LEWISTON — Police Chief Michael Bussiere disputed claims of excessive force in the early-morning arrest of 11 Bates College students Wednesday, saying the incident began with seniors visiting their old first-year dorm on campus just before midnight.
The group — which grew to as many as 300 people — blocked an ambulance called to Smith Hall and events escalated from there, with an officer breaking his leg in two places during a scuffle and students refusing to leave the area, then resisting arrest and yelling taunts, Bussiere said Wednesday.
“While I know some of the students are upset they got arrested last night, and I know some of them are upset their friends got arrested last night, I think it’s important for them to realize Bates College security and the Lewiston Police Department are here to protect them and, sometimes, to protect them from themselves,” Bussiere said.
“I think, obviously, alcohol played a role in this," he said. "Excessive alcohol.”
One first-year student, two sophomores, two juniors and six seniors were charged with failure to disperse. Eight face additional charges. Senior Samuel Guilford of Surry was charged with aggravated assault after he and Sgt. Robert Ullrich fell while Guilford was resisting arrest, Bussiere said. Ullrich broke his leg in two places and tore ligaments.
A second officer who Bussiere declined to identify suffered minor injuries and was already back on the job.
All 11 students were freed on bail before 9 a.m., according to Androscoggin County Jail Capt. John Lebel. They were given July court dates.
Bussiere said he wasn’t aware of any students getting seriously hurt in the melee, but in her news release, Bates College President Elaine Tuttle Hansen said that “a small number of Bates students were also treated for injuries.”
She said she was “deeply concerned” about the incident and that an internal investigation had been launched.
Bussiere said the night’s problems began when Bates security staff tried to clear a crowd on Bardwell Street in front of Smith Hall to make way for an ambulance. United Ambulance had been called to campus for two women who needed medical attention, possibly because of alcohol use.
Rescue workers had a difficult time pulling the ambulance up to the dorm and a difficult time leaving, the chief said.
United Ambulance Executive Director Paul Gosselin said that, after talking with staff, “I’m not sure if (students) were blocking it or there were just 300 people there and there was no room for them to go.”
When the ambulance turned on its lights to leave, no one moved. Next came sirens, which parted the crowd. It’s difficult to say how long the ambulance was held up, Gosselin said. The delay “wasn’t 20 minutes and it wasn’t 10 seconds.”
After 10 minutes of trying to clear the street and multiple warnings to leave, Bates security called Lewiston police for help at 11:57 p.m.
“Some people did disperse," Bussiere said. "At least 100, 150 refused to do so and several became confrontational with police, telling them it was private property and they didn’t have the right to be there."
Roughly 10 to 15 minutes after Lewiston police arrived, other departments were called for backup. Bussiere estimated there were at most 25 police and security personnel on the scene, outnumbered 10 to 1 by students.
After failing to break up even after Lewiston police got on loud speakers, the most confrontational students were arrested, he said. “A lot of folks got arrested for jumping in and trying to keep their friends from being arrested.”
He said he didn’t believe excessive force was used, noting that none of his officers used Tasers but some used pepper spray. After initially saying that no officer had used a baton, Bussiere said he got an in-house report that one officer had either used or displayed a baton.
As for student complaints that people being arrested weren’t read their rights, Bussiere said that fit procedure.
“At the scene of a fracas like this, they’re not going to take out their cards and read their Miranda rights because they’re not questioning them," Bussiere said. "Students watch TV like everyone else; in reality that’s not how it works. Some of the terminology they used, I’m not going to repeat it. It was, ‘"Blank" the police.’”
Tom Carey, Bates director of security, said the college hadn’t sanctioned the wandering senior party. He said more than 1,000 students on campus weren’t involved.
Most times, if a crowd gathers and people are asked to leave, “The students listen to the officers and it’s over in two minutes,” Carey said. “This is truly an aberration and something you see every 20, 30 years.”
By the time he arrived around 1 a.m., things were under control, he said. None of his personnel used batons or pepper spray on students.
“As a college community, Bates has enjoyed a long history of respect between our campus and local law enforcement,” Tuttle Hansen said in her release. “This incident is highly unusual for Bates, where the college’s values are clearly grounded in personal responsibility and respect for others.”
Bates College will hold its commencement Sunday. Spokesman Bryan McNulty said it was yet to be determined whether any of the seniors charged would be stopped from marching.
Bussiere said Ullrich would be out on leave for several months. When the swelling in his leg comes down, he’ll need surgery to insert pins.
“The kind of ironic thing about Sgt. Ullrich being injured, prior to him being promoted sergeant, he was the regional alcohol investigator and worked closely with Bates College,” Bussiere said.
Ullrich was 2009's law enforcement officer of the year for the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
kskelton@sunjournal.com



drunk
the "kids" were drunk, celebrating the end of year. I bet all were not of age? how about finding out who bought the booze and arresting them. Without the beverages none of this would have happened.perhaps Bates has a tape of the situation on surveillance cams to protect the students from rapists and burglars.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Tron
You have the most ignorant coments I have ever read. You just don't make sence. I would bet that your problem with police is derived from you as a little child constantly watching you mommy or daddy being taken away.
The fact of the matter here is that When the police tell you to do something. You do it. and you will have your day in court. Judges are plenty liberal in that you would get off on a molesting lobster traps charge instead of any other criminal conduct.
As far as I am concearned and many others your are public enemy #1. You cost us all money. I know you dont know anything about hard work and sacrifice like most of us. Instead you ride on the back of the people who stand up for you. then when they are not looking you cut them down.
TRON you sleep peacfully at night because these MEN stand to do violence on your behalf. I would be more then willing to bet you have know Idea what it feels like to be afraid and alone. DO YOU KNOW WHY. Because you have come so comfortable with police and in the back of your mind something is telling you that your safe tonight. THAT IS ALL BECAUSE OF THESE MEN.
SO TRON STOP DROOLING AND MUMBLEING ON YOUR SELF. YOU ARE A SELFISH LOSER. I HOPE YOU DONT EVER WAIST LAW ENFORCEMENTS TIME WHEN THEY COULD BE HELPING SOMEONE WHO IS ACTUALLY WORTH HELPING. GFY I would apoligize to anyone except you for any spelling errors because you are not worth going back and fixing them.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.State Brutality
The first and only ( and the last time) time I was at the Old Port in Portland, I saw street sweepers spraying water on people leaving the pubs at around 1:30 in the morning. It was without a doubt a way to disperse the "crowd".
Having lived in europe for the last 25 years, I was absolutly shocked!
Maine does not earn the moniker "Vacation Land". I would call it Police State Land!
On the way home to Auburn, (thank god I didn't drink) I encountered a roadblock where I was checked for DUI.
The way people are treated now days is reprensible!!!!
Nany State to the tenth factor!!!!
Can't even smoke while drinking a beer in a bar! What a shame. What has become of "Vacation Land".
I wonder what would have happened if Maine's finest would have been near our graduation festivities when I graduated!?!?!?
Please take a chill pill- We do not need a nanny state to babysit citizens.
I was an infrantry soldier looking for a fight. On the East German boarder, that was needed in 1986. We don't need that in Lewiston in 2010.... The kids are alright!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.did anyone notice all the
did anyone notice all the beer cans littering the area in the pictures yesterday...that is so telling as to what was occurring...
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Own up and take responsibility
I was arrested 30 years ago on obstruting government administration. I was intoxicated and could not keep my comments to myself. I was rude, disrespecful and deserved to end up in the back of that car.
You tend to do stupid things when you are inebriated. Own up to your stupidity pay the price and move on. If one of my children behaved the way the students behaved I would be embarressed. Bates security must have thought the situation was out of hand to call for back up.The police where doing their job.
At least they will be leaving this weekend. Unfortunately they will return this fall so let's enjoy the summer.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.LPD Great Job!
Lewiston Police Dept. Great Job......Well Done....Protect and Serve....Everyone needs too know the job that the Lewiston Police Dept. does everyday...They risk their lives too Protect and Serve...Underage drinking is not allowed...That's the law.. Bates College students obey the rules of the law or pay the price....My son is a NYPD in the Bronx. Master's from John Jay Criminal Justice...Policemen are not the Bad person... You students from Bates College need to grow-up. Bates College is known to be an ELITE College doesn't make you students to take over the law....Every Colleges Parties that's true...But when the Ambulance can't get through to help a person in need that is unacceptable..If you students would live in the Bronx you would of recieved the BATON....You assault one Police Officer you go to JAIL....Don't ever insult or touch a Police Officer...I hope that this Police Officer recovers from this foolish behavior...The students involved in this behavior needs to be punished...Repeat his Senior year at Bates College, Community Service in Lewiston, Maine...Apoligize to the LPD, United Ambulance and everyone from Maine State Troopers, Lisbon Police Dept., Sabattus Police Dept....Bates College needs to revise their Policy Assesment.....Bates College Security needs new Assesment Policy Standards....
To All College Students... Stop Blaming the COPS ......All the students involve in this situation was their fault...NOT THE COPS!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I have no vendetta.
The only experience I've had with police is some traffic difficulty in the last century and I served with Phil Crowell on a CDBG committee several years ago.
We give law enforcement agencies tremendous power and need to be vigilant that the power is not abused. We need an impartial citizen committee to investigate all allegations of abuse. We cannot allow the "good ole boy" network to do so fairly. We have two side, one says excessive force was used, and they only one to rebut it is the very people who did the alleged abuse. We need to find out if indeed, people were beaten while handcuffed, maced while in cruisers and if indeed Ullrich was injured because of an accidental fall. Also it was stated that Ullrich was a liaison with the college, so why was this group allowed to get this size? This was a yearly event, the night was unduly sultry for a May night, why were there no presence as the crowd grew? Maybe Bates needs to build a Dunkin Donuts on campus to ensure police presence. I don't know, but considering the amount of power wielded by these guys, we need to find out. Mayor Gilbert should appoint an independent citizen committee to investigate this incident and the police department in general. Of course with his history, I won't hold my breath, since he's part of the "ole boy network."
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.“We need an impartial citizen
“We need an impartial citizen committee to investigate all allegations of abuse.”
A rare, sensible quote from tron the troll. Good one.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Please correct me if I am wrong
tron I thought you told a story about getting arrested for carrying a lawn dart or something like that. I might have you confused with someone else. Like the title say correct me if I am wrong.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I don't even know what a lawn dart is
much less been arrested for carrying one. You've confused me with booby, I think.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.tron is actually correct this
tron is actually correct this time as i do know what a lawn dart is, although I've never been arrested or even questioned about carrying one..but being that tron is a stranger to physical activity we could exacuse his not knowing what a lawn dart is...but did you ever notice tron has to turn every comment around to me of all people, I am so flattered with his man crush continues! (sorry tron, I'm not gay so you're out of luck)
But more important - who would train a civilian review board? who would be selected and how would they be selected...I don't want untrained people making judgement against my police anymoer than i want a plumber to review malpractice by my physician should that occur. This has come up several times over the years and tron has still not answered these questions..gimme a good answer and I'll back you all the way...done right its worth doing, done poorly, its a boondoggle with worse results that doing nothing....
think about it, do you put other law enforcement personanel on the board - nope tron would tell us they are covering one another? do you put people like tron who never leave home without assistance? nope, they fail to see the real world and don't understand what cops go through....so when tron can provide a good rpogram I'll back his concept, until then, call me a lawn dart carrying skeptic!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Any answer I give to your question
will be rejected by you, simply because I suggested it. You have an agenda. Just because you are unable to recognize truth when you see it, doesn't mean the average person has to be "trained" to ferret it out. Law enforcement personal can not be on a citizen's committee. I can recognize truth when I see it, as can most people. All I want is to find out what really happened, then go from there. Obviously your handicap prevents you from serving, but a respectable committee could be formed. But it would have to happen now.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Always the same non-answer to
Always the same non-answer to the question..its easier to make accusations than to stand behind them when questioned huh? As an example, I'll bet each of us could not come to the same definition on what deadly force is and yet you expect us to make a judgement of a system we have no involvement with nor were we present? IT then boils back to who do you believe more, the accused or the accuser? How can you find truly knowledgable yet unbiased people to serve that would satisfy your standards? When is the last time you actually did a ride along to see what they put up with? Duddenly your ane xpert because you sat with crowell on a CDBG budget review...holy cow, you must be the #1 biggest knowledge of law enforcement now.
So until you give a straight answer, I'll keep asking the same question....details, my friend, details! better yet, write an LTTE to this paper, I hear you speak with them almost daily.....any more harassment complaints made to them hahahahaha
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Just as I thought, any answer I give
is rejected by you out of hand. Which is why any discussion with you is impossible. Why don't you go and play with your boy scout and leave us grown ups alone.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Wow, thats typical of you
Wow, thats typical of you with the I'm not going to answer because you won't listen to me...what a cop out that is and you know it! You are simply afraid to put down an actual concept for fear people might review it and find the flaws....yeah the view from 30,000 must be awesome except no one will ever see it because you refuse to describe it....and calling yourself a grown up when you bring to each argument the same concepts as a child "IM taking my toys and going home if you don't like the way i want to play"...priceless!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.since ...
since this is were grown up speak, i guess that means you will be leaving and leave the rest of us grown ups can hold a civil discourse.
see ya ....
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.The problem is that the
The problem is that the average citizen could not put themselves into the officers position. 10 to 1 odds with drunk routty college kids is hard to picture. The citizen panal would only look at how the officer handled each arrest and not how the officer handled each arrest with 25 kids screaming at him.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Don't sell the average citizen short,
most us know very well what it is like to be outnumbered. Second, let's get to reality, the police tend to exaggerate. The article states there were 25 officers and the crowd was between 100 to 150. So that's more like 5 or 6 to one. And it isn't as if each officer was fighting six people ate once, by themselves. You have a core of officers, well education in crowd control, and well armed. Even I know that if you take the few instigators down, the rest walk away. Proof is the fact only 11 were arrested despite the large crowd. How did the officers handle the screaming kids? I'm certain it hurt their feelings, but come on, words aren't a cause for arrests. The SC says that. Did that cause an over reaction? Don't know, maybe more instruction is necessary. Just seems to be, as a casual observer, that more force was used than necessary. But we'll never know, since all we have is the police and student statements, and they BOTH have reasons to pad the truth.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Tron you show my point with
Tron you show my point with the statement "And it isn't as if each officer was fighting six people ate once, by themselves." That could have easily turned into an officer fighting 6 at once. I could have been 25 officer in a fight against 150 college kids. The average citizen would look at it after the fact like you did. I find it hard to believe that the average citizen would look at it like the officers looked at it that night (that is the problem).
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Thanks for the correction
I wasn't sure thats why I asked. A lawn dart is basically a huge metal and plastic dart. I never played but I think it was something like a mixture of darts and horse shoes.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Lawn Darts!
That brings back memories. Used to play lawn darts by the pool at my parents house. Haven't thought of that in a long time.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I would sure like to know
I would sure like to know what happened to you Tron, that you have this vendetta against the LPD. Come on, what's the story?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.“Some people did disperse,"
“Some people did disperse," Bussiere said. "At least 100, 150 refused to do so and several became confrontational with police, telling them it was private property and they didn’t have the right to be there."
Quite true, it IS private property, belonging to Bates College. Bates College Security called the cops in, so it is also FALSE, because they did have the right to be there.
KUDOS to the POLICE!!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.i know someone who recently
i know someone who recently had the police use excessive force on them by the LPD and they are quite small in stature. they are so afraid that they can't even answer their door in fear that they are coming back to hurt them. they don't feel like they can report this issue out of fear. they said that its like being violated. its too sad really. although i am sure that this bates college event had its reasons and causes for the actions that had taken place-don't be so blind to think that police brutality doesn't exist.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.They need to report it!
@ queenhoneeybee: If this is the case with your acquaintance (I make no judgment whether it is or isn't), then they are morally obligated to report it. They really need to contact the Lewiston Police Chief (Michael Bussiere), or if they are not comfortable doing that, the Maine State Police. Depending on the circumstances - which I do not know here - police are allowed to use force, but not excessive force. If excessive force is being used, the *only* way to correct it is through education - and the only way that will happen is if people report it. Anecdotal reports on the Sun Journal boards (of which I've seen many in the past two days) are not helpful - and in many cases are not actually taken seriously.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.thank you so much for your
thank you so much for your advice. although it is ultimately not my decision to report or coerce them to report the incident... its heartbreaking to me because i love them so dearly and want them to do the right thing so that this does not happen to anyone else again. no incident like this should deter anyone from making a report. thank you again.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.I noticed only two Maine
I noticed only two Maine students on the list. I think we should ban all out of state students from coming to school in Maine. Oh, by the way next police are called to help they should just stay away and let these trouble makers fend for themselves.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Sgt. Ullrich I hope you have
Sgt. Ullrich I hope you have a speedy recoverary and continue the fine work.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.“...to protect them from
“...to protect them from themselves…”
And there it is… The arrogance of the LPD in print for the world to see…
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond....WHAT arrogance? They are
...WHAT arrogance? They are stating a fact since it was clear the underage Bates students as well as the of age students were their own worst enemy. had they done what the LPD asked they would not have been arrested.
It sounds like KONPHL1C7 is one of those who needs to be protected from themselves.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.It’s arrogant for one to
It’s arrogant for one to think they know what is best for another.
I happen to think that the police shouldn’t have the right to decide what is in my own best interest. Perhaps you feel safe knowing that at any moment you can be deemed a “hazard” to yourself by a lowly patrolman – Personally, I feel that if my actions do not have an effect on anyone else, the Police need to leave me the hell alone.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Tuttle Hansen should be
Tuttle Hansen should be "concerned" about the officer that was hurt responding to an incident in which her high paid Security Chief could have, and should have nipped in the bud early on. How long did Bates security know about this party before the cops were even called?? 300 kids partying outside weren't seen by any security staff prior to the cops arrival??? When the cops tell you to get moving,and you want to stay and keep arguing,you're obstructing justice,and can be arrested on the spot. That's what we pay the cops to do in Lewiston,and if you don't like it find another place to drink illegally. Bunch of cry babies. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.If you or I provide a
If you or I provide a location for underage people to drink, we will be charged with a crime. What is the difference here?
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.when you combine underage
when you combine underage drinking with 18-20 year olds that have been reared by parents who constantly re-affirmed their special status of being born and never wanting to damage the fragile self-esteem of their precious little snowflakes you get the type of self rightous conceited little twerps who think they are above the law. guess what? you are not. when the police tell to move, then do it, and there is a good chance you won't be clubbed or arrested.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Underage
The bottom line is drinking on Bates’ campus created this situation not the cops. The person or persons that bought the booze should be charged for providing it to underage students. Two of the eleven students charged are from in state. I wonder what the percentage is of in-state students at Bates. I am tired of catering to people from away who come here and break our laws while drinking and then claim they were doing nothing wrong. These students will never work in Maine or return for any substantial period of time to help our economy save hiring locals to work as servants in their summer homes. Meanwhile Maine taxpayers will be expected to cover the cost of the infrastructure these people use to run rampant and complain about being called on it later. It was a hot night and things happen on hot nights but the bill for this, no matter who was at fault, will eventually fall on the shoulders of the Lewiston and Maine taxpayers, not the students or administrators of Bates. Suck it in and accept the fact that you were doing something illegal in the first place, either allowing underage people to drink or drinking underage yourself.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Nobody on the Bates campus is
Nobody on the Bates campus is claiming that under age drinking was right, nobody is defending the students that were arrested. Under the influence of alchohol, judgement is impaired. People are dumb, but while it might be illegal, drinking on college campuses, without exception, is inevitable.
The reality is, Bates is not generally known as a wild party school, especially compared to most other colleges, and not everyone at that party was drunk out of their minds. I live in Smith. I was there, sober, as were many of my friends.
Bates is a not-for profit organization, like all colleges and universities in the country.We've been in existance, in the same location, since 1855, and have never paid property taxes, because the school has never been a for-profit institution. We don't pay property taxes, but neither do any other colleges, in any other state in the country. The difference is, Bates has one of the highest community involvement rates in the country. The Harward Center for Community Partnerships is only one organization on campus that gives back to the Lewiston community. Bates students are a huge volunteer presence in lewiston schools and after-school programs, in retirement homes, and with special needs programs, to name a few. Furthermore, Bates is one of the largest employers in the area, and many alumnus end up living and working in Lewiston and throughout Maine. To claim that Bates as an institution uses the infrastructure generously provided by the town without giving anything back to the community is ignorant, and just wrong.
Nobody is complaining that the police were involved. It happens, when parties get out of control. The main concern for Batesies is that way that the police used their position to do their job. The police originally claimed to not have used nightsticks. I can give you a crowd of 200 witnesses that know otherwise. The beat down witnessed was barbaric, and inappropriate. People were beaten while already handcuffed, and pepper sprayed while already in the cop car. This wasn't an angry mob of drunk bastards. Some people were drunk, yes, but most of them were over the drinking age. I've been to parties at other schools, where fights have broken out, but this was not the environment at all. I've honestly never been in a happier environment. People were hugging each other, laughing, reminiscing. This wasn't an environment such that the cops needed to use the force they did. Like the Cheif of police said, there is a difference between using force, and using excessive force, and they crossed the line. The aggravated assault charge was for breaking the Sgt's leg, which was ridiculous. The cop tackled the student, and they both came down on his leg. This wasn't aggravated anything.
Look at the facts again, and don't presume to make nasty assumptions about the whole of the school through gross generalizations. The 11 students arrested are not enough to base attacks on the rest of the 1800 students of the population.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.This chief has absolutely no credibility.
From his department's mishandling of the "gun man" standoff last year to this mess, he has shown unprofessional behavior and dangerous reactions. He should resign before more people get hurt.
We also need a civilian review panel to investigate police actions. It seems taxpayers are not getting properly trained people serving.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Dan...you are the
Dan...you are the unprofessional who is dangerous to society. What makes you the judge, jury and exocutioner of the Chief? What standard are you using to pass these judgements? Have you EVER had any law enforcement training? Have you EVER walked a foot, let alone mile in their shoes? So what makes YOU so qualified to be the judge? All you seem to do is arm-chair Monday morning quarterback stories from the comfort of your home, or where ever you blog, sipping coffee and probably listen to the birds chirping. The LPD have to deal with all the communities crap and the best they seem to get from guys like you is...You're unprofessional, your actions were dangerous...blah blah blah. Feel fortunate there are no laws agains drivel because you would be public enemy #1!
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.Job Well Done
Kudos to all responding departments for getting the situation under control. Let's all hope that Officer Ullrich has a speedy recovery and swift return to active duty.
- Permalink
- Is this comment inappropriate?
Kudos AwardedAgree (1)
Would you like to respond? Login or create a new account. You'll need to verify your account before you can respond.