarified in the law. Many people can do some light eating, drinking coffee, even talk on a cellphone while driving. But reading books, papers, newspapers, computer screens or cellphone screens should be illegal. Not having at least one hand on the wheel also, so no putting on your makeup or shaving in the rear view mirror while driving with your knees...
Perhaps if it can be proved that a driver was distracted in one of these ways and caused an accident there could be jail time or at least loss of license along with a huge fine...

JohnBerry's picture

Anecdote Time: My wife and I

Anecdote Time: My wife and I walk everywhere. On more than one occasion we have seen drivers run red lights and stop-signs while texting. I crossed the street recently and could clearly see a driver at the stoplight watching a video on a small computer. When the light changed he drove off and continued to watch the video.

These people are selfish and a danger to everyone. A law banning texting while driving is not an example of Nanny State laws - it is an example of society protecting citizens from dangerous drivers.
_______________

"Half of the American people never read a newspaper. Half never vote for President. One hopes it is the same half." - Gore Vidal

oldgrump's picture

While sitting here with my

While sitting here with my mouth agape, I am reminded of the expression: "you can't fix stupid". I am totally amazed at the number of people, while herding two tons of steel down a road are talking on a cell phone, texting or even reading. IMHO, if/when these people are involved in an accident due to inattentiveness they should be charged with a class C felony, same as shooting or threatening a person with a firearm.

cranky yankee's picture

The biggest problem with

The biggest problem with suggesting such a law is that the conservatives will start crying about there not being a need for more "nanny laws" since this is common sense. Heck yeah, it's common sense and the world seems to be devoid of it these days, making nanny laws, or whatever else you want to call them, necessary in order to protect the rest of us. This fact is demonstrated in the case that was used to lead this editorial. People know it's stupid and unsafe, yet their selfish need for instant personal gratification seems to override their common sense, if they had a lick to start with.

shibear's picture

It wouldn't take too many

It wouldn't take too many fines for texting while driving for people there to get the message, especially if the fine is high enough. At least $100 for the first offense. Come on Maine and get with the program like a lot of other states are doing, make it illegal.

Advertisement