'Here for the kids' School chief recommends city try for grant to reform Longley Elementary

LEWISTON — Superintendent Leon Levesque is recommending that the city apply for a federal grant to improve student performance at Longley Elementary, which serves the city's most impoverished children.

Jose Leiva/Sun Journal

Longley Elementary School principal Tom Hood, pictured above, said he welcomes how federal money could infuse new learning at his school, but he's disappointed the grant would mean he could no longer be principal. Superintendent Leon Levesque is recommending "put aside our pride" and apply for the grant to help Longley students, of which 96 percent come from economically disadvantaged families.

CITlongleyP032710

Longley Elementary School Principal Tom Hood said he welcomes federal money because it could infuse new learning at the school, but he's disappointed that the grant would mean he could no longer be principal.

The Lewiston School Committee is scheduled to act on the recommendation Monday night.

Longley is among 10 Maine schools with such persistently low test scores that the federal government is offering money to help turn things around.

Each school could receive between $50,000 and $2 million over three years, but there's a catch: The schools would have to make big changes, including replacing their principals. At Longley, that means 12-year veteran Tom Hood would lose his job.

“It's real unfortunate that the resources come to us at the end of the line, not the front of the line,” Levesque said Friday. “But we need to put aside our pride and excuses. We're here for the kids. What's the best design we can make?”

School of poverty

The effort to reform Longley faces big hurdles. The school is like no other in the city.

An estimated 96 percent of its students live in poverty. The state average is 42 percent. And, 62 percent of students are immigrants, compared to 3 percent statewide.

Poverty and mobility are two of the biggest problems at Longley, Hood said. Many of its students move frequently, meaning a large number of them are not there from one year to the next.

“Teachers start out the school year making gains,” Hood said. Then students move. “A month or two later someone else comes in. They may not speak any English or they might.”

Teachers end up having multiple levels of students, some two or three grade levels behind. “That makes it very difficult for teachers trying to instruct," Hood said. "It takes a lot more effort, resources, time."

Of the 33 students in the third grade, only six have been at the school since kindergarten, he said.

Money to help turn things around “is what these kids really have needed since this building's been open,” Hood said. “It's always been an inner-city, at-risk population here.”

He's disappointed that he may be replaced when there's an opportunity to get additional resources, "to create conditions for kids and staff that we've always wanted to create but were never able to do it,” he said.

He said he's uncomfortable not knowing what will happen. "It's like you're caught in this zone, feeling unsure.”

Two choices

If the School Committee decides to apply for the federal money and if Lewiston is awarded a grant, the next step would be to see how much money is offered, Levesque said. If it's not enough to make a difference, why bother, he said.

To get the school where it should be, many students need to gain two to three years of academics in one year, he said.

According to the federal grant, there are four reform models from which to choose: close the school, create a charter school, or go with either a “turnaround” or “transformation” model. Longley will not be closed, Levesque said.  There's no room for 312 students at other schools. Maine law does not allow charter schools, so Lewiston would have to decide between the turnaround and transformation models.

In a turnaround model, no more than 50 percent of the school's existing staff would stay. In the transformation, model staff would stay. In either model, the principal would go.

Longley teacher Steve Gagne said he and others were anxious.

“We've seen programs come and go," he said. "Our goals are what's best for the kids at Longley School. This may be an opportunity, but still, we're apprehensive.”

Teachers wonder how much real academic growth students would make, versus improving test scores, Gagne said.

“We don't control all the factors in a child's life,” he said. “Are their personal needs being met? Are they coming to school hungry, tired, loved, taken care of? Those pieces come into play in how successful a child is in school. We don't know how much we can affect all those things in the course of a school day.”

bwashuk@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

rufe's picture
verified

Principal Hood. (Ex Principal Hood :((

"And, 62 percent of students are immigrants, compared to 3 percent statewide."Am very surprised no one mentioned this. I personally do not believe it is fair for Mr Hood to be relieved of his duties. I do realize policy is policy, but most policy's I would hope would have exceptions in some cases. Exceptions? Doesn't the first sentence of this qualify?

eeyoresfriend's picture

Willing to Help

I do not pretend to have all the answers. But I AM willing to use what I do have for the betterment of society--especially the most vulnerable among us. I struggle financially too and so I know what that is like. However, if you are reading this Mr Hood, and if you could use a college educated (B.S. in Mental Health and Human Services) part time volunteer at your school, please respond in these comments and I will contact you and perhaps we can help each other!

jayla's picture

Great idea!

Volunteers are needed in all our of schools.  That's what these welfare parents should be doing...they should be made to volunteer and what better place than at their children's schools?!  Awesome!~

tron's picture

Why limit it to welfare parents

every parent with a child at school should be required to spend one day a month volunteering.  Perhaps if they experience first hand the everyday problems, they would be more supportive.

akg's picture

And the simplest and best

And the simplest and best solution is what eludes them.  What a wonderful idea, it should be mandatory for any parent on welfare, it would at least give the children some support.  How hard can it be to make them "earn" some of the tax dollars we work for.  

jayla's picture

I don't have the answers...

but firing the principal is not the answer.  I don't know Mr. Hood, but I have heard he is a fantastic teacher and principal.  He is doing the best with what he has to work with.  Most of these issues start at home, and if parents were doing THEIR jobs, the school would not be in the position it is in.  So sad....

Pirate's picture
verified

The problem is the whole

The problem is the whole government school system sucks. Far too many are graduating from our high schools who can't add, subtract, multiply, or divide without a calculator or a cash register. Moreover, (not bad for a pirate, eh?) many can't put enough words together on paper to form a coherent sentence; and, far too many are unable to read their diplomas upon graduation. I've dealt with them in the workplace. It's pathetic.

akg's picture

I have to agree with you as

I have to agree with you as well and I have dealt with them on the job, what is worse, is having these illiterates promoted to supervisory positions.  I have seen one person in particular, with his crew, go out on their break and come back so high and reeking of marijuana and laughing about it.  The only thing the manager did, after about a year of this, was to tell them to stop it.  I no longer work for this company (which is related to the food industry) and they don't require that you have a high school diploma to work there.  Nearly the entire workforce is made up of under-educated individuals with felony criminal histories, the rest are Somali.  Not very many have a high school diploma.  Those who are graduating that are functionally illiterate are pushed through the system to either get them out of there because they know they are hopeless cases or the schools don't want to lose their funding and accreditation for consistent low performance. These things that you mentioned along with the welfare problem are the very reason I cannot get out of here fast enough, and as for my grandson, we have decided to send him to a private all boys school where the emphasis is on learning.....costly, yes, but worth it in the end when he is a productive and EDUCATED citizen.  Pirate, again, I agree, it's pathetic.

akg's picture

look around Lewiston

This is truly a sad state of affairs.  How can these teachers be expected to teach students under such circumstances?  Steve Gagne summed it all up perfectly in the article.  You have to question what is going on at home with these children.  I moved here from out of state and I am moving right back out.  When you walk around some of these neighborhoods and take a look at what is going on then you will understand why these students perform so poorly.  I have seen small children out playing unattended, or worse yet with a gang of "adults" on the porch watching and laughing at things the children do, things that absolutely horrified me.  These are the same parents that would rather spend their welfare money on junk food and soda, spend what little cash they have on cigarettes and alcohol because they have to "party" and the kids are left to fend for themselves, it's disgusting.  Poverty perpetuates itself, the parents are statistically very young and uneducated so how can they be expected to help the child at home?   I seriously doubt they even get encouragement to work harder or learn more.  The only example these kids have for their future is at home and it's bleak.  College is something most of these parents will not even encourage their children to strive for.  I can only imagine that in most of these homes the children are exposed to single mothers who have more interest in a boyfriend than in the welfare and education of their child, or fathers who are absent or worse yet alcohol or drug addicted.  I have heard these so-called parents scream such vile obscenities at these little kids and the kids seem so unaffected.  So it is not surprising to hear of such poor performance and no amount of money that you can pour into this school is going to change it until something is done at the home level.  The state of Maine has the most lucrative welfare system in the nation and there is absolutely no incentive for getting off it so the cycle continues.  The sad thing is that the majority of these children will grow up to repeat this cycle.

BobStone's picture
verified

The Most Troubling Number in the Story...

is that 42% of Maine students are living in poverty.  Shame on the ruling party, in power for 40 years, to have devastated the jobs landscape so that so many children are forced to grow up destitute.  Shame on Maine's voters for returning the ruling party to power election after election.

Einstein once said that "the definition of insanity is attempting the same thing, over and over, and expecting a different result."  It doesn't take a genius to understand that the ruling party isn't doing the job.  It is time for change.

42%.  Shame on you, Rotundo, Craven, Wagner, Simpson, Bolduc.

Pirate's picture
verified

The Pirate will drink to

The Pirate will drink to that. Very well stated, Mr. Stone. AARRGHH!

burak__'s picture

What happens if Longley

What happens if Longley Elementary school accepts the amount of $50,000 to $2 million over the three year period that the federal government is offering, yet fails to show a significant improvement during that time? Where will the money come from to continue to provide the level of education that is needed <a href="http://www.e-okulbilgilendirme.com" title="e okul">e okul</a> for these students when the three year period ends? Will the federal government pony up another $50,000 to $2 million? I doubt it. It will fall on the shoulders of the taxpayers of Lewiston. I am curious. Does Longley Elementary school currently offer summer school for its students? Would the federal government consider paying for a mandatory six week summer school program for the students of Longley Elementary who are not performing at their grade level? With the poor economy, I am sure there are teachers (within Longley Elementary School or from another school or district) who would love the opportunity to work during the summer.

Matt's picture

and people say No Child Left Behind is a joke...

This grant program is ridiculous. What a colossal waste of money! How is throwing cash at Longley school going to improve results? It's obvious to anyone who knows anything about education (and it's stated quite plainly here in the article) what the obstacles to success are at Longley. Generational welfare parents and 50%+ of the student base who can't speak English. So what do the feds propose? We'll give you even more $$ than you already get but you have to fire the prinicipal! Yeah, that'll work!

I think the Parents of

I think the Parents of children need to start speaking English...everywhere I go I  hear Somalian...I understand it's not easy ,but for there childrens sake they should  take English classes as well..and citizenship classes to learn our heritage.Perhaps this would transfer to their children with pride for our nation.. ,after all is said and done,it is their nation now whether you think so or not.I don't believe it's the schools fault ...just poor circumstances.

Rinoblast's picture

Nope

Wrong answer. Parents of immigrants are encouraged to speak their strongest language (usually, this isn't English) at home. Why? Because if they speak a language they have not mastered, they will pass on poor habits and mistakes to their children, and the children will then be deficient in two languages (English and the native language they are now ignoring). It's better for them to be an expert in a language that's not English than bad at everything.

Reason's picture
verified

Maine Law should allow for

Maine Law should allow for Charter Schools

sadie's picture
verified

I agree.  As a parent, I've

I agree.  As a parent, I've been looking into it for a while now, and I think that the law should definitely change.  I've read all of the pros and cons, but frankly, the bottom line is my children (and all children) and whether they are receiving the best education possible. 

 

Reason's picture
verified

Tom Hood

Tom Hood was always an excellent first grade teacher.  There is no shame in rotating him back to the classroom.  There is, of cours,e a financial change which would occur for him which would be significant. 

I have always felt that any principal should do this to keep abreast of the feelings of staff and students in the classroom.  However, what will probably happen is that they will just push Tom to another school.  Funny how attached teachers and Principals become to one school if they remain there long enough. 

As for the Federal Government programs, all they do is throw money at a problem.  This never works.

 What they really need to do is take students, regardless of their age, and place them at the appropriate learning level even if it is two or three yrs behind their age group which gives teachers the advantage of dealing with everyone at the same ability level.   These students can be cross integrated into activities where their size and age would be an overwhelming advantage to them over younger students.  I speak specifically of activities like physical education.  

Yes, there will be critics that say you can't do this as it humiliates a child.  Honestly, are we more concerned with the sensitivity of the parent/child or the learning that the child can accomplish which will affect their entire life? 

If we deny retention, then we must embrace "learning levelization" without fear.  Those old enough will remember the dreaded "tracking" system of the 50's and 60's, but they/we did not turn out so badly. 

Society must change if education is to advance in this country.  The countrys of the world who value and achieve in education have a socially positive view toward it.    They do not value sports over education, they value learning over all other things.    There is a lesson here to be recognized... either we learn from it or we become the academic slaves to a more dominantly educated society somewhere else in the world. 

Remember the world is connected electronically.  Finally, I advocate that parents should take away the cell phones and Ipods.  Replace them with true learning tools like books, hands on puzzles and acknowledge that it is the "responsibility" of all parents to monitor the computer use of their children. 

Society had rights long before parents and their children had rights granted to them by the liberal courts of the 60's.  I ask that we rally again as a society and not as individuals to take back the responsibility for educating our children... Reason with me on this.

news4u's picture

"A child educated only at school is an uneducated child."

The above quote is from George Santayana, a philosopher, poet, literary and cultural critic. While I agree with a lot of what you said, I do disagree on one thing. How will rotating Mr. Hood back into the classroom improve the situation? Will this move decrease the poverty level of the students at Longley Elementary School? Will bringing in another principal change the fact that 62% of their school population are immigrants? Will moving Mr. Hood from his current role of principal to the role of a classroom teacher change the fact that only six of 33 students in the third grade have been at the school since kindergarten?

What happens if Longley Elementary school accepts the amount of $50,000 to $2 million over the three year period that the federal government is offering, yet fails to show a significant improvement during that time? Where will the money come from to continue to provide the level of education that is needed for these students when the three year period ends? Will the federal government pony up another $50,000 to $2 million? I doubt it. It will fall on the shoulders of the taxpayers of Lewiston.

I am curious. Does Longley Elementary school currently offer summer school for its students? Would the federal government consider paying for a mandatory six week summer school program for the students of Longley Elementary who are not performing at their grade level? With the poor economy, I am sure there are teachers (within Longley Elementary School or from another school or district) who would love the opportunity to work during the summer. 

Directly underneath this article in the newspaper, on page A7, is an article titled Deer Isle votes to turn down grant money. Although the high school is on the state's list of the 10 most "persistently low-achieving" schools the townspeople and school board are not willing to fire their principal of 2 1/2 years. Why? Because major changes have occurred during that time. They have a tutoring program in place, improvements in teacher collaberation have occurred, and the student suspension rate has decreased by 65%.

As the saying goes "Education costs money, but then so does ignorance." But isn't it ignorant to think that all educational woes will be solved by simply handing out money without looking for the root cause of the problem(s)?

 

Advertisement