Lewiston council moves ahead with staff cuts, including 10 layoffs

LEWISTON —The City Council voted Tuesday night to lay off 10 city employees and eliminate another 12 vacant positions, cutting $750,000 from the 2010-11 budget.

Councilors met in executive session to discuss offers from the city's seven labor unions designed to stave off staffing cuts. The cuts were not enough, according to a statement read by Mayor Larry Gilbert.

"The concessions proposed totaled less than half of the $750,000 needed to avoid layoffs," Gilbert said. "Some unions offered more than their fair share. Others offered less. One bargaining unit offered no concessions whatsoever. Most of the concessions offered were contingent on the city's agreement not to lay off additional staff. "

Councilors then voted 4-2 to authorize City Administrator Ed Barrett to begin staff reductions immediately.

"While we appreciate the thought and effort by our employees, we must move forward with staff reductions that will produce a tax rate acceptable to the council and that takes into account the economic circumstances of our community and our residents," Gilbert said.

The proposed budget calls for $43.6 million in spending, a slight decrease compared to the current budget. Even with the cuts, the proposed budget would increase property taxes by about $150 on a $150,000 home, because of a reduction in state revenues.

Councilors have spent their last few meetings reviewing budget cuts and savings that would trim pennies off the property tax rate. Cuts would include fewer open hours at the Lewiston Public Library, cutting support for festivals and special events, reducing the number of polling places to one and cutting the Police Department by four positions.

None of those options had much council support.

That left a staffing cut of $748,085 as the biggest budget-reducing option. It will cut the property tax rate by 41 cents per $1,000 of property value — about $61 a year for a $150,000 home.

Councilors were hoping that the unions representing city employees would agree to forgo scheduled raises for the year, saving enough money to stave off the staff cuts.

Barrett said the work councilors had done over the past few weeks had helped matters. Tuesday's vote would cap the city's tax rate increase at 50 cents, from $24.90 per $1,000 of value in the current budget to $25.40 next year.

"I think councilors took these discussions extremely seriously, and I think they looked very hard at having to lay off any employees," Barrett said.

He said he would begin meeting with department heads and employees right away, first notifying those affected by the cuts. He would not say publicly which departments would lose positions until after he had met with the employees themselves, then notified city councilors.

Barrett said he expects to make the cuts public later this week.

"I think we have enough information now to begin drawing up a final document and working toward a final public hearing," Barrett said. That meeting is scheduled for May 18.


What do you think of this story?

Login to post comments

In order to make comments, you must create a subscription.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must hold a valid subscription allowing access to this website. You must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your SunJournal.com profile. To subscribe or link your existing subscription click here.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned from posting comments.



 's picture

Auburn's SRO's

Auburn, as of last council meeting, has decided not to cut the SROs from the budget.  The data is that you cite is from the police force. This is a similar situation to the one stated above where the cuts are proposed knowing they will be unpalatable to the public and therefore will not go through. In this case, the council has caved to the political game.

 's picture

Cut it all from the Police dept!

Johnny walker yellow, I have an idea. Why not take the money the state gives your  girl friend to support her brood and stop spending it on booze. Find yourself a job, support yourself and man up. You may feel better about hings.  


Absolutely do not cut

Absolutely do not cut personnel from the police department, however, the use of overtime should be looked at for drastic reduction. For the sake of jobs in this tough economy, all personnel, union or not, should be willing to hold the line on salaries this year.


Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...