Same-sex marriage repeal petitions turned in to state officials

AUGUSTA, Maine (AP) — Gay marriage opponents hoping to derail Maine's new law before it can take effect submitted petitions Friday that they said contain more than enough signatures to force a people's veto referendum.

Gay Marriage
Joel Page

Rev. Buddy Gough, of the Stand for Marriage campaign, carries a box of signed petitions to the Secretary of States office following a news conference Friday, July 31, 2009 outside the State House in Augusta, Maine. The group collected more than 100,000 signatures and are seeking a referendum in November on the state's new gay marriage law. (AP Photo/Joel Page)

Leaders of the Stand for Marriage campaign delivered a stack of cartons holding petitions with more than 100,000 signatures to the Secretary of State's office, which has until Sept. 4 to certify at least 55,087 of them. If it does so, voters will be asked on Nov. 3 whether to repeal the law.

Maine became poised to recognize same-sex marriages in May, when lawmakers set aside a state law that defines marriage as between a man and a woman. The other New England states of Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Vermont recognize gay marriages, as does Iowa.

The Maine Legislature's action needs to be reversed because traditional marriage between one man and one woman is a basic building block of society that must be protected, Stand for Marriage campaign leaders said at a news conference Friday.

"I am greatly concerned about the Legislature's redefining what has been the very foundation of our civil society," said Brian Souchet of Brunswick, standing next to his wife and children.

Campaign leader Rep. Bob Emrich, pastor of Emmanuel Baptist Church in Plymouth, also criticized lawmakers for "mocking and disparaging the deeply held faith of Maine people" before they voted to recognize same sex marriages this spring.

Gay marriage supporters said they weren't surprised by Friday's filing and stressed their own efforts to marshal support for their cause.

The No on 1/Protect Maine Equality campaign also continued to criticize the other side for hiring an out-of-state company to assist in the petition drive. Stand for Marriage spokesman Scott Fish responded that both campaigns have received help from organizations not based in Maine.

"We know this is going to be a really hard-fought election. There are passionate supporters on both sides of this issue. But we feel very confident that our campaign (has) over 60,000 supporters so far," said Jesse Connolly of the No on 1 campaign. "I think our advocates knew when they went into this ... that they'd have to win both in the Legislature and also at the ballot box."

Maine has a domestic partnership registry, but gay marriage advocates say it doesn't go far enough to ensure marriage equality.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

jalbrecht1's picture
verified

Marriage is not an

Marriage is not an institution. It was not ordained by god. If it were then plural marriage, biblical marriage, would be the way of the world. Oh! that's right it is.
Marriage was ordained by the Priests as a way to control family life; their main source of income. The laws on civil marriage have been changed frequently. The last time interracial marriage was allowed.
It amazes that those same small government conservatives want to override state laws and use the Federal Government to impose their religious views on the rest of us. Hypocrits.
Jon Albrecht Dixfield

Gil's picture

This law has as much to do

This law has as much to do with equality as the messiah's healt care bill has to do with health care. The messiah wants power and control for the state, gays want recognition and money. Otherwise they would accept a phrase like Civil Union, and let it go. They also know that the majority of the people would never vote it in, so they went the coward route of having the legislature and the courts push their agenda through over the heads and out of reach of the people, the same way they did their special rights bill a few years earlier.
"In the history of the nation, there has never been a political party so ridiculous as today's Democrats. It's as if all the brain-damaged people in America got together and formed a voting bloc." Ann Coulter

John 28's picture

REMEMBER that the CATHOLIC

REMEMBER that the CATHOLIC CHURCH spent $100,000.00 of YOUR donations for this trivia, while is SHOULD have used it to keep OUR CHURCHES from being closed. To feed the poor, to give scholarship to poor kids, and the list goes on. What hypocrites those men in robes!!! And how they covered up the pedophile priests and they dare call themselves Christians, like the rest of you hypocrites that are so afraid of the truth!!

jchick's picture
verified

Marriage is not a trivial

Marriage is not a trivial thing. The attempt by homosexual activists to get the State to redefine marraige, which is an institution ordained by God, is a slap in the face of all who believe in the sactity of marriage.

John A. Chick

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." -- Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Colonel Charles Yancey (January 6, 1816)

Gil's picture

The church has already

The church has already denied that the funds came from parishioners, but rather a donor fund for such actions. But hey, don't let facts stop you, keep repeating the lies until the brain dead believe you. Worked for Goebbels.
"In the history of the nation, there has never been a political party so ridiculous as today's Democrats. It's as if all the brain-damaged people in America got together and formed a voting bloc." Ann Coulter

robert's picture

tron...."What is know for a

tron...."What is know for a fact is people were PAID to collect signatures, at a rate of so much per signature. I am certain that some collectors were "aggressive" if not liars in the process."

That is down right hilarious...i guess the signature gatherers utilized a tactic from the mesiah...can you say ACORN! The fact that he will use his personal paid special interest group to perform the next census is criminal.

Whether you agree or disagree is not my biggest concern. The fact that the wing-nuts in Augusta feel they know better than the voters of Maine is. This has been voted on and defeated a few times so why did the disconnected and misrepresenting electorate decide to disregarde the interests of the voters? They need to be taught, if you say one thing and do another (remember all the campaign promises daying, "If you vote for me I will listen, you will have a voice if you send me to Augusta..blah blah, blah) Remove them by voting in real representation, not imitation.

Rinoblast's picture

Except it hasn't been voted

Except it hasn't been voted on, and to try and act like it has displays complete ignorance of the issues and reveals deeper issues you may have with the homosexual community.

Cpt.Zombie's picture

Wow, i'm confused as to how

Wow, i'm confused as to how such support against something that REALLY doesn't matter can be mustered. Seriously. Let Homosexuals get married. If you can't stand to look at it - GROW UP. This is such a 5 year old fight. Between people who can't handle change and people who just want the same freedom as everyone else.

snuffy's picture

What would our forefathers

What would our forefathers who created our vision of America think of the easy paths given to all the minorities in this country to enjoy the fruits of our labor. America became immensely prosperous thru hard work and sacrifice,but are we so prosperous that we need not cotinue to adhere to the principles and visions of our forefathers?

sadie's picture
verified

"America became immensely

"America became immensely prosperous thru hard work and sacrifice..."....through the hard work and sacrifice....of *minorities*!!! Because of African slave labor our country prospered through the trade of cotton and tobacco....Asian americans built our railroads...I guess you could say that we (white people) worked hard to force the natives from their land....we prospered from that! "Easy path" my ass!

Taxpoor's picture

I dont need a book to know

I dont need a book to know that a person attracted to another of the same sex is very sick. So stop blaming a book. If it were normal we wouldnt be having this discussion. Some of you gays may be book smart but thats as far as it gos if you think same sex Marriage is OK Get back in the closets or better yet jump off a high bridge somewhere.
NOTICE I didnt call names like FAGIT and so on & I dont think I made up any words

Rinoblast's picture

You're right, being gay is

You're right, being gay is so abnormal that it occurs in over 1,500 species on our earth: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_animals_displaying_homosexual_behavior

jchick's picture
verified

I see, Animals do it, so it

I see,

Animals do it, so it must be ok. We are not animals, we are human beings created in the image of God. But lets say you don't believe in God, but in evolution, natural selection and the survival of the fittest. Homosexuality is still an abnormality. In fact, it could be argued that homosexuality in and of itself disproves evolution. Natural selection dictates that only those traits that give a species the best chance of survival are "selected". Since homosexuals cannot reproduce it would stand to reason that it would be in the species best interest for homosexuality to be weeded out of the selection process. Yet homosexuality is on the rise.

Never mind religion. Homosexuality (speaking in the general sense) defies logic, defies science and serves no useful purpose other than to gratify the desires of homosexual individuals. In the animal kingdom, even those individuals that exhibit homosexual-like behavior still mate with the opposite sex in order to breed.

John A. Chick

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." -- Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Colonel Charles Yancey (January 6, 1816)

tron's picture

Mr. Chick, homosexuals do

Mr. Chick, homosexuals do NOT reproduce, but they generally are capable of doing so. In fact many have children before admitting to themselves that they are homosexuals. And the arguement about natural selection could be made that homesexuality is good for the species since it keeps the population explosion in check by not reproducing, but still contribute to society. So again it all comes down to whether we should have discrimination of legal and financial rights based on who a person sleeps with.

jpat's picture

Abnormal is not the correct

Abnormal is not the correct word. Sin is the correct word.

jpat's picture

Abnormal is not the correct

Abnormal is not the correct word. Sin is the correct word.

Chippy's picture

Let the voters decide if

Let the voters decide if they want this law passed. Marrage is for MAN and WOMAN.

tax2dth's picture

Whole state has gone to hell

Whole state has gone to hell in a hand basket............

verified

If all of these WACKO's want

If all of these WACKO's want same sex marriage let them go see Nancy Pelosi ... she from the biggest weirdo area of the all San Francisco.

triumph's picture

Maine's law allows all

Maine's law allows all religions the right to recognize or deny any marriage, but most importantly it does not force anyone to follow the beliefs of others. If my faith, say Quaker, wants to recognize my marriage it can do so. If my faith, say Southern Baptist, doesn't recognize my marriage, it does not have to. The special rights, which have only been given to heterosexual couples up until this law, are now extended to all Maine citizens with this law.

jchick's picture
verified

triumph, First, the State

triumph,

First, the State (government) does not grant rights. If rights could be granted by government, then they could also be taken away by the government.

Secondly, Maine's laws do not allow regligions to do anything. We do not have to get permission from the state to worship as we see fit. The State has no authority to regulate religion or redefine marriage. The laws that exist regarding marriage are there to protect the insitution of marriage, not to grant special rights. There is a difference between rights and privileges. Marriage is neither a fundamental right or a "civil" right. Marriage is, and has always been, the union of a man and a woman in holy matrimony. It is the foundation of the family and in a broader sense, society.

John A. Chick

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." -- Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Colonel Charles Yancey (January 6, 1816)

verified

Paranoia Rinoblast. Plain

Paranoia Rinoblast. Plain and simple. They are scared. It amuses me when grungy old men talk about "if that gay guy plans on hitting on me...". Ask any gay man around, the paranoid guys are the last ones any of them would find attractive, but that's what it boils down to. That and/or shame for their own secret desires!
(God forbid, someone call it like it really may be?!?!)

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants. It is the creed of slaves." William Pitt

jchick's picture
verified

Paranoia? Please, Stacey.

Paranoia?

Please, Stacey. Paranoia has nothing to do with it. Rather it is outrage that our elected representatives and the Governor would have the gall to attempt to redefine marriage. That is not why we sent them to Augusta. Marriage is not a right, it is an institution ordained by God. One that we hold sacred. As others have stated, marriage is the foundation, the bedrock of society. The health of any society can be measured by the success or failure of this institution. Marriage is, and always has been, defined as a union between a man and a woman. It is because of this that laws have been established to PROTECT marriage.

Gay people did not lobby the legislature to gain equal protection for their partnerships, they want the state to legitimize their lifestyle by redefining marriage. If it were just about obtaining certain privileges afforded married couples, that would be different. In the end, regardless of which way this goes, marriage, in God's eyes will still be a union between a man and a woman and homosexuality will still be an abomination.

John A. Chick

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be." -- Thomas Jefferson in a letter to Colonel Charles Yancey (January 6, 1816)

candiceanne's picture

A lot of those signatures

A lot of those signatures were obtained by outright lying to people about what the petition was to get them to sign. It is unfortunate that a minority is trying to force their religious beliefs down everyones throat. This country was built on religious freedom not religious right bigotry.

jpat's picture

Where did you get your

Where did you get your information?

tron's picture

What is know for a fact is

What is know for a fact is people were PAID to collect signatures, at a rate of so much per signature. I am certain that some collectors were "aggressive" if not liars in the process.

sheesh's picture

Does not matter if some one

Does not matter if some one was paid to collect signatures or not. The fact is that some people signed it because they felt it was right to have every person cast their vote for or against homosexual marriage and not allow the Governor to just sign a bill and leave it at that. Equal to vote either way regardless of what your beliefs are.

When I went to vote this past May, in the town I reside in, no one chased me or tried to explain anything to me. All I was asked was if I would like to sign the petition or not. I watched this woman for 15 minutes or more when each voter passed how she acted and she never ever tried to convince any one to sign something they did not want to. In fact most of them approached her and asked what it was all about and out of the 10 people I saw, 9 signed the petition.

Cpt.Zombie's picture

I agree, there was a

I agree, there was a "Anti-Gay Marriage" booth set up in front of JAY police station. I work across the street, and often saw them flagging down people in the police parking lot, and walking up and attempting to get passerby to come and "give them a chance to explain".

LewistonNative...'s picture
verified

Don't think it is going to

Don't think it is going to be quite the landslide that you may think. Equality Maine already has 60,000 and they haven't even really started to campaign to voters to vote No on 1. Even if it gets voted down someone will go threw the court process calling it unconstitutional and then it will again be overturned by the Courts which means no person/s can try to overturn it. I.E see what Mass. and Conn. did because they went threw the court system.

Enoch's picture

How many times has this type

How many times has this type of vote regarding GAYity been held? When will they get the message? I'll be part of the landslide to repeal.

Rinoblast's picture

Never has Maine voted on Gay

Never has Maine voted on Gay marriage, and the lost vote on "GAYity" (classy move on that one Enoch) added sexual orientation to Maine's anti-discrimination laws, protecting both homosexuals and heteorsexuals alike from being discriminated on by their sexuality. That law was upheld by public vote in 2005.

Hulk's picture

FACT: Every time homosexual

FACT: Every time homosexual marriage has been voted on by the people of this country it has lost.

T's picture

Eagle, read the article

Eagle, read the article again. You'll find it's about same sex marriage, or do you care?

BTW, what's a "demoscrotes"? You know, there are plenty of commonly accepted words you can use to employ your juvenile name-calling without making them up.

People like you drive good citizens away from true conservatism.

__________________
"A government big enough to give you what you want is strong enough to take everything from Gil"

Hulk's picture

If you don't know what a

If you don't know what a "scrote" is, it's probably because you don't have one! The derivative word is scrotum.

Cpt.Zombie's picture

HAHAHA I love how badly

HAHAHA I love how badly EAGLE failed at making fun of democrats. And geez, if you ask me both democraps and re-pube-lickins need some work. maybe one more then others but yeah, you don't have to resort to name calling to prove a point. but true - i wish we all could be 5 years old.

fixit001's picture

First Vote the bill down

First Vote the bill down then vote the members who voted for it out!!!!!

sheesh's picture

For those that want to see

For those that want to see which legislators vote which way here are the links;

(COPY BOTH lines to make one and paste in to your browsers. For some reason it won't
let me post to make it hyperlinked to just click on it and go)

HOUSE:
http://janus.state.me.us/legis/LawMakerWeb/rollcall.asp?
ID=280031932&chamber=House&serialnumber=52

SENATE:
http://janus.state.me.us/legis/LawMakerWeb/rollcall.asp?
ID=280031932&chamber=Senate&serialnumber=64

Gil's picture

More than twice the needed

More than twice the needed signatures, a good start to repealing a special rights bill that never should have been passed.
"In the history of the nation, there has never been a political party so ridiculous as today's Democrats. It's as if all the brain-damaged people in America got together and formed a voting bloc." Ann Coulter

Rinoblast's picture

You've yet to explain how

You've yet to explain how giving them the same rights heterosexual couples enjoy is "special."

Hulk's picture

You've yet to explain what

You've yet to explain what rights are being denied homosexuals.

Rinoblast's picture

The right to marry the

The right to marry the person of their choice in front of the state, which comes with it intrinsic benefits along with the 1,000s of privileges that married couples currently enjoy (ie inheritance, patient visitation rights)

Gil's picture

There is no "right" to

There is no "right" to marry, so your argument is moot at best, ignorant at worse.
"In the history of the nation, there has never been a political party so ridiculous as today's Democrats. It's as if all the brain-damaged people in America got together and formed a voting bloc." Ann Coulter

Advertisement