AUBURN — An Androscoggin County Sheriff's deputy had arranged a meeting with a man suspected of stealing laptops when the man spotted him and took off in his car.
The suspect from Smithfield ended up crashing his car on Route 202 in Winthrop after a chase by the deputy who was seeking to arrest the man on an outstanding felony warrant.
Deputy Maurice Drouin remains on the job pending an investigation into the crash, Sheriff Guy Desjardins said Tuesday at a news conference at the Androscoggin County building.
The crash triggered three independent investigations, including his office's internal investigation, Desjardins said.
A week before the May 12 accident, Desjardins' office got a tip that Glen A. Witham, 39, had been using fake addresses to buy at least two laptops from local stores. Witham allegedly used the address of a past acquaintance for billing future payments on the computers.
Drouin and Witham had corresponded online, Witham unaware of Drouin's identity. One of the sellers helped authorities track down the computer by tracking software built into it, Desjardins said.
Drouin set up a meeting in Greene with Witham on May 12 to discuss the purchase of an item Witham had posted for sale on Craigslist, an online classified ad site.
“It appears (Witham) had noticed the deputy and the chase ensued,” Desjardins said.
Witham raced down Route 202 into Winthrop in a Dodge Stratus. He avoided spike mats authorities set in his path, then, three miles away, smashed into an SUV driven by 27-year-old Jenna Lawrence of Manchester and flipped off the road. Eight months pregnant, Lawrence escaped without life-threatening injuries, police said.
Witham was hospitalized in critical condition. As of Tuesday, he remained at Central Maine Medical Center, unable to move, Desjardins said.
Witham hasn't been charged in connection with the crash, Desjardins said.
The Kennebec County District Attorney's Office is looking into possible charges.
Witham had failed to show up in court for sentencing on a felony theft charge. He has an extensive criminal history dating back to 1990, Desjardins said. Witham was convicted of “numerous” burglary and theft charges resulting in jail sentences ranging from four years in prison to shorter stints at county jails, the sheriff said.
An arrest warrant was issued on March 22 when he failed to appear to serve a one-year sentence for a conviction on a Class C felony.
Witham has four active protection-from-abuse orders against him involving allegations of domestic violence by four women, Desjardins said.
Witham's driving record includes eight convictions and four suspensions. His license was suspended for failing to file insurance, failing to appear in court and failing to pay child support.
Maine State Police are investigating the May 12 accident, including a reconstruction investigation.
Androscoggin County Capt. Ray Lafrance is overseeing an internal investigation of the department's actions relating to the chase and accident. His investigation will determine whether departmental policies and procedures were followed in undertaking pursuits, creating roadblocks and other actions.
The last time an Androscoggin County Sheriff's deputy was involved in a similar crash likely was in the late 1980s, Desjardins said.
Every police officer who attempts to pull over a vehicle could end up facing the same choice of whether to engage in a pursuit if the driver of the vehicle fails to pull over, Desjardins said. Whether to follow the vehicle depends on a variety of factors, including time of day, road conditions and traffic density, he said.





Duh Drouin
Erin & commonsense18, we had Officer Drouin in our town for too many years. He did more harrassing of community members, allowed pitbulls to attack children and roam loose and never did anything that required getting out of the cruiser. Best thing our town did was to let the Sheriff office have him. Now they can get rid of him. Drouin is not the outstanding officer people want to think he is. He should never of given such a high speed chase. He should be suspended with out pay.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Its called acountability
If you or I where involved in a accident while distracted we can and should be charged! When an officers actions creates a hazard for the public at large why would they not be held to the same accountabilty? This a nation wide problem we are not alone in this we all want to see justice served and see the wanted criminal brought to justice. As I can see here there are those like myself that feel it should not be at the price of public safety, that is not acceptable no matter how good of a guy the officer is or how hard he works.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.accountability?
where is the accountability for the idiot who ran? if he had pulled over like he was suppose, we would not be discussing this. remember this all started when he ran.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Ummm I believe he will be
Ummm I believe he will be criminally charged for the incident thats where he will be held accountable as would anyone eluding from police officers. You are missing the point. Police all over the country use incidents like this one to create better standard operating procedures, as they should. This accident was preventable both by the criminal and the sheriff involved. Please take some time and question a few people in Law Enforcement and see if their stance is chase down the criminal at all possible points, rather than weigh the safety and lability of themselves and others. Like I said before there is a balance, people need to meet in the middle and stop this being so one sided/blind sided it does nothing positive for the community or for Law Enforcement in general
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.pissed off
Unbelievable u people who sit here and judge the deputy who was doing his job tryin to catch this low life looser...yes it was unfortunate for the lady who was pregnant to be involved thank god she and the baby are doing well but to talk trash about the deputy u don't even KNOW shame on you... he is the most honest person,trusting person, very dedicated to his family and very dedicated to his job.. you negative people who have nothing better to do with your life.. get a life he is the HARDEST working deputy I have every met and would never do anything to harm ANYONE!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.No one is saying the deputy
No one is saying the deputy intentionally hurt anyone or saying how undedicated or less of an officer he is. Matter of fact I would give him kudos for doing proactive work in trying to catch a career criminal. Whats being asked is should this pursuit have been called off or not. As I am sure this deputy, being the outstanding law enforcement officer he is, hopefully is questioning this incident to see if there is anything he can learn from it. I'm sure he can tell you stories from being at the academy where they use videos from other officers pursuits to learn and train off from, good and bad pursuits. It is a hard job to be in law enforcement especially when so many second guess every move you make, but a good officer also is constantly looking at his experience and how he can learn from it.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.No chase here, tron
DURHAM — A local man was arrested following a head-on collision on Route 136 on Tuesday afternoon.
Paul Bucklin, 25, of Newell Brook Road was charged with operating under the influence and possession of a controlled substance.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Were they being chased?
Head on crash story - "Lewiston Police Sgt. Brian O'Malley said Tuesday night that Taylor Bentley, 10, of Auburn, and Joel M. Frenette, 17, of Lewiston, were transported following the 7:50 a.m. crash at the intersection of Lisbon Street and North Lisbon Road."
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Let all the criminals go
Right, tron?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Well, I wonder if this excuse
Well, I wonder if this excuse for a car chase is acceptable to the pregnant woman that got hit and was sent to the hospital! They were damn lucky that she didn't die or that she didn't miscarry!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.eh--- not necessarily safer
eh--- not necessarily safer to the PERPS, that is. Just to be clear.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I have no sympathy for the
I have no sympathy for the perp with the extensive criminal record. I am however concerned with conscience-less criminals being pursued at high speeds for lengthy periods of time, since they have no compunction about killing or injuring other people on the road. I'd like to see the police beef up their methods and tactics for taking the criminals out in a safer manner (safer to others, not necessarily to them!)
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Excuse me meinmaine
I disagree with the sheriff's deputy in this case. If you want to call it bashing go ahead. Just keep that in mind the next time you disagree with someone.
They knew who he was, how to reach him and what he was wanted for. This didn't call for a high speed chase down a busy route in mid afternoon IMO.
I don't believe there is anyone writing here that is suggesting they should let him go. They should have waited for another time. This wasn't some spur of the moment chase. They had time to set up spike mats so it had to have lasted a while. Long enough for clear heads to take over.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Thank you "Erin." Your logic
Thank you "Erin." Your logic is refreshing. Everyone seems to think they need to be on one side or the other, but it is a question of logic, common sense and safety. He was a THIEF. Can you imagine if that poor girl and baby had been killed, or if the car had gone into the Veterinary Hospital? There are so many possible alternative endings. If I had left work just 5 minutes later I could have been the car he crashed into. Rules need to change. Of course if any reporters had been thorough enough to report the rules we might have more information to judge by. Either the rules were not followed that day or the rules need to be changed. We should all step back and say thank goodness no one was killed and then make sure rules are in effect that protect innocent bystanders from danger when a mere THIEF avoids arrest. You worded it much better than I did Erin but I will say again..you all need to think how you would feel about this if this woman was your wife or sister. The papers make it sound like she had little to no injuries, but look at the cars. I'm sure she's in a lot of discomfort not to mention the long term mental concerns after a crash like this that she will need to deal with.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Ridiculous
Officer should be fired for endangering the lives of citizens by pursuing this at high speed. The innocent victim will pay for his idiocy for her entire live while recovering from the injuries received, and who knows what physical problems her unborn child will have to deal with. Of course it will be us, the taxpayers, that bear the cost of the police officers stupidity, and of course an investigation by the state will show that he followed procedure and his actions were well within the law.
WAKE UP MAINE! It's time to start holding the police responsible for their actions, common sense should tell you there was no need for a high speed chase to pursue what was in essence a suspect in a petty theft case.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I'm going to state this
I'm going to state this again. I've been in law enforcement for over six years now and each department has a different policy when it comes to pursuit and for good reason. I've seen some pursuits in Maine with comments from Tron and other cop bashers that state the chase was uncalled for, such as a recent one involving a DUI. I've also seen police supporters such in this case who will go to all lengths saying police did the right thing. There is a balance to everything and it seems like those lines are getting futher and further apart in EVERYONES eyes. Personally from my experience this prusuit was not warranted once certain speeds were reached, the spike strips failed, and the amount of traffic increased. There is always a time when judgement is needed to say ok we should hold off. There is also a reason for a chain of command. Someone with more authority should have been monitioring the radio, especially given it was a work week in the middle of the day, and had gone on the radio and called the pursuit off at a certain point. You'll find in most states a pit stop, made famous by California police and media helicopters that broadcast chases, are not allowed. They cause serious harm and even death to innocent bystanders. Like I said there is a balance. This is the question I pose to the SunJournal to find out. What is the sheriffs office specific policy on pursuits? Is there on each shift a Sergeant or higher up that makes these calls or is the decision left to the officer. Is the sheriffs office looking at this case to help improve there current policy or do they feel it was justified? I don't like to second guess other officers, because I was not there. What I would like to see is how are they learning from this incident. I also hate to say this but the female in the other car has a perfect law suit on her hand that could create a case precedent for traffic pursuits for every police department in the state.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.moc.spohs1-1.www
(Ablonde might be living in my neck of the woods)
online store
…… , . – . – , _ , ……… http://www.1-1shops
……… ) ` – . .> ‘ `( …….free shipping
…….. / . . . .`\ . . \ ……..paypal accept
…….. |. . . . . |. . .| ……..
……… \ . . . ./ . ./ ……….
……….. `=)\ /.=` …Versace Colostomy bags $34
…………. `-;`.-’
…………… `)| ….Ed Hardy adult diapers $15
……………. || _.-’| .
…………. ,_|| \_ Hello Kitty colostomy bags $45
……. , ….. \|| .
……. |\ |\ ,. ||/ …Gucci bedpans $23
…. ,..\` | /|.,|Y\, ..
….. ‘-…’-._..\||/ …Fendi false teeth $15
……… >_.-`Y| ……………
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Missing the point
To all who are bashing the cops, don't you even DARE to dial 911 when you have a problem. Not ONCE. They do their jobs and you knock them. They back off and let a convicted idiot back into the community to do even MORE damage, and you knock them. I'd say its about time for all of you to head right off to cop school. You fricken arm chair quarterbacks make the rest of us who live in the real world nuts. The woman, I will say thankfully, did NOT suffer serious injuries. The BAD guy, there is ONLY ONE in this story, is paying the price for his evil doings. Shut up already.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Agreed
People need to take responsibility for thier actions. He broke the law and hurt people in the process he should be charged accordingly. The police officer should be commended for doing his job on a daily basis.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I agree with you 110%
I agree with you 110% MeinMaine.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.POORLY WRITTEN
This article is poorly written and includes typos so l can see where it confuses all of you and leads to more questions. Some points to consider...
1. If Eric Samson was sheriff (who is the other candidate running for Sheriff), he would need to provide a public response to a high speed chace and crash as well. Otherwise, if he didn't, ignorant people who do not have the full FACTS continue to make their own assumptions. I have not made a decision on who I will vote for but I am not ignorant to think that "the other guy" would do different.
2. Do none of you see this criminal's history of theft and protection from abuse orders, etc.???? I mean seriously people, he continued to ignore consequences rendered for past crime and yet you think it makes sense to let him go? Sure, we should let a criminal go who continues to NOT learn from his mistakes, yeah that makes sense!!!!. If you look at the research on criminal behavior and those who commit crime, the ongoing risk taking behavior to commit crime only continues to escalate if that person has had no consequence or intervention! The fact that this man had 4 different protection from abuse orders from 4 different women speaks to the character of this man and what he could be capable of. Domestic abuse is a form of violence, this was in this man's history. Even if it were not, are we to ignore laws? Can the deputy just chose to let people go who commit crimes and start to rationalize which offense deserves more investigation? It appeared this man only continued to add to his criminal record throughout his life, clearly he wasn't stopping (and literally didn't stop). What's his case for a lawsuit? "I ran from the police and then crashed into a car and got hurt." Do you people even realize how ridiculous you sound?!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Let's make this clear....the
Let's make this clear....the criminal crashed and caused harm to innocent bystanders, not the deputy who was doing his job...UNLESS you beleive the new policy of any law enforcement department is to be"if they run, don't chase them"...wonder how thats going to work out in tronland? OH and tron, you misspelled "deputy"....given your avocation to point out my spelling errors, just thought you should be reminded.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.look first
beleive should be "believe" shouldn't it?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Out of the whole incident
Out of the whole incident listed above the best you could do is bust someones balls over spelling. Please, get a job, you must be truly bored with life.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The Facts
Did the deputy show up to meet the guy in a marked police car and then he gave chase ? Why wasn't there an undercover cop handling this and a stake out set up. Also was this guy a violent criminal or just an accused thief not immediately threatening someone. lf so does not sound that good for the county ?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This article is nothing more than
a pro-active defense for the impending lawsuit. It's also a free campaign ad for the Sheriff, who's involved in a competitive primary race. It's difficult to comprehend the Sheriff justifying the damage done during this episode. I still believe an independent investigation should be started. Having the AG's office or even the sheriff department investigating this incident is like the fox guarding the henhouse. There's no sympathy for the innocent bystanders harmed by what this deupty did. This is one reason we should vote against the sheriff, although I'm not sure things would change under a new leadership, but we can hope.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.As usual Tron only see's the
As usual Tron only see's the little narrow picture in his little narrow mind. Had the Police not given chase and this guy got away and then committed another crime, possibly a violent crime as he does have a history of people filing protection from abuse orders against him, and someone was hurt or worse, then the Police would be held liable for letting him get away. Then Tron's favorite people the trial lawyer's would possibly sue the State, Town and Police department for the crime happening because they didn't capture him when they had the chance.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.For once...
I agree with Tron. This chase should have never happened. It is only by God's grace that that poor woman and her child are not dead. Although this guy sounds like a minor menace to society, the chase turned him into a deadly menace. Very poor judgment on the part of the police.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.wrong blame
tron is right in that the chase should not have happened but for the wrong reason. when the officer turned the lights on, he should have pulled over.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.What a MESS
Definitely not worth this. What was the deputy thinking? This was not a violent offender in the commission of a violent crime and the "warrants" excuse turns out to be one for failure to appear on a conviction for sentencing on a minor offense. The deputy already new this person's license was suspended but he sets up a meet that will put the person behind the wheel and on the road? The deputy then closes this mess with a chase that leaves a pregnant woman and her unborn child lucky to be alive and the suspect in critical condition unable to move, from the sound of it likely to be on the public dole for the rest of his life and suing the county successful on top of it. What a mess, no common sense here.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.