Raymond tells judge porn wasn't sexual

PORTLAND — Former Auburn music teacher James Raymond Jr. said in federal court Friday that he viewed child pornography regularly and purchased memberships to three Web sites until something suddenly made him stop.

James Raymond

James Raymond

Raymond, 29, said it was an image on one of those sites that made him see something startling in the photographs and “freaked me out,” he said.

“The last one I saw was a child in pain," he said. "I said, ‘This is really wrong.’”

He began the Web site memberships by looking at pictures of nude children, but not for sexual gratification, he said. He wasn't addicted, despite an earlier admission to a police detective. And he said he hadn’t thought of his students sexually.

Raymond took the witness stand for most of the morning Friday at U.S. District Court. He was indicted last year by a federal grand jury on two counts of transporting a minor in interstate commerce with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity.

He was released on bail, confined to his Auburn home pending trial, which started Tuesday.

If convicted, Raymond faces a minimum sentence of 10 years in prison and a maximum sentence of life on each count.

A 14-year-old girl testified earlier in the week that he had touched her breasts, buttocks and “private area” during two trips to Canobie Lake Park in Salem, N.H., in the summer of 2007 when she was 11 years old and was his fifth-grade student. Raymond also had taken the girl’s 9-year-old sister on the two trips. No other adult or child went on those trips.

Under questioning from his attorney, Richard Hartley of Bangor, Raymond denied the girl’s accusations. He said he may have touched her buttocks while climbing a ladder to one of the rides. If he had, it wasn’t intentional, he said. The park was crowded and that kind of touching might have resulted from jostling.

When he learned about the other allegations of touching he said, “I was shocked because I knew they had not happened.”

Raymond said he took pity on the girl, whose family was poor and couldn’t afford such a luxury. He had offered to take the entire family, but the girls’ mother objected, he said, so he ended up taking only the two girls.

On each trip, his cousin was supposed to accompany him and the girls, and each time the cousin had called at the last minute to say he couldn’t make it, Raymond said.

Before leaving town on the first trip, Raymond had taken the girls to his home because there was less urgency to leave immediately after he learned he didn’t have to pick up his cousin 20 minutes away, he said.

He said he never invited the 11-year-old girl onto his bed, as she had testified. And he never cuddled with her younger sister on his bed.

During a lengthy interview with an Auburn police detective, Raymond said he made false admissions because he thought they were what the detective wanted to hear in the wake of accusations of inappropriate touching lodged by a different student.

He said he understood the detective to have told him there would be no repercussions if he admitted to the type of behavior of which the detective accused him.

“He was really aggressive in his questions,” Raymond said of Detective Chad Syphers during the interview in October 2007. His language was laced with “crude and sexual” references, which offended Raymond and wasn’t how he was used to being spoken to, he said.

“I felt like there was nowhere to go,” but to admit to things he hadn’t done and thoughts he hadn’t had, he said.

“I did not feel like I could leave that room,” he said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig Wolff said Syphers had reminded Raymond more than once that he could leave the interview any time and he would not be arrested. Wolff played video clips from the interview, showing Raymond making admissions, including urges to put his hand up young girls’ skirts and touch their legs and buttocks.

That and other admissions were uttered by Raymond before Syphers talked about “wiping the slate clean,” Wolff noted.

When Syphers asked Raymond in the videotaped interview if he was nervous, Raymond said: “No, I’m pretty hungry.”

When questioned by federal agents about the pornography sites before Sypher’s interview, Raymond told the agents he was interested in young girls. But on Friday he said he had been intimidated by Special Agent Gary Moulton and two other agents with him and felt pressured to give them the answers he thought they were seeking.

Raymond also countered the alleged victim’s earlier testimony about a different trip to the New Hampshire park. Raymond’s chorus group had gone to the park at the end of the 2007 school year. On the ride back from the park, the girl testified Raymond had told her to sit in the back of the bus next to him. She and other students testified that Raymond had touched her inappropriately during that ride.

Raymond said Friday the girl had willingly sat with him and had fallen asleep on his shoulder. He hadn’t touched her at all on the bus, he said.

Hartley had one more witness to call, but had trouble scheduling a time and date, he told Judge D. Brock Hornby.

The trial is expected to resume after Monday, when Hornby planned to meet again with both attorneys.

Raymond waived his right to a jury trial; Hornby will decide the case.

cwilliams@sunjournal.com

What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.

Advertisement

Comments

 's picture

I agree with everyone's

I agree with everyone's comments.  I also wanted to add that several kids on that bus saw him with his hands on the girl's legs, rubbing them.  He claims that he didn't touch her.  Maybe this guy is just crying out for help.  I don't know.  But he cannot be around kids anymore.  Not at all.  Even if that means being in prison for a long, long time. 

 's picture

We need to be careful and not jump to conclusions

 

An issue as disgusting and vile as sexual relations with children is something that really hits us hard, as it should. We tend to let out feelings take over, allowing us to jump to conclusions. If anyone hasn't seen the documentary Capturing the Friedmans, you absolutely should. It's the story of a child molestation case similar to this.. two men, a father and son, accused of having sexual relations with children in a computer class they ran. When the allegations popped up, police raided their house and found child pornography belonging to the father, which in their mind immediately made them guilty. The film exposed some improper ways of police enforcement going about handling the case. Rather than asking the children what was done to them, they would say "They did this and this and that, didn't they?" and pressure the children into admitting things that hadn't actually been done.

This man is obviously troubled and in need of some psychological help. If he is indeed guilty of what he has been accused of, he should go to jail. I am in no way accusing the law of ill-play here, as that would also be jumping to conclusions, and we need to be careful before we do something like that to anyone. 

 

 's picture

Oh please.....

Oh please.......what other reason would he be looking at pictures of nude children for besides sexual gratification? And it's illegal..plain and simple!!! How can anyone get on that stand and defend him? I can not even imagine putting my reputation on the line for him. His musical talents means crap! He's a pedophile..........everyone always wants to doubt the childrens words........this is why children are so afraid to speak up. Do you doubting adults know what it's like to be abused and then be called a liar when you are finally brave enough to speak out?

 's picture

GUILTY

Child porn is a crime and joining sites is SICK.

Guilty      Confessed

PAUL ST JEAN's picture

Defend him all you want, but

Defend him all you want, but anyone who claims his kiddy porn was not sexual is missing a few points. The man needs help.

Are you nuts or another pedophile?

He admitted to viewing child pornography and buying subscriptions to some of these sites, till one day a light came on in his f@#%ed up head....uummm!!!! He absolutely knew what he was doing and anyone that defends him is just as guilty.  Take your head out of the sand and see this for what it is.  He preyed on young girls and he is dangerous.  I'm sure not every child he ran across  was his type ; hence the good things other kids remember about him.  They don't advertise what they are.....And being talented has nothing to do with what he did, but it helped him land a job where the kids are!

 's picture

It is sad that any parent or

It is sad that any parent or teacher (those who spoke on his behalf yesterday) would or could defend this individuals admitted behavior. He is a sick deranged person who belongs in an environment where he can no longer offend. I would think these teachers? and parents? are in need of some sort of psychiatric help!

Advertisement

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...