In an open letter, Mayor Dick Gleason has asked Auburn residents to "demand" of city councilors that the proposed city budget cuts be restored.
The letter was e-mailed to members of the community and the media in response to the Auburn City Council's request of City Manager Glenn Aho to cut one million dollars from the city's 2010-2011 fiscal budget.
The letter reads as follows:
An open letter to the citizens of Auburn:
Nearly two years ago, Glenn Aho was hired to be the Chief Operating Officer of our city. He came to us with many years of experience, a solid education and excellent references.
Working with staff, he spent months preparing the budget. He was pleased to announce that, if it were not for state revenue sharing shortfalls, the Auburn tax rate would have in fact, dropped again.
That, in itself, is a remarkable accomplishment. Instead of congratulating and thanking him, the Auburn City Council voted to direct the city manager to cut one million dollars from his proposed budget.
It turns out that no matter what he proposes, it will create what is known as a "domino effect" which is a chain reaction that occurs when a small change causes a similar change nearby, which then will cause another similar change, and so on in linear sequence.
Here are some examples of the "domino effect" of proposed cuts:
1. Drop the School Resource Officer program: What we save in dropping this will be offset by spending more in juvenile arrests, court time, and social costs
2. Halt Capital Projects: We would realize short term financial benefits by saddling long term financial burdens upon future councils—and that burden will be felt as soon as next year.
3. Reduce snow plowing overnight: By reducing our overnight plowing it could increase school cancellations, extend the school year, and have labor contract ramifications.
4. Stop funding special events: We could save money by not funding the Balloon Festival, Liberty Festival, Dempsey Challenge, but we lose in terms of community spirit and community building.
5. Labor reduction: We save personnel costs but are losing hours of service to our citizens. For example, we will only have the Clerk’s office open in the afternoons. We unilaterally reduce non-union wages at the risk of having them unionize and only cost the City more money in the long run in terms of contract administration and legal costs.
Interestingly, this million dollar cut from the proposed budget would only save the average homeowner less than $150 for the year, but the long term effect could be much more expensive.
This Tuesday night will be our final city council meeting before final budget decisions. I am asking Auburn citizens to demand that the original proposed budget be restored. They can start by calling or emailing the city councilors. Their contact information is available at AuburnMaine.org
Second, concerned citizens should attend the meeting in Auburn Hall this Tuesday, April 20 at 7pm.
Now is the time to keep from dropping our fine city to its knees.
Dick Gleason, Mayor
City of Auburn, Maine
Mayor's office: (207) 333-6601 x 1216
Business office: (207) 784-5868

Budget cuts
Thank you Mayor Gleason I believe you letter to the citizens of Auburn shows your concern for us I belive that you will come to the right decisions to please some of us at least, without costing us more out of pocket money in the long run. The council has to realize that not plowing, doing away with cleanup etc, will cost citizens more money.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Shox,Dunk,Jordan, Air max, Air force,Adidas
welcome to:
===== http://www.fashionsports.org ========
50%off ca,ed hardy t-shirt$15 jeans,coach handbag$33,air max90,dunk,polo t-
shirt$13,,lacoste t-shirt $13 air jordan for sale,l nba jersy for sale sale,$35,nfl nba
jersy for sale
and so on..
if you like to order anything you like.
More details, please just browse our website
Quality is our Dignity; Service is our Lift.
enjoy yourself. thank you!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.These are the "Salad Days" as far as taxes go...
and all indications are that next year will be far, far worse. We'll remember 2010 as the days when taxes "were low." Our friends in the Maine legislature have bonded (borrowed) like there was no tomorrow. (Debt now totals over 11.5 billion, to be paid by the what, 50% of Mainers that actually pay taxes).
Our friends in Washington, both Democrats and Republicans, have wracked up $13 trillion in debt and are spending at the rate of $4 billion a day...and we long ago spent the last dime collected from the taxpayers this fiscal year.
I've contributed to social security for 50 years...and it's been spent...not a dime invested. There is no cash in Al Gore's vaunted "trust fund." Just IOU's.
There is a light at the end of the tunnel. It's not the tunnel exit.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The Council is demmanding the cuts not AHO
Remember AHO, gave a warning these would be tough harsh cuts, and recomended against it...the council wants these cuts and ultimately they have the final say on the budget, as city residents can';t vote for the budget....they they must vote for the least sl;imey politcian....if there is such a thing...................
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Respectfully Disagree
I don't particularly disagree with any of the 5 points Mr. Gleason has raised but I do have a concern.
My concern is that if we neglect to make at least some of the reductions passed down from the state, and choose to pick up the tab solely from property taxes to maintain the status quo this year, we are assuming the risk of a double impact next year, should a similar reduction occur.
I don't know for certain that another state revenue sharing reduction of this size is likely in the next fiscal year, but I don't think it is safe to assume that it just won't happen -unless the contingency plan is to simply increase the property tax rate by 10% or so on an ongoing basis.
If there was some indication that this is intended as a one time ONLY measure and that no matter what any further reductions in state revenue sharing will need to be dealt with in some other fashion, then all of this would be more palatable. Unfortunately, it appears as though there is plenty of talk about how much of a disaster this is, and I think there needs to be more discussion of the long term view.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.couldn't agree more!
I have been a citizen of auburn for several years now. I have to say that this is one of THE WORST city councils I have ever seen!!! When Herrick originally asked for a 2.5 million dollar tax cut, I almost blew a gasket! we may not be a booming metropolis, but we are definitely not some "rinky-dink" 4,000 populated town! We are one of THE biggest cities in the State of Maine, and to run such a city is going to take money! At this point in the game, Auburn cannot afford to go back wards, we need to keep thriving and pushing forward, I definitely understand that "times are tough", but we NEED the police, we Need the fire department, we NEED to make sure our streets are sanded and plowed. These are all things that, as a community of our size, we NEED! I could not agree more with the mayor on this letter!! keep on keeping on Mr. Mayor!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Well said Mr. Mayor
That $150 for everything is less than I'll have to spend out of pocket for hauling my own spring clean-up off to the dump. Cutting the SRO's is a horrible idea to boot.
It would also be nice that when you bring up your concerns and contact your councilors that they would respond, or at least ask thier constituants what thier thoughts are, especially on issues like these.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.