Pond camp owner launches bid for village to secede from Roxbury

ROXBURY — In an effort to gain local
voting rights while making a last-ditch attempt to prevent a wind
power developer from installing 22 turbines on town hills, Robert
Montgomery launched a secessionist movement on Wednesday.

RUMsecessionP0813.jpg
Terry Karkos/Sun Journal

Terry Karkos/Sun Journal
Tranquil views like this one on Wednesday of a West Shore Road camp on Roxbury Pond (also called Silver Lake), in Roxbury will be changed forever in a year when a wind power developer constructs its proposed giant windmills along the wooded ridge in the background.

Montgomery, a former Auburn resident
who recently moved to Rumford, is also a Roxbury Pond camp owner. His family has owned two camps in the Sunset Cove area
for 60 years. The pond is also called Silver Lake.

He said he pays $4,000 a year in taxes
on the property to Roxbury, but is not allowed to vote, because he is a seasonal camp owner.

Montgomery said he and a group of
other camp owners are in the process of forming a delegation to meet
with Andover officials to talk about seceding from Roxbury and joining Andover.

They also want to create their own town
or village called Silver Lake, within the town of Andover, and annex into it all Roxbury land west
of the Swift River and north to Byron, and east of Andover and south
to Mexico.

“The people have had it with the town
of Roxbury not following the will of the people at Roxbury lake,”
Montgomery said, reiterating what he said he was told after Tuesday
night's Roxbury selectmen meeting.

There, selectmen voted 2-1 to deny a
citizen-initiated petition that would have prevented — pending
majority town meeting vote — wind power developer Record Hill Wind
LLC from installing its proposed $120 million windmill project on
town hills.

Roxbury Pond residents who list their
voter registration town or city as other than Roxbury, have not been
allowed to vote on the wind power project, which will directly affect
their properties.

The giant windmills will be very
visible from atop the ridges lining the pond's eastern side.

“This is it, we're leaving,”
Montgomery said. “We're sick of being totally ignored. Roxbury Pond
has always been the bastard child of Roxbury village.”

Anne Morin, a member of the Silver Lake
Camp Owners Board of Directors, said early Wednesday evening in
Roxbury that Montgomery's secession movement isn't adhered to by the
association.

“We're not behind it, but it's a nice
thought, calming and soothing, but I don't see that getting any
support at this point,” Morin said. “But, at this point, anything
to stop the (wind power) steamroller gives people hope.”

She was referring to the Maine
Department of Environmental Protection's green light given on Tuesday
to Record Hill Wind principals Angus King and Robert Gardiner by
conditionally approving their project.

All that hangs in the way now is Maine DEP
Commissioner David Littell's consent and signature on Record Hill
Wind's site plan review permit. That is expected to happen Thursday, Aug. 20. Once it does, the project can commence
construction.

And that is what Montgomery says he's
trying to thwart, by getting camp owners to secede from Roxbury and
claim the privately-owned land on which the towers are to be built as
belonging to the yet to be officially recognized town or village of
Silver Lake.

“I say, 'Good luck,' to him, but I
don't think it's ever going to happen,” Morin said.

For decades, Roxbury Pond camp owners
have contemplated seceding from Roxbury to become their own village,
but it's never happened. Montgomery believes he and others can
succeed.

“I'm not against wind power, just
what they're trying to do at Roxbury Pond,” Montgomery said. “This
is going to explode.”

“Like I said, the Frye bridge is not
the bridge at Lexington and Concord, but, hopefully, we can get to
the association meeting and fire the shot heard round the world,”
he added, referring to a local bridge near the Roxbury town
office and the start of the American Revolution.

tkarkos@sunjournal.com

Stay informed — Get the news delivered for free in your inbox.

I'm interested in ...

In order to make comments, you must verify your account.

In order to comment on SunJournal.com, you must use your real name and include the town in which you live in your profile. A member of our staff will call you to verify this information. To join in, fill out your user profile completely and check the box "please verify my status." We'll get back to you within one business day to verify your account.

Login or create an account here.

Our policy prohibits comments that are:

  • Defamatory, abusive, obscene, racist, or otherwise hateful
  • Excessively foul and/or vulgar
  • Inappropriately sexual
  • Baseless personal attacks or otherwise threatening
  • Contain illegal material, or material that infringes on the rights of others
  • Commercial postings attempting to sell a product/item
If you violate this policy, your comment will be removed and your account may be banned.

Advertisement

Displaying comments, from newest to oldest

candiceanne's picture

It is very easy to have a

It is very easy to have a say. Become a permanent resident and register to vote. Just remember you can only have one permanent reidence and register and vote in one place. Take your pick, be a visitor property owner or a resident voter but you can not control the destiny of residents if you are a resident out of town or out of state. And if you aren't smart enough to understand that it explains this crazy sussession plan because you can not vote on that matter either since you are not a resident and voter and those who are wont vote for it.

candiceanne's picture

It is very easy to have a

It is very easy to have a say. Become a permanent resident and register to vote. Just remember you can only have one permanent reidence and register and vote in one place. Take your pick, be a visitor property owner or a resident voter but you can not control the destiny of residents if you are a resident out of town or out of state. And if you aren't smart enough to understand that it explains this crazy sussession plan because you can not vote on that matter either since you are not a resident and voter and those who are wont vote for it.

mimio's picture

I agree with Mr. Montgomery.

I agree with Mr. Montgomery. Succeed from the the town of Roxbury. They do virtually nothing for the Roxbury Pond camp owners. Let's see how they do without our tax money. I would think Andover would welcome us with open arms especially since their biggest taxpayer, Andover Wood Products, is closing their doors. We camp owners were not allowed to vote on these wind monstrocities, yet we are the one's who will lose our peace & quiet, our wildlife, the ecology of the lake and possibly our health. The whole voting process was done in a very underhanded way, on a cold January evening. Most of the Summer resident's that are registered to vote in Roxbury, were gone for the Winter. Even at that, the vote was very, very close. All we were asking in the petition was to conduct another vote while these residents are here. Two of the selectmen voted to deny that vote. One is not a native and lives in an area that will never hear the noise or see these giant eyesores. The other one is the president of the local ATV club and I woulkdn't be the least bit surprised if they come up with a HUGE anonymous donation. This is small town politics at it's worse. I truly believe that the town of Roxbury and their selectmen will be sued and held accountable just as they're doing in Mars Hill. I'd like to say that we'll have the last laugh but unfortunately it will be too late for our beautiful pond and it's majestic mountain range.

rumfudcar's picture
verified

nimby " I'm not against

nimby " I'm not against wind power, just what they're trying to do at Roxbury Pond" where would he want to put them? if they become their own town boy will the porperty taxes go up and who to say the mountains go with the lake?

Hal's picture

For those of you that dont

For those of you that dont know what it is like to live in this family's atmosphere, not being able to say what is going to happen to them or their family property even though they faithly pay their tax's yearly, it's wrong. Taxation without representation is unconstitutional. Yes there is state laws that let towns do this to people but that doesnt change the fact that this is wrong.

Jay Bee's picture

They don't want 120 MILLION

They don't want 120 MILLION DOLLARS in investment??? Dontcha think that their property taxes would go down just a bit??? A bunch of nutters.

Ernest's picture
verified

He's going to have to be a

He's going to have to be a year round resident of Silver Lake if he plans on voting there. That said Mr Montgomery has a severe case of NIMBY.

mexico2009's picture

my family has changed their

my family has changed their perminant address and we were still not allowed to have a say...so that doesn't always work.

youngandaware's picture

This has got to be the most

This has got to be the most absurd thing I have heard. Do these people not realize that allowing windmills to come into their town that their electricity bills will be significantly lowered.
In a town in Massachusetts called Hull the entire town's power is supplied by 4 windmills. I'm pretty sure that no one has been killed or injured due to the windmills being in their town.
What is wrong with these people from Roxbury? Don't they get that this will help them. Unreal, if Mexico decides to have windmills come to town I will be voting for them.

mexico2009's picture

I'm sure you know about

I'm sure you know about roxbury pond, and that theres also a little pond next to it called garland pond..or "little ellis" (Roxbury is also called Big Ellis/Ellis). My family has a camp on Garland pond, and I'm not saying this is the reason why this certain person doesn't want the windmills, but I do know why my family does not. Garland pond does not have electricity at all! You just can't. Well, the windmills were going on the side of the mountain that we (Garland pond camp owners) would be able to see... as well as roxbury pond owners, too. So, the windmills would be put in on the scenery we do have AND PAY FOR. Sound carries very well over water and where many people go to have a quiet relaxing week/weekend at camp, it would be altered by the noise... maybe not very loud noise, but still, we'd be affected...YET nobody from the pond would be able to benefit from this (for we don't have electricity, nor can we, even if we wanted it). Even though Roxbury CAN have electricity, maybe he doesn't, and this still doesn't give the right that we, camp owners, are not allowed to vote or have a say AT ALL to this issue, or any others even though we'd be affected by it just as much, if not more than others who have houses in the town. Everyone should be able to have a say...Like what was said in another post- this is taxation without representation. If camp owners are not allowed to have a say-we shouldn't have to pay.
Also, I'm for getting wind turbines, just not in this particular situation.

to be or not's picture

Please come to waterford,me

Please come to waterford,me

Advertisement