Lewiston police name those arrested in early morning melee at Bates College

LEWISTON — Police arrested 11 people on the Bates College campus early Wednesday for refusing orders to disperse. Those arrested:

Samuel Guilford
Submitted Photo

Samuel Guilford, 23, of Surry, ME, was charged with aggravated assault, disorderly conduct, and failure to disperse in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Paul Chiampa
Submitted Photo

Paul Chiampa, 21, of Massachusetts, was charged with failure to disperse and refusing to submit to arrest in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Zachary Fenno
Submitted Photo

Zachary Fenno, 21, of Armonk, NY, was chardged with disorderly conduct and failure to disperse in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Sarah Ewing
Submitted Photo

Sarah Ewing, 22, of Washington, Conn., was chardged with disorderly conduct, failure to disperse, and refusing to submit to arrest in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Kelvin Gutierrez
Submitted Photo

Kelvin Gutierrez, 19, of New York, was charged with failure to disperse in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Charles Carey
Submitted Photo

Charles Carey, 20, of Lincoln, Mass., was charged with failure to disperse in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Andrew Livingston
Submitted Photo

Andrew Livingston, 23, of Waterville, ME, was charged with disorderly conduct, failure to disperse, and refusing to submit to arrest in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Francis Suozzo
Submitted Photo

Francis Suozzo, 21, of Golden Bridge, NY, was charged with failure to disperse in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Kevin Hanrahan
Submitted Photo

Kevin Hanrahan, 21, of Glen Mills, Penn., was charged with disorderly conduct and failure to disperse in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Kush Mahan
Submitted Photo

Kush Mahan, 22, of Michigan was charged with disorderly conduct and failure to disperse in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

Mark Stehlik
Submitted Photo

Mark Stehlik, 22, of Buffalo, NY, was charged with disorderly conduct and failure to disperse in connection with the altercation at Bates College early Wednesday morning.

• Samuel Guilford, 23, of Surry, on charges of aggravated assault, refusing to submit to arrest, disorderly conduct and failure to disperse;

• Paul Chiampa, 21, of Bryantville, Mass., on charges of failing to disperse and refusing to submit to arrest;

• Zachary Fenno, 21, of Armonk, N.Y., on charges of disorderly conduct and failure to disperse;

• Sarah Ewing, 22, of Washington, Conn., on charges of disorderly conduct, failure to disperse and refusing to submit to arrest;

• Kelvin Gutierrez, 19, of New York, N.Y., on a charge of failure to disperse;

• Charles Carey, 20, of Lincoln, Mass., on a charge of failure to disperse;

• Andrew Livingston, 23, of Waterville, on charges of disorderly conduct, failure to disperse and refusing to submit to arrest;

• Francis Suozzo, 21, of Golden Bridge, N.Y., on a charge of failure to disperse;

• Kevin Hanrahan, 21, of Glen Mills, Pa., on charges of disorderly conduct and failure to disperse;

• Kush Mahan, 22, of Kalamazoo, Mich., on charges of disorderly conduct and failure to disperse;

• Mark Stehlik, 22, of Buffalo, N.Y., on charges of disorderly conduct and failure to disperse.

All had made bail by Wednesday morning, according to an Androscoggin County Jail official. Their various bail amounts were not immediately available.

During his press conference, Chief Michael Bussiere of the Lewiston Police Department, joined by Bates College head of security Tom Carey, said officers didn't use Tasers when breaking up the crowd on Bardwell Street but did use pepper spray. Bussiere said one officer also displayed or used a baton. The crowd, as big as 250 to 300 people, outnumbered police and security 10 to 1, Bussiere said.

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

MichaelRainbow's picture

Being Arrested

The bottom line is this. These students will have to get their parents to hire an attorney and cost them hefty legal fees to resolve their legal matters. Then after this they will have to deal with the colleges code of conduct rules to face discliplanary action or even to possibly be expelled especially with the case of the aggravated assault charge. This is not a good mark to have on someones record. This will no doubt leave a black mark on their record over one night of celebration and is not the police and college security's fault.

KStern's picture

This is ridiculous

My word - enough with the whining! Quite simply, 250-300 twits out of the student body of 1800 decided to have a party and blow off steam prior to graduation. Great. As long as you are of legal drinking age - have at it. Any brain cells lost will clearly not be missed by the host.

You made mistakes. Your own campus security could not handle your unlawful gathering, and had to call for assistance. You invited law enforcement from not only Lewiston, but other surrounding communities and the State Police by your own actions. You had your chance to disburse when asked by campus security. The mob clearly wanted a fight.

So - it's done. Big melee. Congratulations. You got your mugs on the news and in the paper and that will follow you forever. Good luck explaining that to potential employers in the future.

Own your mistakes. Grow up. Stop pointing fingers. By all means, graduate, pack your bags and get the hell out. We poor, uneducated, uninformed, backwoods, hickified Lewistonians thank you in advance for your cooperation in this regard. Summer is here and we are looking forward to the peace that time of year brings our community...in your absence.

newt's picture

Taze them all.... LOL go LPD

Taze them all.... LOL go LPD

dilligaf's picture

Broke the law

I'm not condoning nor encouraging the actions of these Harvard and Bowdoin rejects and I'm sure the cops could have used better judgment and tactics before responding, BUT they were breaking the law, plain and simple. The fact that Bates isn't a public place has absolutely nothing to do with it. If you want to get technical I'm sure there are local ordinances requiring a permit for an assembly of this size during these late/early hours that don't include underage drinking. Spare us the rationale that everyone does it in college because that's about as lame and pathetic an excuse as resorting to going to Bates because they didn't pass muster at better schools who actually look at SAT scores. They all wonder why they get such a bad rap in the local community? DAH!

yerpaderp's picture

Actually...

That Bates isn't a public place has EVERYTHING to do with it. It wont surprise me if the disorderly conduct and failure to disperse charges are thrown out. (Assault is more serious, that wont get dismissed.)

As for dismissing the fact that people party while they're in college, in my mind, that is relevant. Maybe your kids (college-aged, now or in the future) aren't letting on what they do on Friday or Saturday nights, but it's likely not going to be sitting around drinking root beer and watching Hitchcock films.

As for the quality of Bates as a college: it was ranked #25 in the US News and World Report's rankings of Liberal Arts Colleges; admissions rate: 29%. Middle 50% (25%-75%) of SAT scores: Math 635-710, Verbal 630-700. And I only speak for myself, but having spent time at Harvard and Bowdoin, I wouldn't have traded my time at Bates in Lewiston to go to either, though I got into Bowdoin as well when applying.

northwoods's picture

Actually

Since the security(the people with authority of the school(private property)) called the police the charge will stand. The college is the property owners not the students. Also disorderly conduct is basically disturbing the peace, which means if you are disturbing other people with the right to be on the property you can be arrested for disorderly.

anonymous's picture

Bowdoin and Colby are both

Bowdoin and Colby are both SAT-optional as well.

Brain's picture

SnoopDog and the Insane Clown Posse

Yep the apple doesn't fall far from the tree....
Let's get Snoop back for the commencement address for more inspiration

K0NPHL1C7's picture

What do Snoop Dog and ICP

What do Snoop Dog and ICP have to do with anything? Has ICP ever even come to Maine?

awaterman's picture
staff

Press conference video

Please keep checking back for video from the press conference. It will be up soon.

Thanks for your patience!

Amber Waterman, Staff Photographer

Dontbotherasking's picture

haha

wow their parents must be real proud of them! I dont feel bad for these college kids at all they brought this on themselves and I hope these "kids" did get a good beating maybe this will be a lesson learned for them! time to grow up.

northwoods's picture

Word of advise to the college

Word of advise to the college kids that didn't spend the morning in jail. For now on, when you meet a cop use the yes sir/no sir approach. Example, if a cop show up to a party and says leave, you say YES SIR and then you leave. If the officer asks you do you want to go jail, you say NO SIR and then do what he tells you. Its that easy.

yerpaderp's picture

Couldn't agree more...

I live in a country where cops don't hesitate to pull out their billy clubs, don't have to pay for buses and subways and can cut the lines in whichever store they're in. And while it is all a bit absurd, it does reinforce the respect with which you have to use in dealing with police. The more you use "sir" or "ma'am" with police and heed their instructions, the quicker you'll get out of whatever situation you're in.

30.06_Marine's picture
verified

Amen to that!

Amen to that!

veritas's picture
verified

Is that Chicago???

Or New York.....

yerpaderp's picture

South America

South America

veritas's picture
verified

Oh well,

I obviously guessed Central America (tongue in cheek)

But those New York cops will treat a Brother like Royalty.

main-e-ac's picture

Agree, good advice. Many

Agree, good advice. Many young people unfortunately learn the hard way. I'm sure there will be a lot of parents saying "What the hell where you thinking?" It is too bad that the police were not able to handle the crowed in a better way.

DR's picture

"I don't think anyone at

"I don't think anyone at Bates (students, staff, faculty) would want them to change"

yerpaderp, sorry to burst your bubble, but I do know people in that community who are not happy that the school hasn't taken a firmer attitude against prosecutable behavior and vandalism.

yerpaderp's picture

Fair enough...

I know some professors who take issue with Bates' alcohol policy (quickly: beer and wine are okay, hard liquor earns you a strike, three strikes and you're suspended), so you're right, I mis-spoke (or wrote) there. That said, schools with stricter alcohol policies run into problems; they either force students to turn in one another (which doesn't usually work out all that well) or they spend exorbitant amounts of money on in-school policing.

There are certainly some in the Bates community who think that the administration and security both take it easy on the students, and in certain instances, I agree. Bates can be too easy on its students, particularly when it comes to alcohol related incidents. But the instances in which stricter rules would apply are SO few and far between that to many, it doesn't seem worth it to change. Fear not, they do drop the hammer on kids when they mess up and they deserve it, but I'm not sure Bates needs to be going after the kid making jungle juice (liquor + Kool-Aid) for ten of his friends on a Saturday night, and I'd guess that most at Bates would agree.

For incidents like last night's, certainly, they should not be taken lightly. Someone was charged with assault and someone else has a broken leg. That's no joking matter. But this is the first time I've seen something like this happen in the seven years I've been connected with the school (as a student and alum). One bad night does not necessarily mean the school needs to be re-evaluating its policies.

Centarie2000's picture
verified

ya your right. lets wait

ya your right. lets wait until someone dies from alcohol poisoning, gets raped, or tries to fly off a roof before we even think of interfering with their party scene. that is why they are there is to party of course. lets watch it get worse first. future leaders motto.

yerpaderp's picture

Easy...

That's not what I said and you know it. I simply stated that there have not yet been more than a handful of serious drinking incidents at Bates (thank goodness). Why restrict something that has not proven to be much of a problem (in the grand scheme of things, obviously it was an issue last night)?

Also, have these things happened?

30.06_Marine's picture
verified

Ya gotta be flippin' kidding

Ya gotta be flippin' kidding me. Try walking down College sT. cAMPUS, etc after 11 PM in good weather and you will see many drunk and disorderlies.

Let's also not forget that Bates students also rent apartments OFF campus and the police have been to these many times. Look at the "Blue House" on college st (159 I think). That has been, and is, a major party place for YEARS and campus security and LPD know it all to well - loud music, drunken fights...

veritas's picture
verified

Sure, Son....

yerpaderp (who didn't even have the good grace to register on this forum by his name) writes:

"I simply stated that there have not yet been more than a handful of serious drinking incidents at Bates"

Nine-tenths of an iceberg is unseen and underwater, Lad. So it is with your ridiculous statment.

yerpaderp's picture

To the iceberg comment, I'm

To the iceberg comment, I'm not sure where to start. You're assuming there is an iceberg (big problem with drinking at Bates). Having gone to school at Bates in the recent past, I'm saying there is not, save for a few kids with individual drinking problems (as there are anywhere in the world). Perhaps our views of "too much drinking and bad behavior" are slightly different. Either way, it's unlikely we'll get anywhere on this one. Do you have several examples of Bates kids drinking too much? You'd need them to cite some kind of bigger, campus-wide problem among all 1800 students, no?

My larger point is that there's actually FAR less drinking at Bates than most colleges. I transferred to Bates from a school that had real issues with drinking and fraternities. There were incidents like this once or twice a month there. Believe me, it could be much, much worse than a couple kids yelling in the street every once in a while.

Also, I suppose your mama named you "Veritas" then. My name is Steve, happy? I'm not trying to have people track me down on Facebook or anything because I said something they disagreed with. There are crazy people on the internet, so I choose not to share my information wherever I go. Problem?

Centarie2000's picture
verified

i know that you didn't state

i know that you didn't state that. i was just paraphrasing that is going though bates' leaders minds. i am aware that this hasn't happened.....yet. but when they do, then what? everyone will sit around and talk about the warning signs and what should have been done. this is a warning sign. also, there are numerous studies about the problem of alcohol abuse and deaths on college campuses nationwide. is there a 12 step program at bates to help troubled students? should security be beefed up toward semesters ends? weekends? if there are partying "traditions" wouldn't it make sense to beef up during those known times? expanding security force, patrols, and presence? when did it become an acceptable part of college life to go to the er and have your stomach pumped? not all incidents end up on tv, and most end quietly. when does a handfull become a problem?

yerpaderp's picture

There is a link (a person) to

There is a link (a person) to a local AA meeting and there has been a meeting on campus in the past (not sure about now).

You're right, the incident shouldn't go unexamined. My point is that it would be a mistake to view this event (routinely one of the rowdiest of the year that comes after the senior pub crawl) as a trend or the norm for a night on Bates College's campus. There should have been more security. There should be a bigger security presence on campus than there is. I definitely agree with that.

The general argument I'm making is against this idea that there's a huge culture of drinking at Bates. Partying is part of social life at Bates, but only part of it (and not a huge part for most students). On many campuses it's all-encompassing.

main-e-ac's picture

Most college towns have some

Most college towns have some tensions between students and neighbors. This is bascally because you are dealing with young people who are drinking. This could have been handled much better by both sides. Angry remarks made here are not helpful in anyway. People are generalizing what they believe and what they resent in these students. I think both sides need to evaluate their deep resentment and wonder why they really so negitively towards each other.

DR's picture

I love it -- students caused

I love it -- students caused all the trouble, including vandalism BTW, yet they blame the cops. Or they believe they should get a free pass because they were under the influence. Maybe their fawning mommies and daddies should be held accountable too, for never telling the kids that they might be held responsible for their actions outside the family cocoon of ignorance. Intelligent students have no trouble partying without getting involved with the police. It's the stupid ones who can't do it discreetly or think they're immune from consequences. The comment about the outraged kid demanding the officer's badge number was hysterical, as well as the comment about how the police have been "interfering" with their partying. It's like comedy central over there at Bates, with the college administration leading the parade.

main-e-ac's picture

This is a sad comment, you

This is a sad comment, you obviously have a deep seeded resentment. I believe these students did insite the police and were intoxicated, this however, gives the police no right to act so aggressively. Both are wrong! I sincerely don't know how anyone could love the situation because it is best to work towards a good relationship not rally on a bad one. As a local business person we need to work together, it is what is best for all.

Centarie2000's picture
verified

russell street variety by any

russell street variety by any chance? one who benifits completely from their party scene?

yerpaderp's picture

Fishy...

Not to belittle the incident, but a couple thoughts:

1) If only one kid was charged with assault, then why have we seen pictures of several kids who appear to have been beaten? (None of whom are the kid charged with assault, I might add.)
2) Interesting: that people forget that Bates is one of the biggest employers in the area.
3) I think it's funny that people expect kids to not party and drink while in college, let alone, in their last week of college. Surely you all had some raucous times at one point or another and surely you've pissed off your neighbors as well.
4) It's also interesting that in times like these, L-A forgets that most Bates kids volunteer in the community during their time at Bates. Maybe they don't come into contact with the volunteers, or maybe their kids don't mention the Bates kids who help out in their classrooms.
5) Two of the eleven kids are from Maine. That's roughly equal to the percentages of Maine kids and non-Maine kids. Also, it should be noted that the ONLY kid charged with anything worse than disorderly conduct and/or failure to disperse is from Maine (he's charged with Aggravated Assault).
6) I'm not sure of this, but to be charged with disorderly conduct, don't you have to be in public? Smith is well insulated from any public areas, so is Bates pressing this charge? That seems unlikely.
7) Charging kids with failure to disperse when they're on their college campus seems fishy.
8) Indicator that something unseemly is afoot: Sarah Ewing was charged. I met her when she started at Bates and she WOULD NEVER get into it with the police. Never. She might have been watching as kids were dealt with, but she would never have done anything to get herself arrested. If she was arrested, then something strange is going on.
9) Also interesting: that Lewiston's citizens feel the need to chime in on this subject, even though the incident took place on campus, and other than the officer with the broken leg (which sucks, obviously, though I'm sure he'll be compensated until he can go back to work), will not have an affect on their lives. Heck, if anything, it'll likely improve Lewiston's citizens quality of life, if only by a little bit, as Bates students are likely to be more cautious in the future so as not to get beaten on by LPD.
10) I grew up in a college town and in choosing to live in a college town or near a campus you get the good with the bad. (The good: helps the local economy A LOT, generally safe neighborhoods near the school; the bad: the occasional incident like this, sometimes strained relations between town and school.) Ultimately though, even if you have no connection with the school and don't know anyone who has worked there, it's not THAT bad. To see people complaining about the fact that the school is located in Lewiston seems a bit absurd because A) Bates isn't going anywhere and B) It's been there since 1855. Unless some of you in the comments are living in the same house that you great-great-grand parents once lived in, you likely moved to where you're living now with the knowledge of the location of Bates. That might sound arrogant, but it's still true.

I went to Bates and I loved my time there. Not only are things unlikely to change ON CAMPUS because of this one incident, but I don't think anyone at Bates (students, staff, faculty) would want them to change. Bates is not a big party school compared to others of its caliber (which is quite high, though many from L-A would like to think otherwise). Bates is a fairly normal college, filled with largely nice kids, many of whom feel resented and antagonized in the local community.

yourhypocrisy's picture

Legalese and Opinion

there is a whole lot of generalization and opinion here. not worth rebutting for the most part.

someone gets their leg broken and it sucks but you're SURE he'll get compensated?

it must be a cold or elitist little world, wherever you hail from.

objectivity would have been nice.

amyo's picture

Police Brutality

Why is it that with 5 Police departments involved the only one being blamed for police brutality is Lewiston PD? I know alot of the outstanding officers in both Lewiston and Auburn, and have seen many of the officers injured in the line of duty. 200 students against 5 low staffed mid week police departments? The need for aggressive dispursement was necessary. I live within a block of this fine institution and all colleges deserve that recognition. I have heard the late night parties, and when my children have walked across campus after a public event found "college kids just out for a good time" skinny dipping in the pond. The antics are juvenile at best, and Lewiston police should not be facing any action regarding police brutality. This was obviously not a safe situation.

batsie's picture

Since I was there, I can

Since I was there, I can honestly say that it was a relatively safe situation, until the cops showed up.

K0NPHL1C7's picture

Most sensible post of the

Most sensible post of the day. Thank you.

veritas's picture
verified

For alleged 'Police Brutality'

The perps in these mug shots look very trauma-free to me.

No black eyes, broken noses, split lips, abrasions, evidence of crying, emotionally distraught, etc

30.06_Marine's picture
verified

some of them are even

some of them are even smiling! I guess pepper spray will do that

NorthwestClassic's picture

Check the earlier pictures,

Check the earlier pictures, there's plenty of blood and bruising for you there.

veritas's picture
verified

What do you expect

When drunks fall down.....

Centarie2000's picture
verified

paul chiampra of bryantville

paul chiampra of bryantville mass. looks really happy actually. laughing like this is all a joke. the girl is the only one who looks frightened, most of the others look like they are trying hard not to laugh.

northwoods's picture

Check out the picture of the

Check out the picture of the kid from Buffalo. He looks abused.

veritas's picture
verified

Looks like a good time was had by all!!!

If there was abuse - I'de chalk it up to self-abuse.

Next case!!

veritas's picture
verified

You bet!!

Alter Boy, Crossing Guard, Paper Boy. Academic Scholarship to Catholic High School....

Then I joined the Navy when I was 17 and it all went downhill from there......

momof4's picture

veritas

I'll bet you were a very good boy growing up.

momof4's picture

tron

The press brings their own stuff. Also, look at the list. these are the kids who vote in our State/Town issues and then go back home, leaving us to deal with the results. They are concentrated in a dorm setting and special interest groups are notorious for targeting their votes. Now they can vote on question 1, go back to their home states, because ither way it won't affect their lives. Absentee ballot should be the way to go, like the snowbirds and summer people do. When you look at the list of kids and where they are from, just imagine them voting on things that really have nothing to do with them.

NorthwestClassic's picture

Oh right, because who marries

Oh right, because who marries who has everything to do with you? I wasn't aware you suffered when gay and lesbian couples married. My mistake.

Centarie2000's picture
verified

and this has what to do with

and this has what to do with an out of control bates college party?

leavittdollface's picture

What is really funny! Almost

What is really funny! Almost all of the students aren't from Maine. LOL Go home you stupid little rich brats!

tron's picture

Then you can watch it on the local news channels

at noon, OR watch it on the net. The first step is to move the press conference to the council chambers where the camera set up is already there.

momof4's picture

cuz

maybe folks outside of Great Falls range wuold like to see it.

veritas's picture
verified

Newsworthy

I think the entire State should be aware of how ill-mannered these brats are.

When I worked in L/A years ago, I lived about a half-block from the Frey Street student halls and unions. It was common to be disturbed on Friday and Saturday nights by the bellowing and drunken mating calls, screams, and raucous behavior of the Bratus Batsii.

Combine immaturity, alcohol, and a sense of entitlement for some damn boorish behavior.

30.06_Marine's picture
verified

Newsworthy

I live on COllege st currenty and it is no better

batsie's picture

Honestly, what did you

Honestly, what did you expect? Some people party on Friday and Saturday nights at college. Fry street has a lot of off campus houses, living close to it you should have been ready for some noise on the weekend. I'm amazed you'd make such a general claim about the nature of all Bates students based on no more than some yelling on Friday and Saturdays.

tron's picture

Why doesn't the police department

hold their press conference at city hall and have Great Falls TV carry it live?

thinkingman's picture

Lets hope they release the

Lets hope they release the names of these idiots!

K0NPHL1C7's picture

Why? Looks like they did, but

Why?

Looks like they did, but I really don't see why you care. Do you feel safer now, knowing the names of these hardened criminals?

God I hate nosy people.

yourhypocrisy's picture

Nosy people

we all should care. most mainers care when spoiled out of state kids start riots and injure law enforcement officers.

only one maine kid from all those arrested.

it's pretty clear what that means. probably something cool to blog about or giggle over with mummy & daddy back in their affluent, out of state, gated community points of origin.

a lot of these out of state playboys & girls i'm sure are into hate too, as evidenced by these public police records which no citizen of maine should take shame in examining or wanting to know about.

the funniest part is running to hide behind this innocent until proven guilty routine and that out of state litigation-speak so many of these plastic visitors live by & hide behind. never a responsible day in their life i suspect.

predictable & laughable.

Centarie2000's picture
verified

for most people in the world,

for most people in the world, being named in connection with criminal activity is an embarasment. but these are bates students, they are too smart to feel remorse or embarasment.

K0NPHL1C7's picture

So are you implying that they

So are you implying that they be named in an effort to embarrasses them, which could possibly act as a deterrent?

Might I remind you that every single one of them is INNOCENT until proven guilty, and for that reason alone their names, much like the police log, should remain undisclosed until they are convicted of a crime.
Too often are people wrongfully accused, only to be acquitted in a court of law. Unfortunately, the media is quick to report on the alleged crime, but rarely do they follow up when the trial ends. This leads to an unintentional smear campaign against innocent people.

I mean just look at all these comments. Not one of you were even there, yet a lot of you are badmouthing everyone involved. Let the courts decided what really happened before you tar-and-feather innocent people.

facetheone's picture

No comments from Pirate yet>?

No comments from Pirate yet>? he must be on an early lunch break from his imaginary job where he gets paid to post comments on SJ.com :) and Tron is his boss - lol love ya Tron :) LMAO

Advertisement